None directly. I just saw a nice simple coin with some people supporting it that wasn't even being updated for critical security flaws, and felt I could help out with that.
None directly yet he hosts the 'most up to date' source code on his personal github account... I'm working on the Namecoin DNS seeder: https://github.com/fluffypony/namecoin-seederI've also forked Neocities and even submitted a PR: https://github.com/fluffypony/neocitiesOur main focus is on Monero, but that often gives rise to peripheral and even unrelated projects, and that's ok. Enough said. That explains why monero projects never get done. I´ve asked you before, and i will ask again... have you donated a very big amount of monero or are you willing to pay the devs a whole-year salary so they can work on monero? Otherwise i guess what they are doing in their free time is none of your business... |
|
|
|
The previous developer of AEON has abandoned the coin and some community members want to rebrand it. Discuss here. If the rebrand goes forward this will become the new ANN thread for the coin. What is needed: 1. New name/logo/etc. Bounties may be available depending on fundraising (item 2) 2. Fundraising to pay for development (incentives/bounties if desired for team members, etc.), hosting, seed nodes, etc. 3. People to work on the project, especially creating new builds, porting other cryptonote tools (gui wallets, etc.). Bounties may be available depending on fundraising (item 2) 4. Marketing and business development to get relisted on some exchanges, renamed on pools (if any still support it), etc. Bounties and/or pay for work may be available depending on fundraising (item 2) 5. More? If you are looking for the most up to date AEON repo (source code) it is here: https://github.com/iamsmooth/aeonSpecification:
PoW algorithm: CryptoNight
Max supply: ~18.4 million
Block reward: Smoothly varying using the formula (M−A) / (220) / (1012) where M = 264 −1 and A = supply mined to date.
Block time: 60 seconds
Difficulty: Retargets at every block
Launched: 6.6.2014 at 6:00 PM UTC
4. Minergate is still supporting it |
|
|
|
|
Woher willst du denn wissen das Cloak nach dem ganzen Fiasko ein super Dev Team hat? .... das einzige was man weiss ist das Cashmen jetzt als Hauptinvestor das Ruder in der Hand hat, ansonten hat man bis auf dieses eine Video von nem Monat keinen wirklichen Unterschied zu dem Cloak von Mitte/Ende August gesehen wo alles den Bach runter ging...
Ehrlich ich will es wissen, verstehe diese ganze Lobhudelei im Mainthread überhaupt nicht ohne auch nur den Hauch von Progress
|
|
|
|
|
Could we keep the cheering to the point something is really done and public? Otherwise this just looks weird.
|
|
|
|
Oh the 'instamine', this has been done to death and is very boring, but the net result appears to be that the dev 'might' have something like 300k coins. Certainly a lot less coins than Satoshi has. Anyway, please let's not go there again, it's been done to death.
And there is a reason it has been done to death... why not simply re-launch... should be easily possible the first 48h if you made an honest mistake... and the Satoshi defense is ridicolous... as far as i know the block rewards + reductions parameters never have been changed unlike DRK/Dash... |
|
|
|
Where are x86 binaries for Windows ?!
x86 support was suspended after the memory requirements blew past 4gb. I've painstakingly worked through as many of the x86 incompatibilities on the blockchain branch as I could find, so 0.8.8.7 will support x86 again, and we're in the process of completing final merging and testing on that at present:) How long is it going to take, a week, month, longer ? You should have left simplewallet x86t binary, cant sync my cold storage !@# We're not a company, we are volunteers that work for free, so it will be precisely as fast as it can be. If you'd like us to work faster then I suggest donating. Of course you can download the last working x86 binaries if you need: https://downloads.getmonero.org/monero.win.x86.0610.zipThanks for uploading it again, it was redirecting to a 404 earlier today. Now that you mention donating, what is going on with 10k XMR donation to Atrides, dwarfpool admin ? Has he written one line of code yet ? It has been 3 months already... EDIT: Where to download old linux x86 bin. ? Why you ask here, and not atrides himself directly? Bet if you donated back then he will answer you as fast as he can... if not not i guess all people that did donate know whats going on |
|
|
|
Wieso sollten Masternodes nur auf "statischen" Servern laufen? Ich kann auch hier zuhause einen Masternode aufsetzen und laufen lassen. Genauso wie ich auch hier von zu Hause aus Bitcoin minen könnte. Wobei Mining ein gutes Stichwort ist, besteht nicht die eigentliche Zentralisierung bei Mining-Pools?
Natürlich könntest du das, aber dann ist wiederum die Frage ob a) du deinen eigenen Server ausreichend vor Zugriff sichern kannst bzw jeder andere der das macht und b) wieviel Prozent das überhaupt machen. Und ja auch die Zentralisierung durch Miningpools ist eher besorgniserregend. |
|
|
|
Ohne grossartig hinterfragt zu werden? Die "Instamine" Story ist bis zum erbrechen durchgekaut worden.
Es steht ja jedermann frei sich davon abschrecken zu lassen oder eben nicht. Für mich war es ein ehrlicher Fehler und die Sache ist für mich erledigt.
Bzgl. Technologie: meinem Eindruck nach ist die Dash Technologie gut genug bzgl Anonymisierung.
Die Einwände bzgl. "Zentralisierung" der MNs kann ich nicht nachvollziehen und die Möglichkeit sie zu kompromittieren erscheint mir schlimmstenfalls theoretischer Natur.
Natürlich ist es zum erbrechen durchgekaut worden, weils einfach mit ja ein "Grossteil wurde ja damals zu MiniCent preisen weitergegeben" abgekanzelt wurde. Ich verstehe nur nicht gerade wenn es keine Absicht bzw ein dilentatischer Start war, warum nicht einfach neugestartet wurde, sollte doch bei nem 1-2 Tage alten Coin nicht die Rede wert sein, weiss nicht einmal ob er nach 1-2 Tagen überhaupt schon irgendwo gehandelt wurde. Mir persönlich würde allein die Möglichkeit/Theorie das der zentrale Punkt die MasterNodes überhaupt kompromittiert werden können schon abschrecken, alles im Internet was auch nur irgendwo eine zentrale Anlaufstelle hat ( und das sind statische Masternodes auf irgendwelchen Servern in Datenzentren ) und nicht reines cryptografisches P2P ist kann komprimitiert werden. |
|
|
|
Hier gehts aber um denzentrale p2p projekte - kann nicht sein dass iregendwer irgendwas verkauft und dann alle leute die Arschkarte haben...
Stel dir mal vor Satoshi hätte sowas abgezogen - keiner von uns wäre jetzt hier.
Aha. Also so eine Art Krypto-Kommunismus? Allerdings mit Eigentumsrechten sobald ich einen Dashcoin gekauft habe und der Dev dann für mich arbeiten darf? Sehe ich anders. Ich finde der Dev darf sein Projekt verkaufen. Und wenn er es tut und es jemandem nicht passt, sollte auch der Verkäufer kritisiert werden, nicht der Käufer. Evan wollte es nur allen recht machen und nicht einfach ungefragt den Namen benutzen. Mir ist es übrigens ganz recht, dass Evan nicht anonym wie Satoshi ist, bei dem niemand weiss, ob seine Coins irgendwann reaktieviert werden. Ich wundere mich, dass das Dein Hauptkritikpunkt ist. Es wird ja von "instamine" über Namenswechsel und unterlegener Technologie alles mögliche gerade kritisiert. Mich wundert eher das gerade die von dir genannten wirklichen Hauptkritikpunkte von einem Grossteil der Dash Community, ohne wirklich grossartig hinterfragt zu sein, verteidigt werden. |
|
|
|
When reading the posts, Fluffypony comes off as someone who is giving both sides of the story simultaneously. Doesn't seem one sided at all to me. It's just that Darkcoin has no attributes and nothing going for it tech wise, so it's getting destroyed that way in conversation. It's like those on the monero team are the 160 IQ nerds and those on the darkcoin team are the half retarded bill boos.
What a silly post. Nobody from the DRK team has posted AFAIK, so your point is invalid. Fluffypony is clearly a very smart guy and has made some great contributions to the discussion. However, he was highly critical of Darksend based on a flawed understanding and also made some rather odd claims about masternode security requirements. His core argument around compromising the masternode network was based on gaining control of a number of nodes that he couldn't quantify, meaning he couldn't demonstrate whether such an attack would be practical. why does it have to be practical ? The only question i would have for myself if it is possible? Why quantity over quality? because if it's impractical to mount such an attack, it won't be mounted... Sure but i guess "if" the 3 Letter Agencies really wanted to get an insight, it would not be that impractical anymore to even corrupt/steal/sniff a number of like 10k of MNs, as i guess a large % of MN are hosted in rather easy to access countries DCs. Given the afford and possibilities the NSA alone has... guess thats why other people in this thread were pointing to Snowden |
|
|
|
When reading the posts, Fluffypony comes off as someone who is giving both sides of the story simultaneously. Doesn't seem one sided at all to me. It's just that Darkcoin has no attributes and nothing going for it tech wise, so it's getting destroyed that way in conversation. It's like those on the monero team are the 160 IQ nerds and those on the darkcoin team are the half retarded bill boos.
What a silly post. Nobody from the DRK team has posted AFAIK, so your point is invalid. Fluffypony is clearly a very smart guy and has made some great contributions to the discussion. However, he was highly critical of Darksend based on a flawed understanding and also made some rather odd claims about masternode security requirements. His core argument around compromising the masternode network was based on gaining control of a number of nodes that he couldn't quantify, meaning he couldn't demonstrate whether such an attack would be practical. why does it have to be practical ? The only question i would have for myself if it is possible? Why quantity over quality? |
|
|
|
Well it could be optimized, doesn´t really sound native german in parts  . |
|
|
|
Hehe I also tried this just to see if it works, works like a charm. It's awesome to from XMR/BTC to Pokerstars in 1-2 minutes  you can load your neteller card with bitcoin now? maybe i should order the plastic card again now  |
|
|
|
Lol , This is a niche of troll here
hey hey drk fanboi |
|
|
|
or you wait till the DB implentation is done which uses way less RAM |
|
|
|
i would not mind if we can all mine in silence some more days |
|
|
|
Is XMR Mining with a Celeron CPU N2940 4GB Memory (Notebook) a bad Idea?
I don't think so. Are you mining with just a miner (solo mine, like Yam or Wolf etc), or are you running with a full node? (built in miner)? if you're in the US, a good pool for that sort of hashrate is www.monerohash.org. Only about 5 kh/s, so even if you do like 100 - 200 h/sec, you'll still get 0.3 -0.5 xmr per payout. you mean .com? |
|
|
|
Why are the xmr Dev´s Anonymus? DRK Dev´s are ......
Why is Satoshi anonymous? |
|
|
|
|
Why should anyone sell now, if he didnt sell before hahaha... besides jorrrr who sold all his cloakcoin today
|
|
|
|
Even a fkn scumbag like bob should know who jorrrr is Also this is what cashmen said when he took over, that he IS the biggest bagholder... where do you get your news from? Internet Explorer? Who the fuck you calling a scumbag?? LMAO... Stop hating dude. Just keep bag holding and I'll keep stopping by to remind you how much of a bag holder you really are! im calling you a scumbag, pump and dump scheme abuser and initiator with ur PnD ( that you even got payed for lol ) crew... you may have put it all into your pockets.... but you did not do cryptocurrency in general a favour... parasites are scumbags You even admit it by yourself with your signature |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
