I see. Although, restriction on posting their own threads is also a good thing. It prevents them advertising malicious content very easily through multiple accounts. With the restrictions in place they would be less likely to create many accounts and spam. But, yes I know that they could just post instead of opening up their own thread.
But, I think seeing the same person spamming loads of threads could be a problem. Especially from companies with spambots etc.

The same reason why I think it reduces scamming. It limits the amount of people creating multiple accounts and acting that the person/service is legit when it's not. I think the restrictions should be a little more and the users should only be approved by staff if anything. The current system is working and I think does a good job.

I think one of the main questions to be asked is: Are you willing to use a escrow?

Seems you may need to go to your email. There may be a email with a confirmation code which you can input into the site login page. This is the 2 factor authentication. If you haven't enabled this then I would make sure that your account hasn't been locked by checking the email associated with the account. Otherwise, try contacting support and see if they can help you any further. You can always reset password with the passphrase you are given upon registration.

I normally aren't this busy. Holidays is normally when I get some time off. But, this year it's been a little crazy.

The staff will not get involved in any situation like this. If you need to resolve anything you should speak to the person who is leaving bad feedback and hopefully get it resolved. Otherwise, the staff cannot help. Although, informing people that someone is doing it without any reason is a good idea.

The trust feature isn't moderated for obvious reasons.

I see the point. EA's optimisation may not be the greatest. I've taken a quick look at the official forums and I must say there is a lot of people discussing that their computer is struggling to process the game. Also, people are reporting a lot of freezing even on i7 processors. As a gaming fan I expect bugs, crashes and late releases but it seems Battlefield hasn't even tested their product before releasing. So many quick fixes which they stated like the campaign saving issues. Instead of rushing the game in order to complete it before christmas they should have took the time in developing and testing it further. Maybe working out the bugs and making it more stable. Older computers would struggle because of the requirements of the game. However, they haven't helped themselves they could indeed optimise the game and improve. Most people can't afford the new hardware. So optimising it and making sure there are no game breaking issues they would increase their customers and profit.  Following some of the development updates I always thought they were rushing the game, even though EA are not the most 'loved' company in the world they have brought out some very nice games which run well and have become a success. Do you think Battlefield 4 has been a unsuccessful game and may destroy the battlefield franchise?

Sorry, for getting you started! 

Although, I see people benefited from this. Seems a lot of people had more than 10 vouchers and have began to sell them for Bitcoin. Although, I don't think it's worth paying for this when you have google hangouts etc.

I'm glad you pointed out DLC. I disagree with the whole point of dlc. If you have already purchased the game then you should be able to have whatever comes with it in the future. These days when you have a game you don't actually have the full game. IN reality you have already purchased half of it. If I went to purchase a car and I found out later I would need to buy wheels, brakes and a new engine later on. I wouldn't buy it because it's incomplete. Most games don't advertise that there will be extra content released at a later date which you will be charged for. Even free to play games seem to like to charge for dlc to make their money worth. I haven't come across a developer that isn't greedy and doesn't release dlc just for extra money.

I heard EA did rush to release in order to compete with Call of duty. That’s one of the main reasons I have held out playing. I did start to play battlefield campaign but had issues with saving. At that point I decided for all the patches to be confirmed working and the game playable at least. I tried a little bit of Call Of Duty playing with the AI. But, didn't get the feel you would if online against others.

But, at the moment I'm thinking they both aren't worth it.

It's been discussed before. Staff members have confirmed selling accounts and buying accounts is allowed. Even advertising it on the forum is allowed. I doubt this is going to change in the near future either.

Without a escrow? What if you buyer pays all fees? I couldn't see why you wouldn't want to do this. Using a trusted escrow.

Aren't you lucky that you got to redeem one. How long did it last? I seems it only lasted a few hours then it was taken down.

I see the internet as a living organism. It's fantastic. It just keeps on growing and evolving. When it first started people seemed to think it wouldn't be useful. But, look at it now. It's used in everyday life. Even by the older generation.

I would like to know peoples input. Due to the amount of bugs that Battlefield has had upon launch and the huge success Call of duty has had upon launch. Which one do you prefer? It's a common question which normally gets a few debates going.


Over recent years I have preferred Battlefield. Even though with it's glitches, bugs and other sorts which spoilt some aspects of the game. It just felt more relaxed and more mature than Call of duty. But, because of the recent launch problems I have held back from playing either one. Just to give both a fair chance to work out any bugs. I'm going to be playing both games this weekend on the Playstation 4. I will complete bith campaigns before moving onto multiplayer.

I would like to hear others ideas and opinions on both games and which you prefer.

I guess you didn't miss out on much. It's only for video calls up to 10 people. Direct live support and discount off a webcam.

I will send a personal message to Stunna regarding the issue. As I don't see why it's needed to be posted. I will however put a Bitcoin address up for the time being. Although, thank you for pointing that out. It was fine to just send him your address at the end of the cycle before.

I've contacted him and explained why I have edited the post.

It was unlucky. I found out about this a little too late. It's only because of the holidays....taking up all my time.

I don't think so. They share the same.

Once someone purchases these accounts, it's out of the OPs hands. Therefore, putting "no scams please" is just ridiculous. If you didn't want people scamming. Don't offer the accounts. Especially if they have trust tied to the account.

No you don't. I will be writing my address in the personal message I send Stunna when collecting my payment.

I wouldn't offer this much for buying the whole lot. As most of these are worthless to me and are not very good domains. I may be interested in some if you are willing to sell individually.