There is some people try to scam your money like in every successful ico out there.
You should double check everything you are doing while participating in an ico.
Not just participating in ICO, you should really DOUBLE CHECK EVERYTHING. Scammers also evolve. Be careful, guys. |
|
|
|
|
Were there any news from the team? Did I miss any announcements? I would really like to know when the private sale ends and pre-ICO starts.
|
|
|
|
Im aware the users that have bought token with huge discount will dump all their token immidiately after listing. any plans how to stop this??
Yes, to release limited amount of tokens during Pre ICO, that it won't have influence in case of immediate selling. But even if you release them in pre-ICO stage, they still won't be available for selling/buying on exchanges, because they won't be listed yet. Usually, tokens get listed only after the sale is over. Isn't it? |
|
|
|
Hope that mark.space have good marketing since another platform have been performing good and even got a spot on super bowl in which some part of it got cut. raising a good amount of fund is no joke but the project need to be advertise to reach more user.
What other project you're talking about? I think MarkSpace is currently doing a good job. I've seen quite some advertisements and the list of partners is pretty impressive. |
|
|
|
Unsold tokens will firstly be allocated to the reserve fund and locked for a period of 12 months with a 3-month cliff and thereafter they can be used to strengthen partnerships, market presence, marketing, technology etc.
Since unsold tokens will not be burned, does this mean that they are thus at the disposal of developers? Consequently, the command will no longer have 18% + 20% tokens, but much more. Why does it seem to me that this can affect the price of the tokens negatively? While on the other hand, even if you burn non-sold tokens, the percentage of tokens at the disposal of the team also increases. But the total number of tokens decreases, and therefore the price of tokens does not decrease significantly.
To be honest, I don't really get this idea of a reserve fund till the end, but it seems that you're right and the token price can go down since there is suddenly more tokens than it was paid for in the beginning. I would suggest to review it again, if the advantages of keeping those tokens outweight disadvantages. |
|
|
|
I see the team is neglecting any events or conferences...why so?? I think attending the conferences will boost the project popularity
We are not neglecting them, we will be part of them, but during ico, currently we are focused on project development and we think, that currently it is more important: to develop the product and project. I've seen on the website that you gonna go on the Asian trip while the main sale gonna be in progress in March. It says there gonna be meetings with investors, are those potential investors? Or it will be some sort of conference or some summit? |
|
|
|
If this project would not generate enough revenue but the money from ICO was spent till that time. What happend to the project? U will make one more ICO?
In case if needed money for platform build up won't be raised, we will turn to investors funds one by one, but of course, this will take longer time and Akaiito will develop slower than we would love to. We want to release platform as soon as possible, that world would see how cool it actually will be and how much we need this kind of platform in our every day life! Gauging the current status of the project and the community support, do you think Akaiito will be able to raise enough funding? Pre-ICO just started couple of days ago, the current amount raised is 114 ETH (it says on the website). Considering that there is still main sale ahead, I think the softcap will be reached, they would however need to step up marketing and advertising a bit in order to speed up the process. |
|
|
|
|
#Proof of authentication
- Twitter
- Social media campaign
|
|
|
|
|
Finally announced! I've heard of Opporty, it's really great news both projects decided to partner. Hope there will be more partnerships like that to come.
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to download the white paper from the website. The link goes to a Google drive, but gives an error. Is there another link or is the team uploading a new version?
It doesn't work for me either, it says that the file doesn't exist. I guess some mistake occurred, maybe something wrong with the server. Hope it's only temporarily. |
|
|
|
|
Since pre-ICO has already started, what is your projected result? How much you think you will be able to raise? Are you maybe in negotiation with some potentially big investors?
|
|
|
|
How much team needs for bootstrap process? per month
I think team could not predict such kind of expances as for now. Moreover the team is going to be increased after ICO.U know it will require additional funding also I don't think the composition of the team will change anyhow after the ICO. That's kinda the point, they already have everybody on board who is able to make this project happen, they just lack funding. Also, that's why we have roadmaps and plans including budgets, to have an idea of how much money is needed. Of course, expenses can deviate, you can't predict everything, but at least you try. |
|
|
|
Why would they need to partner with a VR project? Something that make sense to me are platform like Civic, Selfkey or Persona
Basically every announcement about partnership would be good, we all know that in the early stages of the project, the main think is promotion, so any partnership would be a good commercial even if its not really that practical. |
|
|
|
What is the price of one token? I could not find.
The price in pre-ICO is 1 AIC = 0,001 ETH or 1 ETH = 1000 AIC. At this stage you also get 60% bonus. The min purchase is 5 AIC. |
|
|
|
Does this project also belong to offshores jurisdiction like all other ICOs?
The Estonia jurisdiction. What is the matter where project is based? Im just curious to know what is the difference if as an example project based somewhere in Europe or lets say in the USA? Just for my background knowledge No, Estonia is not an offshore jurisdiction. Offshores are also called tax havens, because of their lenient tax policies, that's why many companies are officially registered there. The difference is whether a project is based in USA or in Europe is in different conditions. Depends on the country exactly, but I'd say the main difference is for financial projects, American SEC has quite high demands. |
|
|
|
|
What will happen with the unsold tokens after the ICO? Will they be burnt? Recently, it becomes more popular not to burn them, but to redistribute the rest to already existing investors according to their share. I think it only complicates stuff, better to burn them.
|
|
|
|
How many languauges ur WP is being transalated at the moment??
as a matter of fact it is very important question because the multi langual WP is the thing that is very needed for every project to spread the word Check the website and you can immediately see everything - https://akaiito.io. It's translated to 8 languages besides English. |
|
|
|
Looking forward to try a demo or mvp an see how it works , even if the main feature of it is going to be the ability to filter out malicious scoring.
Is there any information when the first demo is available? The project is awesome and I like to use reputation. Looking forward to the the future of reputation The beta will start after ICO and investors can participate in the beta testing. So a demo would be available around this time at the latest I assume. Yes it should be after March Q2 2018 Closed beta testing of the platform among ICO participants Public testing will follow shortly after the closed beta testing, so even if you didn't invest in the ICO you'll still be able to check out the platform. |
|
|
|
I like the project. If I had to give any criticism, it would be the tokens for downloading the app part of the plan. It just makes a giant list of people that will not actually use the platform. I think it creates a messy start to a social media app. Look at alphabet social platform for example. It's a spam fest and I already have more followers there than I do on twitter. Without even trying because they offer tokens for every friend you confirm.
Tokens for joining I think are still ok, it's pretty much the same as bounty campaigns. Despite the fact that some people won't use it, it still spreads the word. Giving tokens for confirming friends is however a little too much. |
|
|
|
when zuckerberg comes, it is all over  nah, it would take a while untile facebook is ready for the blockchain, meanwhile others can take the lead I don't think any giant company would want to go with blockchain at this moment. Regardless of how well established a company is, everyone has their own secrets which they don't wanna show to the world and we all know that the blockchain is transparent. It would be like overhauling the whole Facebook platform if they integrate blockchain technology and I think it will be a huge task. Conversely, startup platform like REPU which will be developed from scratch has the big advantages with regards to integrating such technologies. What would Facebook be using a blockchain for I wonder. It's more or less an advertising company now, so what do they care if the data is decentralized? They don't need to cecentralize the whole platform. They could for example use crypto for payments like their advertisment and boost stuff for professional use. Also they could implement an reward system like Steemit has based on blockchain. I don't think they want to decentralize the whole, but there are different things they could do. To do so they would need to change a lot of things and I don't think users would like all the changes. Also, costs might be very high. I think it's time Facebook gives space for new projects. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
