If you look back a few posts you'll see that some holders dumped. Price has been making a comeback from it's low, actually. Lots of room to grow. Wish I could buy more.

@GoshaGT, I'm sorry for your loss. The responsibility of cryptopia is to provide a quality service to it's customers.
I was merely saying that we have enough to be upset with them about. There is no need to make unrealistic allegations, like secretly staking our coin.

Right after you posted, the buy orders starting piling up. I was trying to get more on the super cheap. Had to settle for just really cheap.    With airdrop just days away, ya can't go wrong at these prices!

I'm no fan of cryptopia, but they have grown immensely in such a short period of time. Anytime coin movements peak, delays do as well. With people withdrawing to claim Airdrop, it's likely to cause peaks.
There have been issues with dozens of other coins for over a month. Many of the issues now appear to be resolved. - Actually, truly resolved, not just them saying so.

During the downtime, many holders of various coins claimed Cryptopia is staking the coin, receiving airdrops, etc. However, most of the coin with issues were not POS, masternode, or had airdrops. Cryptopia did put forth extra effort to keep ZCL wallets working during the BTCP fork. They could have benefited immensely by not doing so, then claiming the forked coins for themselves.

I agree it's largely due to cryptopia problems. They did have majority of trade activity prior to their wallet issues, but downtime was so long, there got to be a lot of FUD. Like the people suggesting they were secretly staking our deposits. Which doesn't really make sense, because there were 20 or so coins with major downtime as well, most of them were not POS or masternode coin.

Cryptopia now accounts for 60% trade volume, (It was 30% prior to cryptopia fix) The price could easily double, and still have room to go before returning to pre-cryptopia issues.

Buys, Sells, Withdrawals, and Deposits all confirmed to be working on cryptopia now.
Issues with many other coins are now appear resolved as well.

Wallet back up on Cryptopia! Looks like it's synced up and showing correct block height! I haven't tried withdrawing yet.

*Edit* I also notice several other wallet updates on Cryptopia. I would venture to guess that they have been working behind the scenes to bring multiple wallets back online, and maybe were waiting until hardware upgrades were completed. I did notice a brief downtime for the entire exchange earlier today, a sign the servers had been restarted.

It just takes a simple script (many readily available online) to replace a list of words with whatever you like to a batch of files. Fixing anything replaced that shouldn't have been, like a name on a copyright, would be done later.
Regardless of how the credits were removed, even if thru ignorance, I give the devs the benefit of doubt they're not trying to pass off copied code as their own. There would be no benefit since their not selling it. It has no effect on the coin or what it can do.

There are other Dash clones, but most or all have problems. Too much premine, still using X11, no mobile wallet, etc. Mobile wallets are very important nowdays, as so many primarily use mobile. It is good that the dev team is working on a mobile wallet rather than fixing things that aren't broke.

Anyway, this is all getting redundant. The only reason I respond is I know this will sit here forever and others will come and see all your FUD and probably move on to another project instead of investigating this one, like I did. Hopefully I provided a little better insight.

coinsplease is a crypto-noob

There are other changes, if you'd have compared the files, you would see. Yet you call me lazy. And that is just one file out of many. I'm not going to compare each file to count all the changes, but feel free.

As far as the copyright notice "taking work" to replace. It's likely they ran Find & Replace. Since you're such a good coder, you should know what that is. Find and replace "Dash" with "Innova". The downside is it replaces that word everywhere, including the Copyright notice. Look at hundreds of other coins, and you'll find the same exact thing.

ASIC resistance has everything to do with the subject matter. Dash had like 30% premine, and it's hash power is controlled by big money, yet you're here whining and calling this a scam when the biggest point of Innova is to remove the centralized profit, and give it to the community.
Nobody is trying to pitch Innova as a completely new ground-up build. Nobody is trying to sell the software. Yet you holler fraud.

TONS of crypto is worked on in secret. Including some big ones.
Some successful projects without daily commits: Cloak, Bulwark, Obsidian, Electrum Wallet, tons more small coins / crypto related stuff.

More activity is good, yes, but that's still no reason to make the accusations you do. You are like everyone's annoying aunt. Mrs. Nitpick 

So apparently INNOVA credits sources in many places, while in others it is missing. I don't think this is something worth devoting so much time and FUD to. It's not like Innova devs would have done this intentionally. Anyone who's anyone in crypto design knows about Dash masternode system. It would be impossible to try to pass off their code as a new creation.

Why not just message the devs or something? All that needs changed in the masternode file you shared, is the addition of this line above their own copy write notice.

INNOVA is based on Dash. However, with INNOVA, you get the good parts of Dash, without the excessive premine and centralization of mining power, Putting coin control back into the hands of ordinary people with a computer. Do you even know what an ASIC is?

INNOVA is far superior, but go ahead and FUD away! Cheaper coins for me!

@coinsplease

Old, well establish projects like LTC and DASH with large development teams are obviously going to have a lot of source commits.
A newborn project with small dev team will not have many source changes, especially when they are busy working on a wallet.

Again, you are posing as some sort of crypto coding lawyer genius, but have obviously never been involved with any projects, nor understand the MIT license.

They clearly show the copyright information, giving credit to the bitcoin code parts used, as well as their own code.

Meh... I didn't want to get caught up in defending a project I'm not even associated with, but you have serious issues, dude. I could probably find you on car forums telling mechanics how to fix a cars and giving medical advice to doctors.

@coinsplease, you appear to be giving investment advice, when you are clearly unqualified to do so. That is something that can actually be argued as illegal.
My comments are quite relevant, given the subject matter. It's as if you stumbled out of a lobotomy clinic and found yourself on this forum!
I purposely don't quote you when replying, because it's gross to have to see your comments twice.

Yep that is fair. Lots of work to be done. Some innovation in the bounties and PR would be an improvement for sure. Communication seems to be a common issue with crypto. Some more than others. I'll assume INNOVA more than others. Their twitter is actually more active than some other more-popular cryptos, tho.
But, those making accusations without merit will not help anyone who's invested heavily. Calling something illegal without substantial proof is a bit extreme. Especially for someone so new to crypto.

I took some deep losses with XEM recently. I feel left in the dark about quite a few things, but I'm not spamming their forums with FUD.

I'm not new and have not received any free coins.
I am a crypto investor that hadn't heard of INN until a few days ago. Today I bought a tiny bit. I have less than .0001% of my portfolio in INN.

I am not promoting INN, but merely pointing out flaws in the accusations made against a small fish in a pool of sharks. You can't expect every mom and pop shop to become the next Walmart overnight. There's plenty of scam coins out there that need light shed on them.

I came here to read more about INN. I had not heard of it before, but saw it's price dropping quickly, and thought I would do some research and see if it's worth investing in.
Yes, I bought some! I didn't have a lot to invest, but I bought a little. And have buy orders for more if price falls further, as it looks like it is undervalued. Take that into consideration however you please.

There are some accusations in this thread, so I did some research. I couldn't find anything illegal with copy-write claims or otherwise. I do think this is a clear case of FUD. - Spreading Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. (I spelled it out, since coinsplease clearly still does not understand what FUD means! SMH!)

coinsplease has newbie account with 21 posts, 17 of which are to defame this project.   (Yes, I am newbie account as well, although I've been lurking since before I created my account 4 yrs ago)

Look at his other 4 posts. He is clearly completely new to crypto, and doesn't even understand the basics of the original one, BITCOIN.
"... I have heard that bitcoins transaction fees are very high. Who pays the transaction fee and how much is it going to be? Would it be smart for use a different wallet with lower transaction fees?"

Additionally, he talks about how developers do this or that on github, and apparently recognizes "copy+pasted" code, like he is an expert on crypto development. Yet he doesn't know who pays bitcoin transaction fees, thinks his wallet charges him, and has only "heard" fees are high...

I think it's actually quite likely that he has a mental disorder.
I do want to thank you, coinsplease, for encouraging my curiosity in this project. The more I read, the more I liked. And now I want INN on it!  

I also posted this on the FUTX Announcement thread.

I really hope my previous post didn't lend any credence to this. Although I DO see value in a futures token system for any crypto supporting the function, I find FUTX / FUTR to be very misleading to anyone thinking about investing.

Anyone exchanging ETH for FUTX or FUTR is up against odds that even underground gambling would find excessive. With the 15.3% fee, then potential 20% fee at deadline, one is very likely to lose 33% of their investment even when exchanging in the first phase.
Anyone exchanging after the first phase face even greater odds.

If you do the math, you'll find that the designer/s of this token based the whole system around taking a 1/3 cut from any deposits. Additionally, they (or he) can play their (his) own system to take more, which is very likely, given that very few ETH have been exchanged for FUTX / FUTR since shortly after it launched.

I haven't inspected the token source code to enough to rule out anything additional hidden within, or that it couldn't be altered at a later date.

Lastly, there could be bugs in the system, a risk that any crypto faces. However this risk is trivial considering all the MASSIVE FEES AND LIABILITIES mentioned above.

There really shouldn't be any need for fees, as it should not require much development and maintenance at all. If there are fees, use them as an incentive for investors, not a way to rip them off.
0.1% fee should be more than adequate to maintain a website.

The math futereum posted showing how one can essentially buy ETH at a hugely discounted rate on Cryptopia, by buying FUTX now, then exchanging later is only true if he follows through on the promise.
Given all the misleading information, unclear information, and questionable past, I would take this promise with a tugboat of salt.

I really hope my previous post didn't lend any credence to this. Although I DO see value in a futures token system for any crypto supporting the function, I find FUTX / FUTR to be very misleading to anyone thinking about investing.

Anyone exchanging ETH for FUTX or FUTR is up against odds that even underground gambling would find excessive. With the 15.3% fee, then potential 20% fee at deadline, one is very likely to lose 33% of their investment even when exchanging in the first phase.
Anyone exchanging after the first phase face even greater odds.

If you do the math, you'll find that the designer/s of this token based the whole system around taking a 1/3 cut from any deposits. Additionally, they (or he) can play their (his) own system to take more, which is very likely, given that very few ETH have been exchanged for FUTX / FUTR since shortly after it launched.

I haven't inspected the token source code to enough to rule out anything additional hidden within, or that it couldn't be altered at a later date.

Lastly, there could be bugs in the system, a risk that any crypto faces. However this risk is trivial considering all the MASSIVE FEES AND LIABILITIES mentioned above.

There really shouldn't be any need for fees, as it should not require much development and maintenance at all. If there are fees, use them as an incentive for investors, not a way to rip them off.
0.1% fee should be more than adequate to maintain a website.

The math futereum posted showing how one can essentially buy ETH at a hugely discounted rate on Cryptopia, by buying FUTX now, then exchanging later is only true if he follows through on the promise.
Given all the misleading information, unclear information, and questionable past, I would take this promise with a tugboat of salt.

I'm not affiliated with the Factory Banking Project : Futereum, but I'm going to share what I think I know. I've read every shred of information I can find, but have some questions as well.

Buying FUTX or FUTR on an exchange is simply transferring the token ownership to you. At a point in the future, when all mining levels have completed, or the time limit has lapsed, you may send the FUTX or FUTR token to the ETH address to receive x amount of ETH per FUTX / FUTR. I'm assuming there is a certain window of time where this can be done before a new mining cycle starts.

At rollover, any FUTX or FUTR not returned for ETH, will be included in the next mining cycle. There is no automatic swap. Each FUTX or FUTR holder makes the decision to hold, or swap.

I hope futereum or someone will make some clarifications and correct me if I am wrong. I am excited about this, and hope it succeeds. It should add extra liquidity and value to ETH

When the swap happens at the end of 3months or 12months, how much ETH is returned per FUTX?
If mining of all levels is completed after 3 months, but before 12 months, do FUTX holders still have to wait until month 12 to swap their FUTX for ETH?
When mining is completed, and the swap can occur, how much time does one have to decide to make the swap or hold?
If mining of all levels is still incomplete at the end of 12months, what happens then?

I read every bit of info about FUTR and FUTX that I could find anywhere. This is a very intriguing idea, but I have so many questions like the ones above. I'll wait for a response on these before asking more.
I would recommend making a video explaining and detailing the mining and swap process in layman's terms, but include all the important numbers.

Thanks in advance.

It is a nice look. It appears very clean. In my own opinion, though, the "A" logo is unappealing. I feel that it doesn't reverberate any of the features of this coin. Just my opinion, though. I know you just made the theme, not the logo.