|
How does this daemon update affect masternodes and the increase from 20k to 30k collateral? Does it mean that existing masternodes should remain on the old daemon until block 93k? Then stop the masternode, update to the new daemon, then create the masternode again with 30k coins?
|
|
|
|
Then I hit the following error: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
makefile.unix:224: recipe for target 'swippd' failed
make: *** [swippd] Error 1 Will just wait for full instructions now. Could you give some more details on the link error ? Everything we come across might improve build instructions and troubleshooting guide. Yours, team swipp After the last command of: make -f makefile.unix CXXFLAGS='-std=c++11' I got the error as noted previously: /bin/sh ../share/genbuild.sh obj/build.h
g++ -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wno-ignored-qualifiers -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -I/home/penguin/build/swippcore/src -I/home/penguin/build/swippcore/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DENABLE_WALLET -I/home/penguin/build/swippcore/src/leveldb/include -I/home/penguin/build/swippcore/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -std=c++11 -o swippd obj/groestl.o obj/blake.o obj/bmw.o obj/skein.o obj/keccak.o obj/shavite.o obj/jh.o obj/luffa.o obj/cubehash.o obj/echo.o obj/simd.o obj/alert.o obj/version.o obj/checkpoints.o obj/netbase.o obj/addrman.o obj/crypter.o obj/key.o obj/eckey.o obj/init.o obj/bitcoind.o obj/keystore.o obj/core.o obj/main.o obj/net.o obj/protocol.o obj/rpcclient.o obj/rpcprotocol.o obj/rpcserver.o obj/rpcmisc.o obj/rpcnet.o obj/rpcblockchain.o obj/rpcrawtransaction.o obj/rpcsmessage.o obj/timedata.o obj/script.o obj/scrypt.o obj/sync.o obj/txmempool.o obj/util.o obj/hash.o obj/noui.o obj/kernel.o obj/pbkdf2.o obj/chainparams.o obj/stealth.o obj/activemasternode.o obj/darksend.o obj/eccryptoverify.o obj/instantx.o obj/masternodeconfig.o obj/masternode.o obj/rpcdarksend.o obj/spork.o obj/crypto/hmac_sha256.o obj/crypto/hmac_sha512.o obj/crypto/rfc6979_hmac_sha256.o obj/crypto/ripemd160.o obj/crypto/sha1.o obj/crypto/sha256.o obj/crypto/sha512.o obj/smessage.o obj/db.o obj/miner.o obj/rpcdump.o obj/rpcmining.o obj/rpcwallet.o obj/wallet.o obj/walletdb.o obj/txdb-leveldb.o -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -Wl,-Bdynamic -l boost_system -l boost_filesystem -l boost_program_options -l boost_thread -l db_cxx -l ssl -l crypto -l miniupnpc -Wl,-Bdynamic -l z -l dl -l pthread /home/penguin/build/swippcore/src/leveldb/libleveldb.a /home/penguin/build/swippcore/src/leveldb/libmemenv.a
obj/util.o: In function `boost::program_options::detail::basic_config_file_iterator<char>::getline(std::string&)':
/usr/include/boost/program_options/detail/config_file.hpp:161: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::to_internal(std::string const&)'
obj/util.o: In function `boost::program_options::detail::basic_config_file_iterator<char>::basic_config_file_iterator(std::istream&, std::set<std::string, std::less<std::string>, std::allocator<std::string> > const&, bool)':
/usr/include/boost/program_options/detail/config_file.hpp:145: undefined reference to `boost::program_options::detail::common_config_file_iterator::common_config_file_iterator(std::set<std::string, std::less<std::string>, std::allocator<std::string> > const&, bool)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
makefile.unix:224: recipe for target 'swippd' failed
make: *** [swippd] Error 1 Update: While typing this post, the compile that I was doing on another machine avoided the above error and completed. I don't know off the top of my head what the difference is between the machines. |
|
|
|
same problem here  makefile.unix:217: recipe for target 'obj/version.o' failed
make: *** [obj/version.o] Error 1 Hi. You need GCC 4.4+, alternatively 4.8+ is preferred. Some other compiler with c++ 11 support should also work. We are moving the source base over to c++ 11. Yours, team swipp My system is has a GCC version of 5.4.0 already and I get this error. I made more progress with: make -f makefile.unix CXXFLAGS='-std=c++11' Then I hit an error where I needed to: Then I hit a leveldb error where I needed to: cd leveldb && make libleveldb.a libmemenv.a Then I hit the following error: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
makefile.unix:224: recipe for target 'swippd' failed
make: *** [swippd] Error 1 Will just wait for full instructions now. |
|
|
|
same problem here makefile.unix:217: recipe for target 'obj/version.o' failed
make: *** [obj/version.o] Error 1 Hi. You need GCC 4.4+, alternatively 4.8+ is preferred. Some other compiler with c++ 11 support should also work. We are moving the source base over to c++ 11. Yours, team swipp My system is has a GCC version of 5.4.0 already and I get this error. |
|
|
|
|
I can't get this to compile
--------
makefile.unix:217: recipe for target 'obj/version.o' failed
make: *** [obj/version.o] Error 1
--------
Why the upgrade to BDB 5.1? 4.8 may be older but it's still quite standard.
In any case, where are you getting 5.1 from? I can't find the package in apt.
|
|
|
|
Hello everybody.
A new wallet is now available at our GitHub account under the following repository;
https://github.com/teamswipp/swippcore
We have, of course also saved the older version for reference and kept the git history intact.
Windows binaries and better build instructions will be posted tomorrow. Website will be updated as well.
After block 93 000, old wallets and clients will no longer be able to connect to the network.
Yours, team swipp How does this work with masternodes? If I update the daemon to this version, will existing masternodes stop working until block 93,000? |
|
|
|
Hi,so we would need to do a coin swap in order to implement the new masternodes?
No, you just need to run the new wallet once it's released. |
|
|
|
Please please please implement cold masternodes!
Hi. Cold masternodes are already implemented, even in the old code base. Yours, team swipp Really? I could never get it to work. Guess I should have tried harder. |
|
|
|
|
Please please please implement cold masternodes!
|
|
|
|
I'm curious about how you took over this project. Did you manage to get in touch with the original dev and arrange to take it off their hands? Or are you hardforking the code and convincing everyone here to get on board your codebase?
Hi. We really like the name of SWIPP and many of the ideas behind it from the start. As you can read earlier in this thread, the original author dumped his premine and abandoned the project, deleting his source code on GitHub - at this point we decided to take over and do something great with it. Did you manage to get a copy of the source code before it was deleted? Or are you beginning with a fresh fork, hence the need to hard fork the chain? I'm interested as to why you would prefer to take over this abandoned project instead of starting fresh? |
|
|
|
|
I'm curious about how you took over this project. Did you manage to get in touch with the original dev and arrange to take it off their hands? Or are you hardforking the code and convincing everyone here to get on board your codebase?
|
|
|
|
I just checked out those pools and there are no active miners in them. Mining is currently all by solo miners? |
|
|
|
Coinexchange has stopped withdrawals, is this maintanace or connected with swap of tokens?
Would like to know the answer to this also. |
|
|
|
Very informative roadmap:
ROADMAP
bounties: closed.
airdrop: closed.
exchange: soon..
If the developer has any purpose other than selling the premain after the first pump?
Thanks
if I wanted to sell the premine to the first pumped I would have done it when the old king was listed on novaexchange but I did not! my goal is to make it king big and I will do it with all my strength What interesting features do you have planned to make King more than a typical clone coin? |
|
|
|
Summary on our sanctuary testing so far:
We have about 8 people helping us in testnet testing the future sanctuaries. Out of the 8, I think about 4 are very active.
Out of the 4 we only have a few sanctuaries actually running.
We could still use at least 2 more active testnet sanctuaries, <snip>
I'm just in the process of setting up a sanctuary now. I hope that helps. :-) I've been out of the biblepay loop for a little while but back again. If you can link to the post with the details on how to help test the sacntuaries, I'd be happy to run a few nodes if that would be helpful. |
|
|
|
Yesterday..
Wallet(Normal / Total 15600SWP)
Stake 24x5SWP = +120SWP@1day
SwippNode(MasterNode / Total 20000SWP over)
stake 32x2SWP = +64SWP@1day
...Is it a bug that no matter how much I mined, I only get 2SWP?
Isn't the staking reward 3 SWP? There are 5 SWP total for POS reward of which 40% goes to masternodes, so, 2 SWP for the masternode winner and 3 SWP for the staking winner? |
|
|
|
I've already found several times developer dies father
and no longer answers ..
I hope this time is not like that .. though it all looks like a scam ..
developer took donations to exchange coins on yobit ..
I hope this time I think wrong
LOLZ!! In that case, when someone very close to you dies, I shall expect you back at work the next day otherwise I'll take it that you've run off to the Cayman Islands. |
|
|
|
Those instructions do not create a remote masternode. In those instructions, the controller and the masternode are the same wallet. I'm talking about the common setup of running the controller wallet locally and the masternode on a VPS. This way, the coins are kept in your local wallet (which you can shutdown once the masternode is set up) while the masternode which runs 24/7 does not actually have any coins in it. |
|
|
|
One of the pool is trying to network hijack the coin , we recommend all the miners to use Official pool only and suppor the coin
Which pool? |
|
|
|
Hi, I'm following IRD since a while now and have mined some.
I totally agree with "others" for having a strong preparation before entering market.
I do not want to make fun of the website as I truly appreciate the work and know how hard and time eater it is (I'm a multi-dev too) but I really really dislike the look, graphism and logo.
As I'm not graphic designer too, I ask if there are some in the audience to make propositions, may be rewarded for this and the webdev too, some coins make contest to do this.
As suggestion and because IRD is low supplied, why not make it look "precious", "rare", metal jewel, have a look at veritable iridium picture : it looks and is a rare metal... It is also used to stabilise the "standards" platinium meters and Kilogram : they both are Pt+Ir, so Iridium make elements "more" stable...
This are just some brainstormed ideas and I suggest everybody to post them as there are no stupid ideas.
I also notice there are only 2 pools left. Because I think we need more pools for stability, I'm almost ready to start another one, beta first and if everything is ok, as prod, with hardware evolution possibility. I'm already running a node and tests. I will start with my own server first to see loads, bandwidth and... bugs ! It will be located in France. As I do not want to concurrent others pools and also want to donate to the dev (very sorry for your lost) as discuted before so I will start with fee and dev donations and encourage the others to do it so.
Have a nice day and impatient to read your answers !
Very good input regarding the website! You make very good points. I really like the idea. Let's see what the community thinks. By show of vote, who would like to see the site changed to what stevebrush mentioned and who would like it to remain the same? (The site is not 100% completed. There will be more features added to it. We are talking about the style in general) I absolutely agree with stevebrush, and i have been ranting about the same thing a couple of posts ago. We have a RARE and fair coin and we should reflect that. You got my vote to change the site to what stevebrush suggested Who made the iri.cash site? I was making the iridum.cc site before it went down, it had a design that reflected the rest of the design profile I made along with the logo. This new .cash site looks awful, even the logo text is hacked. I've followed this project from the start. Been away for a while but back again now. Sincere apologies to whoever has been making ird.cash but I agree with mrbard; it's not great and it's an inevitable result when making a site from a generic template builder like SitePad. I've lost track on the progress of the website (way way back I offered to help out also) and I remember when the problem with the chargeback on the iridium.cc domain which threw a spanner in the works. I did think mrbard was still the one working on it though, so, I'm definitely out of the loop. The logo is fine. Simple shapes with distinct colours. LoL.. I agree with you guys. I hated that template generator. It was awful and I apologize it looks so shitty. It took me 4 hours to just get that setup and I was in a hurry. If anyone would like to help with the site, PM me on the Slack channel and I'll get back with you. I want this site to be something all of us can be proud of. For that, we will need to work together. I suggest if mrbard was working on it before the iridium.cc roadblock, let mrbard keep going with what they were doing. I offered to help early on but wasn't taken up on the offer, but if mrbard is designing I can help with dev. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
