I doubt he meant data center as that is 5x + the cost of a mining center. My mining center is fully filtered etc, but it's still a mining center.
no, I meant data center. There is a large need for them here. and many data centers here are also doubling by renting out space for miners as well. be careful i know of a bunch of T3 1/4 filled data centers. you might want to actually look for a failing one and buy it because you will not be able to build it as cheap. The big guys are running around snapping up for 15 million a 40 million $ to build data center. Either way man I wish you luck though! I have considered buying one as well and almost did buy one in Tampa but decided I rather build one on the property I already own and if I do build, it is not going to be a very large one, I would be happy with a 3k to 3.5k sqft facility. and thank you. |
|
|
|
|
well and when going thru Amazon you can still shop small businesses - also the price I am paying on Amazon is the same price as the 3 other sources listed here. If I had no gift cards for Amazon, I would use another source from here - I have bought from several and sold to several people on here. I never use eBay any more - the prices are never a deal on eBay any more, 99% of everything there is more expensive than you can find elsewhere. too many people buying at full price and then selling for a mark up - lucky for them there are a ton of people who do zero research and truly believe they are getting a deal on eBay. I mean just look at average price for an S9 on eBay, its close to $350-$400
in the end, I have to do what supports my business as well - and that is about saving money.
|
|
|
|
|
the person I would be buying from on Amazon is someone listed here in this ad - so would that not be supporting small business? small businesses list on amazon
|
|
|
|
I doubt he meant data center as that is 5x + the cost of a mining center. My mining center is fully filtered etc, but it's still a mining center.
no, I meant data center. There is a large need for them here. and many data centers here are also doubling by renting out space for miners as well. |
|
|
|
|
AM is now reporting LTC with a 544.04 value - can we pick the exchange that gets used? for both the ticker down below and for the profit per day calculations?
it is also reporting bchsv as having a daily revenue of $3,696.39 - it should be more like $205 range
|
|
|
|
ok and if no victims have come forward - on what evidence do you base your statement that people will lose money if they deal with QS? I will read the other posts above about QS when I get home. I again do not back either side in this. I am just curious what actual evidence there was. If there is valid evidence, I would back the flag.
Hhampuz had a business deal with QS. The link is in the OP: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5129675.msg51116576#msg51116576The deal ended with QS being fired. A few days later QS started the accusation with no proof whatsoever based on the mere fact of coins being moved by Hhampuz and makes bold claims such as "Hhampuz has stolen the excess money from the BestMixer campaign for his own personal use". Note that he didn't use the trust system (old or new) to label Hhampuz and when called out on this he said this: I did not say that I wanted others to tag him as a scammer. I said I believe him to be a scammer, and the reason he has not been tagged is due to tribalism.
I do think he should be tagged, but due to the trust system being broken, I don't think anyone tagging him will have any affect any anything. In lieu of tagging him, I will leave this thread open and any potential customers of his (and his current customers) can look at the evidence themselves, including the fact that many of those defending him are being paid his advertisers money by him.
Which makes me think he's seeking to damage HH's business and doesn't have an actual concern or proof of a scam, which would necessitate feedback/flag. Here is a partial list of other frivolous accusations QS has brought up over the years about people he has grudges against: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5147938.msg51387395#msg51387395He took 20 BTC from a known scammer to sue Vod: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1179238.msg12406963#msg12406963There is a clear pattern. now I have some reading to do  and this is the evidence that should have been presented in your OP - at least that is my opinion. |
|
|
|
I guess what I am saying is that I would like to see some evidence of QS scamming someone and not anything that points to his accusation of Hhampuz
He would have a red box if a victim of his actions came forward. As it stands now, he is a high risk individual with a yellow box warning. Perhaps if Hhampuz has a loss of business or a certain person in socal gets harrassing phone calls we can put a proper red box on him but for now this will have to suffice. ok and if no victims have come forward - on what evidence do you base your statement that people will lose money if they deal with QS? I will read the other posts above about QS when I get home. I again do not back either side in this. I am just curious what actual evidence there was. If there is valid evidence, I would back the flag. |
|
|
|
|
I guess what I am saying is that I would like to see some evidence of QS scamming someone and not anything that points to his accusation of Hhampuz
|
|
|
|
@suchmoon - I believe what the others are trying to say is that YOU need evidence to back up your claim that people dealing with QuickSeller are at risk of losing their funds - you made that accusation yet show nothing in relative evidence to back up that people will lose their money to QuickSeller - your basing your claim solely on the fact that Quickseller made an accusation against someone.
Amazing that for just yesterday you bashed me for leaving negative feedback on someone who falsely (with no evidence) accused me and 5 other forum members of scamming him - and here you are trying to put one on Quickseller simply because he made an accusation against someone and you dont like it....
I didn't "bash" you, I just said that retaliatory red trust is frowned upon and tried to explain why I think so. You're free to do what you like. Quickseller's case is not comparable to yours. He didn't merely spam someone's trust feedback from a sockpuppet account, he created a frivolous scam accusation thread in retaliation to getting fired and has explicitly stated that he's aiming to cause business problems for Hhampuz. You're welcome to oppose the flag if your disagree. ok maybe bash is not the right term- the point is you were saying my justified feedback about a guy who accused me falsely as well as several others was retaliation when it was not retaliation. He left a false statement and I left feedback stating as such. And by no means am I backing QS here either - I am simply stating that QS has provided some "evidence" to back up his claim - whether that "evidence" is valid or legitimate is not for me to decide nor do I plan to even review it. I am simply pointing out that is simply retaliation - you stated that people will lose their money when dealing with QS - and your "evidence" is his accusation. |
|
|
|
|
@suchmoon - I believe what the others are trying to say is that YOU need evidence to back up your claim that people dealing with QuickSeller are at risk of losing their funds - you made that accusation yet show nothing in relative evidence to back up that people will lose their money to QuickSeller - your basing your claim solely on the fact that Quickseller made an accusation against someone.
Amazing that for just yesterday you bashed me for leaving negative feedback on someone who falsely (with no evidence) accused me and 5 other forum members of scamming him - and here you are trying to put one on Quickseller simply because he made an accusation against someone and you dont like it....
edit - without reading all of QuickSeller's post on his accusation against Hhampuz - there is one difference between his accusation and yours - he is providing proof, will need to be verified of course. All you are providing is that you BELIEVE there is risk because of his accusation....
|
|
|
|
I think that's where most of our former hashrate whales are. There are some "bonus's" for those large guys, a decent payout structure; still a higher fee but less variance.
I believe the bonus aspect is why they would be there opposed to slush or other options.
currently viabtc has also discounted their fees up to 70% - depending on hash rate - then the merged mining, even though they are shit coins mostly with enough volume, I am sure it would add up. I think my LTC miners are getting about $1.50 per week in doge lol |
|
|
|
We have a few large miners that failover here. They used to mine here consistently but moved on to other pools that let's say don't treat each TH the same. The nice thing is when they failover they are still ramping up and us consistent Kano miners reap the benefits of 5nd. I wonder what pool is that, Viabtc? seems to be the fashionable pps pool nowdays... I have 5 s9's on viabtc - also my BW L21's are also on viabtc |
|
|
|
love the set up man! I am still trying to get mine up and running - so far, only have the land - dont have liquid funds to build it so trying for a loan - that is harder than I thought especially since the electric company wants me to secure the loan first and the bank wants me to secure the power first but I have not given up yet! lol
Thanks bud I appreciate it. Just a bit of free advice: If you can't afford to do it without loans, don't do it. That is the only reason I did not go under like most everyone did in 2018. I own everything in my place as well as my building. I have lines of credit but I don't use them. a loan is the only way I am going to be able to do it lol I aint got millions sitting around. I own the land outright - but need the loan to build. risky deal if we have another downturn like 2018 you will be hurtin. Collectors don't care they just want their cash. So maybe scale up or something? Just be careful bro because I don't have to tell you, crypto is crazy!  my purpose is not to just have it for mining but to also double it as a data center - and you are right, it is crazy but I am not planning of leaving it |
|
|
|
love the set up man! I am still trying to get mine up and running - so far, only have the land - dont have liquid funds to build it so trying for a loan - that is harder than I thought especially since the electric company wants me to secure the loan first and the bank wants me to secure the power first but I have not given up yet! lol
Thanks bud I appreciate it. Just a bit of free advice: If you can't afford to do it without loans, don't do it. That is the only reason I did not go under like most everyone did in 2018. I own everything in my place as well as my building. I have lines of credit but I don't use them. a loan is the only way I am going to be able to do it lol I aint got millions sitting around. I own the land outright - but need the loan to build. |
|
|
|
|
he removed the negative feedbacks and changed his email address - I guess someone/or something go thru to him or he suffered from remorse. I removed my negative feedback on him as well.
|
|
|
|
|
love the set up man! I am still trying to get mine up and running - so far, only have the land - dont have liquid funds to build it so trying for a loan - that is harder than I thought especially since the electric company wants me to secure the loan first and the bank wants me to secure the power first but I have not given up yet! lol
|
|
|
|
Its not a matter of big concern for you because there is so many feedback like these where those guys used trust system as a matter of joke. Every responsible user always check the reference link for justifying a negative feedback.
You have to keep it on mind that without proper reference link or evidence those feedback got no value. Already suchmoon explained you properly what step you can take against that user by using a neutral feedback from your end. I hope you got your answer.
using a neutral feedback does nothing - same as a negative feedback apparently. and whether it has value to you or not, it does to me. When you have hundreds of positive feedback one negative might not matter to you, but when you have 5 feedback and 1 is bad - then that is 20%. I did no such scam and now 20% of my feedback is negative because of it. I like how all the people with tons feedback say the proper thing to do is to leave neutral feedback and look down upon me for not doing so but then do nothing to the liars and/or scammer accounts. So far the only thing that I have seen anyone banned for is plagiarizing a for sale post. Copying someone is a ban worthy offence but slandering with lies is not. I love this site but at times I feel that the ones in charge have their heads up their asses with some of the idiotic logic that is here. |
|
|
|
lol look at https : // microbtwhatsminerd1 . com/ I get a huge kick out of their message at the top: Please be aware
our official domains are "www . microbt .company" "www . microbtchina . com" "www . microbtgroup . com" and
"www . microbtwhatsminerd1 . com"
all other websites are fake especially "whatsminer.net" it's not our Brand name and they don't hold any export rights or certificate from us
so if you purchase from them you will lose all your money.
Our Company brand name is"MicroBT" not "whatsminer.net" they make no mention of the official MicroBT site www.microbt.comI disabled the bad links https://pangolinminer.com is a good link to a good reseller https://whatsminer.net is a good link to a good reseller www.microbt.com is the actual company and I do no know if they will deal with a buyer outside of China sorry bout the links - forgot about that as I just copy/paste from their site. My ISP actually geoblocks microbt.com |
|
|
|
Awesome Miner version 6.5.5
ASIC mining
- Adjust the reported pool priority for BW L21 ASIC
GPU mining
- Improved detection of environment variables for nVidia commands via Remote Agent on Linux
Features
- Added a way to detect duplicated IP addresses for External Miners in the Options dialog, External Miner section
Mining Software
- CcMiner KlausT 1.25
Corrections
- Correction to exact IP address match in the Find Miner dialog
- NbMiner console correction for Remote Agent on Linux and disable watchdog
- Correction to the console tab to correctly clear the display when selecting a miner without any console output
thanks! will update and verify for the BW L21 ***EDIT*** verified that it is now reporting the correct pool! thanks! |
|
|
|
I am new here and trying to build a good reputation and this asshole is lying.
Trust me, nobody will pay attention to that rating. Ignore it. I would also suggest to remove your red trust you posted for that user (retaliatory trust is frowned upon) and post a neutral instead, including your suspicion that this is an alt of the other user. That will alert anyone who cares. I am sorry - my feedback is in response - not in retaliation. Funny how a legitimate response to a lie is frowned upon but the liar is not frowned upon.... as nothing is done about it. You can respond with a neutral rating, that's what it's for. Two wrongs don't make it right. Someone misusing the trust system doesn't mean you need to do that as well. why would I use neutral? and two wrongs do not make a right? what wrong am I committing? the user is fraudulently claiming I contacted him for an unsecured loan - i have not quoted, commented, replied to, sent any pm to this user. My negative feedback on his false claim is justified. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
