<...>
You made the mistake thinking you sent to the same bitcoin address, although it was different addresses, be it from your wallet or not. Supposing you did not make use of CPFP to spend the unconfirmed output from the first transaction, the transaction will still be confirmed at this time because the fee used for the second and third transaction were even lower than the fee used for the first transaction. |
|
|
|
With what I have checked, your transaction is just a normal transaction sent to two different addresses, no one to the same address. On the blockchain explorer: You the sender use address 19WLodTpJkgJMZyQbpp3mDSLGdcaVCcQXf to make a transaction into two addresses 18s15o5fM1HvxhQEieBpcHKE5qzNLeSyHU and 3ETsCeNykiwUNFeojRA8isv55Lxx3xVkaS. You did not make any transaction into the same address. The transaction fee used is okay but for now low for transaction to be confirmed at present due to mempool congestion. Just wait for mempool to be less congested. The fee used for CPFP is low too is the reason why the transaction is not confirmed in time. You can check it now, all the three transactions already have one confirmation. Your transactions are successful already. |
|
|
|
<...>
Never reveal your private key to anyone, but can you tell us the txids? If not, what fee did you use to make the transactions (both the first and the second transactions)? The fee will like be the issue as suggested by mocacinno. The fee used for CPFP can also be very smal leading to unconfirmed transactions. |
|
|
|
Here is a list of tumblers posted by LeGaulois, it will be very helpful. There is another CoinJoin known as JoinMarket. ⭐Name: ChipMixerClearnet link: https://chipmixer.comTor link: chipmixerwzxtzbw.onion Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: PWYW (Pay what you want) Minimum amount: 0.001
⭐Name: BitMix.BizClearnet link: https://bitmix.bizTor link: bitmixbizymuphkc.onion Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: from 0.4% to 4% (+ Network fees 0.0003) Minimum amount: 0.005
⭐Name: BitCloakClearnet link: https://bitcloak43blmhmn.comTor link: bitcloak43blmhmn.onion Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: Randomized ~2% (+ Network fees 0.0002) Minimum amount: 0.01
⭐Name: MixerClearnet link: https://[banned mixer] Tor link: mixermikevpntu2o.onion Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: From 1% to 5% (depending on the method) (+ 0,0007 Network fees) Minimum amount: 0.001
⭐Name: MixTumClearnet link: https://[banned mixer] Tor link: mixtum5lbuslyow2.onion Bitcointalk thread link: hereFees: 5% (+ 0.0007 Network fee) Minimum amount: 0.005
⭐ Name: Blender.io Clearnet link: https://blender.io Tor link: blenderiocpxfema.onion Bitcointalk thread link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5052876 Fees: From 0.5% to 2.5% (+ 0.0007 Network fee) Minimum amount: 0.01
⭐Name: Wasabi WalletClearnet link: https://wasabiwallet.ioTor link: wasabiukrxmkdgve5kynjztuovbg43uxcbcxn6y2okcrsg7gb6jdmbad.onion/ Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: 0.003% Minimum amount:
⭐Name: FoxMixer Clearnet link: https://www.foxmixer.comTor link: foxmixer6mrsuxrl.onion Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: Vary, depends on confirmation time (+ 0.0007 Network fee) Minimum amount: 0.002
⭐Name: MixerTumblerClearnet link: https://mixertumbler.comTor link: n/a Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: From 2% to 5% (+ ~0.0001 Network fee) Minimum amount: 0.01
⭐Name: CryptoMixerClearnet link: https://[banned mixer] Tor link: cryptomixns23scr.onion Bitcointalk thread link: hereFees: 0.5% + 0.0005BTC Minimum amount: 0.001
⭐Name: Samourai Clearnet link: https://samouraiwallet.com/whirlpoolTor link: 72typmu5edrjmcdkzuzmv2i4zqru7rjlrcxwtod4nu6qtfsqegngzead.onion/ Bitcointalk thread link: n/a Fees: flat fee for an unlimited anonymity set. Minimum amount:
⭐Name: Anonymixer Clearnet link: https://[banned mixer] Tor link: anonymixerpolbpy.onion Bitcointalk thread link: hereFees: from 1 to 2% (+ Network fee is dynamic depending on the mempool for example right now 6 Feb it's 0.00009281 for a P2PKH address) Minimum amount: 1 satoshi
⭐Name: Go-OvertClearnet link: https://www.go-overt.comTor link: overtsgjd4xmgu25uegho7p3ez47solhiri5xpylcgm2tlofbafrzwid.onion/ Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: 4.9% + 0.0007 BTC Minimum amount: 0.005
⭐Name: MyCryptoMixerClearnet link: https://mycryptomixer.comTor link: mymixerxtukle6mo.onion Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: from 0.5% to 5% (+ 0.0007 Network fee) Minimum amount:
⭐Name: MixSaferClearnet link: https://www.mixsafer.comTor link: yxzngnm4mivqhly3zdlgnpagla4wja372whatiyhzgaxwanqqcd5aoqd.onion Bitcointalk thread link: didn't find Fees: dynamic and comes up to 5% + 0.0007 BTC Minimum amount: 0.005 BTC
⭐Name: CoinomizeClearnet link: https://[banned mixer] Tor link: http://coinomthajerbtq7.onionBitcointalk thread link: HereFees: 1% - 5% (+ 0.0003 Network fee) Minimum amount: 0.003 BTC
⭐Name: MoneypotClearnet link:https://wallet.moneypot.com Tor link: no tor link for the wallet script but they do have a tor domain for the main custodian Bitcointalk thread link: HereFees: 1000 sats for P2WPKH, 5000 sats for P2PWPKH-in-P2SH (Anti-Dusting) (+ Network fee) If the deposit is larger than 0.01 BTC, the fees are respectively 100 sat and 500 sat. Minimum amount: 1000 sats if P2WPKH, else 5000. |
|
|
|
This number fluctuates all the time... I've even complained about this very high value in the past, but it seems like nobody is willing to change due to the fees being to much for smaller value inputs
How is the wasabi wallet fee is calculated? I heard the minimum amount of fee is $0.003% which will be will be multiplied by the total number of participants. But the total number of participants is 100. Which means the fee will be 0.3%? Also I learned the fee can be edited and customized, is that true? |
|
|
|
This is not accurate. Once a transaction has a confirmation, whether or not it was RBF is irrelevant. Some places will accept zero-confirmations transactions which are not flagged as RBF, but will require 1 confirmation if they are flagged as RBF, but most places will require at least 1/3/6 confirmations regardless of the RBF status.
Ah! That is so wrong of me. You are right. Transactions with zero confirmation or transaction that has not been confirmed can be double spend with RBF, it can also use be cancelled, althought the cancelling is also completely RBF in which another address on the same wallet is paid which will make the Bitcoin to reflect back in the sender's wallet balance. But, RBF can not be used if the transaction already have one confirmation. I have made appropriate corrections. |
|
|
|
The last time I checked, the minimum amount required to participate in CoinJoin transaction was more than 0.10BTC or 4700$.
According to wasabi wallet FAQ undated on 25 Nov 2020. The least amount is 0.1btc, which means anyone that have 0.1 btc can take part in the CoinJoin, not necessarily more than. |
|
|
|
Digital rights lawyers have sued central bank of Nigeria over crypto prohibition, the lawyers, therefore, asked the court to validate the Investments and Securities Act 2007, which made SEC the apex regulatory body of the Nigerian capital market A civil society organisation, the Digital Rights Lawyers Initiative, has dragged the Central Bank of Nigeria and Securities and Exchange Commission to court over the recent action of the apex bank that Deposit Money Banks should desist from transacting in and with entities dealing in cryptocurrencies. In Suit No. FHC/L/CS/ 188/2021 filed on Monday, February 8, 2021 at the Federal High Court in Lagos, the group said the CBN, which is the first defendant, lacked the power to restrict financial institutions from dealing in cryptocurrency transactions. The digital rights lawyers argued that the second defendant, SEC, had in a circular dated September 14, 2020, declared cryptocurrencies as legal digital assets “protected under section 44 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended)”. The lawyers, therefore, asked the court to validate the Investments and Securities Act 2007, which made SEC the apex regulatory body of the Nigerian capital market. They also prayed the court to declare the CBN action as “ultra vires, unconstitutional, null and void” while also seeking a “perpetual injunction restraining the 1st defendant from regulating and/or further regulating virtual currencies/ crypto currencies in Nigeria.” The suit, which has not yet been assigned to any judge, was filed on behalf of the group by its counsel, Irene Chukwukelu. Moghalu had said there was regulatory dysfunction between the CBN and SEC. He had also argued that there was no means of exchange devoid of risk, adding that if the CBN could manage the risks of paper currency and electronic payments and other means of exchange, it should also be able to mitigate the risks associated with digital platforms such as cryptocurrencies. https://punchng.com/digital-rights-lawyers-sue-cbn-sec-over-cryptocurrency-prohibition/ |
|
|
|
On average ّّّ~10 minutes later (Bitcoin Blockchain) a new block is mined. When this block is mined, we will have two blocks. Original one with a longer chain and a new, shorter block, tries to have some "orphans," which try to have new blocks on that chain.
Two blocks are created by two miners or mining pool at the same time, chain-reorganization will help to inavidate one block and the other one will remain valid, the one that remain valid is thae one that new blocks build upon which will be the longest chain. Calculate the probability of two blocks being mined at the same time?
You can read the quote below. I don’t know what the mathematical probability of this is, so here’s the frequency of chain reorganisations based on the data from my bitcoin node (which hash been running continuously since 17 December 2016):
Actual Reorganisations: 39 (1 every 5,796 blocks / 38.8 days)
Avoided Reorganisations: 100 (1 every 2,260 blocks / 15.2 days) https://learnmeabitcoin.com/explorerhttps://learnmeabitcoin.com/technical/chain-reorganisationWhy is the process of Bitcoin Blockchain re-organization every two weeks?
Chain re-reorg is not every two weeks as you can see from below data. It does not have a definite day. 665005 07 January 2021 664578 05 January 2021 645179 24 August 2020 644543 20 August 2020 638519 09 July 2020 619970 03 March 2020 618465 22 February 2020 614732 27 January 2020 578141 28 May 2019 551355 24 November 2018 Calculate the probability that 3 blocks re-organized?
Only two same blocks have been mined by the same miners at the same time in the past. No three miners have mined the same block before. About confirmation It depends, some organizations can accept 0 confirmation from you if you do not enable replace-by-fee, but if you use RBF, some organizations will wait till 3 to 6 confirmations. On exchanges for example, remember not your key not your coin though, like on binance, only one confirmation is accepted for deposit while two confirmations for withdrawal. I have seen many exchanges accepting 10 confirmations irrespective of enabling or not enabling RBF. But, in my opinion, 1 confirmation is enough if RBF is not enabled, while you can wait for more confirmations if RBF is enabled.But, in my opinion, 0 confirmation is enough if RBF is not enabled, while you can wait for confirmations if RBF is enabled. But, for more safety, six confirmations are recommended. But, do not let chain-org confuse you, nothing like double spending. Double spending can only occur while you enable RBF while the transaction not yet confirmed, you can then double spend the Bitcoin back into an address owned on your wallet or into another address of your choice. The Bitcoin Blockchain is not faulty, nothing like double spending because the two but the same blocks that are mined by two different miners, one block will later be invalidated as new blocks build on the other one which will have the longest chain and valid transaction. |
|
|
|
On February 05, 2021, the central bank of Nigeria prohibit any regulated institution dealing with bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, such institutions accounts were ordered to be closed.  But, Nigerians should still know that bitcoin and other crypto assets are not banned in the country, only the banking aspect of it are restricted. “As regards our recent policy pronouncement, it is important to clarify that the CBN circular of February 5, 2021 did not place any new restrictions on cryptocurrencies, given that all banks in the country had earlier been forbidden, through CBN’s circular dated January 12, 2017, not to use, hold, trade and/or transact in cryptocurrencies. So, carrying out p2p is not forbidden or any other thing related to cryptocurrencies like mining remain legal as they are beyond the power of the CBN. What do you people think about this? |
|
|
|
China hasn't banned bitcoin or the mining of bitcoin. They banned ICO's, and it's illegal for their citizens to take part in such activities.
I think you should read this quote below, Nigeria too ban cryptocurrencies in such way. Exchanges are the platforms linking banks to crypto users accounts on exchanges in order to make crypto purchase easier. Although, this is strongly discouraged on this forum but many people still are not concerned about such privacy and make use of custodial exchanges for crtpto purchase. Cryptocurrency-related activities have received little tolerance from the Chinese government. Initial coin offerings (ICO) were banned in China in September 2017. Exchange platforms that traded cryptocurrencies or provided facilitation services were also ordered to be closed following the crackdown on ICO. I remember binance head quarter was originally located in China before move to Japan because of the restriction. Binance was initially based in China, but later moved out of China due China's increasing regulation of cryptocurrency. “As regards our recent policy pronouncement, it is important to clarify that the CBN circular of February 5, 2021 did not place any new restrictions on cryptocurrencies, given that all banks in the country had earlier been forbidden, through CBN’s circular dated January 12, 2017, not to use, hold, trade and/or transact in cryptocurrencies.
“Indeed, this position was reiterated in another CBN press release dated February 27, 2018.” Cryptocurrencies are not also banned in Nigeria, only it is restricted for banks not to support any crypto institution. Mining and other can still be done, p2p also is still legal in Nigeria. |
|
|
|
<...>
China has their own local board and ban the use of crypto assets in their country. It is even always surprising that China mine 75% of total Bitcoin in 2019, while China still mined 65% of total Bitcoin in 2020. When India banned crypto assets, they also still have local board on this forum which was very helpful for them to know what to do. Bitcoin can also be banned by a country, but the people of the country still have as many as possible ways to make use of Bitcoin while we strongly still believe crypto assets will later be legalized in Nigeria. When Nigerian government ban Bitcoin, why was Bitcoin price increasing that day to the extent it reached $40000 recently. Let us hope theymos will give we Nigerians local board which will be very helpful for us. |
|
|
|
Bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2776678Current amount of posts (including this one): 1292 How much merit have you earned in the last 120 days: 295 SegWit BTC Address for Payouts: bc1qju74tksrgc6y6lyzjf3rs5k3vczuxautumrnly I will like to change my btc address to: 37uXhmrm9bgZoQJq17NaNm1dUGTZZ22951 |
|
|
|
|
If I will advice, it will be good to never use a wallet not supported by ledger company again. I am just wondering how you were able to buy such wallet, you need to be careful of people that will repackage back used wallets. There could be vulnerabilities in the wallet which could have now been fixed in the ones supported by ledger nano, such as ledger nano S and X and the ones still supported by ledger. Do not use such wallet, also using old electrum version for it is not advisable. You can get your family member a ledger nano S which is what you supposed to advice people to use, or latest one ledger nano x, not such unsupported wallet, that they should use supported ones which the latest version of electrum can run.
|
|
|
|
Thanks for this information, I did not even know it is existing. There are many of us that are not still posting in the local thread, and many are not active yet. If we are given local board, you will still see increase in Nigerain local board posts per month. I am very certain it will increase. Some consider the local thread as a way many information can not be passed across, there will be increase in our zeal to make quality topics and replies if we are given local baord. |
|
|
|
If we take a trip down memory lane, there was a time Nigeria board was requested for on this forum, but due to one reasons or the other, we were not given local board. It would be as a result of some reasons, best known to theymos, but of which the reasons will be genuine. CryptopreneurBrainboss created a local thread, Africa Bitcointalk Community Hangout., where some of us do have some discussions related to bitcoin, other cryptocurrencies and our country. Later, we noticed all of us there are Nigerians, we finally have to discuss about it, and CryptopreneurBrainboss changed it to Nigerian Bitcointalk Community Hangout.. Two languages are accepted on the thread, English and Pidgin. The thread surfaced to be for Nigerians and we are happy for that as the evolution of Nigeria local board on bitcointalk is dawning to become reality. That is why we are making a request for theymos to grant our request and give us Nigerians a local board. There are many reasons we Nigerians need local board1. Like the Brainboss exchange service, some new Nigerians may not know there is anything like that, but moving it to our local board will make it more easy to be seen and known. Not only Brainboss service, there will be some Nigerians that will like to provide service for people in Naira (the Nigeria fiat). 2. There was a day I wanted to convert litecoin to Naira, I have to call a member on this forum that did it for me, requesting such directly from our local baord would have been the best which will make such transactions transparent in case by making such offer on our local baord. 3. Our government just banned cryptocurrencies, but we know it is going to be legalized back, our local board is a place to easily find latest information that will be posted by our members about how to exchange Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies to Naira during this hard time. The way we can still make trades in Bitcoin, in other cryptocurrencies and in naira will be easily discussed on our local board. Nigerians have many active users on this forum, only what we need is for us to be given a local board, we active users are ready to develop the board. Please, we need support from other members about this to help us leave positive comments which are true about us Nigerians to convince theymos into giving us a local board. Boards requested forChild-boards- Altcoins
- Marketplace
- Off-topic
Monthly stat, starting from January 2022January 2022 : [CHARTS] Monthly Overview Of The Unofficial Nigeria Local BoardComparing the activities of December to January  Merit activities of 2021 vs 2022 (con't)  Sources: @DdmrDdmr merits dashboard & Ninjastic.space |
|
|
|
I will still prefer Bitcoin, many people do not even care about privacy, all they want is to make use of cryptocurrencies, be that as it may, privacy is very important and necessary. Truly, there are anonymous coins like monero, dash and zcash that have anonymous ledger, but I will still prefer Bitcoin with transparent ledger.  Bitcoin ledger is transparent to the public, but not connected to individuals, that is why people says Bitcoin is psuedonymous, except in some cases of mistake like the ledger data leak which was the mistake of ledger company, not how bitcoin was designed. You can still increase your privacy while using bitcoin, use of CoinJoin, mixers and coin control in few cases and many other ways we can possibly think of to maximize our privacy. You can even send bitcoin to anonymous coin like monero and send it back to Bitcoin, this will not be always but at times for maintaining privacy. Monero and others like it can bring about anonymity but Bitcoin makes it better as it is flexible enough to maintain privacy in an advance fashion. What is mostly needed is not anonymity as it can bring about money laundering and terrorsm financing, which can be reduced while dealing with bitcoin, we have seen many cases of such when illicit Bitcoin is hijacked by the government, but yet, Bitcoin brings about privacy if we'll handled. And as for kyc, it is extremely dangerous because it will bridge people's identities to their transactions. That is why people discouraged buying Bitcoin with verified (kyc) accounts. |
|
|
|
GazetaBitcoin, NotATether, bitmover, NeuroticFish, Bthd, congratulations. Welcome to ChipMixer. The campaign has been replenished with worthy posters.  Seeing NotATether among the selected members into ChipMixer Campaign is not a surprise, he is a very hard working member with good quality posts. I congratulate everyone accepted, you all truly deserve it. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
