No, it has nothing to do with fees. The input to the transaction was taken from previous unconfirmed transactions. The network couldn't verify the input as existing as it is unconfirmed so the transaction was rejected. The casino will have to update their routines to handle building transactions correctly.
That's great information. Do you know if something like that could happen if someone sent Bitcoins from the standard Bitcoin client with -paytxfee=0 ? I'm pretty sure the standard client will not let you send a transaction from unconfirmed inputs. But then again I have not tried. |
|
|
|
|
You own yourself.
Seriously. I can be your internet pimp. I'll send you encouraging or dismissive messages based on your performance and when someone tries to rip you off or injure you, I'll send them pictures of their houses.
|
|
|
|
So, in a nutshell: the Bitcoins were sent from an address belonging to the casino and blockchain.info showed the transaction until it was rejected by the network because of insufficient fees. That way, the Bitcoins remain in the casino's original wallet.
No, it has nothing to do with fees. The input to the transaction was taken from previous unconfirmed transactions. The network couldn't verify the input as existing as it is unconfirmed so the transaction was rejected. The casino will have to update their routines to handle building transactions correctly. Now it's up to the casino operators to verify that and, if they're honest, correct the OP's balance on their site or send the Bitcoins again with enough fees. Correct?
That's correct. |
|
|
|
There are four (possibly more, depending on if there's an even longer chain than I can quickly see displayed) unconfirmed inputs with below-recommended fees. That transaction will probably disappear from the queue before it ever goes through.
Do you mean that it might never actually go through? No, it has already been rejected completely. See also the other thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=293554.0 |
|
|
|
OK, so considering a situation like this: someone sends Bitcoins and doesn't include a transfer fee. What happens to those Bitcoins if the network "decides" not to deliver them to the destination address? Are they returned to the sender?
Good question. Anybody knows an answer? They were never sent in the first place then and are still on the old address. (might only be that some clients don't show them, because they are marked as "reserved to be sent") Bitcoins are never "lost in cyberspace" they are always on a Bitcoin address. That makes a lot of sense. But isn't it kind of pointless for a client to generate a transaction number for a transaction that is never going to occur? That's what's confusing me. And from what the OP said, it seems that at some point the transaction was showing on blockchain.info. If you look in the other thread, you'll see what happened that a transaction was sent out that relied on a previous unconfirmed transaction. The second transaction was rejected and removed from the network. |
|
|
|
You can always cancel your withdrawal (if one is still pending), and then buy bitcoins, send them to bitstamp.net and get your euros.
That worked up until a while ago. Now people are also reporting BTC transactions not going through. |
|
|
|
"reposotory" Oh, Fox, you never disappoint.
What the fuck is an "e-note"?
  I..... I should have expected that. I didn't. I'm slightly disappointed in myself. |
|
|
|
Lol, have fun sending money to a place outside your country. That.... might actually be an American thing. I have never paid anything for anything at my bank. Then again my monthly influx on that account is high enough I qualify for the Never-Pay-Anything-For-Anything type account. So maybe this is a problem specifically only affecting poors. |
|
|
|
|
First let me ask you a few questions.
- Are you physically fit?
- Do you have a recent health checkup/blood test/immunoassay?
- Do you have a means to travel and if yes in what range?
- On a scale from hideous to gorgeous how -eous are you?
- How comfortable are you with things sticking in or out of your bottoms?
|
|
|
|
|
"reposotory" Oh, Fox, you never disappoint.
What the fuck is an "e-note"?
|
|
|
|
Looks like it got rejected 52f39c4b03240a845d7b1160f6ac4d37ceb0c65c534af39dc0096871d29b21b3 ConnectInputs() : mapTransactions prev not found 779fa0d2aecc478ee88114547a51b642e8efc69f3b8a042bffc1cc28a0b6fecb 2013-09-13 08:29:20 Do/did you have other stalled transactions around? No, it's my first broken transaction... Is my money gone? :/ You'll need to contact the casino. Their transaction to you didn't go through most likely because of the unconfirmed incoming transaction they've got. |
|
|
|
my goal is to eventually be producing between 50 to 150 BTC a minute (If it sounds low im a noob at this please recommend a better target) Better make that "per decade" don't break his heart  But that's what I do best.  |
|
|
|
Looks like it got rejected 52f39c4b03240a845d7b1160f6ac4d37ceb0c65c534af39dc0096871d29b21b3 ConnectInputs() : mapTransactions prev not found 779fa0d2aecc478ee88114547a51b642e8efc69f3b8a042bffc1cc28a0b6fecb 2013-09-13 08:29:20 Do/did you have other stalled transactions around? EDIT: Sure enough there's an unconfirmed transaction 779fa0d2aecc478ee88114547a51b642e8efc69f3b8a042bffc1cc28a0b6fecb lounging around for some hours now. |
|
|
|
my goal is to eventually be producing between 50 to 150 BTC a minute (If it sounds low im a noob at this please recommend a better target) Better make that "per decade" |
|
|
|
|
You need to pay fees for your transactions to go through. This is why bitcoin is advertised as having no fees. Kinda like bitcoin is advertised as anonymous only it's totally not.
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. You're still using Mt.Gox. You must not like having money very much.
|
|
|
|
|
I wouldn't worry. I'm pretty sure all orders will be delivered by locusts in Two WeeksTM
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
