Did anyone watched Chicken Hawk (men who loves boys) 1994 ?
This freedom they enjoy to talk such things and to promote something against law,
i just don't understand why community neglecting such threat for society and kids.
Today this is even worse they can hide behind TOR and recruit more "people" and gain more power.
What I don't understand is that part. isn't it illegal to promote illegal activities? |
|
|
|
Thanks for pointing this out. You know that before privatisation electricity cost 1.5 times less where I live? You know what happened after privatisation? They fired half people working here, cut all the costs then increased the price.
The "private companies work better" is just a big fat lie. It's not true. The only things that changed after privatisation of energy in my country was a rise of prices, more unemployment and more debt for the states that's all.
Cherrypick 1 situation that we dont know anything about, I dont know the circumstances of your situation with the electricity, but it may be just because the companies are forced to deliver the electricity cheaper. Which is kind of anti-free market, price controls and shit like that. And eventually it will end in disaster as those companies could go bankrupt if their prices are not allowed to freefloat Because you provided any example to prove your point? I don't know a single company that was privatized and that is working better, creating more jobs for the people. |
|
|
|
Ok so you care about people around you, fine. And you think there is no other way of doing that without violence and a system based on theft?
No there is none. Or at least nobody created another one. The violence of the system is here to compensate the greed and the individualism of humans. Because if you really care about people around you, you would not want them subjected to this violent system.
Sur because a system in which poor people can't afford an education is much better. A system where if you got a cancer and you don't have enough money you gonna die slowly and painfully is incredibly better.
Taxes at their most fundamental level are meant to afford the necessary papers, rents, and essentials for government to function properly. Taxes cannot be based on donations because laws will be biased towards the donors. Each individual must have an equal investment, equal stake in the government to have an equal voice. It is not possible to live in anarchy because you would need a government to ensure that government doesn't form-- which negates itself. It is hereby proven that we can't live with too much government and we can't live without it, therefore we must put into place a limited government that benefits the most people by being the most transparent in its prime reason for existing: To guarantee individual's right to life, liberty, and property.
Then reform the tax system and eliminate the tax on income, that is the worst of them all, because it steals away productivity directly. Wrong. Tax on income doesn't steal productivity wtf are you saying? Tax on income takes away money nothing else. Productivity has nothing to do with that do you even understand what you're talking about? I personally would have no issue with property tax , but most taxes are just illogical and hurt your quality of life.
Property tax? Why is this one better than the other? What you have to tax is the wealth, the ownership of capitals! That's what is dangerous in capitalism: the concentration of capital. |
|
|
|
Now... Do you understand why your position is hilarious and why you are a liberal, by US definition, not france's? We do not care how you call yourself. As long as you believe your ex minister has more rights than you. It must be! How come he hasn't been in jail yet? The BBC article is dated 15 April 2013.
Not unusual at all. European justice is long. And it's the case everywhere. Only 3 years ago man, 3 years for national cases is nothing. I don't see your point here.
French Corruption from the Corrupted French Socialists. They know they have enough useful idiots** like you to keep them out of jail forever...
But do tell us why France never vote for the liars, young engineer...
Stop right there!Where did I say anything like this? I was talking about American presidence run. The fact that people seem to actually love Trump and I was wondering why. I NEVER said French politic was different. The only different is that we don't like them, we vote for the one we think is the less horrible that's all.
I invite everyone to use google search the way I did and seek juicy french corruptions for this lesson giver.
It was an honest question, I wanted to know why Trump is loved so much. Galdur answered. End of the debate. Never gave you lessons about politics here. |
|
|
|
Looking through a number of those, I don't think they are realistic assessments of "true or false." Not in the least.
I'm not perfectly aware of American politics and news so I'm probably less well informed. But I relaly like how it's done. They're rather harsh on notation that's for sure! Another typical, logical perspective from a well informed liberal...  I just said I'm not well informed in the general American political life. I don't understand what you mean here. |
|
|
|
the physical destruction of the white race through miscegenation The german .gov saw that 1933+ didnt work out now they are trying to do the opposite!!  ( yeah i know i just read the dailystormer) Well... It was really close. Most people would argue that the 3rd Reich was a success. Hitler only made a few horrible mistakes. Attacking Russia for one, but then also pushing ahead in winter. Bombing the UK instead of leaving them alone. Would he had not made such mistakes, the 1933+ would have worked out pretty well I think  |
|
|
|
Ban guns and upgrade our baseball bats to make them more lethal weapons. Everyone will be entitle to one baseball bat per household. Cops will have the more lethal version with spiked 6" nails protruding like a death wish. Students will have a less deadly version but can still justify a few broken bones if needed.
I don't see the use of lethal weapons really. Do you really need to blow someone's head off or would a few broken bones suffice?
When one gets to the point of needing self defense, the situation is utterly serious and it would be unwise for most people to be making less than a 100% effort to defend themselves. Bonking a home intruder on the head with a frying pan makes for good comedy on TV but has a very good chance of working out poorly for the defender in real life. Arguments for less-than-lethal ammo can be made both ways (and have on this thread.) I personally still keep that as an option, but it is mostly because my biggest threats are against large animals which I don't normally wish to kill, and I can switch over in less than one second. As long as I can keep my head together in an emergency situation which hopefully I'll never be in. Yeah better make it legal to own lethal weapons. It will help the whole population and make it easier both for criminals and good citizens to kill each other. Great. Lethal weapons? People own knives and other tools. Why should guns be any different? Oh and the gun/knife analogy is flawed from the beginning because guns are single use while knifes are multi use. Knifes are used on a daily basis to cut food or other things while guns have nothing but single purpose: to kill. Hence you can't really compare them. You want to make legal to own guns? Then why not also making it legal to own missiles, chimical weapons, flamethrowers, tanks... |
|
|
|
Ban guns and upgrade our baseball bats to make them more lethal weapons. Everyone will be entitle to one baseball bat per household. Cops will have the more lethal version with spiked 6" nails protruding like a death wish. Students will have a less deadly version but can still justify a few broken bones if needed.
I don't see the use of lethal weapons really. Do you really need to blow someone's head off or would a few broken bones suffice?
When one gets to the point of needing self defense, the situation is utterly serious and it would be unwise for most people to be making less than a 100% effort to defend themselves. Bonking a home intruder on the head with a frying pan makes for good comedy on TV but has a very good chance of working out poorly for the defender in real life. Arguments for less-than-lethal ammo can be made both ways (and have on this thread.) I personally still keep that as an option, but it is mostly because my biggest threats are against large animals which I don't normally wish to kill, and I can switch over in less than one second. As long as I can keep my head together in an emergency situation which hopefully I'll never be in. Yeah better make it legal to own lethal weapons. It will help the whole population and make it easier both for criminals and good citizens to kill each other. Great. Lethal weapons? People own knives and other tools. Why should guns be any different? Simply because killing with a knife is incredibly more difficult than with a gun. |
|
|
|
Pay no attention to the civilized debate behind the curtain. Cognitive dissonance at its best.
It's not a debate.It's a wrong statement..So keep up your quest for no rules with rules I'm surprised people want to even argue against homosexual relationships. It is not my business what people do in their bedrooms. Would they complain that Asians like to have more oral than Blacks (just an example, I'm not sure if it is true)? Why people even think about what gay people do in their bedrooms? Why they have interest in it? Closet gays themselves? Jealous? Never understood that logic. It really does not matter if kids are raised by a man and a women or two women, two men, or three men and five women. What is the difference? If parents love their kids, they will provide for them, show them love and teach them how to be good human beings. I agree with you 100%, it is nobody's business, even the government's. I never argued against homosexual relationships. I stated that people are demanding increased regulation via the government, as a result it effects everyone subject to that government regardless of your sexuality, therefore merely objecting to it does not make one a homophobe or a bigot. The idea that it doesn't effect anyone else is a myth designed to mask the fact that this makes people less free, not more free, exploiting the LGBT movement to do so. This directly involves the government and gives them more power, control, and authority over gay marriage when the government shouldn't be involved in any kind of marriage at all. Wrong. People are only asking for the right to chose if they want to be regulated by the government or not. Nothing more. they never asked for government regulation, only the possibility to be regulated by gov. because believe it or not, some people like both their country and their institutions |
|
|
|
Damn stable. Just raise a bit, I wanna sell at 380€ that's all I ask for  |
|
|
|
click on my signature and you'll see how much hotter it can get WINK WINK
LOL Check the number of models online on my signature first. 304 MODELS ARE CURRENTLY ONLINEAnd there are completely free public shows. "Public show on free chat" - that mean - for free, absolutely. 24/7 No credit card, no bitcoin, only a valid e-mail. Thake one new free e-mail for this on https://mail.yandex.com/Ahahah! Vika NSFW are you a commercial or the creator of the website? |
|
|
|
But more transactions were expected by the coming years
How do You expect it, if usually people "store" bitcoins with hope of exchange rate 1 BTC=$100.000. ? To be honest people can't really use their bitcoin as with the current blocks and network we can make around 1 transaction per person every 3 days ^^ |
|
|
|
|
Ok.
Just read the last 3 pages.
I won't yell as much as Craked5 but indeed, it IS a shock.
As a European too, I didn't understand the existence of an actual official association.
I therefore understand why you're so worried about any change concerning them.
I still think the "dolls subject" is right. It's better to let them get rid of their pulsions on dolls than on real children.
But I understand your point of view. It's really shocking. I don't even understand how this thing can exist. Do they have official HQ? I mean people should burn it to the ground!
|
|
|
|
Man that would be something. I have never seen politics like what we're seeing now it's like the super bowl of politics.
And still some people wonder why our world is shit and is crashing down. I think the whole reason is in this sentence. |
|
|
|
Bernie won 3 of the last 4 states
#FeelTheFern!
I still don't believe he can do it ^^ He got half the number of delegates she has. Unless something really amazing happens, it'll be clinton vs Trump. which means Trump already won. |
|
|
|
|
Good thing. It's great to see that education is on the move.
It's important people coming are taught about contraception, man and woman position (talking about monogamy here nothing like sex positions xD) and what it means to have a family here.
I especially like the "family planning" part, its goal is to prevent people from just fucking and making kids without thinking about it.
But again not sure a digital solution will have lots of effect.
|
|
|
|
Irrelevant. No link with our subject. It's like saying "I want people to love each other". It's beautiful but irrelevant.
2. It depends on the severity of the case, many of which have appeared in "TV Show"
mentioned earlier didnt get 15 years. Yes they did not abuse child but their intent was that! So please stop be smart.
He is still predator and he will strike again
So you want anyone who ever stepped on the line ever to be put in jail until he dies? Again, what will you do once there is more people in jail than out... 3. Yes i'm against dolls.. And any other movement about their rights!
For me this is same as letting them freely watch CP.
Not the same simply because CP implies that somewhere a child has been abused. So the CP is created. Hence it can't be tolerated. Whereas the dolls harm absolutely no one. And how your post can contribute this topic?
By explaining why what you're asking is nothing but true and complete dictatorship. You might think it's just "to protect children" but you violent every human rights by asking for people to be put in jails for having weird dreams. |
|
|
|
china's gonna light yer ass up
My sells weren't done, coins in transfer to the exchange plateform... But I'm maybe going to wait a bit in case you're right  |
|
|
|
Good post. Thanks for bringing this up, I feel it is a very important point people consistently overlook. Anyone who spends any small amount of time looking over crime stats will find that there is a high correlation between crime rates and the amount of multiculturalism in an area. It is a fact that the more you put people of different classes, races, religions, etc in an area, the more they conflict, thus resulting in higher crime rates. Even in Europe they still usually have an ethnocentric core of a native population that serves as the foundation for their nations. In the USA there is no such thing. Everyone except for the Native Americans and the Indians came here from somewhere else. You could argue that Caucasians are largely in control and serve as that same core, but even if that were true to an extent, those Caucasians often come from very disparate places all over the world and do not necessarily share a common culture or heritage. In my opinion this is the crux of the reason why USA suffers from higher rates of crime, and as a result depends more on gun ownership to control that crime, because as you said guns are the great equalizer. Even granny and little Timmy can fight off big 300lb assailants if they know how to use a firearm properly. Good luck doing that without a gun.
Really? Glad it's so easy. But it's funny, after looking up for a small amount of time I found Texas having such a strong amount of rapes and murders while having one of the most homogeneous population of USA (85% whites, 14% blacks) and one of the highest rates of gun property and the most freedom concerning guns. Would you care to detail where is the link with racial diversity in Texas? |
|
|
|
The people who don't believe that we have a gun problem in this country is out of their minds. Countless numbers of people die every year over guns so don't tell me we don't have a gun problem!
Use of guns in self-defense and self-determination (suicide) are both human rights, and not a problem for anyone but an aggressor. Remove those from the statistics and suddenly you find out that countless more numbers of people die every year because they were {il}legally disarmed for violent criminals' safety. Look at South Korea, Japan, and other countries with extremely strict gun laws, they don't experience mass killings like our lovely gun slanging Cowboys here. Take that out of the equation, make America as monocultural as Japan and South Korea is, and you'll notice the crime rate plummet, which includes the rate of mass killings. Only true difference between these nations (Japan, SK, China, NK) is that their mass killings occur usually with stabbings, what I presume is the 2nd best thing next to guns to injure others. So clearly the issue does not rest with guns, even in these societies where everyone ought to get along with so much in common, they still fail to. So I guess if you really would rather be stabbed to death than shot, banning guns might help you out, but I sincerely feel the distinction is minute. That's not to mention the power shift between those allowed to have guns--usually only those in the oligarchy--and those regular folks who have no sway over what is and is not acceptable for gun ownership. If you feel this won't be abused for the decider's benefit, it is due to your naiveté towards power games. And then there's the fact that, in the case of someone overpowering me to stab me (rather than shooting me), I am at a severe disadvantage since I'm not as strong as most people, and this is the case for many. Firearms heavily level the playing field here. Further, Europe has far more stricter gun laws in general than America does, and yet has mass killings on par with, if not greater than, America. Also notice that Europe is also multicultural. I hope the pattern is becoming clear to you. It's identical to computer control, to limit who can have access to a computer and who can't, to prevent hackers from hacking and to prevent pedophiles from sharing CP etc. Is the computer the problem? No, it just facilitates action, it is neutral. I can make this argument for just about anything. What about encryption control? What if some bad guys use encryption to hide their plots? The harm in banning or controlling such far outweighs the benefit. And hackers would still get their computers, and encryption is simple enough to do on your own anyway so that'd be hilarious to attempt to control. Let's say that you have never used a computer in your life. You feel that life is perfectly fine without computers. You notice that computers are often used to do terrible things, and have been used to ruin many people's lives daily. The odds of you supporting computer control skyrocket. However, because--chances are--you do use computers regularly, you would feel personally infringed upon to have this right to computers tampered with. You are far less likely to support such "Orwellian" measures, because you would personally feel the negative effects of that control. What right does the government have to tell me whether I can use my PC, my laptop, my smart phone, my gaming console? And I can guarantee you, if you tried using firearms, if you got comfortable with their presence, if you learned how to personally control them, you would not project your own feelings of being out-of-control with firearms onto a political agenda. You feel the need for others to control firearms because you do not feel you have any control of them, and that makes them very scary. You should learn how to use guns, your mind will change very quickly. Would you care to explain why Texas got so much rapes and killings while having a population mainly white? (85%) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
