This has always been the case with any similar service that has ever existed, going all the way back to
VirWox (note the linked article is outdated as VirWox closed back in 2020). If this was the case with a seller, then their rating probably wouldn't be 100% positive anymore, innit.
Shitters also value very much their reputation and an account with high reputation.. so they surely do and manage considerating risks mading fraudulent transactions, so they surely don't operate them all long the way, and manage to place just some that would not have repercussions.
I was asking as they can always ask for KYC like they say..
We may at any time require you to complete our ID verification process and may also require you to submit additional identification documents to AgoraDesk if we deem it necessary. Failing to complete ID verification will be considered a violation of this agreement.
So in case of money transfers services, making it mandatory to display the name of "buyer"-(who will operate a money transfer through a banking service or so).. or maybe asking the buyer to report the name of the transfer maker at the close of the trade could add an additional layer of protection..
Especially in case of new user with no repairs, no (adress book) of proven and tested Traders yet..
Personally I wouldn't trust a seller like that just from his trust ratings !
(you know that recent case of that forum user who was a reputed DT member and decided lately to shit all customers of his products!)
Hardly. What would happen is the seller gets their account closed or limited by whatever service they are using, which may or may not affect the funds received by the buyer.
By seller I mean the person that would sell/concedes (Crypto-currencies) .
Show Posts
Dans le Bitcoin, elle serait du parti de dire "ah bitcoin, c'est un mâle! quelle honte"
Qu'est-ce tu dis ? 
. 
