I have no idea what you are talking about. It's truly bizarre.

I'm probably one of the few people here who has never used any encryption software.

Either that or he lost it all in ZeekRewards.

I'm glad to see this man. You're obviously a good guy.  It's definitely easy to go overboard in anger when you get scammed.

The guy is a piece of shit, totally agree with that. Take care.

Repentance do you own any Bitcoins?

Wow this is definitely the juiciest thing about Shavers that's come out for a long time.

The safety deposit part doesn't ring true to me though. I honestly don't think he could have made that much money. Plus that bit about palladium being "better" than platinum is weird. Palladium is worth a good bit less than platinum. Still pretty valuable, but it's weird to even mention it though, and even weirder if true. Why would he diversify into palladium? Can anyone who knows more than me about investing in precious metals think of a reason that someone would do that?

Very interesting stuff and thank you for sharing it. Maybe it's all bullshit but it was still fun to read.

Haha, I love this guy.

Hey Croppo, maybe you should spend less time chasing me around these forums and more time with your wife....oh, that's right. She's a fictional character you made up. Sorry, never mind. Carry on.

Dank isn't a real guy man.

He's a troll character created by someone with a frustrated creativity and too much time on their hands.

Of course, this is the one forum on the internet where such a character can also obtain anonymous loans.

There's something beautiful about that though.

"Dank" is winding down, he's not been around much in the last few weeks.

My prediction is that we won't see him in the new year. He'll have a scammer tag soon enough.

And people will be wondering "Was he for real?" and the answer is "No, probably not."

Also this is weird. You also need a new hobby.

The reason that I drew attention to your (lack of) communication skills is because you are incoherent. I couldn't even understand your point, and to be honest I still can't. There's not much point in a debate when the other person writes so poorly that you don't even know what they are trying to say.

But, if you need to be the winner Rob, congratulations, you're the winner!

The sweet taste of victory, huh? I'm glad I could help you out with that, and I wish you and your family all the best this Christmas.

You didn't do too well at school did you? Maybe formal education just isn't for you. Have you considered picking up a book to help you out? I think this one could help you express yourself in a more coherent way, and also help you understand others. I really think it would make your life a little easier, and then you wouldn't have to get frustrated and angry like this.



All the best Rob! Good luck!

Charlie

Haha "FUD". Hey, I'm glad you got a good deal man.

I call scam on this one. The story doesn't add up and now he's begging hardcore.

Haha how would you possibly know? You don't know me, you've never met me, and you have no idea about the state of my bank account.

What is your first language Rob?

Of course I would, and I think most people would. Unless someone was very short of money, in which case I think a lot of people would be tempted to keep it.


Hahaha. I love this. I want to see some more people come out and say this.

Pirate: "Yes, it was a ponzi scheme....but what in this world is honest, after all?"

Bruce Wagner: "Yes I did run MyBitcoin....but who in this world didn't think I was a sleazy scumbag from the beginning, after all?"

Zhou Tong: "There was no Chinese relic dealer...but who in this world is genuinely a relic dealer, after all?"

AugustoCroppo: "Yes, I don't have a wife....but who in this world would marry me, after all?"

Rob, honestly, if this happened to me I would not give a shit. It's simply not worth my time to worry about fifty measly bucks if it was my mistake in the first place. I'd just chalk it up to experience, exactly like I said.

For Roger to make such a big deal over $50, he must be in financial trouble. Either that or he's completely insane. I think the latter is more likely, but who knows.

Rob, your first language isn't English, is it? Please tell me it isn't.


The whole Blockchain.info thing aside, don't you think it's completely unprofessional for Roger to publish the guy's address on a forum? I'm not saying it's morally wrong, I'm saying it's inappropriate. After all, this guy didn't scam Roger. He just kept the wrong change. To me it amounts to a customer service dispute, really.

What kind of company solves a customer service dispute by posting the customer's address on a forum for the sake of fifty bucks? One run by completely immature amateurs, in my opinion.

Well, you sure showed me! I can't compete with you on the Japanese style emoticon front. I had to look up what that one means. Damn, outsmarted again.

Man that Wall of Shame thing is harsh. If someone is stealing food from a shop I feel sorry for them and I hope they get back on their feet. Thankfully something like that would be illegal here. So, of course, is shoplifting, so there's really no need for public shaming.

As many others have said, keeping the change isn't scamming. It's dishonesty. It's morally wrong. It's taking advantage of another person's honest mistake, but it's not a SCAM. A scam is a deliberate attempt to gain money from someone by deception. That is not what happened here.

All this "This guy is a THIEF and a SCAMMER and he should be vilified and Roger Ver is a poor innocent victim and should be deified" stuff is totally off the mark and at complete odds with how things actually went down.

Roger Ver made a mistake. Sometimes you need to pay for your mistakes. Sadly you can't always count on people being honest enough to help you correct your mistakes when the mistake benefits them directly. That's life. Ver has all the tools he needs to ensure it never happens again. He doesn't have to worry about being scammed or robbed again, because no one scammed or robbed him. All he has to do is make sure he (or his employee) doesn't give people the wrong amount of Bitcoins when he makes a transaction.

Roger Ver should have just asked this guy for the money back. If the guy didn't feel like being honest, too bad. Write off the loss, move on. Take it as a $50 reminder to be more careful in future. That's what any sane human being would do.

I don't usually like your posts but these lines made me laugh.

What's Bitcoin100? I must have missed that. Got an explanatory link?

Probably. He's probably fine anyway, I just wanted to give him a way to throw a rat out the door rather than be stuck with Roger Vermin

"We will see what we can do" as in Piuk and I together, idiot.

Well, of course you couldn't be pushed out, but if you started acting in a devious, unprofessional and untrustworthy way, then no one should buy your coins.

There's an element of trust in every commercial transaction, not just with Bitcoin. Obviously some involve more trust than others, but no matter what, I never do business with untrustworthy people, no matter how secure the system.