|
I have dealt with contractors from India just like this, take a job they cannot finish or even understand. Turn in code that makes no sense and is no where close to the guidelines set forth. Then getting mad when you tell them the work isnt correct and you will not pay them for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Chaplin, be honest, you cannot produce the results you have tricked people into thinking you are capable of delivering. The reason you are having so much trouble explaining the satoshi spam is because you think you have access to the wallets total balance? Or you think by sending coins to that address it adds the address to the blockchain on some level you somehow created a hard link? Do you even understand the logical fails here?
This is like you are saying: Yes officer, little 9 year old Suzie sold me the crack. And the cop looks at you like you are a nutcase because he clearly saw crackhead A hand crackhead B said crack. (Chain of custody.) Then Chaplin says, "Yes, yes, I know the crackheads gave me the crack, but then I threw some on Suzie....so now she is involved too and she gave me crack now since I gave her some." To which the cop responds by putting you in a straight jacket.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply Chaeplin. I have studied the blockchain and read your post several times and I still cannot see that you provided a direct link.
In which transaction were Wallets B and C used as inputs?
Which address is the output of this transaction?
Please do not only paste code. You need to also establish what the code implies, using normal English.
Alternatively, write in your first language and we will try to find someone to translate it for us.
Sorry to interrupt, just an interesting reading that could help in the near future related with "privacy/annon" technology . (somewhat related with the hard link request) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parental_testing. The DNA parentage test that follows strict chain of custody can generate legally admissible results that are used for child support, inheritance, social welfare benefits, immigration, or adoption purposes. To satisfy the chain-of-custody legal requirements, all tested parties have to be properly identified and their specimens collected by a third-party professional who is not related to any of the tested parties and has no interest in the outcome of the test.
The quantum of evidence needed is clear and convincing evidence; that is, more evidence than an ordinary case in civil litigation, but much less than beyond a reasonable doubt required to convict a defendant in a criminal case. Chaeplin, stop repeatedly saying the same thing. You are wrong. Read the quoted website above. Learn about chain of custody. |
|
|
|
|
Not in the same manner no, each coin is extremely different (even anon is handled differently). We will simply be sharing concepts between the two to make both better.
|
|
|
|
We are working on getting good development ideas/teams together to cooperate rather than compete. This will benefit XC and the Cache team simultaneously, and spur innovation further. So "or similar" may be more accurate for now  . |
|
|
|
Probably in the next couple days when the new release comes out |
|
|
|
Looks like multipath will eliminate the half hearted backtrace being attempted by people on xc anon. So after seeing its design, I know we finally have a decentralized mixing in each wallet. You guys ready to have actual privacy for the first time?
you can't tease us and leave  details pls Cant go kissing and telling. However, its the first legit anon system I have seen functional and decentralized. |
|
|
|
|
Looks like multipath will eliminate the half hearted backtrace being attempted by people on xc anon. So after seeing its design, I know we finally have a decentralized mixing in each wallet. You guys ready to have actual privacy for the first time?
|
|
|
|
He is attempting to show how encrypted messaging works without giving you context |
|
|
|
I duplicated the bug, back to work. |
|
|
|
|
Still needs some more work, but thats a good start/glimpse.
|
|
|
|
Yes, append --rescan. that should give you back coins you had before the fork.
nope...didn't work. still a zero balance. I've also tried re-deleting the cachecoin folder in %appdata% and resyncing along with appending -rescan. Just out of curiosity...would the nodes in cachcoin.conf make any difference? thanks again for all the help. The exchange should be able to delete the tx too, thus restoring your balance on the exchange. |
|
|
|
|
If someone wants to test the social tab for us.
|
|
|
|
|
That is just it, it functions now.
|
|
|
|
|
That is not what he said, and you are misconstruing what is being said. Try reading the previous pages.
What was pointed out is that the current system disconnects the inputs/outputs. That is the most important step, and has been accomplished already before the rest of the project is done. Thus, it is a success. If you feel this is incorrect, there is a bounty to find a string of tx or even 1 that ties to the original.
|
|
|
|
Trust me when I say media attention is not really desirable while the "nodes-can-steal-money" issue remains.
That does appear to be trollbait, please use technical analysis instead of pure ignorance to bring up your points. Then people will likely discuss them instead of calling you out. |
|
|
|
 I dunno about you guys, but I think we are about to hit the "media attention" phase. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
