IT was clear from the start that it IS SCAM.
The devs and PR are same scammers as SIGT 1.0.
Main dev account is spam-bot.
What else we could expect?
Just stay away from this shit.
Looks like this, all of his previous posts is in offtopic threads. Yep, guy spreading shit wherever he can, his prevoius posts telling about his nature very clearly. |
|
|
|
I have a question: They said the swap coins will be burnt, but how can I know if they were burnt or kept? If the developers (include Dr.) had a plan to collect all SIGT and manage to kick the price up and so on...? We all cant know.
The burn will be transparent, everybody will be able to see it in explorer. Can it be faked? I doubt it, cant hide things in blockchain  Anyway all swap details can be seen at 29 nov. |
|
|
|
I have a question: They said the swap coins will be burnt, but how can I know if they were burnt or kept? If the developers (include Dr.) had a plan to collect all SIGT and manage to kick the price up and so on...? We all cant know.
The burn will be transparent, everybody will be able to see it in explorer. |
|
|
|
team members on the site are copied from another site, they aren't associated with this project in anyway.
clear scam, do you work better to atleast to cheat stupid properly.
oh really?  Hahaha this made me laugh. This is hilarious! Good devs defending their thread against FUD  And what so funny? Guys showing themselves and that is worth of respect. Grow up man. The guy said we didnt exist, with that picture we show that we exist, im sorry if you take it wrong, but i prefer to show that we exist rather than hide behind a pc. You are my new hero man, Vitalik is sucks  btw when ICo will be over? |
|
|
|
team members on the site are copied from another site, they aren't associated with this project in anyway.
clear scam, do you work better to atleast to cheat stupid properly.
oh really? Hahaha this made me laugh. This is hilarious! Good devs defending their thread against FUD And what so funny? Guys showing themselves and that is worth of respect. Grow up man. |
|
|
|
Well, I see why the price dove, the swap is turning into a scam even.
SIX YEARS!!
WTF, BTC is only like 9 years old and crypto coins have only had a dollar value for about that time.
So for those who want to swap their coins, if they don't get some of that year 1 STRAKS they have to wait a year to try again, that's ridiculous.
You guys needed to distance yourself from SIGT, not tie yourself to them for 6 more years, what a disaster.
You're also hurting your masternode system by holding back so many coin for years.
Next is, the price won't be able to stabilize until the number of sigt being swapped in is determined.
Lastly, the remaining coins you didn't use for the swap were supposed to be used for airdrop/bounty was it not... so the airdrops and bounties aren't going to happen until year 7?
Epic fail guys, sad I wasted this much time following this only to get hit with that doozy of proof that you guys are going to have a rough uphill battle trying to make this work.
Decisions like this will bury your project and I highly suggest you reconsider before you tie your nice new coin in with a confirmed scam coin for 6 years.
You guys just created your own FUD storm, I hope you can clean it up before it kills your coin before it even gets out there.
I don't get it why SIGT dev allows this kind of swap process. Sigt dev disappeared long time ago, wake up pal, and now Sigt holders have an opportunity, that was kindly provided by Straks team, to swap their coins to Straks. Use it or not can decide only people themselves. This is all created thanks to SIGT. You are new here and do not know anything, but you allow yourself such statements. I was with Sigt from day one so trust me, I in the know. |
|
|
|
|
So when new exchange? TS is quite awful one.
|
|
|
|
Well, I see why the price dove, the swap is turning into a scam even.
SIX YEARS!!
WTF, BTC is only like 9 years old and crypto coins have only had a dollar value for about that time.
So for those who want to swap their coins, if they don't get some of that year 1 STRAKS they have to wait a year to try again, that's ridiculous.
You guys needed to distance yourself from SIGT, not tie yourself to them for 6 more years, what a disaster.
You're also hurting your masternode system by holding back so many coin for years.
Next is, the price won't be able to stabilize until the number of sigt being swapped in is determined.
Lastly, the remaining coins you didn't use for the swap were supposed to be used for airdrop/bounty was it not... so the airdrops and bounties aren't going to happen until year 7?
Epic fail guys, sad I wasted this much time following this only to get hit with that doozy of proof that you guys are going to have a rough uphill battle trying to make this work.
Decisions like this will bury your project and I highly suggest you reconsider before you tie your nice new coin in with a confirmed scam coin for 6 years.
You guys just created your own FUD storm, I hope you can clean it up before it kills your coin before it even gets out there.
I don't get it why SIGT dev allows this kind of swap process. Sigt dev disappeared long time ago, wake up pal, and now Sigt holders have an opportunity, that was kindly provided by Straks team, to swap their coins to Straks. Use it or not can decide only people themselves. |
|
|
|
What are you doing dev? Do you still want to develop something, or anything?
He is busy of buying cheap BAS, that is current development process of dev team LOL |
|
|
|
I'm finally catching up on the last few days posts and this shit is golden! I hate to take credit for debunking this scam, but it seems like my posts caused people to finally look into this scam. Really the best part of this all are the people who defended this coin after my posts, and now they are suddenly silent after the terms of the coin swap have been changed. I'm sure the devs made a killing on the SIGT run though! And to add insult to injury, the swap information is still not in the announcement! This is the first time I have ever seen github used as a a platform to announce coin information over a website or forum. In the end though, I'm glad that the people mining this quickly saw the scam, and the idiots still holding sigt got fucked. Trusting any venture that is related to sigt would be like buying a new currency created by Nicolas Maduro
You should really look at Straks discord, all main discussion is going there, all your eloquence is pointless here. |
|
|
|
Join Altminer guys altminer.ne ccminer -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://eu1.altminer.net:4533 -u wallet -p c=STAK |
|
|
|
At last POLY have exchange, thanks |
|
|
|
yes better go to straks highly competent team nice community and they actually answer questions unlikke i dump only devs from luxpisscoin
I believe you won't be wellcome in any project with your "always asking but never listen" nature...lol |
|
|
|
it's correct that for every signatum i hold i get 1 signatum 2.0? this will be done via exchange or message signing?
Its calling not signatum 2.0, but Straks https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2433318.0 and swap rate will be 4 Sigt:1Straks. All swap details at 29 Nov. |
|
|
|
Hi!
Original SIGT had 1250 coins/block. 650 after 30k block.
STRAKS has just 10 coins/block.
Dev will swap coins like 4:1. And it's the end.
Price will be dumped. If you are mining STAKS, you shold say "bye bye" to you money.
Why such low block reward? Why such low amount for swap. Why not 100:1?
Even if STAKS will have swap 100:1, it will like 1000 coins/block. Even 100:1 less than SIGT's block reward.
Millions of original SIGTs will bring huge inflation.
We should turn off rigs, cause it's madness.
We have been trapped, mates.
As i told before, its a trap. But noone stop you to buy sigt and abuse this trap with 100-300% gain. Of course, it's possible, to buy SIGT and swap to STRAKS with quick profit. But i said about future of this project. STRAKS - is POW coin, isn't it? We know about millions extra coins from swap. Noone will mine it with such options. As for me, STRAKS has future only without swap. Straks told me that it have future only without you.. lol  |
|
|
|
|
They just hit MNrank, next is Coinmarketcap as dev said.
Think further exchanges only after ICO end.
|
|
|
|
Thats a good news, thanks! |
|
|
|
I want to congratulate the developers with a successful start, it was one of the best starts in recent times.
Smooth transition to the mainnet and accessibility for all platforms.
LOL, in recent times? Hardly. This started out with devs saying it could only be mined using a built-in cpu miner with a confusing script that would launch multiple daemons. I'm sure their plan all along was to mine with their GPUs while the idiots wasted cpu cycles. They waxed poetic as to how different this coin was and how it was too advanced for pools or miners to implement. Only when pools did actually implement it because its nothing more than a standard algo did they change their tune. Lets not forget that rewards started 2 days after the stated time. If you ask me, this ranks as the 2nd worst start in recent times, ranking right after Bitcoin Gold. This was a simple statement of facts, but it appears you have a certain narrative that you are content on aligning your re-wording towards. There are 1250 coins on the market today, if for some reason STRAKS is not a currency that you would like to be a part of, I am certain that there are other currencies out there that will resonate with you. Nobody is forced to trade nor direct mining power towards STRAKS if they do not want to. At no point did we "change our tune" as you state, it is simply just a fact that the protocol is newer than what there currently is on the market. The protocol is too new for mining pools to be able to easily implement it without any updates implemented to pools. Our hopes were that CPU mining would have lasted longer, so that even the hobby miner would have had a chance to get on board (the farms today can make it difficult for the small hobby miner to get on board) but while monitoring hashrates it became evident that someone had managed to crack it a day before launch. All credit goes to Decker from Deckerpool ( https://t.me/deckerpool) who managed to update yiimp to the new protocol. After we managed to locate him, we approached him and agreed to pay him a bounty in exchange for making the code open source to the public ( https://github.com/DeckerSU/yiimp/tree/straks), so that pools could be set up, miners would have a leveled playing-field and lastly so that the hashing power could be decentralised across multiple pools. If we were, as you state, holding onto a GPU miner ourselves, I am not exactly sure why we would go to the effort to pay someone for their source code for GPU mining? I addressed this very concern several pages ago too ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2433318.msg24952030#msg24952030). A core value to STRAKS is transparency. Under no circumstance will we ever compromise on that value. We know the cryptocurrency market is crowded with nefarious individuals, we seek to shake that up by doing our part to create an ethical corner in this crowded space of nefarious individuals. Fair enough, but I am a proud owner of a few Straks currently, so in the spirit of this being community driven and transparent, I'm just throwing in my 2 cents. And I don't want to argue semantics, but Decker really only updated the stratum code, and from what I can tell, it looks like the main sticking point was the 5% rake the devs take from the blocks. Suprnova implemented this coin and they don't even use yiimp. Strange that a russian pool that previously was solely dedicated to mining SIGT would come up with this update though. Anyway, I just thought it seemed kind of shady to make it sound like there was some giant technical advancement preventing GPU mining, when the real problem was that no one had implemented it with the stratum protocol and ccminer doesn't support getworktemplate. CPUMiner-opt does support getblocktemplate though, so if this really had started as a cpu only venture, anyone could have used that to mine to the daemon instead of a goofy hack to run multiple daemons. What I think is a little alarming is this. I have ~6800 sig that I got from 1 week mining sig fairly early on that I didn't bother doing anything with. This translates to approx 1700 STRAK. Based on current network hash rates, it would take me approximately 4 months to mine this many STRAK. It seems to me that the sig holders will be the one to control this network, but how is that fair? Why can't this coin be a true fresh start, without giving all the power to the people who held some unrelated coin? You forgot that there was a poll with 2 swap options - swap with rate 1:4 and 1:20, and as we see most people chose 1:4. It was a people choise, thats it. From what I recall there was no option to not have a swap at all and create a new coin without the sig baggage. This option is coming from default, to swap or not your Sigt is up only to you. Again, this is not the case I am trying to make. Of course it is up to you whether you want to swap your sig or not, but the fact is plenty of people WILL swap their sig, and that is what hurts the network as a whole. Ok, again, people made a choise to choose the option of 1:4 swaping rate, WE all decided it so no turning back now, of course people with Sigt at their hands have an advantage over those who havn't, but no one forbid to buy more Sigts to have some Straks bag after swap, and after the swap period will be over, after all those Sigt holders will dump their swaped Straks, price of Straks after month or two will find balance between rare mining coins and dumped Straks from Sigt swap. As for me , I believe its fair that Sigt holders have some advantage considering that they are loose damn bunch of $ investing into Sigt. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
