My favorite lately is 20479.  Best performance I have found.

Try STILT's BIOS.  It makes the mid-range memclocks (between 1375-1450) much higher performing.

They have always "worked". Just now, stats are actually shown.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=433634.msg5657095#msg5657095

Disabled because the query for found blocks was very heavy on the database.  PoolWaffle plans to create a new table to store block finder data in a less resource stress-full way, at some point.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=433634.msg5663855#msg5663855

I highly doubt the hardfork will cause a significant value increase.  I would lean more towards a decrease.  A key thing to remember about DogeCoin, is that is will lose it's main utility if it achieves a much high market cap.  The utility of Doge lays in it's relatively low value which leads to people sharing them in large volumes without much care - do you think people would continue to tip big chunks of Doge (it's main form of advertising and basic utility) if it's market cap neared that of litecoin?  I think not.

I personally expect Doge's network hashrate to drop significantly after the hardfork, and it's price to follow downward.

I think the dev's are rushing the new Doge update... the diff switching code is largely untested, and potentially opens up some interesting mining strategies.  I would argue that multi-pools have made Doge what it is - one of the biggest miners of Doge over it's lifespan has been MiddleCoin (which represented more then half the Doge network for quite a while before it was even on cryptsy), and of course recently WafflePool.  It will be interesting to see if doge remains profitable after the hard-fork.

Looks like the hard-fork is going to happen at 145,000.  Which gives 5,701 minutes, or just over 3.5 days of variable block rewards remaining.  And then we'll see what happens with their new difficulty algorithm taken from DigiByte.  It does implement a fix to the non-counted ntime block time-switching attack, but looks potentially vulnerable to other manipulations (more analysis/simulation is needed).

WafflePool killing it so far today.  Over 1/4 thru the day, and have been holding at over 0.00878182 BTC/MH for a while.

Doge and Litecoin power.

Looks like you have expiry set too low.  Try scan-time 4 and expiry 8.

Hm, looks like Worker stats replaced individual block finder stats.

@PoolWaffle:  can we get blocks found back on the personal stats page?

Give it more time?  You can always look up the txid on blockchain.info or a similar website for further spend status information.

Not sure where the heck you are getting that from... You realize the MC pool "Balance" never gets anywhere close to 0, right?   Middlecoin has been significantly less profitable then WafflePool recently.

WafflePool... we don't just mine, we destroy.


WafflePool's blocks:
dogecoin   2014-03-11 04:01:38      438,588     Block#135478
dogecoin   2014-03-11 04:00:12      466,278     Block#135475
dogecoin   2014-03-11 03:59:22      467,952     Block#135471
dogecoin   2014-03-11 03:59:01      268,318      Block#135470


Everyone else's doge blocks:
Block#135472:   25,885
Block#135473: 159,866
Block#135474:   51,137
Block#135476: 323,828
Block#135477: 243,098


WafflePool - Snatching the nuggets and leaving the dust for the rest.

Rejects are low on US East server, even with a high >100ms ping.  Looks like endpoint load has a lot to do with reject rates.

Ahh, that's just a load of crap.  The reason for the falling prices is a lack of speculator interest.  BTC is suffering a bit right now, and when that happens, interest fades away from the shit coins.  When interest in BTC is high, you get more speculators putting money into the smaller coins in hopes of getting rich.

If it wasn't WafflePool, CleverMining, MiddleCoin, etc mining these coins, then someone else would be mining them and selling them - makes no difference if it is a multi-pool or not.

Crap coins are crap, and that's the reason for declining interesting/profitability.  The majority of scrypt coins will likely die out this year.

That's obviously not possible for a system like this...

@gyruss: The apache and MIT licenses do not obligate the OP to publish the source code, unfortunately for us.

Only unmodified code would need to be released under the same license (and therefore carry a license notice), so the OP is likely in their full right to use modified parts of MultiBit and BitcoinJ.

Very impressed this turned out legit... Impressive to say the least.  Deposits were all refunded.

Nothing wrong with that if you have a low hash rate.

@PoolWaffle: any luck with coins stuck at coinmarket?  Looks like they are online right now.

I would say AUR is worth mining small bits of when very profitable. Max 4 blocks waiting maturation would make sense to me.

Or it's a proxy, if the guy isn't half retarded.  Coins are gone, we're going to have zero recourse.  But, power to you if you think you can actually encourage him to payout.

mini.ponzicoin is also halted.  Read the writing on the wall, folks.  Sucks, but that's the ponzi game for you.

PoolWaffle said exactly why... Yeesh, some people...

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=433634.msg5365044;topicseen#msg5365044

Learn to search before you go full retard.