I will ignore those people who do not contribute and have a strong and arrogant attitude.

I do not spam, I try to explain the problems as well as possible, because a programmer who can not reproduce it can not fix it. Now for your explanations I see that it is a problem of the shared port of yiimp, but I would like it more than the programmer told me, since it is not in the documentation.

And yes, I have called some incompetent programmer, but it has not been exactly here, it has been in other forums of another program and the programmer was very bad, he fixed one thing and broke 20 more. That one is a programmer does not mean that it is GOOD, it is only a programmer, and within them there are bad and good ones. That forum did not enter or use your program, and if I said bad, it is because it deserved it, you have to be honest, if it bothers you, it's your problem.

And when you pay for software like this and you see various failures, it communicates them. For now I have no problems here with the person that interests me, who is the programmer, I only have them with some people who are very smart and go calling fools to others.

If you are not interested in my posts, just ignore me and everyone happy, I do not need your moral advice. I will continue writing as I am doing.

It is clear that if I see failure, I communicate, if something is not documented and I need to know, I ask, and if I post a lot, it is because I am all day with this program, which for now has not exceeded my expectations, but we all know that It's a bit peculiar, and that does not mean it's bad, I do not want to be misunderstood, it seems to me good software, with its problems, like everyone else, but with a lot of documentation.

Nor do I see many reporting problems and even less bothering to send videos. Other reports of mine have been errors that have been corrected for the good of the entire community. It seems that even if you do not like my attitude, you are a beneficiary of what is fixed due to my reports or suggestions that the programmer is free to do or not, but nobody can tell me not to suggest possible functions.

IF you are angry with the world, do not be angry with me that I am not guilty of anything in your life.

With your permission, I'm going to ignore you, I'm not interested in that kind of poisoned opinion.

First thank you for your comment.

Seriously we have that limitation?

I understand, the port is the same, but I choose currency with -p c = COIN.

WTM, CC or Coinwarz gives me the price and knows which currency to hit, you just have to choose the right pool.

When I do the test separately, that is, choosing the coin alone, I do not have a single problem and it measures me correctly. I do not understand then, if for example if WTM says that mine MBC, it will choose the pool that I have defined for MBC, and not that of V-I-V-O or Qbic that I have in the same pool.

The price takes it from one site and mine in another, I do not know why it should interfere. phi-phi-pool is one of the most stable pools that I know of when it really gives what it estimates, I do not know why AW is wrong.

There will be no alternative, right?

I know that when I go against a protocol and port, mine the most profitable coins and convert it to the one I want through -p c = COIN.

The one that decides which currency is WTM, CC etc ... I do not understand the confusion of AW, with Zergpool I think it does not happen, but I do not like that pool, it takes weeks or months to pay you in the currency you request.

I understand

WTM trigger> choose my custom pool with the currency> mine that port and ask for that currency. where is the problem?

It's not the pool that tells me to mine, it's the three price pages and currency difficulties, that's why I do not understand that it fails.

I hope this has a solution. I hope that patrike can confirm it, to change or not change those pools, or wait for a solution.

-------
Another clue, it only happens to me with phi-phi-pool groups, I say this to give data, I have added 3 coins followed by that pool and the problems have started.

The last one added MBC equal, and Qbic the same. When Zcore, which is the first one in the switch list, is there, it is also in phi-phi-pool.net, there could be a problem in the programming. What I know is that it is not normal.

in phi-phi-pool mine to the something, but then you add in advanced -p c = MBC or the currency to extract, I do not know if there will be any problem with that pool and AW.

I try to reproduce the problem
NOTE that useful is to ignore users, I know that person has written but I do not see the post. Better.

I have just defined another multipool, where I have chosen less coins, but among them V-I-V-O (I put it with scripts or translates it badly), and in the second pool with fewer activated coins it seems to be fine

There is a limit of manual currencies activated at the same time ??, are there problems with cryptodredge? because you have already seen how it changed currency without restarting.

I hope it helps to identify the problem and can be fixed, or to inform me if there is a limit of selected coins. I do not understand that behavior that I have shown in the videos.

After a while I went back to pool 1, and everything goes well again.

At first glance it seems to be some cache not synchronized in the programming. If you can manage 10,000 miners, on some programming side you will have cached parts to avoid too many calls to the database.

Another explanation I can not find. What you have seen in the videos has now disappeared, so I think about some cache.

In pool1 I have 37 groups selected, in pool2 of tests select 17. I went to pool2 and everything was right, after a while I returned to pool1 without changing anything, and everything fixed.

I know it is a very confusing error, I have explained it to him and I have shown it to him in video. Before I intuited it, but today I have seen it completely, and it is usually of a random nature.

Maybe my time of 2 min is less than some cache. I check statistics every 9 minutes.

------ 1 hour later
I just happened, by adding another new currency MBC also neoscrypt. Without being the most profitable, all the rigs have gone to undermine it ...... V-I-V-O also happened to me after adding it and activating it in the pool. I mention it in case it helps to find the problem.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/luv2z2dy2dt84j9/IMG_2293.MOV?dl=0
https://www.dropbox.com/s/t47s9z696szgqr1/IMG_2292.MOV?dl=0
please see the full videos.

Well, I have another problem. Some days ago I thought I saw something strange, but today I have been much more attentive and I have seen the problem.

The swtich auto does not work correctly at least using cryptodredge mostly for neoscrypt. Sometimes it hits, sometimes it does not go to a currency of lesser value.

I have left you a video where you will see that I have a pool with many coins added by hand, in view details it tells me that I should switch to zcore or xzx, but it goes to V-I-V-O that yields much less. Apart from that it is in auto profit, and everything is correct, other things that are not seen, would be that I get the price in CURRENT, I do not use the average of 24 hours, although I have also tried it.

Suddenly in this case today is "V-I-V-O", although it is not profitable right now, is chosen by the autoprofit, when seen in the video that is not even among the first, nor respects Zcore that would be the first option of AutoSwitch

This today I realized in a big way, but I was already suspecting it from days ago. It is as if sometimes it gets stuck or frozen in a coin for no apparent reason. After a few hours he has a more normal behavior

That is, there are some problems in the Auto Switch, and you have already seen that in view details, there are many other currencies above live to be switched to undermine, but the program has given you to undermine V-I-V-O. Another day is another currency. And V-I-V-O has a modified profit of 0.95, so there is not much difference to profit 1.

But I can not say, but if the swtich auto module does not work well, it will be impossible to get money out of this program. In many of the updates you do, you comment that you correct the swtich car a lot, it is as if there was a problem known to you that you still do not finish dominating.

Now what do I do if suddenly the autoswtich does not work well? And this happens frequently with other currencies.

I have looked at all the options, it is in pool with more than 80 coins activated, the auto switch shows that other coins would be chosen, I have restarted the computer and I have looked until the last option. It is as if there was some type of cache that does not get deleted and stays stuck on a coin, or does not read the auto switch list correctly.

It is perfectly how the program works, as well as to know that it does not work well. That's why my results for now have been small compared to NEMOS, when before I had fewer cards.

The auto switch selector is not being reliable, but I do not know which is the trigger that makes it work badly. Maybe you have a lot of coins and can not handle them?

All this happens with the cryptodredge miner, I do not know if it will be the culprit. But I'm going crazy. Look at how it magically changes currency and profit, without cutting the miner and keeping time. This is wrong, either that or my installation of the program has gone crazy.

I just bothered to read all your comments in bitcointalk. You always want to be right, and even to insult people calling her silly for using the term ROI which is also very valid.

In all the post you end up arguing because you are intransigent, and for what you have shown me in AW, a total ignorant of the practice, but if you know the theory.

That said and for the good of the forum, I will not answer any comments. If you are looking for a fight, look for it in another post. To others, who see their message history and see that he is an unpleasant person who only knows how to talk and always wants to be right, it does not matter what post you read. He is very smart and the others are very stupid

If your life sucks, do not infect me. Here ends my conversation with you and your super intellect, and I will ignore you.

I see that your attitude is "I know more than anyone else and I have to prove it", I stopped to read all your posts and you are a person that you will discuss a lot here if you do not adapt and you are less strict with your nonsense.

If life is going badly for you, if you are a bit bitter, do yourself a favor and do not make others bitter, turn off the internet and make your neighbors bitter.

Seeing the controversy that you have in all the posts you post, I'll ignore you and not answer more to your messages in the forum of Awesome miner, you have no idea and allows you to give advice. You are smart in your house, but a fool in the rest of the world.

With the ignorant it is stupid to argue, especially about the ignorant who want to give lessons. And I call you ignorant morally.

Do you want everyone to dance to your music

ROI is valid and understandable. Using it does not make you look silly, it makes you stand proud and wise in front of others, impose your criteria and if you have to call fools to others you do it.

After studying marketing, ROI is the return on investment, I have invested 100 and I have recovered 100. That you prefer the other version, it seems more foolish to me to use the other acronym, because you want to go through life giving lessons, when nobody asks for them.

Here is to complicate life when there are simpler options.

There are other interesting rules in AM, I refer to the documentation and also the use of a whatdogs, in addition to programming a restart every day, either from AM or from the Whatdogs that cost $ 5. Even there are some that control the graphics, if a reboot falls. if the light goes out and it comes back, it turns on, in short, it does not take more than an eBay whatdogs and to know better the options of AM

IFTT I have known it for a long time, I have used it more for self publishing in blogs and Spam, it is very useful, but it seems to me here that complicate what is easy, and read more carefully the rules of AM, and the API, can do this in a simple way.

Have you tried it to say that?

I get coins and they are between 10 minutes and 50 minutes, sometimes longer.

The key is the percentage of profits, the difference that must exist between currencies.

If I play with time, for example 15, 20, 25 minutes, if you make a bad change of currency (a lot happens), you will be undermining a bad currency for a long time. At 1 minute, that error only lasts 1 minute.

A 30% change, my currency must lower profitability and raise another.

I suggest you try it before accelerated conclusions.

I think that, as in the previous commentary, you do not bother to do any kind of tests, so your experience is minimal, no matter how much theory you may know.

I have done many combinations for days and measuring the profit in satochis, I am looking at the coins and the changes for hours .. Please, please try the configuration.

Not because it is 1 minute, it will change every bit, as I mentioned, when you catch a coin you can hold it for a long time, that high percentage filters the peaks of some coins that you have sometimes and I avoid making useless changes.

Please try, or tell me your configuration and I will taste it with pleasure to draw my own conclusion, but surely you have already tried your configuration.

So what do you suggest? to look for the best group and leave the profit at 1?

How to know if a group is the best or not, if it is not measured with a test?

I am going to leave a list of different currencies, looking for your best Pool, and you will see what difference there is from estimated profits (profit 1) to when it is measured at least 2 times, that is, two tests of 3 hours at different times and doing the average, you can verify that Profit 1 is not valid and is deceptive.

I really appreciate your answers, and I know that theoretically you are right, but one thing is theory and another practice.

Honestly, I think you want to make the difficult easy. You can win with little effort, but you can earn more with more effort.

List of measured coins, measured in Profit, have been tested twice and averaged their results, from the estimate to receive and what is actually received in the pool, to see if you understand the problem


INN  0.60   BSOD 
MANO  0.80  gos.cx 
ABS 0.65    gos.cx   
DNR  0.65    yiimp.eu 
BTX  0.95     suprnovq
RVN  0.9     ravenminer
PGN  0.97     suprnova
XVG  0.80      suprnova
CREA  0.77    yiimp.eu
RABBIT  1.2   angry pool   
BSD  0.80  Suprnova
ZCR 1.05   phi-phi-pool 
GIN  1.07  angrypool       
XMN 0.95  gos.cx   
Mona 0.65  suprnova
GRLC  0.9    garlicpool     
DSR  0.80  uniming.net
TLR    0.90 taler-pool.online
MBC  0.65  arcpool    repeat  in blockmasters.co     
Urals  1.6  pool.uralcoins.info   
Kreds  0,70  supernova     
B-hash 1.15 BSOD
Ore  0.95
btcz 1.01
GRV  1.04  BSOD   
ALPS  0.98 angrypool 
CRS  0.9  haspool.eu
Lux Phi2  0.84 bsod   
hth   0.80  protopool
btg 0.95  suprnova
crc   0.80   bsod   
DIN 1.05  BSOD
ZXZ  1.01  gos.cx   
SPK  0.7  bsod   


You only look for the best pool (I also look for it, but I check it) and forget, do not change any parameters or test the pool's performance.

Now think slowly, and imagine who will have the best auto swtich closest to reality.
And now I wait for your explanation because what I do is wrong, or really bad is to make the minimum effort and then complain about poor performance.

Right now I'm testing coins and pools, my goal is just to stay between 20-30 coins that I will change every month, we are several people at once checking the performance of the pools and we write them down in an online excel, each one deals with a Lot of coins and makes the measurements.

Now say that my way of working, even being slower and heavier, has no logic but to add a pool and forget.

It's the last time I post that list and it's not complete. Every 15 days all the coins are reviewed, first we look for a better pool, and then we do another 3 hours work test, seeing the estimated and the obtained, to calculate the Profit.

This can obviously be automated in a certain way only if the program allows it, but does not allow it. These measurements are key to hit more times in the auto switch.

For you a pool can be good, because it is close to it, or because it conforms to ignorance, but for me it can be a pool disaster.

to practical examples, it is not the same to earn 0.1 btc per day than to earn 0.13 btc, it is 30% more, but yes, it is more difficult, but I want results, I am not afraid of working hours. To others like you, it's going to be simple and easy, but a little blind as to what you expect and obtain.

I think you do not pay much attention to hashrates for hours like me.

Choose 10 different coins, for example Neoscrypt, from different pools in different parts of the world, and then take the test. You'll see that you get different hashrate values.

If I am in Spain and I am in contact with a server in the USA or Japan, my connectivity is not as good, with which the hashrate is reduced. If the configuration of Vardiff is not correct in the server, it also changes the hashrate, and so several more things. Hypothetically it is always the same hashrate, but different causes make it fall for different reasons. A Pool in a bad server, will have bad connectivity, bad response, and therefore a poorer hashrate.

The only way to get it right and correct is to be able to measure the hashrate by pool / currency

I only invite you to take the test and then give your opinion. I have seen it in many currencies, in X17, x16s etc ... Different currencies, different hashrates, but within a margin. In X17 XVG the same rig gives 114-118 mhs, and in another currency that I can not remember now it did not exceed 105, and it is the same thing.

These hashrate differences cause the switch to be incorrect.

This is forcing me to do 3 hours tests in each pool / currency to see the deviation and modify it in the pool through the Profit field, but this is just a patch.

Please do the test and then give your opinion.

I think you do not pay much attention to hashrates for hours like me.

Choose 10 different coins, for example Neoscrypt, from different pools in different parts of the world, and then take the test. You'll see that you get different hashrate values.

If I am in Spain and I am in contact with a server in the USA or Japan, my connectivity is not as good, with which the hashrate is reduced. If the configuration of Vardiff is not correct in the server, it also changes the hashrate, and so several more things. Hypothetically it is always the same hashrate, but different causes make it fall for different reasons. A Pool in a bad server, will have bad connectivity, bad response, and therefore a poorer hashrate.

The only way to get it right and correct is to be able to measure the hashrate by pool / currency

I only invite you to take the test and then give your opinion. I have seen it in many currencies, in X17, x16s etc ... Different currencies, different hashrates, but within a margin. In X17 XVG the same rig gives 114-118 mhs, and in another currency that I can not remember now it did not exceed 105, and it is the same thing.

These hashrate differences cause the switch to be incorrect.

This is forcing me to do 3 hours tests in each pool / currency to see the deviation and modify it in the pool through the Profit field, but this is just a patch.

Please do the test and then give your opinion.

1m   28-32%

that I already removed it and it still failed. And that has nothing to do with the fact that when it was released, it referred to PHI, when I mined Neoscrypt. I confirm that I tried it without that line and it failed the same. I used the strange fork of HSRminer since it was the only solution I had.

Also if I have that failure to put a "-" would give me error in the miner but continue, I would not refer to another protocol as seen in the videos that I bothered to record for you.

Using that Fork is when I realized the difference of hash between currencies of the same protocol, that disables the effectiveness of Auto swtich and maybe it is the biggest failure of the program, which in my opinion should be taken into account for next updates, for Ensure better changes of the auto switch.

I am sorry to comment so much in the forum, but it is my obligation as a buyer and hard user, to communicate all the faults that I find. And that does not everyone.

I use all the functions, and I am in front of the computer more than 10 hours every day, it is normal that if I touch all the functions and use all the functions, it is normal that I find fault, and the good thing is that we have a good programmer that corrects The falls.

If you do not understand half of what I say, it is because you do not know how to handle the program, or you do not understand the problem of having different HASHs in each currency for the same protocol, so it is difficult for you to guess the change.

Either I'm crazy or you're a newbie, it must be one of those two things.

If you only use the basics functions with an ASIC, you will not find big problems, because you will only be using 10% of the functions. I use EVERYTHING, I take it to the limit and I suggest the solutions.

That for a same protocol there is a different hash in each currency, whether x17 or neoscrypt, makes the swtich not very accurate.

IF you only put asic, that's easy and for people with little knowledge, you only use a small part of the program

For the programmer a user like me is worth his weight in gold. Because others like you, only use a small part, and when there is something strange or worry about reporting the error, with which, PAtrike can not improve it.

I tell you in another way. IS SPORADIC and occurs alone. Without doing anything suddenly gives that fault. That last order, I formatted the HD and reinstalled everything. IF the pool was wrong, it would not work in any rig, since it is the same poool for all rigs. It's a bug I've reported before.

In the end I had to install a replacement for Klaust, since Neoscrypt is one of the most used protocols with less miners within AW.

It can happen in any something, and it has already happened to me several times. When I fail in this machine, it was after a reboot, and I'm telling you, that neither formatting the equipment fixes it, and the pool information is the same for all platforms. If you see the video well, mino Neoscrypt and in the failure speaks of PHI which is another protocol, sometimes we say that some information is crossed to AW.

if we want better software we have to give all the possible information of the failures to the programmer to fix them, the problem of this error is that it is sporadic, and therefore difficult to reproduce by the programmer.

I've been thinking a lot about AW and it's a great software that requires a lot of attention, but it has a huge weak point.

They are the Benchmark that are made by protocol. I can see that I have a different HASH in two coins of the same protocol. It is very noticeable, I mino much neoscrypt, the same rig for a coin can give 5mhs, but for another currency neoscrypt can give a rate of 7 mhs.

Then thinking one realizes that it does not make sense that the switch is done only by the hash of the protocol, that's fine for the pools type Zpool and auto change.

But if I have 80 coins added, I need to know the hash for each of them, because although many are from the same protocol, they get different hashes. This difference can be by the ping, it can be by the stratum, by configuration of the Vardiff etc ...

Consequently, it would not be unreasonable PAtrike that you are considering in your programming that we can also save the hash for currency, and that this is the one chosen to make the Auto Switch.

I think the problem is perfectly understood, and is the culprit that some currency changes are worse instead of better, something that should not happen, and that only happens because of what I just commented.

A program of this price and this level, with so many added functions (and many other bugs), should be closer to the reality of each currency, being able to obtain that hash per currency / pool, instead of only Protocol HASH, which in the end it is not precise at all.

It is that if you also give the coins you give everything done. The ideal is not to add all the currencies of the world or you will have excessive changes of mining and loss of time.

Ideally, choose about 30 coins and keep your information. If you add it from Coincalculator, it is already updated alone.

It is the work in which I have been several weeks and I have not yet finished, because to know if a coin is good or not, apart from adding it, as you say you have to look for the pool with more hash and then measure the pool, that is to say Testing hours to see if what is estimated in profits is what really gives you. Do not forget to choose the best Exchange, not all have the same price, there you can also lose money.

The program is an interface precisely to facilitate the work, and it is a lot of work, worse would be at hand. It's impossible to give you all that information.

The peculiar plugin that you say is AW CU, and if it's weird and difficult, and you have to update the reward.

But pay attention to me, if it does not appear in Coincalculator, Coinwarz or What to mine, it is a new currency without volume, and if your idea is to sell every day, get away from those coins of little volume and exaggerated price.

As you will see, it is a lot of work. It's like buying a van to deliver, you have to drive hours and hours every day to deliver packages, they will not be delivered alone. Well, this program is the interface and database that you have to complete in data, and this changes depending on what style of mining you do, speculative, hodl or sell day by day.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2765610.0
a strange fork of hsrminer, compatible with api ccminer and with very good hash rate. A very good alternative to Klaust for Neoscrypt, right now I put it on all my machines

It's getting about 20% more than Klaust, and 100% compatible CCminer api, it's fabulous.