a sto punto a chi posso rivolgermi per farmelo compilar ecome si deve?
nel caso di tassazione da capital gain in redditi diversi, quanto dovrei pagare di tasse?
e se invece non dichiaro nulla e un domani mi vengono a bussare alla porta quanto dovrei pagare?

DRK uber alles. Ricordati di diversificare!

./darkcoind stop
rm ~/.darkcoin/peers.dat
./darkcoind --reindex
start MN from cold wallet
./darkcoind getinfo
./darkcoind masternode list | grep $IP

try starting from local wallet again, i had to do it twice before it became stable.
also delete peers.dat and check if your on the correct block with your cold and hot wallets (getinfo),
if not start with -reindex

For anyone interested, here is the original merger document for when Darkcoin and Evan Duffield tried to acquire ShadowCash: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HrGDKKtr5cKKE8Iu7aOw1vXbVTGk9078sQaWlprZYrs/edit?pli=1

Here was the ShadowCash response: http://shadowtalk.org/topic/252/darkcoin-proposal-statement

I thought it was pretty interesting that a more established project like DRK would be so interested to buy off the ShadowCash project.  Do they feel threatened?  There obviously must be something of value here if they wanted a merger.  Then I wonder why in this video Evan Duffield the DRK developer didn't even acknowledge the value of zero knowldge coins, or trustless solutions like SDC (8:26 mark): http://youtu.be/lzu_02-lp7o?t=8m26s

Instead he only criticized zero knowledge, even after he had seen the potential of ShadowCash enough to offer a merger deal?  It just doesn't seem very honorable, and its slightly embarrassing for the DRK team.  I bet they are happy that it was never widely publicized.

One part of the merger details that I found kind of funny was part 2 on the proposal conditions:

Really weird that they thought this would work out.  What if the devs were not working as hard as Evan had hoped?  Its like the ShadowCash team would have become subserviant to Duffield, but don't worry Duffield will allow them the privilege to work on whatever they want, as long as they keep the same pace as now, lol.  Seems so amateurish and desperate by the DRK team.

We're currently in talks with the ShadowCash developers to join the teams together and become the second largest team in crypto. As the twitter states , it's not about their technology, we already have a working anonymity implementation. It's about the team itself, their programmers and designers are top-notch and we could go far together.
This should greatly benefit both teams. It's hard to survive in crypto and there's a great cleanup that's happening right now. Darkcoin will survive and through a merger they'll come out ahead too.
For anyone who wants to read the proposal as it stands:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HrGDKKtr5cKKE8Iu7aOw1vXbVTGk9078sQaWlprZYrs/edit?usp=sharing

Let's play a game:
#1 Guess which number is bigger!

A. 5,084,962
B. 6,458,360

#2 Guess which number is bigger!

A. 5,084,962.00000000
B. 6,458,360

#3 Guess which number is bigger!

A. 5,084,962.0000000000000000000000000000000000
B. 6,458,360.0000

I agree not to get carried away. Some people just get more excited than others sometimes.

However, you can compare prices of PoW coins and PoS coins. Active mining and Active staking are both viable blockchain stablilizers. And Shadow actually has more coins than Darkcoin. Add in 2000 masternodes with 1000 a piece in them that can't move and there are close to 2x more SDC "available" than DRK. Great news for Shadow!