PoolBerry.org is giving out a 10% mining bonus! Come help us search for our first block!  No windows executable, no big powers I've merged LucasJones code into bbr repo, and uploaded pre-build windows bin: http://boolberry.com/downloads.html Hope it helps. |
|
|
|
we must improve Gravity Well
when the hashrate slow down,and the diff down,someone prize the hashrate and diff quickly
when the diff going so high,they leave us,I think there is a bug in it
Well, i see as a main problem now is that we don't have pools. Since we have a different PoW it's not so easy to be add BBR to existing pools. I'm working now on simple built-in pool, to allow everyone to run his own daemon-based pool withot any development, just plug-and-pool. But if this won't help - i'll hardfork BBR with new difficulty adjustment. |
|
|
|
No block in 3 hour ?
Cloud people left when difficulty went to 214G Whoever this is: STOP THAT! I bet you it's a GPU miner. Why? There are people who can launch thousands of instances on Amazon for a hour.... And how much do they pay each time they do that? You only have to buy graphics cards once. To all who is wondering where did the evil came from: if it is a super-GPU or it amazon: take a look to BBR graphs: http://boolberry.com/state.html You could see there just a lot of new connections, and a lot of peers appeared in greylist. And this is only peers seen by one machine(monitoring node). So it seems that it was just huge amazon evil. >And how much do they pay each time they do that? Unfortunately not everyone have to pay for servers  |
|
|
|
Do you think it is possible to make a GPU miner? From what I understand, Boolberry is based on CryptoNote but does not require 2MB of internal cache, right? Is this the reason why it could work on a GPU?
Boolb needs more than 2Mb actually. Current scratchpad size is already 4MB. |
|
|
|
Sent 50 BBR, hope BBR pool is up very soon. Thanks!
Thank you! |
|
|
|
As i could see he is doing some things in core... hm, i thought pools use daemon "as is". Could you connect me with Lucas? |
|
|
|
|
Yeah!! Block is found! Good job!
|
|
|
|
@OP: I think you have done a great job sofar but could you imagine to delegate some coding work to other devs willing to help? The project would certainly grow alot the moment new devs start working on it.
Yes, you right, and Boolberry is definitely welcome for new developers who interested in work in this coin. |
|
|
|
Hi friends. I answer to everyone about GUI: yes, i'm working on it, now it's most priority task. For developers who want to track progress or interested in details, here is a branch i work in: https://github.com/cryptozoidberg/boolberry/tree/GUII use Qt+webkit for this. I spent some time to make it work together with daemon sources. Current GUI branch state is not production-like code, im just making proof of concept, so there some scary thinjs like hard-coded path's to libs. PS: We had another HR peak and now blocks is extremply rare, this is sad. I've asked some of miners to correct this, hope situation will be solved and difficulty will back to reality. We really need to create open-source pool for BBR, so i'll ask mike to orginze this and i'll offer 500 BBRs for that (half of current donations fund). Hope some of other stakeholders will add prize. Good "luck"! |
|
|
|
Anyone else getting this error while trying to transfer?
Error: transaction <1edab0d63b5c19af30aa0a36b850ff3535fd883f3332b0627837c140aa44da60> was rejected by daemon with status "Failed"
I tried rebuilding and still getting the same error. This is the error message in the daemon.
2014-Jun-02 03:30:17.816807 [RPC0]Transaction verification failed: <dac3116a58bb59548bf0e155f3c174edfdd485ca584c52c7fb1b162d0be429a1>
2014-Jun-02 03:30:17.816968 [RPC0][on_send_raw_tx]: Failed to process tx
2014-Jun-02 03:31:04.975187 [RPC1]transaction is too big for current transaction flow, tx_id: <67afa7a671e0e4436fc508ebe0a29971f8b47d576341cce9602e327093458d4a>
What software version ? How much coins you have tried to send? You can PM me if you want. |
|
|
|
Ok its up and running... I've tested all i can without any BBR ... someone be the first! Thanks, Richie Thank you! |
|
|
|
Richie, any idea when BBR will be listed? It looks like crypto_zoidberg has modified the code to include a payment id. Still trying to integrate but having problems... if anyone the dev team is around, we'd love to talk to you  Thanks Richie I'm here, researching problem. |
|
|
|
On the bright side, we just made hundreds of future clonecoins' jobs easier.  |
|
|
|
UPDATE I spoke with Zone117x, who developed the pool I operate at http://www.extremepool.org, and he informed me his developer friend is looking at the backend to see what can be done to make it work with boolberry! This is great news, we are getting closer to a working solution. The bounty is currently up to 480 Boolberry, keep the donations coming, the more we get the sooner we will have a working solution! Let me know if he need some help with understanding protocol or extending API, or whatever. He have to take a look into simpleminer. Unlike other cryptonote coins, our simpleminer could connect to daemon and work with it, just as an example of thin miner. I also started topic to support pool developers here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=628180Good luck with development. |
|
|
|
Anyone know why the latest windows binaries have a file in them called simplewallet.exp? Is this just a typo?
Fixed. |
|
|
|
I think Boolberry is a good compromise most can live with. I for one even like it pretty good, its unique, friendly and the berry part makes for some fun puns in upcoming applications. Happy this is resolved (although none of my great suggestions got elected  ) Thanks for the kind words! |
|
|
|
|
Boolberry is not the best name, i see.
But i've decided to stay with that.
i'm so sick of this naming talks - it's not possible to please everybody.
I like this name and i'll make a value for this name with my work and my ideas.
Thanks to all people who suggested names, i'm very sorry that i didn't like it, please try to understand me.
The prize will be devided between all who suggested in this thread, with thanks and respect. Sorry again that i didn't take name here.
Now naming issue is closed.
I'm gladly go back to work, hope we will appear on exchanges soon.
PS: those who was complained that solo mining is impossible - you can try your luck now since hashrate is pretty low now. this is your second chance.
PPS: those who don't like the name - that's ok, i can understand you and respect your choice if you go to Monero(or whatever). Mine in peace!
|
|
|
|
|
Boolberry is not the best name, i see.
But i've decided to stay with that.
i'm so sick of this naming talks - it's not possible to please everybody.
I like this name and i'll make a value for this name with my work and my ideas.
Thanks to all people who suggested names, i'm very sorry that i didn't like it, please try to understand me.
The prize will be devided between all who suggested in this thread, with thanks and respect. Sorry again that i didn't take name here.
Now naming issue is closed.
I'm gladly go back to work, hope we will appear on exchanges soon.
PS: those who was complained that solo mining is impossible - you can try your luck now since hashrate is pretty low now. this is your second chance.
PPS: those who don't like the name - that's ok, i can understand you and respect your choice if you go to Monero(or whatever). Mine in peace!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
