Are bitcoin gambling sites illegal in USA?
(sub-question: Does it make a difference where they're hosted, ie. if they're hosted outside USA?)
Lastly, If an online game involving money and payouts requires skill more than luck, is it considered gambling? And is it illegal?
To USA everything that doesnt involve giving the a part of the cake is illegal, or if its not, they will make it illegal. So much about your "freedom" Correct. According to the Boston University Law Review, U.S. regulations pertaining to online gambling are about how much money the government can make or lose and blocking competition. You, the consumer, are oppressed, as you have to pay higher prices (higher vigs and rake) and have less choices, when you have to buy from monopolies and oligopolies. You can get full explanation at http://stockbet.com/#/support/gamblingThis is not necessarily true. If a casio can reach an economy of scale then they can charge less from consumers in the form of lower house take. I'm not sure I understand your point. That's like saying that if Ford can reach an economy of scale, then the car prices will be low for the consumer and the variety and choices of cars will be enough. Therefore, there is no need for more competitive car makers, such as Hyundai, to lower price even more for the consumer, and no need for BMW to provide different types of cars. Is this what you're saying? |
|
|
|
Are bitcoin gambling sites illegal in USA?
(sub-question: Does it make a difference where they're hosted, ie. if they're hosted outside USA?)
Lastly, If an online game involving money and payouts requires skill more than luck, is it considered gambling? And is it illegal?
To USA everything that doesnt involve giving the a part of the cake is illegal, or if its not, they will make it illegal. So much about your "freedom" Correct. According to the Boston University Law Review, U.S. regulations pertaining to online gambling are about how much money the government can make or lose and blocking competition. You, the consumer, are oppressed, as you have to pay higher prices (higher vigs and rake) and have less choices, when you have to buy from monopolies and oligopolies. You can get full explanation at http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling |
|
|
|
Most of the laws relating gambling and sports betting relate to dollars being transferred across state lines. The fact that we haven't seen a bitcoin gambling site shut down it pretty good news. I've seen other more traditional gambling sites shut down. Their website was removed and replaced with a giant Department of Homeland Security seal. I don't think it's very difficult for the appropriate US agency to take down a website if it really wants to. Most hosting companies are going to comply readily with any requests by the US government.
Well, there was Bitbook.biz which was like the top sports betting site and disappeared pretty quickly. They let people take their BTC out but it was really hush hush about why it closed. And I think it might have been located in US, which would explain why they closed. This is speculation but there's never been a reason given for bitbook closure. Technically you could have it hosted somewhere else and use a vpn to access it. The risks would be quite high if you are caught. There might have been a few RARE occasions, but governments don't generally try to stop players. They care mainly about the money and hence they are trying to block competition. It's easier to stop this competition by blocking the operatings then trying to find the millions of players. |
|
|
|
According to Boston University, the laws or regulations pertaining to online gambling are related to how much money the government can make or lose, not related to morals or the pretext of protecting consumers. See: http://stockbet.com/#/support/gamblingUncle Same just wants his cut. So basically if you pay taxes on your winnings then you are okay. But lets be honest, who's paying taxes on bitcoin gambling... It's now more than just Uncle Sam. Sheldon Adelson of Las Vegas Sands is trying to beat back online competition. He has hired a team of lobbyists to bash online gambling, by spreading spin and lies. There was momentum towards state-level legalization. Now, Adelson is reversing that trend, so that he can limit the gambling choices that the consumers have, to just land-based like his. You can read more at http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling |
|
|
|
The only argument you need when someone talks bad about gambling is that everyone has a choice of their own. It's not a big deal.
Unless you're a gambling operator and they banned your business in 2006 (UIGEA) and are trying to ban it again by giving bogus reasons instead of the truth, which is to block competition. |
|
|
|
Seems like the Boston University Law Review is full of shit. I don't know why the American tax payers are funding organizations like this, which dish out nothing other than bull-crap all the time.
Neither do we. Most of us don't even pay enough attention to know we are funding so much garbage. The poorly kept secret about this kind of stuff is that researchers learn really early on that if they tell the government what it wants to hear they get more funding. If they tell the truth and it doesn't fit into the government narrative their research grants dry up. Boston University is a private school. Do you know how much funding they are getting? Throughout their paper, they are harshly criticizing the government in regards to online gambling. I didn't see anywhere where they were writing things that the government wants to hear. Quite the opposite. Did you read the paper? Please provide excerpts that support your claim. Are you saying that "investing is identical to gambling" is what the government wants to hear? |
|
|
|
Seems like the Boston University Law Review is full of shit. I don't know why the American tax payers are funding organizations like this, which dish out nothing other than bull-crap all the time.
Can you elaborate on why they are full of shit? How are each of their arguments flawed? Even a schoolkid would tell you that all this is crap: 1. Gambling and investing are identical 2. Most People Gamble all the time 3. Extremely important activities are gambling activities What next? People will argue that smoking weed is identical to doing research on cancer drugs. Please present your argument on why those are crap. Did you read the Boston University Law Review's paper? Did you read the three dictionaries' definition and examples of gambling? Did you read http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling ? Here is an excerpt from http://stockbet.com/#/support/gamblingAccording to the documentary Lucky:
"More than half of all American adults play the lottery, making it, by far, the most popular form of paid entertainment in the country" Just that one fact means that the majority of people gamble. Here is another excerpt: - Dictionary.com's definition for gambling includes:
- "to take a chance on; venture; risk: I'm gambling that our new store will be a success."
- "any matter or thing involving risk..."
- Merriam-Webster's definition includes:
- "to risk losing (something valuable or important) in order to do or achieve something"
- "to stake something on a contingency"
- "take a chance"
- "something that could produce a desired result or a bad or unpleasant result"
- "an act having an element of risk"
- Examples include:
- "The mayor is gambling with the city's future."
- "people who lost money gambling in the stock market"
- The mayor is gambling that the new policies will help rather than hurt the city."
- Starting her own business was a gamble, but it paid off."
- "She thought about starting her own business, but she decided it was too much of a gamble."
- Oxford Dictionary's definition is:
- "Take risky action in the hope of a desired result:"
- Examples include:
- 'he was gambling on the success of his satellite TV channel'
- '...it is always tempting as an investor to gamble on risky firms...'
- 'Investors began gambling on future returns...'
- 'Financial speculators, who are gambling on more chaos in the Middle East, are also pushing up prices.'
- 'He's extremely talented and has good drive and business sense, but this is a gamble and could leave me in a bit of financial trouble if it fails.'
- 'we decided to take a gamble and offer him a place on our staff'
- 'If reliability is unknown or unknowable, then they just charge a high premium and take a gamble, hoping to spread a loss to other less-risky areas.'
- 'Some guests want to know at the time of booking precisely what cabin they will have and others are willing to take a gamble in exchange for an upgrade.'
- 'The money stream was very fresh, and they were willing to take a gamble on buying a house and spending as much or more on a remodel.'
Hence, you and almost everybody you know, gamble all the time. A more stringent definition of gambling stipulates that the activity should involve the following: - Stake
- Chance (Most activities involve chance even if there is skill)
- Profit or Loss
Even with this, most activities are in fact, gambling activities, because they involve the above. These include extremely important activites: - Sales
- Marketing
- Investing (in anything)
- Insurance
- Starting a Business
- Drilling for Oil
- Mining for Minerals
You might have read gambling definitions from the government that differ from the dictionaries'. Their motive for trying to spin or change it is explained later. Feel free to provide definitions from dictionaries that are more reputable than the above. |
|
|
|
Seems like the Boston University Law Review is full of shit. I don't know why the American tax payers are funding organizations like this, which dish out nothing other than bull-crap all the time.
Can you elaborate on why they are full of shit? How are each of their arguments flawed? |
|
|
|
I have no problems with gambling, like with porn, computer games and the list goes on, the people who attack these kind of things are just a bunch of controlling assholes who want to interfere with peoples private lives, if you don't harm anyone or commit fraud with your money then it's nobodies fucking business what you do.
Oh wait, I just realised this suspiciously looks like a minor plug for your site and took you more seriously than I should have, nevermind.
The main attackers are the land-based gambling operators and entities that benefit from them, such as the government. There was a trend and momentum towards state-level legalization of online gambling. According to Forbes, Sheldon Adelson, 5th richest person in the U.S., is reversing that trend. The main reason that they are attacking online gambling, controlling you and interfering with your private lives, is not for the reasons that they spin and use. The main reason is related to money and to block competition. Yes, this is a minor plug for our site. It is also a plug for all online gambling sites. This topic was posted on the "Gambling" forum, mainly targeted to all of the other online bitcoin gambling operators and a call to arms. (I don't know why, but it looks like someone moved it off of the "Gambling" forum.) Hopefully, the blog will enable them to understand the true nature of the attacks in order to help defend our online gambling industry. There is a reason why there are so many industry associations and lobby groups. United we stand. Divided we fall. |
|
|
|
Yeah. There have been times when I felt like I was gambling when I was just doing my thing on Mintpal. And I've told people that just getting out of bed in the morning can be risky. I'm not against gambling, but I do think that people with gambling addictions need to get help before it reaches the point where they're taking out a second mortgage to keep their habit going.
You guys are correct that problem gambling or gambling addiction are not good. Please read http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling . Here is an excerpt: Based on the above three elements [stake, chance, profit/loss], millions of people also gamble on real estate. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York's article: "Flip This House": Investor Speculation and the Housing Bubble: "At the peak of the boom in 2006, over a third of all U.S. home purchase lending was made to people who already owned at least one house."
...
People complain that users of online gambling or casinos can lose too much money. However, millions of Americans have lost way more money to houses and the stock market. The comparison is not even close. If these self-appointed moral authorities are concerned about others losing money, they should ban people from buying investment properties or stocks. They should also ban the millions of entrepreneurs because every year, the majority of them lose their shirts and waste several years of their lives trying to start a new business. They should also ban small business owners, as the far majority of them go bankrupt. The number of "problem gamblers" pale in comparison to the number of entreprenuers and small business owners and the amount that they lose.
...
Few activities in this world are perfect with no downsides. Driving provides significant value, but it has downsides as well. According to Wikipedia, approximately 34,000 Americans are killed in cars every year. But we don't ban driving.
How many people die from gambling per year? If it is such a problem, then why doesn't the government ban lotteries, which is the worst form of gambling? Why does the government promote it and push it heavily?
Cell phones provide significant value, but they distract people to the point of causing car accidents and walking into buses. However, we don't ban cell phones. If you bought a house, hoping to make a quick buck by flipping it, then you were making a bet that the price will continue to go up. Calling "flipping" as investing was spin and spin is pervasive in society. Millions of people were doing this. Millions of these flippers lost on their bets, and lost big. Every one of us knows one or multiple people who lost money on houses. Few of us know people who lost this kind of money to "problem gambling", yet politicians keep attacking the gambling industry on this. I know several people, who bought multiple houses each and ended up losing hundreds of thousands each. Two lost essentially their life savings. One nearly did, still has three houses with two still underwater. Who is running a campaign to ban investment properties? Losing 25BTC as MKRLE did, is chump change, compared to the money that millions of Americans have lost to houses and stocks. There isn't any campaign to ban investment properties, stocks, entrepreneurs, driving and cell phones, all of which have positive and negative aspects. There is a campaign to ban online gambling, not for the moral or protection reasons that they will try to make you believe, but to block competition. |
|
|
|
Agree with grue, investing is not "gambling" in my opinion. OP is trying to compare real life risk taking with negative EV gameplay.
Please see my reply to grue. You don't need to take my comparison. Three dictionaries and Boston University Law Review provide definitions, explanations and numerous examples that show investing is gambling. The right argument to make is simply the fact that gambling is a fun activity that people should have the right to partake in if they please.
I absolutely agree with you that people should have to the right to partake in it if they please. However, governments try to take this right away. If you read http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling , there is an excerpt from the Boston University Law Review paper: "...gambling and investing are identical activities of wagering...both risk-taking activities have been present in the American culture for all of its history. At some point over 100 years ago, public attitudes of the two types of speculation diverged, with investing being labeled as socially desirable and therefore supported by law, and gambling being labeled as socially undesirable and therefore prohibited by law. This divergence was based not on any logical differences in the activities, but instead on the classes of people that participated in these activities and who profited from them. Stock brokers, stock exchanges, and their wealthy clients benefited from this legal distinction; working class gamblers and bookmakers did not.
The decision to prohibit an activity should be based on a sound analysis of its costs and benefits, including whether any important freedoms are associated with that activity. Similar activities should be regulated similarly, without regard to traditional labels, pretextual and inconsistent morality arguments, or discriminatory categorizations based on class." Now, Sheldon Adelson and his team of lobbyists are trying take or keep the right away. Gambling for any reason other than entertainment is not a good idea.
If you've ever worked in the stock market, you will know that it is also entertaining. Most professionals and retail investors won't openly admit to it, but they get excitement and fun from trading, similar to the fun and anticipation of winning a poker round, or seeing a winning number come up on the roulette table. Some retail investors will use the word "fun" to watch the prices go up and down. Watch CNBC. With the "suspense" music, fast-paced speaking anchors and scrolling stock tickers, they try to instill a sense of urgency and excitement to the viewers and broadcast the stock market like it's a sports event. The documentary called "Lucky" refers to lotteries as entertainment. Stock market is much more entertaining than lotteries to most participants, except for the one participant who wins the lottery jackpot. |
|
|
|
- Most People Gamble all the time (Without Knowing It)
what's logic behind this? - According to the Boston University Law Review:
Gambling and investing are identical
no it's not. the expected value of almost all gambling games is negative, whereas the expected value of investments is positive (see: stock markets). The government discriminates, as it lets the rich gamble, but ban it from the lower class
clarification needed - Extremely important activities are gambling activities
clarification needed - Americans have lost way more to gambling on houses and stocks, than to Las Vegas. Housing bubbles in the U.S., Canada, Australia and UK are partially or mostly created by their governments, luring millions to gamble on it.
maybe because the amount of money spent on stocks is much greater than on las vegas? [/list] If you read the sections entitled "Most People Gamble All The Time" and "Do As I Say, Not As I Do" at http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling , they will answer your questions and give you clarification. I think you are saying that the expected value over multiple years on stocks is positive. A professional poker player can make the same claim. In the short term, you can lose just as often on stocks as a poker player. Regardless, the expected value of an activity is not a defining factor on whether it is gambling or not. See the three dictionaries' definition of gambling and Boston University Law Review's explanation at http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling. Yes, the amount of money and hence the amount of gambling done on stocks is MUCH greater than on Las Vegas. The honest stock market professionals will tell you that the stock market is the world's largest casino. |
|
|
|
You might see a campaign in the media against online gambling. If supposed moral authorities attack gambling, here is what they and you should know: - Most People Gamble all the time (Without Knowing It)
- According to the Boston University Law Review:
- Gambling and investing are identical
- regulations on online gambling is mainly about money and blocking competition, not about morals or protecting consumers
- The government discriminates, as it lets the rich gamble, but ban it from the lower class
- Extremely important activities are gambling activities
- Governments have "Do As I Say, Not As I Do" mantras, as they are the world's biggest operators and pushers of gambling
- Americans have lost way more to gambling on houses and stocks, than to Las Vegas. Housing bubbles in the U.S., Canada, Australia and UK are partially or mostly created by their governments, luring millions to gamble on it.
- The filthy rich, such as Sheldon Adelson, is reversing the legalization trend in the U.S., in order to fend off competition. Don't believe his employed and richly paid lobbyists, who claim that they are trying to protect consumers. (The UIGEA helped fend off competition.)
For explanations of the above, read: http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling |
|
|
|
According to Boston University Law Review, the laws or regulations pertaining to online gambling are related to how much money the government can make or lose, not related to morals or the pretext of protecting consumers. See: http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling |
|
|
|
According to Boston University, the laws or regulations pertaining to online gambling are related to how much money the government can make or lose, not related to morals or the pretext of protecting consumers. See: http://stockbet.com/#/support/gambling |
|
|
|
No problems, please fill in my new template (ahh laziness) and I'll get it added shortly  Here is our new site: Site: StockBet.com
Key: Not sure what should go here
Min Cash In: BTC 0.001
Min Cash Out: BTC 0.01 or balance, whichever is lower
Games: BullBear
Min Bet: BTC 0.001
Max Bet: None
Comments: In regards to being provably fair, players can verify stock prices from stock market.
You can get more information at announcement of StockBet.com - Bet on stocks with Bitcoin |
|
|
|
StockBet™ is bringing liberty and freedom to the world, by letting people bet on stocks and initial public offerings (IPOs) with as little as 0.001 Bitcoin.
Nice idea, I'm looking forward to it, I ony wait for some feedbacks because there are too much scams here to believe in anything.
Thanks. Yes, we've noticed the discussion on this forum about Coinbet. This is unfortunate. We thought that Bitcoin and all of these "provably fair" sites will elevate the trust. We could be wrong, but maybe not all of them were scams from the onset. Maybe the following are possible factors that caused the casino and poker operators to loosen their integrity or ethics: - Since most of those sites use software from the same vendors, they needed to differentiate and they probably had a lot of pressure to do so because there are so many operators. One of the areas where they can differentiate, was to offer bigger bonuses, vouchers, etc. This caused many people to take the offers but they didn't play the games after they took advantage of the offers. Maybe some scammed or hacked the operators. When the operator realized that they offered too much and it was a losing business model, they might have pushed back too hard (or tried to be revengeful?). - Another area to differentiate, was to offer bigger jackpots, hoping to attract more players but also hoping that no players won it because they didn't have enough to cover. Maybe the operator had full intention of running a business, but after a player won the jackpot, the operator decided to reneg or fold shop. - Even with provably fair games, if the players are betting against the house, some houses are going to be unlucky and lose. When the operator loses, the operator didn't have enough integrity to accept the losses. Again, the above are just guesses as we do not know the true story behind each of the situations. I know that it'll take time for people to trust our site, since we're new. Here are a few things you should know: - We built our software. We don't need to differentiate from the casino, poker and sport sites. - Players do not bet against the house at StockBet.com, so we do not offer jackpots. - We do not offer bonuses or vouchers. - We don't need Bitcoin or Blockchain to show that we are "provably fair". Players can check the stock market to verify the stock price. - For security, we keep bitcoins offline in cold storage. - We want our users to get two benefits, not just the one potential benefit of winning money. We want them to have fun as well. - We have two objectives, not just the one objective of making a profit. Some of us are former professionals from the stock market. The stock market is very interesting and can be exciting, but this excitement is limited to the one percent or the people in the West who have thousands of dollars to trade. We want to bring this to everyone. When Facebook went public with their IPO, thousands of people around the world were bantering and debating about it. Some claimed that it will go to the moon. Some claimed that investors will get a faceplant or get Zuckered. These people were from all corners of the world, but they couldn't elevate the excitement by putting money on it. Only the one percent of the one percent who had inside connections to investment bankers on Wall Street were able to. We are trying to enable everyone to get in on the excitement. If we can accomplish this and enable them to have fun, we will accomplish our profit objective. We know that you and players have to trust us because you need to deposit before making bets. Hopefully, we can gain your trust over time. In the meantime, we encourage you to play with the free Chips...or take a small risk, such as betting with BTC0.001. We do not encourage that you immediately withdraw your money after the round is over, as withdrawals can cost us on transaction fees, but if you feel the need to do so, then please do. |
|
|
|
Nice website. Not so many users now but think it will grow!
Thanks and feel free to spread the word! Better yet, feel free to make a bet and challenge your friends (even with the free Chips)! Everyone is bullish or bearish on some company. |
|
|
|
 Welcome to the world's first and only place where you can bet on stocks with Bitcoin (or play for free with our Chips). Why play StockBet™? - Win up to 100% profit on your bets (minus commission): If you trade stocks, the share price needs to go up by 100% for you to make 100%.
- Social Competition: People care more about winning or losing $100 in football pools than winning or losing $1,000 in their stock portfolios. This is because of social competition, which enables players to banter and share a laugh. With StockBet, players can have the same kind of fun with stocks as they do with sports.
- Training: People try to learn how to invest or trade with make-believe portfolios. However, the most important thing to learn, which is not taught and cannot be taught by any school, software or blog, is controlling your fear and greed emotions. These emotions do not exist with make-believe portfolios. You must have money at stake. Trying to learn with thousands of dollars in trading accounts is too expensive with potentially large losses. StockBet enables you to learn cheaply.
- IPOs: Betting on initial public offerings (IPOs) used to be exclusive, available only to the one percent on Wall Street or The City. Now, StockBet lets the small guys bet on the big name IPOs as well, such as GoPro or Alibaba.
- Trading Accounts: Stop paying trading fees just to bet. Avoid the lengthy sign up process, with multiple pieces of identification, to open a trading account.
- Shorting: It is difficult for bears to make bets on the stock market. Shorting is for the privileged, is expensive and not always possible to do. To short, the stock must be available to borrow and then you need to pay interest. With StockBet, it's easy and cheap.
StockBet™ is bringing liberty and freedom to the world, by letting people bet on stocks and initial public offerings (IPOs) with as little as 0.001 Bitcoin.More and more brands, such as Google, Apple and Microsoft, are becoming global. Billions of users know them well. Many are bullish or bearish but cannot place bets on them, because they cannot open trading accounts or do not live in the West. Now they can. Betting on stocks used to be onerous or a privilege. It was onerous to deposit and withdraw fiat currencies on gambling sites. It was a privilege reserved for people with thousands of dollars, pounds or euros, with access to brokerage accounts and willing to pay a trading fee per bet. The privileged could easily bet on stocks like Facebook and Twitter but many, especially people outside of Western countries, could not. You no longer need to go through torturous deposits or withdrawals. You no longer need to have thousands of dollars to play the stock market. You no longer need to live in the West. You no longer need to be oppressed by brokerage regimes and trading fees. Stockbet™ is liberating you. Pick a stock, make a bet, challenge your friends. StockBet™ – making the stock market fun. For more information about StockBet.com, to contact us or to start playing, visit: http://StockBet.com. StockBet's first game is BullBear, which lets players bet against each other on whether a stock, ETF or index will go up or down. Players can pick a stock or ETF from the thousands on the New York, London and Toronto stock exchanges, or they can bet on any of the major indices: Dow Jones, Nasdaq, S&P500, FTSE (London), CAC (Paris), DAX (Frankfurt) and TSX. For more info, please see BullBear FAQs. The following is a screenshot of the BullBear Public Rounds:  The following is a screenshot of the BullBear round for GoPro's IPO day:  The following is a screenshot of the BullBear round for Alibaba's upcoming IPO day:  Note: We do provide London based stocks, European indices (FTSE, DAX and CAC), Toronto based stocks and the TSX index. Therefore, you will see UK, French, German and Canadian flags on our site as well. It just happens that the examples above are stocks trading in New York. (Alibaba is a Chinese company, but will be floating in New York.) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
