Lost coins only make everyone else's coins worth slightly more.  Think of it as a donation to everyone.

Bitcoin's transaction fees have changed. Bitcoin promised financial freedom and unrestricted commerce. Bitcoin's essence looks eroded by high transaction prices caused by network congestion.

Whether a trading method is bad or not depends on how you utilize every opportunity given.
When you say it's bad then you can't master it well.

To reduce losses, you should study harder, use a strategy that suits you, and make sure to follow the market trend well.

How to guarantee deals and transactions in BTC BTC world?
Suppose one is about to sale something valuable. Be it a property or labor expenses.
What measures and steps to be taken to make sure transaction won't stuck in the MemPool and all participants are honestly performing their duties?

1 confirmation: sufficient for small payments less than $1,000.

3 confirmations: for payments $1,000 - $10,000. Most exchanges require 3 confirmations for deposits.

6 confirmations: good for large payments between $10,000 - $1,000,000. Six is standard for most transactions to be considered secure.

10 confirmations: suggested for large payments greater than $1,000,000.

I am sure no man in this world will say out their recovery key, and it's almost impossible to talk about the private key, especially Bitcoin Wallet.

I have had a very bad experience with the stop loss. It is a nice tool to mitigate losses and it is also a good tool to prevent wins. At times I feel that someone watches to see where you place your stop loss and trigger it and after which the market will reverse to profit immediately.

I'll rather trade with 1k without leverage than $100 on X10 leverage

- Too much monitoring of the chart: before you place any trades use a margin you can afford to lose, so that once you place your trade, you set your exit point, take profit or stop loss you wouldn't be checking your chart steadily, because by doing so, you emotions will come into play if it's a margin you can't afford to lose, try as much as possible to trust your analysis, leave it to play out if you want to make good money from the market if it's going your way.

Just because the exchange has been hacked doesn't mean it's not worth using. The key is how it behaved towards its clients at the time of the hack. Whether it passed on the losses to customers or not. Kucoin lost 300 million and no customer lost even a cent. Even Binance was hacked some time ago.

I looked for traces of Satoshi on the Internet. I've read all of his posts since 2009. He is sublime. If you read his writing, you can feel his passion

But if you look back at history.. Yahoo lost to Google. Yahoo was great, but Google was even better. Satoshi gave us a gift called Bitcoin without any greed and went somewhere. The problem is, new geniuses are born all the time, and technology advances. Bitcoin is not physics. It's blockchain technology. Which means that bitcoin is not an immutable law. A better technology than Bitcoin could emerge. What should we do if someone gives us a better system than bitcoin as a gift and leaves? It performs better than Bitcoin, and it even has the perfect decentralization of Bitcoin, which we value highly. Bitcoin was created in 2009, and now it's 2023. Cars made in 2009 cannot be better than cars made in 2023 or later. What if someone with as much genius and passion as Satoshi is creating a system better than Bitcoin?

There are already people who have created blockchains that are “faster” and “better” than Bitcoin. They have blockchains that are everything different than Bitcoin that you could imagine. However, the problem is always decentralization and fair distribution. This is where Bitcoin will always be King and why it isn’t easily replicable.

Crypto itself is an investment already. Form of investment on the other hand is a different thing to talk about. But if it is general preference, then I’d say I prefer using fiat on my investments outside this industry, and let my crypto investments still. There’s no need to choose if you can engage to both. Crypto in the first place still has its limitation with regards to its accessibility, acceptance, and usage. With FIAT as a medium to investments, it also has its pros as well such as having a fixed value of exchange, which I prefer more especially with stocks and some real estate properties.

In the future Bitcoin will be the whales game in terms of transaction fee and many people who don't have a lot will have to look for other means, it's going to get worse with the existence of Ordinals on the Bitcoin network, I have said this few times before, the existence of Ordinals will make Bitcoin transaction fee in the next bull market less enjoyable, you should all be prepared.

Well ...I think it's time for Ten Hag to actually leave United because this team has lost all identity it had as a big club and if they will keep Ten Hag , United won't even be a top 7 team by the end of the season. More than this , I'm sure they won't even move further in Europa League as UCL is already game over for them and the problem is that we are still early in the season and United already failed on all categories   . I also think that some certain players are not for Premier League intensity and a few transfers would do good in winter.  

How will it affect your life if Bitcoin price comes to zero per Bitcoin one day? I have seen most of discussions related to Bitcoin price on pessimistic side only. But we should look at all the possibilities.

Right.  Otherwise we couldn't have a finite limit of 21 million coins, because there would always need to be some minimum reward for generating.  In a few decades when the reward gets too small, the transaction fee will become the main compensation for nodes.  I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume.

Newcastle always has surprises, Manchester United shouldn't underestimate it, after all, without having to underestimate it, Manchester United is indeed in a bad condition and there are many players who cannot be relied on to recover the situation, Bruno and Rashford also couldn't do anything, even scoring one. goals look difficult for them, it is true that Manchester united needs a lot of changes to become better.

Ten Hag will definitely be the one who is at fault too because he as a coach has not been able to make Manchester United perform better in every match, before this match Manchester United was even defeated by City with the same score conceding three goals with a score of 3 - 0, I think it was a defeat Against Newcastle this should also be a serious concern for Ten Hag to be able to improve it in the next match.

Well its called anniversary for that purpose isnt it? Well its likely a never ending event yearly but its okay to talk about that once in a while and remember how people and some great people contribute to bitcoin and even earned a lot from it. If thats prohibited here then this topic should have been deleted anyway.