On September 13, 2025, the UN General Assembly unanimously adopted, one might say reiterated, the two-state solution for Israel and Palestine. Israel, however, considers this decision non-binding, but then the November 29, 1947, resolution establishing two states for Israel and Palestine is also null and void.
its a roadmap towards.. not a declaration of current statehood being settled as being called it This involves an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, release of all hostages held there, and the establishment of a Palestinian State that is both viable and sovereign.
The roadmap further calls for the disarmament of Hamas and its exclusion from governance in Gaza, normalization between Israel and the Arab countries, as well as collective security guarantees.
if there is no elections in gaza by september 2026 which puts inplace a peaceful palestinian civilian government (completely removing hamas from power) then gaza wont get a statehood And Israel will never have peace and security. Not saying that many Israelis care much about such things. |
|
|
|
There are some sources stating that Ruzzia sent more than 10 drones in East Poland. If that is true, what would be the right NATO response?
Since some Ruzzian drones ended in Poland, it seems like the right moment to have a NATO backed "drone exclusion" zone 100 km from the Polish border - even over Ukranian airspace.
It would be the right response as Ruzzia either attacks Poland voluntarely or they need "help" keeping their drones in the right place. Well, the right place will be in their arses, but you know what I mean.
I don't even understand why would Russia do something like that, honestly. What could they possibly earn from violating air space of Poland, which has a very complex history with the Russian and the Soviet union? As it stands today, Russia would rather the NATO to stay away from them, but they instead sent drones to the air-space of one of their most protected members? What is even Putin thinking about all of this situation? It does not make sense... Unless they are indeed more reckless than the International Community initially thought. Perhaps distracting the attention from things like Ukraine blowing up one refinery per day, and the odd oil tanker for millions a days??? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgGPFCPJwsAThis is the Primorsk terminal. This is the black blood that feeds the Ruzzian satrapy. Note that Russia is rebuilding refineries as they need them. Ukraine can't destroy enough refineries to make a difference. It seems certain that Ukraine took control of these drones and redirected them to Poland. This requires a high degree of control and power, and need multiple sources to jam and take control. [...]
Have you got any evidence or are you spreading fake? The evidence is simple. The whole operation of Russia is focused on Ukraine. It would be to Russia's advantage to keep the focus there. But Ukraine is the one who needs an excuse to keep pushing Russia in the direction of war. The war is a product of Ukraine and the West. Why? Because pushing Russia into war is the one thing that might give the West the strength to keep from destroying itself... an excuse in the eyes of the Western people so they willingly support their governments in a REAL WW3 war. But since you seem to not be able to use your head for anything other than a hair rack - don't tell me you are bald - you will never be able to understand what is really going on.  That is not evidence, that is an argument and some opinions. Ruzzia may simply be provoking and testing NATO. Again, have you got evidence that the Ukrainians sent those drones to Poland or are you dis-informing again? |
|
|
|
This is just an assassination. Killing without a trial, without evidence, using the army to do so... The fact that the US law admits such act does not mean the world and international admits it. All I have to do to kill anyone that is annoying me is to declare it is part of an terrorist organisation. Since proofs are not needed and dead do not talk, this is a blank death sentence to be filled at will. [...]
there are some extreme crimes which should warrant death penalty. also.. if america has gun laws and such where a homeowner can defend his property, you can possibly see how this can expand to defending territories against invaders too especially when the invaders are known to be part of groups that kill americans, and double-especially when just one of those causes deaths of multiple people
you really are doubling down on stupidity, comparing class A drugs to toothpaste/sugar/cannabis/alcohol(facepalm)
if you knew how little certain class A drugs are needed to kill a person vs how much weed/nicotine/beer is needed.. you might start to see the issue
what you are also ignoring is the the drug traffickers on the boat were identified and they are not some lame street dealer thats just selling $10 weed
what you are also ignoring is the the drug traffickers on the boat were not sailing their maiden voyage, its not the first trip they made
the traffickers are fully armed and supplying $Xm's per boat. which just that one boat can kill thousands
the risk:benefit loss:save ratios of lives lost vs lives saved based on actions taken on that boat. after fully identifying the boat and occupants determines the eligibility of authorising a strike on the boat
[...]
a) Capital punishment may be legal in the US. Killing in foreign waters or international waters is murder. b) No, your jurisdiction does not apply in foreign waters because they are in another country that has its own laws and as much right as the US to have them Example: Venezuela considers Trump a murderer - acording to Venezuelan law - so according to your theory, it is absolutely OK if they send hitman to kill Trump.
Do you see how little sense you make or shall I put a more clear example?c) Drug cartels do not kill drug users. Drug users kill themselves and in the way they create failed estates all over Latin America and kill millions of innocent people. Unless you are going to argue that people are not aware that using certain drugs is (a) illegal (b) extremelyt dangerous (c) addictive and that such drugs may contain shitloads of various poisons at the dealer's whim. But all this is non-sense, this is about the Venezuelan oil. Trump is all about recreating the past and it is not that long ago that 25% of the oil used in the US was from Venezuela. You just need "the right government". From Wikipedia, but any source will tell you this... As of 2006, Venezuela was one of the largest suppliers of oil to the United States, sending about 1.4 million barrels per day (220×103 m3/d) to the U.S.[3]
In October 2007, the Venezuelan government said its proven oil reserves was 100 billion barrels (16×109 m3). The energy and oil ministry said it had certified an additional 12.4 billion barrels (2.0×109 m3) of proven reserves in the country's Faja del Orinoco region.[4] In February 2008, Venezuelan proven oil reserves were 172 billion barrels (27×109 m3).[5] By 2009, Venezuela reported 211.17 billion barrels (3.3573×1010 m3) of conventional oil reserves, the largest of any country in South America.[6] When 2015 ended, Venezuela's confirmed oil reserves were estimated to be around 300.9 billion barrels in total. |
|
|
|
The "West" play catch-up again once again. Russians already on the bankrun after Medvedev annouces that next years budget will be military.
Fools think that sleeping on piles of cash will save there savings, lol wait what Kremling will do, the same what India did some time ago.
They are not going to buy gasoline that is sure. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=470whO3SZagThe bank run makes perfect sense. Most of the debt of the Ruzzian estate is hidden in the accounts of the weapons manufacturer's... which are actually estate owned. But at this point the "welfare estate" fund is pretty much dry. |
|
|
|
Branko, are you deliberately ignoring he is Ruzzian born and has a couple of nationalities, one of which is French? Does that make him French or just a holder of a french passport. ...........................
Funny until one remembers that the population of these areas voted something like 9 to 1 to be part of the Russian Federation
................
It is easy to have a vote wenn the native population has been removed and schatterd around the world, because after all a submarine base is more imported that the native Crimean Tatars (Turkic ethnic group). Crimea has been a country before Russia or Ukraine even existed. The dopple headed eagle on Russian presidential flag why the war even exists, "Order out of chaos". https://x.com/i/status/1967180608490406014"Every country has its own mafia. In Russia, the mafia has its own country." — Garry Kasparov Putin is a product of the west Meanwhile "falling debris" must have caused the fire at Kirishi refinery, the largest oil refinery in Liningrad region, top 10 in Russia, 800 km from Ukraine. In Perm region Russias biggest methanol producer has technical issues. Seams like the war is running of course, the Ukraine people dealing with the parasite class. The poster child how to run a totalitarien country is in trouble Voting in Ruzzia is like a joke, but it is nevertheless interesting how they keep the appearences.. just like the commies pretended to be commies til the last minute. Fortunately, you do not need to vote sanctions if you can apply kinetic sanctions on oil. Two tankers in Primorsk... https://youtu.be/FgGPFCPJwsARefineries every other day... sometimes two in a day... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1XHzMxGFbIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neAt3SO5tcQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WflwwUXfv7cPutin will eventually have to stop pretending this war does not affect Ruzzia and is just something for tv. Why are you evading the question? Do you still believe that blowing up Nord Stream was international terrorism and an act of war? A simple "yes" or "no" would suffice. Also ignoring your questionworks fine for me., since you have already gone over it 5 or 6 times and I have answered like a million times. You want to keep talking about the same things over and over, but the world has moved on. I assume you are still trying to justify what cannot be justified. The Germans are ignoring you too. https://www.rheinmetall.com/en/media/stories/2023/rheinmetall-a-powerful-partner-at-ukraine-sideSpecific projects in the pipeline include the manufacture of artillery ammunition and the supply and production of Lynx infantry fighting vehicles. In addition to possible direct deliveries by Rheinmetall, the (re)industrialisation of national manufacturing know-how is also intended to make a significant contribution to Ukraine's sustainable defence capability as part of the cooperation. Rheinmetall had already founded the joint venture Rheinmetall Ukrainian Defence Industry LLC with a Ukrainian state-owned company in October 2023. Ukrainian specialists were trained in Germany in the maintenance and repair of combat vehicles and have already been working on the corresponding systems in Ukraine for some time. In June 2024, the maintenance hub in western Ukraine was officially opened under the umbrella of the joint venture in the presence of high-ranking political representatives. The aim is to be an effective partner for Ukraine in rebuilding the once strong defence industry in Ukraine and ensuring the autonomy of Ukrainian capacities. More kinetic sanctions on the way. Will report. |
|
|
|
I personally believe the government of Trump carried out some misuse of force with those in the boat, allegedly transporting drugs through the Caribbean sea... Those alleged drug trafficked cold have been an useful source of information for the Trump administration, so they could have got information from them, in exchange of a shorter stay in prison, a plea deal.
Anyways, there are people who are happy with these people dying, they forget about human rights and the right people is supposed to have to get a fair trial, even if those people in boat were American citizens, Trump could get away with it, as the supreme court already gave much power to be figure of the presidency .
It is illegal. An act of war. |
|
|
|
...........................
Funny until one remembers that the population of these areas voted something like 9 to 1 to be part of the Russian Federation
................
It is easy to have a vote wenn the native population has been removed and schatterd around the world, because after all a submarine base is more imported that the native Crimean Tatars (Turkic ethnic group). Crimea has been a country before Russia or Ukraine even existed. The dopple headed eagle on Russian presidential flag why the war even exists, "Order out of chaos". https://x.com/i/status/1967180608490406014"Every country has its own mafia. In Russia, the mafia has its own country." — Garry Kasparov Putin is a product of the west Meanwhile "falling debris" must have caused the fire at Kirishi refinery, the largest oil refinery in Liningrad region, top 10 in Russia, 800 km from Ukraine. In Perm region Russias biggest methanol producer has technical issues. Seams like the war is running of course, the Ukraine people dealing with the parasite class. The poster child how to run a totalitarien country is in trouble Voting in Ruzzia is like a joke, but it is nevertheless interesting how they keep the appearences.. just like the commies pretended to be commies til the last minute. Fortunately, you do not need to vote sanctions if you can apply kinetic sanctions on oil. Two tankers in Primorsk... https://youtu.be/FgGPFCPJwsARefineries every other day... sometimes two in a day... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1XHzMxGFbIhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=neAt3SO5tcQhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WflwwUXfv7cPutin will eventually have to stop pretending this war does not affect Ruzzia and is just something for tv. |
|
|
|
|
El USDT y otras stable supongo que no son bloqueble?? Tb asumo que todo el tema de uso ilegal causara eventualmente problemas para el emisor del USDT si no puede demostrar que lo controla??
|
|
|
|
Si, la inflacion afecta al precio del bitcoin y muchisimo al oro. Si ves un grafico del oro del ultimo año y un poco en los previos te desmayas. Tiene que ver con la crisis China, que normalmente buscaria bonos americanos como refugio, pero que ahora prefiere claramente el oro. El bitcoin en este caso es el oro digital. https://oro.bullionvault.es/Precio-del-oro.do5 años, de 1600 a casi 3200 mas o menos el doble en 5 años pero casi todo en el 2024 |
|
|
|
These crooks have already showed they are not willing to leave this country through democracy, only force is left as an option and Trump is aware of it, in the end, this is a conflict for oil and liberty, since we have long lost our actual freedom, because of corruption and a corrupt elite.
As a Venezuelan, what would you like US to do regards the current situation of your country? Do you think they can help you, or cause more harm than good in the end, just like the current regime is doing? And is this view common sense in Venezuela, or do you consider yourself to be a dissonant voice among your countrymen? There is a significant amount of people here who just want to current regime to be ousted and they would be willing to accept the consequences of a military action by the United States, if that meant to get rid of Maduro. However, I personally would like to have a regime change without the help of the USA, become it would make the change more traumatic for civilians like me, though this regime is criminal and it is not willing to let us go and be free through peaceful means, that fact leaves violent options open, that is a consequence of them stealing the lastest presidential election. The United States are not the impersonification of the goodness and their military are not saints, but the United States is at least and functioning republic which have more standing values than us. I am sure Maduro has made it from quite difficult to neraly impossible to have a life in Venezuela, now, you have to look at Afganistan and Irak to understand what happens after the US takes charge and what happens after they leave. |
|
|
|
There are some sources stating that Ruzzia sent more than 10 drones in East Poland. If that is true, what would be the right NATO response?
Since some Ruzzian drones ended in Poland, it seems like the right moment to have a NATO backed "drone exclusion" zone 100 km from the Polish border - even over Ukranian airspace.
It would be the right response as Ruzzia either attacks Poland voluntarely or they need "help" keeping their drones in the right place. Well, the right place will be in their arses, but you know what I mean.
I don't even understand why would Russia do something like that, honestly. What could they possibly earn from violating air space of Poland, which has a very complex history with the Russian and the Soviet union? As it stands today, Russia would rather the NATO to stay away from them, but they instead sent drones to the air-space of one of their most protected members? What is even Puting thinking about all of this situation? It does not make sense... Unless they are indeed more reckless than the International Community initially thought. Perhaps distracting the attention from things like Ukraine blowing up one refinery per day, and the odd oil tanker for millions a days??? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgGPFCPJwsAThis is the Primorsk terminal. This is the black blood that feeds the Ruzzian satrapy. It seems certain that Ukraine took control of these drones and redirected them to Poland. This requires a high degree of control and power, and need multiple sources to jam and take control. [...]
Have you got any evidence or are you spreading fake? |
|
|
|
Yet Germany supports Ukraine with money, weapons and other aid. Why don't you give their goverment a ring and "explain" all that to them. And now you talk about France politics and whattabout with it? Are you trying to avoid talking about the frontlines and the refining crisis in Ruzzia? [...]
Russia's government doesn't simply think something up and then act. That was the USSR that did that.
Today Russia is a constitutional democracy. Except in real emergencies, Putin has to follow the Russian rules for deciding to do something.[...]
BA, tell me, what is required to have a democracy. I am saying this because once again you are spreading fake. So you make a statements that blowing up Nord Stream was international terrorism and an act of war, and now evading answering if you still stand by those statements? Quiet telling when you're avoiding commenting even on your own words. Yes it appears that Merz and Macron backed themselves into a corner. Unlike Ukraine, people still have a voice there so both presidents are paying dearly for this with their approval ratings. Macron and Merz escalated this to the point where it became existential for themselves and now almost guaranteed to bring ultra rights into EU. Which works for both Putin and Trump, they're destroying EU for a chance to capture Ukraine, great move  The agreement about not attacking energy facilities seems to be off, Russian refineries are attacked and so is Ukraine electrical infrastructure. Kyiv is already having blackouts with the mildest weather not even close to winter. I don't bother myself with sensational hourly events on the front line, overall it appears that red machine continues to steadily grinding through Ukraine, as expected. I am saying that Germany is supporting Ukraine and recent declarations by their prime minister are very clear on that and that you should give all those "explanations" to them. |
|
|
|
-cut-
obviously to legally protect itself (should a drone owner(russia) cry foul of a bad shoot/damage/declaration of war..) poland would need to have done some kind of investigation to declare good reason to shoot it down. EG it came within polish borders.. if poland said it was 100km away from poland, russia could call it a message from poland declaring war on russia.. which would be a bad case to initiate
Why would they need to legally protect themselves? Russia denied sending them, so why would Russia even mind? And which court you think would defend individual doing this? no country, including poland cant just shoot anything. lets make up a country lets call it "dogwagtailistan" now lets say dogwagtailistan decided to airstrike a 'google street' aircraft or high altitude starlink satellite(none weaponed reconnaissance aircraft).. they need to justify the strike especially if its one countries attack on another countries property, the international courts would mediate/judge this. by showing intel. they can justify the attack and close the case/squash the court action before it goes that far, deeming it justified as for individual doing this.. well the height the drones can achieve i dont think it would be some 'individual' shooting it down with a handgun.. ,, but when it comes to military actions they need to classify the attack via intel and such to justify the hit on a drone as a military concern. else it could be seen as a declaration of war instead of self defense [...] The point is that since there is a precedent of those drones hitting Poland, the justification is much easier. You set an intervention / drone exclusion zone of 100 km or whatever, and you advise Ruzzia that anything on this range is considered a threat based on their previous actions. Hardly an escalation, as it is merely defensive, but quite proportional. Poland is not downing a random object or a civil or military plane, They are downing an explosive, unmanned object over the territory of Ukraine, not over Ruzzia, so that can hardly be classified as an act of war. My guess is that NATO is going to respond very blandly in appearance, but be sure there will be quite a bit of "retaliation" under the radar. |
|
|
|
Are you deliberately being obtuse? Drone flies over wester Ukraine, gets jammed, goes Poland.
are you obtuse.. so they are(in your view) able to fly into ukraine, from the east border with russia. get jammed.. and instead of crashing or running out of fuel.. continue through ukraine for 800 miles. never shot down by any military in ukraine. just continue on. continue on.. and then once in poland suddenly they are spotted where some are shot down and some just crash.. and some make it all the way up north(many more hundreds of miles).. Does not matter where they come from or how far they flew. Drone ends up in western Ukraine, gets jammed, goes Poland. This is a posibility of among others. And BTW some of them do go for hundreds of km unchecked or pass by mere saturation of defences, plus and the ones in Poland carried an extra fuel "bag" instead of warheads. But if the point is that this could be a provocation, sure and it does not really matter where they come from if they are Ruzzian, which nobody questions, and are in Polish airspace. before.. [Occam's razor] the simplest logical version based on available information usually turns out to be the truth
Then it is a provocation. But Occam's does not always work with Ruzzia - sometimes the most abstract "reason" is their "reason". |
|
|
|
Yet Germany supports Ukraine with money, weapons and other aid. Why don't you give their goverment a ring and "explain" all that to them. And now you talk about France politics and whattabout with it? Are you trying to avoid talking about the frontlines and the refining crisis in Ruzzia? [...]
Russia's government doesn't simply think something up and then act. That was the USSR that did that.
Today Russia is a constitutional democracy. Except in real emergencies, Putin has to follow the Russian rules for deciding to do something.[...]
BA, tell me, what is required to have a democracy. I am saying this because once again you are spreading fake. |
|
|
|
Poland has now started shoting drones, locations to be confirmed. There is some possibility that these drones were jammed by Ukrainian REB systems and they accidentally went into Poland.
get a map! poland is not beside russia, it was not a simple bad turn from russian border or bad turn from ukraine due to jamming.. there is belarus and lithuania/latvia buffering poland away from russia.. if anything it could be russia using the baltic sea as incursion border and hopes to then go south east unnoticed over poland to enter ukraine.. or go noticed to poke/provoke poland (one drone found inn olesno(north poland (near baltic sea)) .. the drones were not that of military/weaponised drones. but more so wood/foam decoy drones*. so not really a threat to poland.. more of just a psychological poke *the drones were Chinese-designed 'Gerbera' drones, but used before by russia and have Cyrillic alphabet and numeric printed on them (not chinese) Are you deliberately being obtuse? Drone flies over wester Ukraine, gets jammed, goes Poland. |
|
|
|
most countries only have a 24mile zone before its open "international" area. so a 100km no-go zone is not gonna happen
i think you are picking a number based on the barrier between atmosphere vs space. rather than some military/maritime barrier of diplomacy and territory control
[...]
if poland said it was 100km away from poland, russia could call it a message from poland declaring war on russia.. which would be a bad case to initiate
All that international law is exactly what Ruzzia violated. Do you fail to realize this is a proportional response to an act of war? Of course Ruzzia does not have to follow "instructions", the drones would be destroyed from Poland over Ukraine - so Ruzzia is effectively not attacked. Unless Ruzzia wants to claim sovereignty over any bit of airspace they occupy with an unmanned flying bomb. You do not attack Ruzzia - so no escalation, but you can perfectly agree with Ukraine to accept this and destroy drones over Ukraine, which cannot be classed as "escalation" as Ruzzia or Ruzzian assets are not destroyed. You need some distance to intercept a drone, 100 km is good enough, but if you want 200 or 300. If Ruzzia decides to send a ballistic missile then 500 km I guess. Again poland could if spotting a foreign drone within polish borders would have to surveil it and decide if its an actual viable threat, and then shoot it down. if not a threat or in international space or other things then poland can just watch and report and gather more evidence to strengthen viability for future incursions to be probable threats
Yes that is correct. They will assess the threat and based on previous experiences, anything getting 100 km from the border is a threat. I also heard about this information in one of our local news channel and in my thinking I was like this is a show of might from Russia having their drones hover over the Poland airspace. An action that goes against international policy which can escalate the situation of the existing war.
On the other hand, Israel recently made an attack on HAMAS leadership on the Qatar soil in the middle of an ongoing negotiation that was being handled by the Qatar authority. This another action just like that of Russia drone over Poland airspace that also goes against international policy and can be taken as a slap on Qatar's face by Israel.
As a neutral entity who wishes to air his views on the two events, I am thinking that the US regime of Donald Trump isn't helping in genuinely trying to make for peace in this different waring zones. Where sanctions are meted on Israel for certain violations of international extant laws and even the UN do nothing about it but only makes statements condemning the act and it ends there, and Russia under Vladimir Putin watching what's happening would feel that he can act in his own might on the neighbouring countries without considering what the consequences are, because if Israel could always get away with theirs then why can't Russia.
I think the US and UN are not doing enough genuinely in their supposed efforts in finding a lasting peace in these regions and they've to do better otherwise we will continue having these similar events unfolding which can lead to a WW, God forbid.
These are just my thoughts though.
Ruzzia hit a building, it was not "flying over". The UN is at this point unoperative - there is no enforcing capability. Regarding Israel, I agree that they cannot legally attack a foreign country without a declaration of war. The real solutions are the agreements for disarmament from all sides, but that is currently impossible. |
|
|
|
|
There are some sources stating that Ruzzia sent more than 10 drones in East Poland. If that is true, what would be the right NATO response?
Since some Ruzzian drones ended in Poland, it seems like the right moment to have a NATO backed "drone exclusion" zone 100 km from the Polish border - even over Ukranian airspace.
It would be the right response as Ruzzia either attacks Poland voluntarely or they need "help" keeping their drones in the right place. Well, the right place will be in their arses, but you know what I mean.
|
|
|
|
Esto se ha hablado muchisimas veces y la verdad es que con nuestro leve conocimiento solo nos queda agarrar lo que nos dicen de cada lado y tomar una posicion.
Con de cada lado me refiero a que por un lado estan los alarmistas que dicen que todo revienta y que apenas una computadora cuantica llegue a X punto destruye todo el cifrado actual y bla bla y por el otro estan los que dicen que no hay ningun problema porque eso ya esta resuelto de ante mano que se sabe como cifrar anticuantico y que es tan solo apretar un boton y poner un tipo de operacion que no pueda resolver.
Prefiero quedarme con la segunda para dormir tranquilo.
En algo así como tomar la pastilla azul o la pastilla roja, los que toman la roja dicen que los demás no se dan cuenta del peligro inminente, mientras que los que toman la azul dicen que los demás son unos exagerados y que no pasará nada malo. Personalmente prefiero un término medio, no dejarme dormir en los laureles y pensar que algo malo nunca pasará, pero tampoco asumir que no habrán esfuerzos por parte de las personas que tienen más conocimientos y más bitcoins que yo, en pro de la seguridad de la red y de sus propias inversiones. Lo máximo que podría hacer un pequeño inversor como nosotros es tratar de adivinar cuando sería el momento oportuno para hacer una salida total de nuestros activos, pero eso implicaría el no dormir y tomar el tarro de pastillas rojas y tomárselo todo con un solo vaso de agua. En fin, Bitcoin no es demasiado grande como para fallar, pero tiene personas detrás de su desarrollo que hará lo posible para evitar una catástrofe. Si, sabes lo que pasa con las pastillas? Que los vendedores de pastillas dicen algo, por ejemplo: "El sistema basado en oro se va a desplomar en tres meses". Si ocurre, recordaran al mundo entero que ellos si lo sabian, acertaron de pleno y son los p. amos. Si no ocurre, a nadie le importa porque nadie se acuerda y el "vendedor" procede a la siguiente "prevision" de colapso. |
|
|
|
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/aug/22/ukraine-attacks-pipeline-that-sends-russian-oil-to-hungary-and-slovakiahttps://www.reuters.com/business/energy/shell-agrees-10-year-gas-supply-deal-with-hungarys-mvm-ceenergy-2025-09-09/Ukraine attacks pipeline that sends Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia Shell agrees 10-year gas supply deal with Hungary's MVM CEEnergy Good dog! Orban is a goooood doggy! And not for long, he is likely to blow the elections. ..................
Been away for a while, has the red army reached the Alps or I need to keep waiting?
There is the one or other hiccup, Ukraine just went 4000 miles (6500 km) inside Russia to eliminate the "Butchers of Bucha" Putin wants Russia to be as great as the CCCP, Petrol coupons shows the plan is working. Russia fighting two wars, one in Ukraine the other against its people. If Ukraine doesn't change soon, it will ALL become part of Russia.
Someone has to be intentionally ignorant or is brainwashed not anderstanding the president of Russia flag.  The president is the horse in the middle I assume. https://www.reuters.com/world/china/kremlin-says-merz-views-ukraine-talks-dont-matter-after-putin-war-criminal-2025-09-03/Merz said in an interview with broadcaster ProSieben.Sat1 aired on Tuesday that Putin was "perhaps the most serious war criminal of our time" and that there was no place for leniency for such individuals. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/russias-imperialist-plan-only-beginning-042846283.htmlRussia's 'imperialist plan' is only beginning, Merz says Kremlin says Merz views on Ukraine talks don't matter after Putin 'war criminal' comments Merz explained why many Germans find it difficult to see Putin as a threat.
“Among a part of our population, there is a deep-rooted fear of war. I do not share it, but I can understand it. In principle, it is right to seek all paths to peace. However, when it comes to Russia, my point of view is realistic: I am currently rereading a book about British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain and his policy of appeasement toward Adolf Hitler. We must not repeat such a mistake,” Merz said.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpw7vllepx7oGerman chancellor promises to help Ukraine produce long-range weapons
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
