|
Supongo que entre ellos habrán llegado a un punto intermedio de reparto de poder/responsabilidad del cual solo saben ellos el acuerdo para que esto se haga publico ahora, por una parte bitcointalk org tiene ahora mismo mucho poder de tracción, no quiere decir que en unos años se desvanezca, pero por el momento no es así y bitcoin org es la pagina "oficial de bitcoin/billetera/cliente/descarga/nodos", si bitcoin org en un tiempo elige un camino distinto, haría daño a la comunidad bitcoin, pero solo es una pagina con un dominio (excelente) donde la gente entra para conocer Bitcoin, wallet, instalación, etc, etc.
Quiero decir que si esto ocurriera habría mucho trabajo que hacer para recuperar la confianza y prestigio con otra pagina y otro dominio, pero con el tiempo se solucionaría.
Es como si hubieran pactado el típico: "No nos vamos a hacer daño entre nosotros, verdad?"
Otro dominio importante es el de bitcoincore org, esperemos que en este estén las aguas mas calmadas.
(De todas formas, la sensación que me queda después de releer el hilo varias veces, es bastante patética.)
|
|
|
|
 Saving in #Bitcoin creates a virtuous cycle that enriches its holders and simultaneously reduces demand for inferior stores of value like fiat currency and gold.
In this sense, holding #Bitcoin is contributing to a global charity mandated with the separation of money and state. https://twitter.com/Breedlove22/status/1251309365337960452 |
|
|
|
Parte de este hilo lo publique en Bitcoin Prehistory como no podía ser de otra forma, no se puede perder, es como una transcripción de Gmax sobre bitcoin.org, no tiene desperdicio, os lo aseguro. (ingles, obvio) tirar del traductor, si estáis minimamente interesados en conocer los entresijos, salen a relucir casi todos los protagonistas. [BCT FACT] Bitcointalk was originally on Bitcoin.org but ... dramahttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5203621.0 |
|
|
|
El comentario de gMaxwell no ha sido explicado en mayor detalle, y me pregunto si está hablando en el plano técnico/evulotivo, regulatorio, o ambos.
Por cierto, hay una pequeña errata en el título del OP ..
Es que, con todo el respeto a GMax, para decir lo que a dicho, mejor haberse callado o soltar su opinión completa sobre el tema, aunque igual es una estrategia y el contraataque llega mas tarde.  Thx, corregido. Hace un rato Cobra ha respondido a ese mismo hilo y el camino que está tomando... cero que lo más sano va a ser mantenerse alejado del dramita que se está montando
Pronto descarrilara, veremos como acaba. |
|
|
|
Ashamed of what? Thanks to you I have greater sports control. The best $ 30 invested.  |
|
|
|
I am also concerned about this comment, it may be a little more explicit. If he had wanted to elaborate explicitly, I think he would have. Greg Maxwell is known for his general outspokenness. If he is here being cryptic, I infer that he is choosing to be so. An intriguing phrase of this nature (forecast of extreme winds towards Bitcoin) in the context of this thread made by one of the most recognized people in the forum, will always require an explanation of the meaning. For my part, I take any GMax post, comment or opinion very seriously, in any direction. |
|
|
|
 Based on January - April fractal $BTC should start its trend to $9000 on Monday.
Observed the following similarities:
- Both 4% shakeout before it broke out
- Both created bullish engufing candles
- Both breakouts occured on Friday followed by a quiet weekend while it retested. https://twitter.com/galaxyBTC/status/1251195327006285825🚀 |
|
|
|
It seems like bitcoin faces such tremendous headwinds.
I am also concerned about this comment, it may be a little more explicit. |
|
|
|
Satoshi created both bitcoin.org and this forum, which was originally at bitcoin.org/smf. Later, the forum got its own domain name, but due to this history, bitcoin.org and bitcointalk.org have traditionally been linked, and for quite some time Cøbra and I have together managed the domain names. However, Cøbra has never had much involvement in bitcointalk.org's operation, and I haven't involved myself in bitcoin.org for a couple of years, so the linkage between the two no longer really made made any sense. Therefore, we decided to separate the domains: I no longer have any access to the bitcoin.org domain name, and Cøbra no longer has any access to the bitcointalk.org domain name. The two sites should be viewed as totally separate, which in practice they have been for years. There will be no changes whatsoever on bitcointalk.org due to this, and I'd assume that the same will be true of bitcoin.org. The bitcoin.org open-source project has been advancing steadily, and I hope and expect that it will continue to do so thanks to the efforts of its contributors. Thanks to Cøbra for handling much of bitcointalk.org's domain-name-related work in the past. Satoshi creó tanto bitcoin.org como este foro, que originalmente estaba en bitcoin.org/smf [/ tt]. Más tarde, el foro obtuvo su propio nombre de dominio, pero debido a esta historia, bitcoin.org y bitcointalk.org se han vinculado tradicionalmente, y durante bastante tiempo Cøbra y yo hemos administrado juntos los nombres de dominio. Sin embargo, Cøbra nunca ha tenido mucha participación en la operación de bitcointalk.org, y no me he involucrado en bitcoin.org durante un par de años, por lo que el vínculo entre los dos ya no tenía sentido. Por lo tanto, decidimos separar los dominios: ya no tengo acceso al nombre de dominio bitcoin.org, y Cøbra ya no tiene acceso al nombre de dominio bitcointalk.org. Los dos sitios deben verse como totalmente separados, lo que en la práctica [/ i] han sido durante años.
No habrá cambios de ningún tipo en bitcointalk.org debido a esto, y supongo que lo mismo será cierto para bitcoin.org. El [url = https: //github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org] el proyecto de código abierto bitcoin.org [/ url] ha avanzado constantemente, y espero que continúe haciéndolo Gracias a los esfuerzos de sus colaboradores.
Gracias a Cøbra por manejar gran parte del trabajo relacionado con el nombre de dominio de bitcointalk.org en el pasado Traducido por google y eliminado algún error de traducción. theymos ahora es el único propietario del nombre de dominio bitcointalk.org, quizás lo único que no me entusiasma es que theymos se desvincule del dominio bitcoin.org. En el hilo hay una respuesta de gmaxwell un tanto intrigante dice algo así como: Parece que Bitcoin se enfrenta a vientos en contra tremendos., leído literalmente es como si tuviera información de algo que el resto desconocemos por completo. Enlace al hilo: Domain name update https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5241347.0 |
|
|
|
Satoshi created both bitcoin.org and this forum, which was originally at bitcoin.org/smf. Later, the forum got its own domain name, but due to this history, bitcoin.org and bitcointalk.org have traditionally been linked, and for quite some time Cøbra and I have together managed the domain names. However, Cøbra has never had much involvement in bitcointalk.org's operation, and I haven't involved myself in bitcoin.org for a couple of years, so the linkage between the two no longer really made made any sense. Therefore, we decided to separate the domains: I no longer have any access to the bitcoin.org domain name, and Cøbra no longer has any access to the bitcointalk.org domain name. The two sites should be viewed as totally separate, which in practice they have been for years. There will be no changes whatsoever on bitcointalk.org due to this, and I'd assume that the same will be true of bitcoin.org. The bitcoin.org open-source project has been advancing steadily, and I hope and expect that it will continue to do so thanks to the efforts of its contributors. Thanks to Cøbra for handling much of bitcointalk.org's domain-name-related work in the past. theymos is the sole owner of bitcointalk.org. |
|
|
|
We do not share the same city but if the same year. |
|
|
|
Tumbleweed gif, if I had one.
 You mean this? |
|
|
|
 Good morning, dinner was perfect and WO appeared between glass and glass of wine, this made it better. |
|
|
|
|
I have lost count of how many fridays I am without having a good beer in my favorite pub or dining in a restaurant, friday is the day I go out with my wife, now for the reasons that we all know, it is not possible, we will do it all the ways, but we will have dinner at home, for this I will prepare the table with all the details, good wine, good music, good company and I will enjoy the night every minute, I recommend that you do the same.
Happy friday to everyone.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin-Based Payment Facilitator Purse.io Shuts Down"We've made the very difficult decision to dissolve the company. We're grateful for the opportunity afforded by our supporters to build products and infrastructure for the cryptocurrency community," the company said in an April 16 statement.
A company helping Bitcoin's adoption
As one of the first blockchain businesses of its kind, Purse.io came into the world in 2014, offering Amazon shoppers a discount for paying with Bitcoin.
After thanking the community, Purse.io detailed ongoing orders and withdrawals remain open until June 26, 2020.
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-based-payment-facilitator-purse-io-shuts-downhttps://twitter.com/PurseIO/status/1250876045693157377RIP
|
|
|
|
Brrrr Brrrrr: #Fed balance sheet has hit fresh ATH at $6,367.9bn as Powell keeps printing press rumbling. Total assets rose by another $284.7bn, now equals to 29.1% of US GDP, fresh record. Since Fed announced its bailouts on Mar15, it has printed and handed to Wall Street $2,055.9bn.  https://twitter.com/Schuldensuehner/status/1251042207706087424?s=20Bitcoin fixes that.  https://imgur.com/V7f4gaQThe predecessors, holy shit, although in Europe we are also well protected, Jean-Claude Trichet, Mario Draghi, Christine Lagarde... |
|
|
|
Me quieres liar la información estadística …
No, solo era una idea para que no te aburras. Veo un pequeño problema con lo que propones. Que pasaria si un usuario que ha duplicado sus meritos de airdrop, pero no tiene la actividad suficiente como para el siguiente rango? Al reiniciarse parcialmente el contador, tendría que volver a duplicar los meritos ganados para poder ascender una vez obtenida la actividad
También podría aplicarse únicamente cuando doblasen los méritos del rango Legendario, una vez obtienen 2000 méritos revertir la cantidad a 1000. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
