Can I place order in batch 4 without losing my place in batch 3?

Thanks! The question was in relation to the letters themselves (org). Just bothered me that I couldn't figure it out, lol.

What are the letters after the period? I can see "DEVCOIN." but the rest I can't figure out.

What happens if our board is assembled and fails testing because one or more chips are bad?  Does Avalon warranty the chips, so that they can be immediately replaced?  Should I order a couple extra chips just in case?

What happens if 1/16 chips are bad on the board -- will it hash at 15/16 capacity, or not work at all?

Actually, If they want a better volume, they should offer reasonable fees policy.

Hey steamboat,

i'm considering 'doubling down' on my order.

1st order was batch 2.

2nd order may be batch 3.

Just wanted to know an estimated time in weeks between completed boards from batch 2 and completed boards from batch 3.

I would likely go ahead with another 12 boards if it looks like being a shortish period of time.

Thanks

Adam

Looks good, any reason this isn't promoted to the main Devcoin.org site? Is the owner of the site unresponsive?

Thanks for the logo, you'll get 2/5 of a share in round 24. There are three 2/5 of a share awards remaining.


To all artists,

To enter a logo, please post your favourite image separately, so I can load it to the devcoin gallery, then I'll award the bounty.

Also, I suggest that the logo vote be taken after we have fifteen logos, or July 1, whichever comes first, any objections?

I agree with Twobits' excellent analysis. Unless a miracle happens, it's gone.

What can be done, is get a new address from your new wallet, then a test transaction will be sent to it. After it works, I'll change the file addresses and ask Mark to generate a new receiver, and all the other file administrators to upload it. This will give you 8,235,000 devcoins for your round 23 work. In return, as soon as you get about 1.1 million of them, you'll pay all the file administrators their typical salary of 2/5 of a share, which is 143,713 each this round. You'll also pay the people who helped on this thread, 143,713 for Twobits who wrote an informative post, and half that to FinShaggy and Jasinlee who wrote small posts. You'd end up with around 7 million.

If you agree to this, please message me a new address.

And as id like to say to both your self and jasinlee  I’m not against FPGA , not at all , its the potential to centralize that is the problem, if the multiple goes way out the window, the producers will mine with thier own device , this is a net monopoly effect also a centralization , then the market with have a concurrent effect , it will snap back at you , so i'm telling people to be careful, ASIC will be the downfall of Bitcoin , you , and they just haven't perhaps realized it yet , (i suspect some of the smarter guys have)

what the market will do is find a novel way that an FPGA can't be reconfigured in an easy manner to adjust to , i don't decide this the market does, as i said open source C++ will evolve much quicker than FPGA and ASIC, so be aware of the risks, although i notice Jasinlee mining with his already, but that’s not a net negative you guys just should be aware.

i will definitely order one based on the cost # power ratio - but just be aware that if and when the market feels that the equation needs a balance , kiss it goodbye. if they spread far and wide at a market price then that may delay this effect, but that whole profit motive tends to work against you there, irrational exuberance and the rest.