I just noticed your signature for example. You are carrying a signature for RAZED.com and It says "NO KYC". Money goes in, the player makes a 99% win chance bet, wins, money goes out. How is that any different than a mixer? Let's report RAZED too, I think that's also a mixer. Yes there is a 1% chance to lose everything but that's the price of using a no-kyc mi... I mean a casino.  Someone with 100 btc can register 100 different accounts on that casino, do 100 different 1 btc 98-99% win chance bets, mathematically he will lose 1 or 2 of them, withdraw his coins and sail away. I am not particularly talking about this casino in your signature space, I mean every other no-kyc casinos. What I am saying applies to all of them. Since players need to make bets before they withdraw, the player can make the safest bets and then withdraw. That way they don't risk pretty much anything. The house edge becomes the mixer fee. No, I did not conclude that Hhampuz did anything wrong with this new signature campaign. I only shared that he was careful with services that look like mixers and he sent PM to theymos for clarification. I only guessed that Hhampuz did the same this time as well. Moreover, I remember that in one post Hhampuz said that he stopped promoting mixer services after the mixer ban in the forum as well as lawsuit cases around. I tried to find that post but failed to find it. I don't think it's necessary to compare Limbo and Razed in this discussion. I found this No-KYC exchanges, casinos, etc. are very intentionally not banned. This service is different in two important ways: First, referring to the mixer definition, it "has a feature advertised for taking property, improving its privacy somehow, and then returning roughly the same type of property." It allows BTC->BTC "trades", which satisfies the "returning the same property" part, and it advertises itself as improving privacy of the returned coins. So it's a mixer. Most no-KYC exchanges neither allow BTC->BTC "trades" nor advertise their service as improving the privacy of your coins somehow, whereas a mixer would have to do both of those things. Second: If somebody posted on the Currency Exchange board and offered to trade your stolen coins for clean coins minus a fee, or linked to a website meant to effect such trades, that would definitely be disallowed due to the prohibition on illegal trades, even before the mixer ban. The service in question here does not use the phrase "stolen coins": they say "dirty coins", which is definitely different and could include some legally-sourced coins. But when I look at all of their marketing materials holistically, it all feels too close to the stolen-coins-trader example. So I'd lean toward banning this particular service even if they didn't meet the mixer definition. "Make your dirty coins clean" is not something that typical no-KYC exchanges advertise. |
|
|
|
So here’s what I’m wondering:
- Are we entering a new era where whale dumps no longer shred confidence because institutions are ready to buy the dip?
- If that’s true, maybe those “dumps” in the past few days aren’t cause for alarm, just part of market rebalancing.
- But then again, what if institutions are just delaying the drop, not preventing it?
Would love opinions: do you see these whale sales as warning signs, or signs that the market has grown more mature and resilient
When whales and market makers want to hype the crowd, attract new investors, speculators, gamblers into the market, they will paint very bright future ahead in this market, and say something like "This month, this dip is your very last chance of purchase before Bitcoin takes off to the Moon". Oppositely, when they want to dump the market, they will say something oppositely and of course not only by sayings, they can make buys, sells in order to trigger the market action and make their sayings more true. Additionally, with big funds, they can set up buy walls and sell walls for controlling price within their favorite price range but at the right time, they can remove those orders and trigger market break out or wash out. With experienced investors, they will see dips as chances of purchasing discount and cheaper bitcoin, and they have kind of long term investment mindset so that they don't bet with their money, don't use leverage, just buy with Spot and withdraw it to their non custodial wallets. They don't mind if after a purchase, they get some loss from that entry as said it is one of their accumulation for long term investment portfolio. |
|
|
|
If you are a long-term investor, you won’t even think about choosing between the two, because you already have a timeframe for when you’ll sell the assets you’re holding.
Now, if you’re a short-term investor, you also wouldn’t bother choosing, since your only motive is to gain a return on profit within a short period of time.
Some people might think that the bull run is already over and that we’re now in the altcoin season, but others believe it isn’t. As for me,
I also believe that the bull run isn’t over yet not because I hold some altcoins, but because we haven’t really reached the high peak momentum of Bitcoin’s ATH.
I am really against the term of short-term investor as with short-term target for your investment, your mindset will be very different than mindset of long-term investors. You can plan your finance and investment capital as well as emergency fund totally different than long-term investors. All these things actually affect your psychology during holding time as well as affect your decision of continue holding bitcoin or selling it. With uncertain plan for long-term, when market are volatile and especially when your maximum holding time is counting down, you will very likely sell your bitcoin, even panic sell. It's not good at all, and that's my reason of being against short-term investor calling. If you invest, it's long term. If you spend money for buying some and expect profit in short-term, you are a speculator in the market and not an investor. |
|
|
|
Today, you can bet on Razed.com in a match between Newcastle United and Arsenal, take your chance with Razed Double Profit offer and try your luckiness. Arsenal actually have to win this match for continuing the title race with Liverpool especially after first defeat of Liverpool in this season after a serie of five continuous wins. Arsenal if beating Newcastle United will reduce point difference with Liverpool to only two points and even this match is a very tough one, Arteta and Arsenal players will only aim at 3 points from this match. See details. 🚨PREMIER LEAGUE PROMOTION🚨 Bet on either Newcastle or Arsenal, DOUBLE PROFIT your team wins and keeps a clean sheet. |
|
|
|
Hhampuz is a very smart and intelligent manager and I'm sure he will not bring mixer to the forum knowing fully well is ban here in this forum.
I've sent Hhampuz a PM, and reported Orion Blake's topic. It got classified as a mixer after users complained, which is totally fine. For the record I messaged theymos about launching this campaign a few days ago and would not have posted it without getting the green light on it. No harm done!  If Hhampuz did the same like a last time he did with a service that is on verge of mixing or not mixing, he would have sent a PM to theymos for admin opinion on this. The manager can answer us about what he has done before launching the campaign this time, and even theymos can answer us about this service too. |
|
|
|
Banks didn’t want to see you receiving or sending crypto transactions and you had to use those P2P services which can be scary at times depending on who you are meeting
Did you mean P2P trades but physically in person? If it is P2P trade online, it is less risky than physical in person P2P trade as it contains risk of physical attacks. It's the same with both types of P2P trades, as you can be scammed by your trade partner and lose your bitcoin. With in person trade, you will possibly lose your bitcoin and also your life, it's very dangerous. Dangerous and brutal physical Bitcoin attacks.Internet is a source of both fake and legit information of anything available in the web. Bitcoin is not immune to that so it’s better to do a fact check through researching to multiple reliable source instead of focusing to 1 or 2 article that spreads negativity and wrong information about Bitcoin.
Information is free to upload to the Internet as people have freedom of speech so there are mixed information on the Internet. Doing research, comparing search results and having proper skills for searching to verify and compare information is important. It's wrong to instantly believe in what you find and read without cross checking it. |
|
|
|
For traders who have short-term goals, this might be an opportunity to buy because the price might go up. Bitcoin got to $124,290 this year and there are high hopes among investors that it will beat this ATH before the end of the Bull run. But for long-term investors who are using the DCA strategy, every time comes with the opportunity to keep stacking.
With traders, they can not open their trading position with hope. Professional traders don't trade with hope but they trade based on their calculations for entry, exit, risk management as well. If you find traders that are trading purely with hope, they are amateur traders or just gamblers in this market. Now when the market is going to the end of this cycle, and even I don't know when it will end but possibly only some more months till its market cycle ending, it's more dangerous to trade with hope. I advise don't trade with hope from now as it's risky to cost you a lot of trading capital. It is a little different when you are buying bitcoins, holding bitcoins with long term investment view, and strategy, while it's not too good time and price for entries but it is still acceptable. With long-term investment, Dollar Cost Averaging can help you accumulating bitcoins with time without concern like whether it is best time, best price for purchases. |
|
|
|
Yes, stablecoins and CBDCs are two different things, I know that.
China has been testing CBDC since 2019 and is still in the process of rolling it out nationwide. But according to the latest news, they are also considering plans to create a stablecoin pegged to the yuan to compete directly with USD pegged stablecoins in the global trading market.
While China is not friendly to cryptocurrencies in general, they could be more flexible with stablecoins to realize their de-dollarization idea.
China does not give their citizens friendly cryptocurrency policy but their government can use blockchain technology to make their governance more easily but more efficiently too. They consider benefits of government are more important than citizen's benefits and restrict access of their citizens to blockchain and cryptocurrencies does not mean that their government does not see benefit from this technology. From CBDC to stable coin, they can do that but if the stable coin in consideration is USD pegged, that is against their national policy as De-Dollarization. I don't think they will consider such USD-pegged stable coins, and it will be very ridiculous if they use such stable coins. |
|
|
|
Wasn't it some days ago that I was warning newbies to start by learning instead of trading futures?
Learning is good but can you say more specifically about which learning? Is it learning about investment? Is it learning about trading but with spot? But I saw some comments saying they can start and also be learning at the same time. Now it seems it has turned bloody for many of them who wanted to escape learning and enter straight into winnings, as the bearish market has caught up with them. And right now, at least two that I knew have gotten liquidated because they didn't use SL.
That is true as in trading, using weapons like Stop loss order or Stop limit order is mandatory. These orders are very helpful to cut loss, reduce your loss and generally can help traders to defend their initial trading capital. With traders, a trading capital must be protected as their biggest priority. If they can not defend initial capital, they can not get profit or will lose all money sooner or later. [Guide] Stop loss order: one of best weapons in trading.Stop-Loss vs. Stop-Limit Order: What's the DifferenceWhat's the difference between Market, Limit, and Stop-Limit orders?My two years of experience in trading made me spot high volatility early, and I decided to close all my positions and move straight to trading stocks on Baba, Nvda and Riot which I'm currently in profit with. To me, nothing beats learning, and I hope they regain their footing.
You are like an altcoin degen by trading such unknown and useless tokens, at least they are unknown tokens with me. Altcoins are useless, dangerous for both your investment or any trading types from Spot, Margin to Futures. |
|
|
|
I think he should be a newbie gambler because I don't see a reason why a player will have that mind to come to a casino thread and complain about not having luck, asking for others to quit from betting on the casino. This is totally childish and unacceptable.
If a player is not making enough profits from a casino, they can choose to try other casinos and go try their luck their but it is very wrong and absurd for someone to ask others not to gamble because they were never lucky enough to make big winnings on the same casino.
It can be a genuine newbie gambler who did not have knowledge and experience in gambling, but quickly joining it, making bets, losing money and crying. Nevertheless, it can be not a newbie but an account created for trolling or even attacking Razed. Just two possible reasons why that account was used to post such complaints about gambling but in particular against gambling at Razed. Thinking about it neutrally, it can be similar to people who spent money for investment in bitcoin, trading bitcoin in this volatile market, but did not have good strategies and disciplines, then got loss and made their noisy crying. Gambling is risky and even very dangerous with low chance of winning, especially winning big, so let's gambling responsibly, at all casinos, not only at Razed. |
|
|
|
Most headlines talk about ETFs, Wall Street adoption, and U.S. regulations… but what if the real crypto story is in developing countries? In places like Argentina, Nigeria, and even here in the Philippines, people use crypto for survival - fighting inflation, sending remittances, and daily expenses.
It's not wrong and news is about things happened or happening in all nations, just released different news at different times. Bitcoin is for you and for the others, in a same nation you are living in or in other countries. There are news about Bitcoin and cryptocurrency adoption as well as regulation but they make less noise, less effects than news from big nations. It's explainable because big nations with bigger economies can have greater impacts and it's just true in any industry, not limited to blockchain and cryptocurrency industry. Smaller countries (in economy) have to be affected by policies from bigger nations, and it's how the world work fundamentally. Bitcoin and cryptocurrency can not change that while it can gives smaller nations and their people opportunities to improve their life wealth and quality. |
|
|
|
There must be something that caused you to be banned. Razed.com never bans anyone without a clear reason. Whether you're playing in a restricted location, trying to play with multiple accounts, or for any other reason. If you feel you've been wronged, you can contact customer service. But first, we'd like to see evidence detailing how you were banned.
Companies have to protect their business reputation so they never take severe action against their users without convincing reasons. It's more true with big companies and big casino like Razed, so if they took harsh action against one account, they actually had reasons for it. The user can complain, open support ticket but with investigation before making that decision, Razed will easily make that accusation invalid by evidence they have against that account. Banning an account is not a soft action so that person actually violated some terms in Razed's ToS and the team don't tolerate such activities against benefit of their company. |
|
|
|
This is none of my business and I am nobody to suggest, but I would like to say that without spending big money, its impossible to win big money  It is soooooooo rare that a person gets a huge multiplier in any game from the very start, without spending a lot of money or without playing it long. Chances are so low for such thing to happen that I rather consider them to be zero than try to achieve maximum with little blood I would suggest not to play slots if you dont plan to spend a lot. Because it will be kind of giving money for free to casino You can spend big money for investment, trading or gambling while you don't get big win, big profit but only get big loss. It depends on what you do, which assets you choose for investment, trading and how you manage your capital for gambling as well as whether you have gambled responsibly or irresponsibly. You got results from your decisions and what you do are reflected in results as loss, profit or draw. In gambling, it's hard to win in long term and if you win big, a smartest way is split it in some parts and withdraw a biggest part as your saving, cashing it out for some physical things like a real estate, whatever. Only use small part for gambling again but let's try to hope that you will win big again. If you are greedy, chase for other big wins, it's likely you will be addictive with gambling and can lose all money from your big win. |
|
|
|
Before that post, Razed announced that someone won big with a Plinko game at the casino. It's a mind-blowing big win from $199 to $199,000 and not only this, Razed celebrates this with a $50 giveaway, and you can join it if you want. 🚨 HUGE PLINKO WIN 🚨
Someone just bagged $199,000 on Plinko💰🔥
To celebrate, We're running a $50 giveaway 🎉
How to enter:
1️⃣ Like
2️⃣ Repost
3️⃣ Follow
Winner announced soon ⏰
|
|
|
|
I never suggest anybody to take a loan to trade, its similar to hitting your own ankle. A lot of thinga could go wrong and there is a chance of making money as well. If you are willing to take that risk, do foresee what would be your backup money source to pay back the loan before you commit.
Rushing in to buy bitcoin has never been my way of thinking. I suggest people to keep buying at the lows every time the market drops to build a stash over years.
You could do differently and still make good money at a risk.
It is not recommended even for investment while for trading, there are more reasons to don't recommend taking any loan for trading. Bitcoin market is volatile and the most popular advice is "Invest what you afford to lose" so taking a loan for your investment is risky and why it is not recommended. Taking a loan raises more risk as firstly, there is loan expiration, loan interest and loan liquidation while if you take a loan for trading with leverages, you double risk of possible liquidations. When a liquidation happens, you will lose very big part of your initial capital used as collateral for your loan and your leveraged trading position. This page from Coinglass with many data on market liquidation is enough for showing risk of taking a loan for either investment or trading in this market. https://www.coinglass.com/LiquidationData |
|
|
|
As I said above, I gave up already so I will not continue because I do not want to push my own limit although the possible prize looks good but the possibility to complete the challenge is quite small this round. I'll be waiting for new challenge but if the upcoming challenge will be similar like the current one (hard games) I will skip it or maybe I will spend less amount of money just to try because we never know when our luck will come You are truly gambling and joining tournament responsibly and your thinking is right. Luckiness comes when it comes to use while it does not depend on our money used for bet is big or small. Increasing bet capital in any tournament does not rise your chance of luckiness in the tournament for taking any award when it ends. It only raises your greediness, risk of losing more money in the tournament while chance to succeed is quite unknown and uncontrolled. Shuffle will be back with other tournaments and you will have other chances for joining, of course with feasible bet fund for a tournament participation according to your capital and risk management. |
|
|
|
Furthermore, rumors suggest that Yamal is a strong contender for the Ballon d'Or. If he wins the trophy, it might boost his self-esteem and make him feel like he's on the same level as other legends. But hopefully he can be more professional in the future.
It's very predictable that Yamal is one of best contenders for Ballon d'Or and he has Euro trophy while Dembele has Champions League trophy is a strongest contender against Yamal. Their chance is like 50-50 but Dembele with his great season with PSG especially his completely focus on proactive defense in Champions League final actually made a lot of impression on voters. Unfortunately, that's not Yamal LoL  Dembele undoubtedly deserves the Ballon d'Or trophy. His track record is clearly very promising, and I'm happy he got it. He used to be a discarded Barcelona player who was seen as a liability due to his frequent injuries, but his prime came after joining PSG. Dembele has never been a Ballon d'Or candidate in any previous season, but this year he made the cut and immediately won the trophy. Dembele deserves this award while Yamal won a youth Ballon d'Or that is like a good award for him. It also motivates him to try more and come back next years with better records and contributions for Barcelona and Spain. This failure in Ballon d'Or 2025 is also a reminder for Yamal that he is still at early years of his career and is not yet a best player. He must try more, be more professional in order to achieve what Dembele has gone through his volatile career from Dortmund to Barcelona and PSG before this massive achievement. |
|
|
|
This is not a special security tip. If you want to keep your account secure, then only secure your Bitcoin address, which is the address you will use first in the account. Then you can recover your account in any situation if your account is hacked.
A staked Bitcoin address is one of proofs you can use for account recovery but if a person is careless enough to get his account hacked, I don't know whether his Bitcoin wallet on a same device was not compromised too. At least, this gives an extra way to recover an account but it's important to keep a device clean, non compromised so that your Bitcoin wallet, your Bitcoin forum account are all safe. In addition, it's important that address used for stake as an account ownership proof can be an empty wallet so that if it was compromised, you won't lose any bitcoin, just lose account ownership proof. Because if you use a same device to store that wallet and to use your forum account, it's a hot wallet that is unsafe for storage your bitcoin. |
|
|
|
If your post is being deleted or your topic is locked you should know that same topic was previously created before yours birth to, or you should know that it's a repetitive topic that has been created almost all time and leaving such topic or thread is not contributing to the forum rather is creating more harm such as spamming and shit posting.
If questions in the topic were answered and moderator saw it as enough, the topic will be locked. It's another reason that was not mentioned by you. The topic author actually should lock his topic when he feels receiving enough answers, and letting that thread opens, leaving it to moderator to lock it is quite late for OP. It looks like such OP did not care about their topics or just did not know enough about how to post in this forum and self moderate their threads too. Searching and finding answers is a very first step that can reduce needs of creating topics for asking. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
