Hello Friends,
some times it takes time to do all the programming etc. its a complex task and there may be delays. Credits team is very good. they always reply on every query in telegram. I am sure that it will be released this week.
Yeah, it's good you understand that, because many people can't get it to their head that this team is doing almost everything from a scratch, not just copy existing stuff and make it better. 2 more weeks to go, and these people are still expecting everything to be delivered on time. I blame cs team, because they are still promisung mainnet in q4. When eventually 31-12 clmes around and team launched “private mainnet v2.0” and token dumps another -50%, then you’ll come back here and bash the team again. No way they will deliver mainnet on time. They cant even deliver testnet 3 since 30th of november, and signal server still hsnt been removed lol. You again, huh, you seem to have a lot of time. Only impatient fellows that don't understand what gem this project is (i.e. you, though you already sold, but whatever) will dump because of rescheduling to polish and optimize the platform. Who cares if SS is still there, it doesn't do anything to the consensus and etc. Either way it'll be removed, there's already an alternative way to connect to the network through nodes IP. But you don't know that, because, guess what, you haven't tested the platform. |
|
|
|
Hello Friends,
some times it takes time to do all the programming etc. its a complex task and there may be delays. Credits team is very good. they always reply on every query in telegram. I am sure that it will be released this week.
Yup, this is what I like about this team, admins are very responsive and always answer people's questions, at least one of admins is always in the chat  |
|
|
|
|
How is the ambassador campaign is progressing by the way? Any news on that front?
|
|
|
|
Another day, another smoke screen to distract from failure to deliver mainnet.
Credits rents a few servers and calls it a partnership.
Almost feels like they enjoy being called a scam?
How is renting a few servers a partnership? XD
Also, nice to see that they change consensus rules last minute (shich is closed source anyway), and now apparently rent 200 nodes fron ibm.
Apparently they are moving to a Ripple like centralised and permissioned blockchain.
Will be nice to get all the cs fees from the txs, as the consensus will probably only select ibm cs nodes as main and trusted nodes.
Anyway, 17 more days to go for testnet 3.2, test 2 and 3, mainner and swap.
Lol.
Another day, another burak... It's clear from the start that you haven't read the 2nd article on CS blog... You're just hopeless... Again, you sold, no? Why do you care? Or you're that desperate and afraid that this project will be great success and you'll miss it so you anxiously want people or project itself to convince you it's real? That's just pathetic... I’m sorry but where on the IBM website does it show the “partnership” Don’t you remember how ibm announeced Stellar? And i’m just trying to prevent people from getting tricked into this scam(?) project Here is a link to the official IBM website. Exactly my point. All that is, is a “use case” on the ibm website, meaning a client story about how great ibm cloud is. Ie MARKETING for ibm cloud its not a partnership. they just using ibm´s cloud infrastructure. its like saying i have a partnership with google because im using google chrome. bla bla bla, can you read? Is it possible that any their customer just mentioned on their official website? They are going to implement IOT business models together and will present joint MVP in the near future? Or is their Vice President liar? Don't think so, all announcements are agreed by the parties of the deal, they would easily sue the project if they spread false information, relax and accept that, it's much easier to raise some doubts than have a closer look to priority points, everything that you are saying is nonsense Dont spread speculation as facts. The fact is that credits claims a partnership whole all they do is use ibms platform and pay for it. Until ibm confirms ibm is nothing but a supplier of credits Time will show who is right, looking forward MVP which will be the most important proof of this partnership, no one is interested in your opinion, I do not understand your goal, if you are not interested in the project, why are you here and demostrating assumptions as the facts Well said, bud, that burak fellow was even banned in their TG for constant inappropriate beahivour, lmao why would people even listen to him Realitycheck, i waant banned for inappropriate behaviour. I was banned for asking the same questions. Lets see if they deliver mainnet. They still claim they will do everything before 31-12. Btw anyone seen testnet 3.2?  reality check... that's a funny one and he's saying he wasn't banned for inappropriate behaviour, lmao |
|
|
|
I think team has to focus its forces on the African country, it is the most promising area to speed up platform mass adoption as they are actually need it
But these countries are poor, they can't benefit the project The most of consulting agencies are claiming that by 2050, more than 3 billion additional people will be living in what is now described as the developing world, thus opening up the broadest prospects for business openings. And African continent is one of them. Just think how it can affect project cap I have heard that broad range of African nationals don't have Internet yet and you are talking about blockchain solutions... It is possible to provide offline access to blockchain, it is not a problem and it can solve a really important issue of Africa, it is unbanked citizens Could you elaborate on that? Seems I can't really understand how it will help) |
|
|
|
|
While I'm at it, can someone from the team clarify if there'll be description of the improvements made to consensus in the Dev's journal along with 3.2 release or something similar?
|
|
|
|
|
In the meantime what are your thoughts on this new IoT models development by CS and IBM, what do you make of this, guys? How this will be beneficial to CS and in what way? Your thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Another day, another smoke screen to distract from failure to deliver mainnet.
Credits rents a few servers and calls it a partnership.
Almost feels like they enjoy being called a scam?
How is renting a few servers a partnership? XD
Also, nice to see that they change consensus rules last minute (shich is closed source anyway), and now apparently rent 200 nodes fron ibm.
Apparently they are moving to a Ripple like centralised and permissioned blockchain.
Will be nice to get all the cs fees from the txs, as the consensus will probably only select ibm cs nodes as main and trusted nodes.
Anyway, 17 more days to go for testnet 3.2, test 2 and 3, mainner and swap.
Lol.
Another day, another burak... It's clear from the start that you haven't read the 2nd article on CS blog... You're just hopeless... Again, you sold, no? Why do you care? Or you're that desperate and afraid that this project will be great success and you'll miss it so you anxiously want people or project itself to convince you it's real? That's just pathetic... |
|
|
|
Funny though, i was “fudding” with the same questions and critiques that i have listed above back in july.
That was when I sold everything for $.40.
Great that they cant censor the discussions in this thread as opposed the the telegram channel.
As soon as you asked even one critical question, you got banned from the channel.
Which was the reason why I sold back then btw.
Which provea team has not learned from their mistakes and has not progresses enough to release a mainnet.
But we have 19 more days to go.
If they do achieve everything they claimed, i’ll log back in and apologize to the team for ever doubting them.
However if a token dumps to ATL right before a mainnet launch, it means insiders are selling their bags because they know the team will no be able to deliver.
Otherwise you’d see massive buying pressure, if the team was convinced that the product they were supposedly aboiut to deliver is revolutionary as they claim.
That's also a lie, people are constantly asking questions there, but they do so in polite and constructive way unlike you did and admins are always there to answer these questions. You should understand one thing, burak, no one really cares what you think or do, team doesn't need your apology. If you really think "insiders" will dump their tokens in case mainnet postponed you've no clue about how and why they support this team. So you sold your tokens, good to know that, move on to another project, leave this one alone and forget it as your worst nightmare. Like Dectonn said, no need to be hypocrite and try to make people convince you project is good. You've done your research and the results is not positive? Forget about the project, simple as that, burak. Peace to you |
|
|
|
Lmao, burak aka zilliqa shiller, are you that burak fudder from telegram? First of all, mark my word Zilliqa will reschedule their launch again due to encountered problems or whatever. Second, there's no holidays in December in Russia, they start in January and are not very long. Third, you didn't test the platform, you don't know anything about dev progress available to public let alone internal dev progress, All you know is, that I'm 100% sure of, some information from not very clever people that don't understand how development works and etc. Fourth, front-end is irrelevant right now, because first and foremost they are making everything to make the platform stable, fast, reliable and secure, then back-end, bugs\erros are possible at any stages, EOS launched mainnet in June and what? They still fixing stuff even now. Fifth, So what if they make changes in consensus? Do you know what changes they will do? If they decided to make them, then it means it'll be better for the platform. They know better than you, that's for sure. And finally, Sixth, I don't mind if they postpone the launch a bit, because that will give them more time to make platform better, double test everything, don't make devs overwork and make it a bit easier for them.
And as guy above said, if you don't like something, leave the project and move on and as far as I can guess you already did so, be so kind relieve us from your presense, no need to be a hypocrite...
This is just sad.. 1) Ziliqa is just an example. Many more projects have booked more progress than Credits in the past 6 months. And they dont lie about not being able to deliver with a "private mainnet".... 2) Sure there are no holidays in russia, but there are holidays in Europe. And guess where most of the testers and current nodes are located, in EUROPE! Who do celebrate christmas. And everybody celebrates new years. But i'll let you have those 3 days/ Team has 13 days to do everything they are claiming they will do before year-end. 3) I did test the platform. How long does syncing from 0 already take for testnet 2.0? I kept getting sync error also, Corrupt db files. Still a signal server that is needed (single point of failure) etc etc. 4) Front-end is highly relevant for adoption. If your front end sucks, no body cares about the back end. If i see a wallet balance of -10CS, I'm not using your platform. 5_ Really? You dont care about the changes in consensus? IT's already a highly criticised product, and you think it's fine to just change the consensus rules, which is wat DEFINES your blockchain. Sure let a team in russia just change the rules without consulting the community. Maybe they changed it to "credits team decides which nodes are eligible to become main node". Would you still use the credits blockchain if they made the blockchain permissioned in the latest update? 6) I also don't care whether they postpone, but their communication has always been their achilles heel, and they keep repeating the same mistakes over and over and over. This is the exact reason why people are calling credits a scam. It's your thinking that is sad actually... no offense, but it is what it is. Here's what I think 1)Don't care much about other projects I'm not invested in, so who cares what they do. 2)So what? All those people need to do is download latest testnet, install it, launch node and that's it, they don't need anything else to do, they literally can leave it for all decentralization test and speed test. FYI downloading, installing and launching the node takes around 5 minutes at max. 3) Highly doubt you test it, it took me several hours to sync completely on the current release which is now running around 2-4 weeks or even more. Didn't have any issues. SS is making easier for people to connect, it doesn't do anything else except registering nodes in the network, there's also an alternative to connect to the network through other nodes IP. That's already tells me something about you. 4) CS team literally said many times that UI will be redesigned once everything will be ready. 5) So now this is what you're fudding about? That's just retarded, pardon my french. Fundamentals of consensus never changed: main, trusted nodes chosen randomly every round, rewards for them, 5 rounds per second, anyone able to become a node without any coins. 6) Even if they decide to postpone, I'll accept that and keep accumulating. This will give them more time to double check everything and polish the platform. |
|
|
|
Recently I did not receive many updates from the project and this made me feel unhappy in this project. I hope the development team keeps up with the news for everyone because I believe the CS will be growing in the future.
They published News Digest №11 yesterday, check it out Digest is rather good, I've already known those news though, but it should be quite informative for newcomers or just people that gained interest recently. Yeah, digest is always pretty good, but there's not much new info for those who follow project progress, but I still watch it every time  |
|
|
|
Hello there, Hackathon participants will create dapps on Testnet 3.0 or miannet?
Hey there, I think they will be developing it on testnet right after its release. And what about the amount of paticipants, did it increase? Last time there were 63
Botstorm said here amount of participants grew up to 150 or even more, it's pretty great amount tbh, and that number was even before Ivan announced it in his video if I'm not mistaken, so I think there's even more) Can someone clarify this? Or we should wait for official announcement about amount of participants? Is there any precise info at all about it? I hope Credits team will announce the exact number of participants and the spheres they are going to create dapps Over 160 developers from 28 different countries signed up. Credits developers team, the CTO Evgeniy Butyaev and Deputy CTO Konstantinos Sotiropoulos, have reviewed the participants’ projects that serve well for various industries, such as the Internet of Things, banking, logistics, insurance, payments, medicine, copyright protection, industrial, consumer goods and will be helpful for future of Credits ecosystem. wow, that's pretty great! I hope there're a lot of great ideas and their implementation for the contest! |
|
|
|
Just another noob question : what if I run a node and I shut down my computer, and then open it again.
Does it download again the whole blockchain or does it work like differential backup (only the modified/new blocks are downloaded and added to the main database) ?
Just another noob question : what if I run a node and I shut down my computer, and then open it again.
Does it download again the whole blockchain or does it work like differential backup (only the modified/new blocks are downloaded and added to the main database) ?
It will download only new blocks. The old blocks that you've already downloaded are on your PC in the "test_bd" folder. Yeah, Kotarastra is right, after you shut down your node you'll stop downloading new block. Once you launch your node again you'll begin downloading blocks that were generated while you were offline, synchronization time will depend on how much time you were offline and how many block were generated. I hope that clarifies the process well enough:) |
|
|
|
Hello there, Hackathon participants will create dapps on Testnet 3.0 or miannet?
Hey there, I think they will be developing it on testnet right after its release. And what about the amount of paticipants, did it increase? Last time there were 63
Botstorm said here amount of participants grew up to 150 or even more, it's pretty great amount tbh, and that number was even before Ivan announced it in his video if I'm not mistaken, so I think there's even more) Can someone clarify this? Or we should wait for official announcement about amount of participants? Is there any precise info at all about it? |
|
|
|
Is it possible to participate in hackathon if the registration is closed?
Nope, not possible anymore as far as I know, registration finished on Dec 9th |
|
|
|
Hello there, Hackathon participants will create dapps on Testnet 3.0 or miannet?
Hi, as i know they are waiting for 3.1 version Did they release 3.0 or just make some changes to not yet released 3.0? Did they say anything about that? |
|
|
|
When do we expect testnet 3.0 and will there be some Dev's journal with improvements and so on? I've heard it should have been released on this week and now it's weekend so I assume next week? I wanna play with it
Yeah, got myself a bit overexcited on Friday and well... didn't get anything, but that's fine, it's even better this way, maybe they found some bug or whatever, I can wait a bit more to play around with state-of-the-art tech! |
|
|
|
Recently I have talked with one doctor from US, he was very interested in blockchain solution. How do you feel is this sphere ready for this sort of innovation?
I would say that medicine sphere is one of the most ready Why? The HealthIT analytics website published a study of more than 80 medical institutions and major companies from the equipment and consumable supplies sector. The analysts have found that 17% of them are using the IoT, almost 30% are working on the integration of technologies, while 53% of respondents had no specific policies on integration but are willing to cooperate and introduce this practice in the future. The statistics are clear: medical companies are interested in working with new technologies and are ready to cooperate with blockchain projects to develop new solutions for the industry. Are there any significant developments in this area? Bracelets with NFC chips for emergency assistance to wounded soldiers. Shoes with sensors designed to eliminate foot pain without medical intervention and warn of excessive foot pressure. A plaster that warns patients about an imminent epileptic seizure. Drones for speedy transportation of blood and medical supplies. A robotic surgical system for operations. This stuff is good, but I sort of doubt the thing about drones for delivery and robotic surgical system (if I get it right what it should do, ofc). Drones will have to be operated either manually or by a very good AI. And so far as far as I know AI thing hasn't been very successful. I can be wrong, but IMO development of an good AI for that could take pretty long time. Agree, AI could become an obstacle for this idea implementation, but I think people will manage somehow and create an AI from a scratch specially for Drones or adjust existing ones, neural networks can do miracles sometimes. But other cases looks quite nice to me and pretty tangible to implement them in one way or another. |
|
|
|
i think that this hackathon made credits perform better that most of the coins in this market bloodbath
Yeah, hackathon is a great step, attracts more attention to the project and gives more exposure. Can't wait for the moment when dapps developed by participants will be announced!  |
|
|
|
Been away for several days and when I'm back I see this. Awesome! Great idea to demonstrate API possibilities! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
