observing BTC\/7500 weeeee    gogogoooo!! |
|
|
|
At the end of it he did his time, I doubt that he has any private keys
What makes you think this? he must still have alot of corns stashed somewhere,,,hmmm  meh |
|
|
|
So what's all this talk about monero.org being hacked and some malware being downloaded from the site? How does something like this happen to one of the biggest crypto projects in the space?
you think the french government has not been monitoring this project?  lmfao ~ what part of honeypot are you confused about? |
|
|
|
Observing $8,130.
Is it just me or does anybody else think that the ever increasingly obvious support at $8,000 is really bullish. We certainly don’t look like falling under $8,000 soon.
$7200 real street price to cash out...  reeeeee Possibly starting to understand this portion of your avatar?  yep i admit we started the hat craze  lel  |
|
|
|
Observing $8,130.
Is it just me or does anybody else think that the ever increasingly obvious support at $8,000 is really bullish. We certainly don’t look like falling under $8,000 soon.
$7200 real street price to cash out... reeeeee |
|
|
|
hire a MARKET MAKER bruh!!.. you new here? ===> "pro hack" something why don't you? LOL!!!\_@@_/ #tradebot |
|
|
|
blah blah blah ===>
The purpose of decred is to be the best and safest store of value in the market.
In addition it also provides income not only for POW miners, but also for stakeholders through POS, privacy and amazing governance.
Satoshi created bitcoin to fuck the system and the banks.
All coins that appears for another purpose in a beautiful whitepaper turns out to be scam.
Cryptocoins were not created to save the planet, to help musicians, artists, gnomes, urea production and bla bla bla
Can the blockchain be used for other purposes? Yes, but it is up to the community entrepreneurs to start their business and make money from it.
There is no need to find just one utility and create a coin around it. The blockchain is there, use it any way you like.
===> DECRED TRIED TO TAKE AWAY MY PRIVACY!! <=== YES BITCOIN IS HERE TO HELP ARTISTS, MUSICIANS, & REAL PEOPLE!!! ALL DECRED IS IS ANOTHER CENTRALIZED SHITCOIN. JUST LOOK AT THE RICHLIST!!! \_@@_/ NO REAL WORLD USE. |
|
|
|
Einstein : we must travel faster than the speed of light to reach the future of crypto currency?  lolzzz |
|
|
|
I'm a Decred HODLER, but I believe the coin is only successful until that first chain split.
Seriously? So in your opinion, coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum are not successful? they both have split, decred hard-fork will be good for ending this nonsense once and for all. BLACKLIST THE GREEDY RICHLIST! >>>fork this turd already! lol |
|
|
|
lol CLAM toolkit literally hacked MILLIONS of dollars of poloniex lenders forcing them to liquidate assets and sell to the chinks offshore!! :-D reeee |
|
|
|
In my opinion, Decred was always a decent project with a dedicated team.
We can see that the development is ongoing and lately we have some strong moves upwards price wise and that is why I started to wonder what is so special about Decred, despite this what I have already mentioned?
There are other better, faster and cheaper altcoins that already are used for transfers, we have BTC which has found a place as digital gold and safe haven and to be honest I don't hear anything about Decred implementations or use cases?
Community governance sounds very good and to be honest, on this hype Decred makes his way to the top 50 on CMC, but what is the future for Decred?
You didn't say anything about privacy and the lightning network that is already implemented in v1.5 release candidadate1 recently released EDIT: There is no other currency as safe against attacks as decred. DCR is more safe than bitcoin The governance system through politeia allows any new feature on market to be implemented if the stakeholders wish. On-chain governance system works until a motivated minority stops following the majority. Remember, changes in the network are permanent. What happens if there's a group dedicated enough not to accept those changes? Chain splits like what happened with BTC/BCH and ETH/ETC can't happen in Decred (next to impossible). Check out my earlier post for sauce: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1290358.msg52950978#msg52950978Can't happen? What if there was a motivated minority that didn't want the "new feature" in an upgrade? What if the majority already voted in 1GB blocks, and the minority didn't want it? What if the miners need to change the supply cap to support their costs, and the majority voted for it, but the minority didn't want it? What would happen to the minority? They wouldn't have the ability to fork, and split away? Unless a "minority" has sufficient voting power in the form of staked tickets, then no, they can't create a contentious hard fork. Decred is specifically designed to make contentious forks unprofitable, and in fact, costly for a minority to continue operating. If some group doesn't ultimately agree with the majority of stakeholders, they can fork the github repo, rename it, and release their own coin. That said, I'm pretty sure Politeia has a 60/40 approval threshold on proposals. Or rename it to Decred Classic, "the real for-the-community Decred". I'm not sure of what's technically possible, but that was the point of the debate. On-chain governance can't stop a community of different standpoints from breaking apart, and splitting away. There's one very important nuance though, and that's the difference between a forked repo, and a forked chain. A forked chain that has a contentious hard fork growing on it shares the same previous block history as the "legit" chain. A forked repo doesn't. The only thing it shares with the "legit" chain is some subset of the source code, and we all know that a successful crypto project is WAYYY more than just its source. Bob and Sally can go fork the Decred repo and name their coin Decred Classic if they wish, but nothing in that chain history will show anything of Decred. It would in fact, just be some other crypto coin. And history has shown us already: copy pasta crypto coins are rarely more than a scam. The market doesn't usually acknowledge such coins. without replay protection ~ what makes you think the original chain nodes will not be sybil attacked via malicious state actors? weeee |
|
|
|
Whats up Cryptotourist.
Can we have the old Lambie back now? Yep... it can be a bit strange that some of the down-caller wanna be sorcerers come in to this thread and amp up their BTC DOWN calling after there has already been a considerable correction, as if they were trying to get others to sell at the bottom, and surely they could end up being correct (but not high odds of such like they are trying to proclaim "inevitable down"), but they seem to be trying to get the BTC price to go down rather than really making any kind of meaningful accurate and/or objective BTC price prediction as they are trying to portray. And, part of the problem is that the BTC price may or may not go down further, but if anyone was going to sell some or all (never go full fiat), they should have done so before the then current correction location, which was already considerably down. In this case, we had an upsurge from $7,300 to $10,300, so if there is a lot of calling of down in the price range of $8,450, then there has already been a short term BTC price correction, from that spot of 18%, and if we are looking at the other more recent tops of $13,880 and $19,666 then we are seeing correction ranges of 40% and 67% respectively, which should cause inspiration to act upon or create BTC buying plans (even at the then current price) rather than any kind of thoughts about selling BTC or waiting to buy. Anyhow, TLDR, if they are effectives in their bullshit convincing of others to either sell BTC or wait to buy BTC at a lower price (that never comes), they are seemingly more likely to cause scared peeps to sell at the bottom or to fail to buy a sufficient amount of BTC rather than causing those same scared peeps to be able to buy BTC lower, as they fantasize about both not losing more value and trying to make some more BTC (which has decent chances of the opposite results). rebuy under 1k reeee |
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/BitGrin/status/1091369743825678336“@ivan_nakamoto We have no premine, it’s a dev fee that takes 4 years to be delivered. Grimble is either too incompetent to understand the difference, or being deliberately misleading about what it means to pre-mine a coin. Hint: they control 99.99% of their coins supply today.” That strategically unmentioned dev fee tho you are a crook, i want my coins back that you stole ! ===> * watch your inbox for my boot up your ass.* |
|
|
|
...
Or rename it to Decred Classic, "the real for-the-community Decred". I'm not sure of what's technically possible, but that was the point of the debate. On-chain governance can't stop a community of different standpoints from breaking apart, and splitting away.
Dude, you've been answered about it dozens of times but seems that you don't want to see the answer and don't stop repeating that fallacy. It's not worth it financially for anyone to do in decred what happened to eth/etc and btc/bch when communities splited by centralized decisions and lack of consensus, which makes it "impossible" in DCR. About copying and pasting the code from github, creating another currency and giving it any name you want, it can be done with any currency. It's up to the market to assess whether it deserves any respect or not. So this is another currency, starting from scratch, there is no link to the previous blockchain. The whole story is deleted. The smart contracts made will not be present, nor will the records in the original blockchain. time to REBOOT the DECRED blockchain because CENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE !!! NOOB!! |
|
|
|
In my opinion, Decred was always a decent project with a dedicated team.
We can see that the development is ongoing and lately we have some strong moves upwards price wise and that is why I started to wonder what is so special about Decred, despite this what I have already mentioned?
There are other better, faster and cheaper altcoins that already are used for transfers, we have BTC which has found a place as digital gold and safe haven and to be honest I don't hear anything about Decred implementations or use cases?
Community governance sounds very good and to be honest, on this hype Decred makes his way to the top 50 on CMC, but what is the future for Decred?
You didn't say anything about privacy and the lightning network that is already implemented in v1.5 release candidadate1 recently released EDIT: There is no other currency as safe against attacks as decred. DCR is more safe than bitcoin The governance system through politeia allows any new feature on market to be implemented if the stakeholders wish. you are not safe from the "powers that be" when they decide to nuke you off the map wait for it. |
|
|
|
Hi, guys i have a problem...can't sync my qt wallet, it ctuck on 2097394 block...i downloaded v1.4.17 from official site, downloaded bootstrap.dat from this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623147.msg9772191#msg9772191 post and put it in folder where my wallet.dat is....it goes fine till wallet renamed it (bootstrap.dat.old) sync stopped on that block...I made clam.conf and add some nodes but still nothing...on client i see a have 16 active connections... "importing blocks" in lower left corner is gone and it's really annoying because i lost 5-6 hours (in last 4 days) on this...  I just updated the bootstrap file: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623147.msg9772191#msg9772191Now it goes up to block 2808000 which was staked on Sat Nov 9 11:55:28 UTC 2019. The advice to connect to a single high quality peer in the previous post is good advice I think. It solves the orphan problem. CLAM avalanched down under 10K satoshis ~ funny how in the end your CLAMs killed off poloniex(goldman-saches) :-D weeeee #cheerzzz ===> https://freiexchange.com/market/CLAM/BTC |
|
|
|
george soros and the pro hackers will be pleased lol |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
