https://www.coincalculators.io/api.aspx?name=krait
It was so easy that I did not see it. He is in the help of the same program. I leave a sample url for other users.

Two suggestions for upcoming updates.

Import / export option to mark or unmark everything. I have more than 100 box click to select, it is very heavy. Sometimes it is better to select everything and disregard what you do not want.

In the COIN tab, a search engine to filter results, sometimes I look for a coin to see its price or reward, but since we already have so many coins I have to look visually, something like what you already have done in the Pools. It would make life easier

As always a great update, can you tell me the .json format of coincalculators? if for example I want this coin, it is an example only

https://www.coincalculators.io/coin.aspx?crypto=keyco-mining-calculator

How would the url be for the Json. Of course very useful as always

regards

a while later and without doing ANYTHING, MONA has returned to work on the auto switch, and I repeat I have not touched anything, nor restarted the computer nor the program nor the rig.

Sometimes this happens and I stop for a miner, I had to create a rule that if a miner is 2 minutes standing, start mining. But these random failures are very annoying. Thank goodness that the video is to show that I'm not crazy.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/r1hv7tilujp9emt/IMG_2254.MOV?dl=0


I will report this failure for the second time, and I also add video with the phone. In this case, it happens with MONA, which uses the lyra2re2 protocol. If you watch the video, I choose the mona pool directly and when I boot it works perfectly.

Then, I choose a pool where inside this MONA and I know that at that moment it is profitable and the auto swtich chooses it, it is the same pool but in auto profit, and a window comes out saying something of skunhash and Klaust, when I use another miner and another protocol.

If the pool is wrong it would not work well when selecting it manually, but if it fails when it is together with others in auto swtich. They also indicate that these errors are random, last for a while and then suddenly it is fixed, one day affects one rig, another day to another.

It's weird, as you see it works well when choosing it, and it fails to auto switch with a protocol and mining not indicated.

It has already happened to me several times in a random way and I indicated it in another post about DSTM, a problem that has not happened again

In this sense it is the easy solution for you, you do not have to change any part of programming, but it does not fix the problem either. I do not have to contact third parties that you use in your program, and you must improve the usability and understanding of your software to the user. How long does it not update the help of your website?

If there are many coins with the wrong reward, I only see two solutions, or adapt as more or less indicated or removes coincalculator. You can not induce to lose money to your clients by using dubious sources or that does not integrate solutions to modify that value.

I ask you that it would be a good idea to include an option if necessary, to be able to MANUALLY add the reward of a coin, but that the other data will continue to be updated. Simple programming is simple, it does not have much of complicated. I have several websites and programmers in my charge, when they take it seriously looking for the best option, or when they do not dedicate time and make the solution easier for them and less efficient for the server, or create extra requests, about loading CPU , they block the database, they do not use cachede results, they do not make suitable indexed tables etc ...

I do not ask for an impossible, it is a really easy option to add and solve a thousand problems IF we have to wait to send an email to another data website and wait for it to correct it, one by one, you are creating extra work and that is not It is the goal of AW.

IF I can change the reward quickly and easily, and that the rest as a problem is updated, you make life easier for all of us, which in the end is the task of this software, not to make things complicated at the usability level for the convenience of programmer.

I feel my words, I try to be constructive and provide ethically correct, efficient and above all easy solutions for the user of your program.

For example, the AWCU add-on that is separate to this development, is so easy to add it natively to your program, that I am amazed that it is not added to your menus, because it is not complicated, but we have to use external programs by api for not including them in AW

LE can tell the coincalculator owner, apart from a premium API of 2-4 $ per month. I would pay for it if it gives me stable data of the coins without disappearing, and the normal api for free use.

I have no problem paying because it makes my life easier and get more benefit. Can you consult it?

I guess that at the machine level making a longer list will be more CPU, and also be a longer list in kbs and now being thousands of people who ask their API data, spend more money in transfer. I told him that I would have no problem paying a small monthly fee for ALL the data.

Please, ask him, I'm almost sure he will. And that there are two api, the current standard and another one apart from payment with EVERYTHING. You do a favor to coincalculator and he can monetize your website, which in the end is the final goal of all the websites.

There are coins that appear, I add a pool and then they are no longer available, I go to the pool and by default it is in BTC and the currency does not appear. They are from Coincalculators and small volume coins. I do not know if there are any limitations, I check prices every 17 minutes.

I had to add them through the AWCU extension. Well, I guess the problem is with coincalculators. CTF, CERBERUS are two examples of currencies that today were and then have stopped being in AW, but if they are in Coincalculator

There are coins that are not good in Coinscalculator and therefore are causing a bad auto switch.

The problem is in the rewards. For example the MTI currency is listed as 20 reward, but really is 8. Which gives a much higher figure of profits

https://www.coincalculators.io/coin.aspx?crypto=mti+coin-mining-calculator   reward 20 coins

stats pool mining
https://hash4.life/?address=M8DcZhiAevxWbcmSxbt1fmC31wvZvVJQNx    rewards 8 coins

My doubt is that if I correct the reward in the currency, is the difficulty still being updated from coincalculator?

I think it is a big problem that a site that gives this data, has bad coins, because it influences us directly, that's why it should be possible to adjust the reward without stopping to update difficultad and other parameters.

Thanks for your information, I will try excavator for Nvidia. But what about DSTM I do not see any solution, even erase Awesome and reinstall it ... I will pass the diagnosis but it will not be interpreted. I'll see if I give you a solution. Thank you for your advices.

I have problems with the earnings forecast in Skein.
Each pool and currency I do a minimum test of 2 hours to calculate the deviation of the forecast of currencies day, fee mining and fee pool. Besides, we already know that not all pools are the same.

It is normal to always have a deviation of between 3 and 10% and to correct it in the pool configuration change to 0.97 to 0.90 respectively. In this way the Switch is more accurate in its changes

But I have already found two currencies that the difference is very exaggerated, we speak of between 50% to 78%, coins like PRTX or TIMEC. I noticed that both are Skein, and then the question arises. If the only two coins that I have added for now in Skein give me such a high deviation, will there not be a bad calculation by AW?

PRTX I had to go down almost 78%, that I added it. But MOC COIN of coinscalculator happens to me the same thing, 51% less according to the forecast of coins and profits. I have looked well that the price was correct the one indicated in AW and the one I have in the exchange, and the result has been just half

So it can not be a coincidence and it only happens in Skin. Patrick could you check this? I get 12Ghs in Skein in case it helps.

The currency forecast informs me AW because it can be customized, it works pretty well, close to reality in all currencies except Skein.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2765610.0

you can think if you can add this new fork of hsrminer if it has api and gives good hash result.

We need a better neoscrypt miner at Nvidia.

About DSTM I still have problems, if someone else has problems that say so. Neither the DSTM that comes pre installed, nor the one that I have uploaded separately work. Nothing comes out in the console, the miner is simply canceled and period, nothing is seen in the console.

I have it deactivated and I already tell you, neither the one that brings nor the one that I have added has managed to work.

Does anyone know where I can get the HSR difficulty data. The original Explorer gives a modified number that does not recognize AWCU

http://explorer.h.cash/api/getdifficulty

I'm sorry I did not have enough time to read the last post, I follow many different threads.

A citation error has anyone, be used perfectly.

THX

An idea suggestion.

I do not know if it would be possible for each currency to choose the exchange where it will take the price. I'm going with MUNCOIN that in AW marks 295 satochis, but in stocks.exchange or coinexchange.io the price is between 49-55 satochis.

If I mine Muncoin and change it in Stocks.exchange and I can choose it from the list of exchanges, I will have the exact price of the exchange that I will use.

Because if not, I do not know how I'm going to correct the price that default gives AW, I look at many Exchange, it would be nice to choose the exchange where you look at the price for that currency.

If we have these problems with prices, the auto switch has it complicated to accept. Because if MUNCOIN mine 295 satochis, but I can not sell it to more than 55 satochis, there is a big problem.

Another one that is not added to the list of coins, although I have 3 boxes of the 3 sources activated
https://www.coincalculators.io/coin.aspx?crypto=cerberus-mining-calculator
https://www.coincalculators.io/coin.aspx?crypto=coin2fly-mining-calculator
.... more   .....
https://www.coincalculators.io/coin.aspx?crypto=seraph-mining-calculator

Thank you for understanding the problem of statistics, you have to understand that there is no point in showing erroneous figures, it is not common sense. I do a great job of measuring each pool and correcting the deviation. Thank goodness that in auto switch if it has it in consideration.

Support to the user who has explained the user and Difficulty. It would be nice to add something to each pool to be able to define the difficulty, the easier it is for us to improve instead of having to define variables, it will always be more difficult for a normal user to define variables. I personally add it by hand in the extra command form.

Finally I have a doubt or a mistake. I have activated the 3 sources of coins at once, now I have coins that I had prefenidas apart with AWCU. But the following happens to me:

This ALPS currency if it is in one of the sites
https://www.coincalculators.io/coin.aspx?crypto=alpenschilling-mining-calculator.json

But it does not appear in the list of coins to be added to a pool, I have looked at it several times and it has not been added and there are three sources of coins activated. I do not know if it will be a fault or I have to add it in some way .json as in WTM

I await your response, thanks in advance.

Thank you very much for this great update, I love seeing so many coins to try.

I'm going to tell you a little bug, which is very annoying, at least for me.

A few days ago I suggested that there be a form to adapt the pool gain, since some estimate low and others high. So if you estimate 100 coins and get 50, it would be 0.5 to have 50%. Something like this capture


It works well, the program takes it into account for the Auto switch. You can see in the following image, where I display the autoswitch menu and make PRTX 0.0033 but just in the window below, where are the rigs, mark 0.13 or similar, it does not look very good. I mean, if you take it into account but it is not reflected in the statistics of the rigs, that leads to confusion.



And in the main dashboar it is not updated either. In this case this pool needs a correction of 73%, it gives me an exaggeratedly high number.

I insist that for the Switch if you get the price correctly with the change that I make in the pool, but in the other places it does not, and that does not make sense. The earnings information by day, month, or by rig should be in line with the correction you have applied to the group.



I hope you understand what I want to explain, it is incongruous, it has no logic.

fixed, my problem in this case, I was missing ":" after coinshortname, is that when you have 120 coins it is difficult to find a fault like that. Could a config.json check file be made?

Because right now it gives few clues. I had to rebuild config.json adding 10 in 10 coins and checking, until I found the block of 10 where the line was missing by a simple ":" giving very rare errors.

So nothing, I feel the discomfort, in case someone happens the same.

In the AW forum where I also report the problem, they tell me that the problem is not theirs, that it is in AWCU. With a little luck we should find him.

I do not know what to do anymore, delete all AWCU minus config.json. Should I erase the coins by hand inside AW?

Reinstall AW latest beta version. The error remains the same. I can not find a solution

Any suggestions?