Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 07:18:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »
741  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 28, 2015, 02:24:21 AM

Paycoin selloff continuing. It's now into the 0.007's.

Always happens at 2.00 AM European time. Let's see, that's around 8 in the evening East Coast U.S. and 5 West coast.

Must be people coming home from work and getting a shock. It needs to get to about 0.003 to be within target range of DRK.

Paycoin 4-hour MACD nicely poised for a sustained descent...



Meanwhile the 5-minute momentum is bent over backwards to accommodate the selling pressure...



UPDATE: While I've been watching these markets I've also been updating my 2 masternodes to 11.0.13.


I've been keeping abreast of this Tok. It's absolutely fascinating to see how the $20 buyback program is being discussed on Hashtalk.org. There's still an overall consensus on there that Josh Garza is going to come through with the $20 per paycoin via the honor program which starts on 1st Feb. But then there are posts like this where people are starting to push for prioritisation as to who gets paid first.

Quote
@gawceo @GAW-Staff @GAW_Darren @GAW_CENO @GAW_Amber @GAW_Brian @GAW_CE0
For the love of God, please tell me that you will be taking care of your actual customers first. The people who "mined" hashpoints for months deserve to be first in line no matter what. The people who picked up cheap coins on the exchanges and never were your customers deserve to be last. Please clarify this ASAP

I can see this turning into quite a mess if many original and early supporters feel they're not getting priority over regular traders. Trying to administer such a thing is diabolical as another poster pointed out they mined a lot of coins early but then did some trading and they shouldn't be de-prioritised for that. Josh has stated in the Q&A that all coins are valid, even if bought off an exchange. But you'll have many people from the paycoin community upset and some getting quite demanding

Quote
@GAWCEO why have you not responded to such a genuine, honest, and down to earth post?

As at time of my post here, there's been no response and that was about 24 hours ago now.

Lots of drama yet to play out I would suspect.

It makes me grateful we haven't had these sorts of outlandish and unwise financial incentive "programs" in Darkcoin as they're extremely troublesome and way more complex to execute than the initial idea would suggest.
742  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 27, 2015, 02:13:16 PM

I'm going to contact the author of this and see if I can explain the strategy of Darksend. Maybe I can get him to understand the insane amount of security that provides.

In any case the way, the CoinShuffle methodology of blinding masternodes IS compatible with DarkSend. This would effectively remove the need for "rounds", even though users could still use them if they wanted. This also doesn't generate any issues from the security advisory, but for them to effectively fix their security they must adopt denominations, which isn't going to happen. As for DarkWallet, Amir is convinced using powers of 2 denominations is safe, which are as insecure as using the unique amounts (I'll write the deanonymizer as soon as they implement it). The future for Bitcoin mixing doesn't look bright, I don't believe there is a comprehensive solution.

In coinshuffle, each output is sent to the next peer in a circle, one at a time. The new peer adds an output, shuffles and then sends the list again. We can do this and actually improve upon it.

To implement blinding, each user would connect to one completely random masternode and say "Send masternode X this output/value for mix N" and pass a single output. That output would be passed to the leading masternode. It would take access to all masternodes used to know who did what, which is as solid as M rounds mathematically (M = number of outputs). This is great because all users can submit all inputs at once. So it's super fast compared to Coinshuffle and even more secure.

Some good pro DRK comments have appeared in the comments at the bottom of this article. Good to see people jumping on the misinformation being pedalled.
743  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 01:18:30 PM
Just a reminder everyone.

Big red text "doesn't ,understand ,commas" guy hasn't been here since page 277 and a bit over 10 hours ago. Chances are he went to sleep exhausted from hurling all that negativity (it is very draining). It's possible we won't see him again but then it's highly likely he'll start up his FUD campaign again any moment now.

The key to stopping this is DON'T RESPOND. Just let his stuff go past and DON'T BITE. Even when it really gets your back up DON'T ENGAGE!

Same for the others involved in smearing Spread. Just don't engage.

But if someone's asking legitimate questions then of course we all should try to educate and answer. There was a terrible period last year in the DRK thread where a few people (and one individual in particular....anyone who's been there for a while will know who I'm talking about) were extremely harsh and rude to newcomers. It was pretty appalling and a guaranteed way to lose new investors; let's not be like that here.
744  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 04:40:15 AM
Pasthetics

I think you are being a bit harsh.  One thread is not spam.

Acknowledge that it happened and move on.  You have better things to do than to yell at the internet.

It was certainly an over-the-top response. Do we really need to be so tribal and territorial? There are some good things being worked on here. Ultimately both DRK and SPR will benefit. There's just no need for such hostility. DRK is open source; by it's very nature it's saying "come, use my code, improve me where and if you can". We (DRK & SPR people) should be celebrating that there's this amazing ability for new ideas to be born and cross pollination to occur between both projects.
745  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 02:54:54 AM
If anyone is actually scared off by the weak FUD these guys have, I assure you we didn't want their investment anyway as the first bug or minor correction would shake them out and we'd have to buy their coin at a higher level than today.

Just ignore the trolls.  Truly, if the technology Mr. Spread creates is worthy of an increased marketcap, all the FUD in the world won't change that.  A professional community that actually ignores the trolls would actually say MUCH MORE about the coin than a community constantly arguing with them.

Just hit the ignore button please.

+1

It's the constant responding and quoting that then spreads the FUD far and wide throughout the thread that's doing more damage than just ignoring. If you simply don't respond, it takes only a day or so for them to give up. They just can't stand no one taking any notice or interest.

Red text ",can't ,use ,commas" idiot will just die off within a day or two when he's getting no attention. He's like the buffoon in a classroom that interferes with and continually interrupts the kids that are trying to learn and get somewhere. The more he's ignored the louder he'll get until suddenly it will be "whatever happened to that red text douche bag?" as we realise he's gone.
746  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 01:07:28 AM
Guys,

I'm a long term DRK investor and supporter, I have a single masternode and have been in DRK since it was around it's ATH. I've traded reasonably over that time to build up my holdings (an achievement in and of itself considering I bought in at around 0.02!) but it's not much more than the single masternode. That's okay though, and I'm grateful I've been able to do as much as I do, I've really enjoyed being involved and I love interacting with some very good people.

Now, I've taken a position here in SPR too (unfortunately before all this madness happened over the past few days so I most likely could have had four times as much Spread....that's crypto for you) and am looking forward to setting up a Spread masternode on my existing VPS. I think Mr Spread's take on how things could be done better is very interesting and I'm looking forward to seeing Spread make a positive impact.

And there are clearly many good people here too with lots of commitment, good ideas and positive sentiment. But unfortunately this thread is turning into a farce. I've just spent an hour or so catching up on the past 15 pages and it's been pretty mind numbing to say the least. We've had never ending posts by Hippie and that other idiot that constantly types in big red letters and can't put a space after a comma,to save himself. And now showjackoff has raised his ugly head in here. Good grief! Can we just move on and stop interacting so much with these people? The amount of tit-for-tat back and forth posting is terrible. I'd say 95% of the past 15 pages of posts have just been a constant FUD, then FUD rebuttal, then FUD rebuttal come-back, then FUD rebuttal come-back plus ask for details of proof, explanation, etc. It's appalling that so many are taking the bait and adding to the cacophony and continuation of shit-head noise.

I'm interested in what Spread's going to do to get adopted and how it will make inroads into areas that crypto may not currently touching i.e. what is Spread for and why is it important?

Can we talk about these concepts and just leave these idiots alone? I've responded once to Hippie and then bumped that response but I doubt it's had any effect. That's about as much as I'm willing to do because he's clearly committed to putting shit on everyone. We just shouldn't interact any further. The same with red,"can't,use,commas",text fool. And don't get started with ebolajackoff, it's just not worth it; he's had a history of extreme FUD and aggression in the DRK thread over many months and he's an untrustworthy individual.

RenegadeMan - the easiest thing to do is just ignore the individuals that you want to.  All of their posts disappear but their placeholders are there if they ever say anything of use.

Yes. Thanks pokeytex, I'm well aware of the ignore button but if everyone else is still responding and interacting, one is exposed to it all still through people quoting. It's often very hard to not respond to people whose only intent is harm; one wants to defend and often lash back at the lies and ridicule, but it's exactly the same as all forms of bullying; the perpetrators get-off on being interacted with and seeing people get annoyed/upset. What I'm putting forward is the need for us all to maintain some level of dignity and not get caught up in the abuse and obnoxious behaviour these individuals are so committed to. Once they're getting ignored by everyone, they'll go off to find somewhere else they can peddle their nastiness (it's the nature of the mindset they've chosen to adopt....it feeds off people being "hooked" and responding). Lets just not interact with them beyond perhaps an initial rebuttal to clarify facts. It's the never ending back and forth come-backs that are just filling the thread up with rubbish which will just turn-off many many people.
747  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 27, 2015, 12:01:36 AM
Guys,

I'm a long term DRK investor and supporter, I have a single masternode and have been in DRK since it was around it's ATH. I've traded reasonably over that time to build up my holdings (an achievement in and of itself considering I bought in at around 0.02!) but it's not much more than the single masternode. That's okay though, and I'm grateful I've been able to do as much as I do, I've really enjoyed being involved and I love interacting with some very good people.

Now, I've taken a position here in SPR too (unfortunately before all this madness happened over the past few days so I most likely could have had four times as much Spread....that's crypto for you) and am looking forward to setting up a Spread masternode on my existing VPS. I think Mr Spread's take on how things could be done better is very interesting and I'm looking forward to seeing Spread make a positive impact.

And there are clearly many good people here too with lots of commitment, good ideas and positive sentiment. But unfortunately this thread is turning into a farce. I've just spent an hour or so catching up on the past 15 pages and it's been pretty mind numbing to say the least. We've had never ending posts by Hippie and that other idiot that constantly types in big red letters and can't put a space after a comma,to save himself. And now showjackoff has raised his ugly head in here. Good grief! Can we just move on and stop interacting so much with these people? The amount of tit-for-tat back and forth posting is terrible. I'd say 95% of the past 15 pages of posts have just been a constant FUD, then FUD rebuttal, then FUD rebuttal come-back, then FUD rebuttal come-back plus ask for details of proof, explanation, etc. It's appalling that so many are taking the bait and adding to the cacophony and continuation of shit-head noise.

I'm interested in what Spread's going to do to get adopted and how it will make inroads into areas that crypto may not currently touching i.e. what is Spread for and why is it important?

Can we talk about these concepts and just leave these idiots alone? I've responded once to Hippie and then bumped that response but I doubt it's had any effect. That's about as much as I'm willing to do because he's clearly committed to putting shit on everyone. We just shouldn't interact any further. The same with red,"can't,use,commas",text fool. And don't get started with ebolajackoff, it's just not worth it; he's had a history of extreme FUD and aggression in the DRK thread over many months and he's an untrustworthy individual.
748  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 26, 2015, 03:16:49 PM
BUMP for Hippie (clearly misses the really important postings)

I'm sure we've all had the experience of standing at a set of traffic lights waiting to cross the road when some idiot in a hotted up hoon-mobile does a massive burn out, making all this noise and commotion as they tear off from the traffic lights with fumes and burning rubber left behind for us all to breath and be immersed in. In that person's mind they're thinking: "Man, I really showed those people standing there and in the other cars what a hot and super happening dude I am who has the wheels to match; yeah baby, I rock!" But in reality everyone's thinking: "What a fuckwit! Man-oh-man, what sort of bizarre growing-up dysfunction was that guy exposed to that he thinks what he's just done is even on the 'cool' scale at all, let alone a fair way up it! What a complete jerk!"

As so it goes for Hippie Tech. This is how these people function. They're in this bizarre parallel world where they actually think that the stuff they do is "pretty damned good" and that people will think "yeah he really showed em!" But in reality, everyone just thinks they're a total prick.

And that pretty much sums you up Hippie. You're a dick mate. You come in here and throw all this shit around and actually believe you're doing something half decent. But, you're not. You're just making a total fool of yourself by picking out selective texts and attempting to discredit through imbalanced postings that are neither accurate nor reasonable. Your obvious agenda is to malign and rubbish Spread. But in doing so you're a most pathetic waste-of-space because it's so childish and so lame.

Give it away. Go back to things that are of worth and of use to you, because Spread clearly isn't. Go and do stuff that helps, not hinders. Reach deep within to find empathy (we all have it) and use that empathy to direct your actions and your objectives. You'll feel all the better to wake up each day knowing you're off to do useful stuff that will bring respect rather than just trying to bring other people down.

Go away and leave the people here alone. If you think it's all folly, fair enough, you've said your piece, now leave (and don't come back unless you're prepared to add value, not just put shit on everything and everyone).
749  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 03:12:25 PM

Oh....yes....

I thought your "Bye bye Demis Roussos" was a metaphorical statement about the Greek election.

He's actually passed. RIP Demis (I was never a big fan but he had quite a following down here in Australia)

http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-30984851
750  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 02:50:43 PM

Bye bye Demis Roussos.


and Nana Mouskouri
751  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 02:42:42 PM
only 250 of it left

edit: and it's gone

So it wasn't fake ?



Not if this volume's anything to go by.

752  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 02:33:10 PM

BTC Markets going berserk.

They don't know whether the news is good, bad a disappointment or what.

LoL !!! 1114 BTC sellwal on BTCe (Fake of course). So much for the moon.


only 250 of it left

edit: and it's gone

edit2: watching the bid/offer listings update when it's like this is like watching the arrivals/departures monitors at a busy airport when thunderstorms start rolling in
753  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][SPR] SpreadCoin | True Decentralization (No Pools) on: January 26, 2015, 02:17:27 PM
Bad news  Sad
I was too careless and lost all my mined spreadcoins. I contacted several data recovery companies and most probably it will be impossible to recover my wallet. Without these spreadcoins I will have no incentive to futher develop and support SpreadCoin.

Sorry for wasting your time with this cryptocurrency Sad

I think I found a way to recover my spreadcoins but you may not like it.

As I lost my wallet.dat I don't know exactly what blocks I mined and exactly how many coins I had.
I can approximately determine block before which my lost coins are situated. Everyone who have mined coins before this block will send them to him/herself (this can be made automatic). This will mean that this coins are not mine. Then, using some hack and releasing a new client I can send myself amount of the rest coins (or maybe less, say 80%).

This rasises two concerns:
1. What if someone will forgot to send coins to him/herself? These coins will still be spendable so he/she will not lost them. This raises the second concern:
2. What if I am a scammer and want just to double my coins, keeping old ones and getting new ones? The only way to prevent this that I see is to limit the percentage of presumably lost coins that can be spend but this is not trivial.

What do you think about such a plan? Is it acceptable in you opinion?

P.S. This way there is no need for anyone to donate coins to me.

And you guys fell for this ?! Shocked


No we didn't, that's exactly why it was not done. The donation proposal was mine, and this was a response to it. Please do not "cherry pick" posts from the forum in order to prove a point that no one cares about.

Just to remind you, if he had said: "I have instamined too few coins, and want more to keep developing the coin because i am a greedy bbastard", we would have donated in the same way, because we wanted to reward him for developing the coin. You don't seem to get that. The community of early adopters WANTED to give him a reward for having created the coin, and we did so. So please, your point was made, you don't trust Mr. Spread, and that's fine. You don't like this coin and that's fine too. We got it. If you have NEW concerns, please post them, but stop repeating yourself.

I'm not dismissing you as a troll because about one in ten out of your posts brings real concerns and constructive criticisms, but those are the ones where you actually write what you think, not the ones where you place lots of quotes, and Complex question fallacies full of passive aggressiveness. So if you keep posting the good ones, the real criticism without malice or implied accusations, you are really welcome as a member of this community. But please, it's getting tiresome to keep separating the wheat from the chaff and if you keep acting that way you'll fatally be ignored in the end.

That's a horrible signal-to-noise ratio. Hit my "ignore the troll" threshold a long time ago.


I'm sure we've all had the experience of standing at a set of traffic lights waiting to cross the road when some idiot in a hotted up hoon-mobile does a massive burn out, making all this noise and commotion as they tear off from the traffic lights with fumes and burning rubber left behind for us all to breath and be immersed in. In that person's mind they're thinking: "Man, I really showed those people standing there and in the other cars what a hot and super happening dude I am who has the wheels to match; yeah baby, I rock!" But in reality everyone's thinking: "What a fuckwit! Man-oh-man, what sort of bizarre growing-up dysfunction was that guy exposed to that he thinks what he's just done is even on the 'cool' scale at all, let alone a fair way up it! What a complete jerk!"

As so it goes for Hippie Tech. This is how these people function. They're in this bizarre parallel world where they actually think that the stuff they do is "pretty damned good" and that people will think "yeah he really showed em!" But in reality, everyone just thinks they're a total prick.

And that pretty much sums you up Hippie. You're a dick mate. You come in here and throw all this shit around and actually believe you're doing something half decent. But, you're not. You're just making a total fool of yourself by picking out selective texts and attempting to discredit through imbalanced postings that are neither accurate nor reasonable. Your obvious agenda is to malign and rubbish Spread. But in doing so you're a most pathetic waste-of-space because it's so childish and so lame.

Give it away. Go back to things that are of worth and of use to you, because Spread clearly isn't. Go and do stuff that helps, not hinders. Reach deep within to find empathy (we all have it) and use that empathy to direct your actions and your objectives. You'll feel all the better to wake up each day knowing you're off to do useful stuff that will bring respect rather than just trying to bring other people down.

Go away and leave the people here alone. If you think it's all folly, fair enough, you've said your piece, now leave (and don't come back unless you're prepared to add value, not just put shit on everything and everyone).
754  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 12:05:38 PM
Tok,

What do you suppose has happened to Ripple (XRP)? It's down about 35% in just 4 days with about half of that drop occurring in the past 24 hours.

I bet there's a lot of very unimpressed people at the moment (but, as we know, it's not a crypto in the true sense of what that means).

Maybe it was counting on the incumbent guv in Greece being returned to power? (just kidding....probably as good as any other explanation).

Edit: am forgetting that Ripple is most likely bought and sold by majority in USD so with bitcoin's recent rise perhaps Ripple is sitting roughly at the same level? Either way, it's in the "crypto" realm so will probably be engendering nervousness with holders given its severe drop against BTC.


755  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 10:45:57 AM

Bitcoin was supposed to go to $280 then back to $99 before it's moonshot.

It's not behaving itself.

Possibly the combined effect of......

[1] - Greece being the new Cyprus

[2] - Coinbase opening a U.S. exchange

[3] - Overbought condition

....being too much for bears to keep the lid on the valuation.





or

[4] Many thousands of people (as AzzAz has suggested) suddenly buying BTC to pay ransoms to Cryptowall ransom virus infestations!

I truly hope not.
756  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 08:57:31 AM
BTC price at BTC-e currently $297
BTC price at BitStamp currently $307

Looks like we're back to the regular $10 difference in price between BTC-e and BitStamp that existed for many months prior to the price collapsing (not sure that it means anything though; just interesting).
757  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 08:54:51 AM
Hey Tok... Thanks for the links.  Watched every video.  Totally agree with the currancy/money difference.  Cheers.

:/

Economics fool chiming in...

What???

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money



So often people post on here with little thought for how their words are being conveyed and one has no idea what they're getting at. If I had a dollar for every time I've read an ambiguous post, well I'd have a lot of dollars.

Quote
Economics fool chiming in...

Are you saying that bigrcanada is an "Economics fool"?

or

Are you saying that the presenter Mike Maloney in the video Tok posted is an "Economics fool"?

or

Are you saying that you are the person "chiming in" and you're labelling yourself an "Economics fool"?


The links you've provided are typically typical in their common outbound messaging of what currency is and what money is. Sentences like this

Quote
"A much more general use of the word currency is anything that is used in any circumstances, as a medium of exchange. In this use, "currency" is a synonym for the concept of money"

do little to get at the heart of what Mike Malone is expressing about the wholesale fraud that has been perpetrated on the citizens of most jurisdictions where the government issued currency is nothing much more than government issued debt without any intrinsic value.

I think the messaging in those videos is of profound importance for all peoples of the world and something everyone should be considering and taking to heart. As normal though, only a small portion of humanity will bother to work out what the true difference between currency and money is, and there'll be much pain and sorrow and "why didn't someone tell us?!" cries of injustice (usual 'human history repeating') when it all unravels.

So for everyone I think it requires a "Note to self": take steps to get ready for the inevitable collapse of fiat currencies and ensure your wealth is stored in something that's real 'money'.

Hey man, post some of those vids you are talking about.

*was calling myself an economics weirdo.

Okay (glad you deleted that first response you made because I was even more confused as to what "you're getting at". Ha!)

There's about six of them all up. This is the first one and you can easily get to the next five via Youtube provided links once you watch this first one:

http://youtu.be/m7TkzvLnE0s?list=PL8J5Vm3TZONiz26nxGQRvB9Lh_8arK4AH
758  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 08:37:38 AM
Hey Tok... Thanks for the links.  Watched every video.  Totally agree with the currancy/money difference.  Cheers.

:/

Economics fool chiming in...

What???

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Currency

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money



So often people post on here with little thought for how their words are being conveyed and one has no idea what they're getting at. If I had a dollar for every time I've read an ambiguous post, well I'd have a lot of dollars.

Quote
Economics fool chiming in...

Are you saying that bigrcanada is an "Economics fool"?

or

Are you saying that the presenter Mike Maloney in the video Tok posted is an "Economics fool"?

or

Are you saying that you are the person "chiming in" and you're labelling yourself an "Economics fool"?


The links you've provided are typically typical in their common outbound messaging of what currency is and what money is. Sentences like this

Quote
"A much more general use of the word currency is anything that is used in any circumstances, as a medium of exchange. In this use, "currency" is a synonym for the concept of money"

do little to get at the heart of what Mike Malone is expressing about the wholesale fraud that has been perpetrated on the citizens of most jurisdictions where the government issued currency is nothing much more than government issued debt without any intrinsic value.

I think the messaging in those videos is of profound importance for all peoples of the world and something everyone should be considering and taking to heart. As normal though, only a small portion of humanity will bother to work out what the true difference between currency and money is, and there'll be much pain and sorrow and "why didn't someone tell us?!" cries of injustice (usual 'human history repeating') when it all unravels.

So for everyone I think it requires a "Note to self": take steps to get ready for the inevitable collapse of fiat currencies and ensure your wealth is stored in something that's real 'money'.
759  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 26, 2015, 01:32:33 AM

W.T.F. is going on with Bitcoin ?

BTCe looks like a smash and grab. People are panic buying like crazy. 140 BTC sellwals instantly vapourised. It's already well on the way to $270.

Just watched a 240 BTC sellwall there get munched in 2 minutes.





Similar over at BitStamp. Price has risen $15 just in the last 15 minutes.
760  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW and Darksend | InstantX on: January 25, 2015, 09:49:55 PM
you mean 99 or 299?

I mean 99.

What's the reason for another crash?  I don't get it?

Speculation.

Right now, most of Bitcoin's value has been speculative. In other words it hasn't been needed as a currency and its speculative value as such is available to chart traders to make money on. They can take the value anywhere as long as the monetary value (the amount of Bitcoin that's needed to fill the pipes of retail merchants, international money transfers and all needs other than those of speculative 'gamblers') remains below the market value.

If the Bitcoin price were to go to $99, the marketcap would still be around $1.3 Billion. Probably more than enough to cover the turnover of the current bitcoin economy when you exclude speculative trading.

Remember, Overstock only took around $3 million in bitcoin sales last year. Lets be generous and multiply that by 100 to pretend that Overstock's Bitcoin turnover is only 1% of the industry total. That gives you a marketcap of $300 million which, when you factor in the coin supply, comes out at a bitcoin price of $23 dollars.

So 23$ is the bottom below which it's undervalued. Therefore even at $99, speculative trading would still have a margin over the 'real' monetary value of bitcoin. They are not likely to go below that though because the future prospective monetary value is so high that the speculative premium would be huge at that price level and such a low valuation would be unlikely to last long.

This is why I keep saying that adoption is everything. By garnering adoption you raise the floor below which speculative traders cannot go. Darkcoin has huge mileage to be gained in this domain and, to me it's going about it the right way. By taking the "warts an' all" approach where the problems all come to the surface early, thereby keeping the speculative premium low. The developer team can try things out and on a community that's reasonably accommodating and keep the balance between consolidation and development at an optimum without causing huge disruption in the markets. (The tiny wee DRK market that we have right now).

There is one thing that any market values over everything else when it comes to technology: reliability. It's like air safety. Something that's never spoken about by airlines but that underpins the value of everything they do.

If a cryptocurrency project is taking on a challenge as difficult as total anonymity (in addition to the 'double spend' problem which has only just been solved after decades of research) it would do well to concentrate on nothing else.

A product that does very little but very well is a dead cert for adoption. People don't care about bells and whistle's, they care about doing the big things right, and right every time. Mundane repetitiveness sells which is why I made my post yesterday about Darkcoin starting to leave the competition behind.

InstantX would be nice but we must not be distracted. Cryptocurrency is a monetary base - not a payments system. Anonymity and speed of confirmation are way different objectives and one should not be compromised for the sake of another.

The reason that I am not bothered about InstantX and that I think Darkcoin should not be wasting its time on it is that point of sale systems (POS) will never be be doing direct transactions with the blockchain. That will be taken care of by payment processors. The blockchain is a clearing system that is at least 1 tier away from point of sale. It doesn't matter if blockchain confirmation time gets down to 5 seconds, it still will never be able to compete with a buffered point of sale system that can instantly reverse the packet of cornflakes that the cashier accidently rung through from the person behind you in the queue.

For that reason, for me, Bitcoin's blockchain clearing time of 30 minutes to 1 hour is going to be much more attractive to the retail industry that a confirmation time of 20 seconds. 30 minutes at least sounds like it has reliability behind it whereas 20 seconds will sound flaky as f*ck.

Banks have a clearing time of 1-2 days so there isn't exactly a lot of urgency.

Stick with the anonymity priority for this coin because that's what it does well and a reduced blockchain confirmation time will only make it look like a toy.


Tok, you're one of my favourite posters on this forum (you can hear a 'but' coming can't you! No, there's no 'but', just appreciation).

You bring a wealth of understanding and knowledge to us all.

I completely understand what you're saying about POS. One of the challenges in a community like this is that everyone sees enormous potential for the technology and with great fervour and excitement, they start imagining the impact it will have and how things will be revolutionised in the same way the Internet has revolutionised almost every aspect of business, media and communications. And much of this imagining is in realms and arenas that most of us have little experience with; POS, being most likely an example of that (perhaps bigrcanada and his wine bar excluded; but to really understand retailers' requirements for POS you have to have implemented such systems in large national retail chains where all the back-end processes have to be seamlessly integrated).

Having worked in corporate and government large scale IT for a long time, I can so easily concur that retailers will have about as much interest in deploying a POS system that's linked directly to a block chain for a crypto currency such as DRK as they have in accepting gold at the checkout. They're just not interested in being involved in all the mechanics of the transactions down at a technical protocol level. That's why payment processors exist; to facilitate all the techo knowledge, security, integration, back-end accounting, consumer legal protection/adherence to laws, support, loyalty systems interfacing and most of all performance SLAs. Everyone talking about 20 second confirmations and the checkout operator being able to void the cornflakes packet purchase and re-charge it to the next customer in line, etc, is just silliness. There's no way, crypto (as it currently stands or even as it may be 10 years from now) is going to be acceptable directly connected to POS terminals. There HAS TO be a layer in between the base monetary system (as you've described it Tok) and the retailer. Performance at a checkout is everything for large scale mainstream retailers. Even if DRK with the masternode network got down to 10 second confirm times, that's still too long at a Walmart checkout by comparison to the Visa/Mastercard networks which have SLAs guaranteeing sub 5 second times. An open source network like that which DRK is built on won't be competitive with the likes of these payment processors, for the moment.

And "for the moment" is a key point. Unlike you, I wouldn't say "(POS) will never be be doing direct transactions with the blockchain" because people have made these sorts of statements before only to then be proved completely wrong some time down the track. Things could develop dramatically over time and block chain technology could become THE network technology that everything works on. The mere fact IBM has invested so much into their IoT ("Internet of things") block chain architecture is indicative of how ubiquitous this stuff is likely to become. But your points about clarifying that DRK is a base monetary system, not a POS tool is a very important differentiation that I think many of us are not clear on. There will be many online businesses that will transact directly with the block chain, but they'll be specialist niche affairs (like DirectBet). Mainstream business is not likely to use DRK for a start because of it's association with illegality (and that would segway into the name issue....but I'm not going there in this posting), but they will use it if a payment processor picks it up and builds products/services around it (that's why that Coinbase $75mil of capital raising story is of such importance; this is where mainstream will meet crypto).

As for InstantX I'm of the opinion that this can only be good for DRK. It will give us an incredible edge and open up much instant trade that will arise where it's currently tethered by BTC's long confirmation times. The key to success will be whether the technology can be robust enough to with stand network forks (like we've just had) and not result in a big mess. It will take years before DRK has a reputation of certainty and reputability, and even then, it will still be payment processors that use it and provide the front end initially.

Keeping posting Tok. I and many others really appreciate your input.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 [38] 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!