The account got nuked, so it's likely to be a spam related issue. Probably posting random rubbish or posting referral links. The accounts been permanently banned so any account that you do create will be ban evasion and will likely be nuked too.

Any good campaign manager will know whether they are a good candidate or not, unfortunately at the moment there's very few managers that actually care about running the campaign and just allow anyone to join and continue spamming. I don't think making reports public will have any benefit as they don't care as long as they are getting paid anyway.

The only way to combat the spam is to report it and because a lot of campaigns have public participant lists it might be easier to actually find the ones that are spamming.

Potential activity just means you've earned the 14 activity, but haven't posted that much. So you could have a potential activity of 28 because you posted in two 14 activity periods, but you have only posted two posts, therefore you have a potential activity of 28 but only two posts. To get that activity you need to have equal or more posts.

It will be given like regular activity. You need to post in each 14 activity period to get the activity, even one post is enough to get all 14 activity. If you haven't posted in these time frames then you won't be eligible for it. Sign up date doesn't matter, older accounts still have to go through the process of posting in each 14 activity period.

This is the risk of trading any where, whether that's localbitcoins or an exchange. Traders on localbitcoins always sell for something more than they originally got the amount for. They tend to put a premium on it too to combat the fees. I'm not sure localbitcoins is the most profitable and probably doesn't have too many advantages over an exchange.

Segwit2x at least tries to improve on the existing infrastructure, whilst Bitcoin cash was just like any other alternative coin. Bitcoin Gold was a scam coin. There isn't any bases on his assumption though, if it's going to sell at a fixed price then I would stay away from the coin. It's likely to get some hype though and will likely be worth something in the first few days. Hard to tell whether it will be more than that at this point in time.

Ask SebastianJu if there is another way you may communicate. theymos isn't likely to be bribed to check the ip logins of the account, and IP logins are very easy to spoof so aren't adequate proof. It's probably better to just communicate through another means and maybe sign the address of the escrow to prove you are who you say you are.

In fact the early investors are going to profit, but will encourage others to start joining and eventually people will no longer make a profit. It just doesn't make sense to hire equipment off of people whilst they are the ones buying it and using their electricity and you still expect to profit, it's just not going to happen.


Some people may well earn a slight profit, but the majority will be losing a significant margin.

If the escrow hasn't been completed and the other party hasn't sent the item you are in the escrow for, then I'm sure SebastianJu could release the funds to the original address it was sent from due to the escrow not completing. Your unlikely to get your account unbanned though.

Well not really, what ever you own your going to get in alt coins when the chain splits. Anything is going to be worth something even if you have £5 worth. It might not cover the transaction fee, but it will be worth something. There's no minimum except being able to cover the transaction fee of the new coin. (if we are talking about profit otherwise there isn't any limit)

If the hacker is the one that changed the password and you know nothing about it, then it's going to be highly unlikely for you to get access to that. The only way it would be possible is if he's used a weak password, which he probably hasn't. What do you mean by the second password?

It's getting worse recently, but if you sit on the patrol page you'll normally be able to report them all as they normally tend to post directly after each other. Just report them, but make sure to put in the comment referencing the other accounts doing so too.

I know account farming has always been a thing, but I'm seeing a lot more trying to bury themselves in giant threads that we have these days.

Anyone can leave negative feedback on your trust page for any reasons they want, and no prior deal or contact needs to have happened for them to do that, in fact many people get negative trust from random users just because they called them out on something or they don't agree with their opinions. It doesn't mean that the trust is valid though, trust is there as an indicator and should be taken on case by case.

You can also tweak your trust list, and many people will have removed some of the default trust from their list.

If it's a bubble that's implying that it won't go up, but simply 'pop' and take a substantial value hit. Hype is also a good and bad thing, the thing with hype is that it's usually short term and causes much instability and personally I don't think many merchants are going to be interested until it's a little more stable that it has been the past few years.

Personally, I believe Bitcoin isn't a bubble overall, but it's inevitable that we will go through bubbles throughout it's time. 

You can either send the funds from your phone to a completely new wallet on your computer and pay the fees or you could find the location where the wallet.dat is stored on the phone and copy it over using what ever method you want.

You could also export the private keys from your phone and import them into the new wallet on your desktop, depending on the security of your phone.

blockchain.info is known for not handling fees correctly, and I would recommend that you start using a desktop wallet such as Bitcoin core, or Electrum or any of the wallets which give you full control over your funds. I would recommend Bitcoin core for hosting a full node, and Electrum as a light weight wallet. 

Read a little more about this here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1914800.0

You were spamming referral links in posts which isn't allowed. It wasn't anything to do with the post that you made in meta, unless you included the referral link in that too. Nearly all the posts on that account from the 29th of October has a referral link in the post, your lucky you wasn't banned sooner. Referral links are only allowed in your signature.

No, instead you farmed accounts to abuse a giveaway thread another thing which is frowned upon by the community, you also claim to have lost those accounts through a hack and then ask whether it's "legal" to sell accounts. It really doesn't look good, but at the end of the day you abused a giveaway with farmed accounts.

Selling accounts is allowed by the forum, as long as they haven't been obtained maliciously.

It's been discussed before, and the conclusion of the discussion was that it would be unfair to the ones that have donated in the past. theymos made it clear that the donation amounts will always be tied to Bitcoin value. Anyway, the main source of income for the forums is probably through advertisements rather than donations these days.

I believe there may of been talk of cheaper ranks being introduced but nothing came of it.

It doesn't matter if it's legal or not, both account farming and abusing giveaways are frowned upon by the community. The trust system is also not moderated, therefore anyone can leave trust for whatever they consider justified. It's quite obvious that you made those accounts to solely abuse the giveaway thread, and was caught.

Now, what did you think was going to happen with this thread? You are a known account farmer, we know that you've abused giveaways. Therefore, I believe you've likely tried to abuse signature campaigns as well. You are also asking a question about selling accounts, when we know that you've farmed accounts in the past, if they have been stolen then why would you be asking this question?

I find it hard to believe that you would be concerned about newbies getting negative trust for selling accounts if you had nothing to do with it.