It looks like Child Harold was right about SDC all along. If the Zeuner review happened sooner (which he kept asking about) maybe this fatal flaw in Shadow anonymity could have been discovered long ago.

They have a bot auto-deleting any negative post from their thread. ENOUGH SAID

The above statement is not quite true. You can replace your head with a thicker one. Does this look familiar?

I told everyone here that the fud team bagholders would start dumping this coin after this last release. Longandshort and the rest of the "team" did just that. That's why you haven't heard from them. The fud team who controls the bitcointalk account deleted my posts and now you guys are the new bagholders. The dev is complicit in this, although he is getting played too. He put in countless hours probably to clone bytecoin and his shadows are worth less than when he started.

The tech here is nothing new. It's a rehash of bytecoin. Congrats on the devs for porting it to bitcoin, but you have literally nothing new here. Even stealth addresses were a port of Peter Todd's python implementation.

As far as recruiting talent, it won't happen. No real devs will come near the nutcases that come out to troll for this coin after they dump and refill their bags. They would probably have to recruit from other coins, but the fud team has fudded so many other coins, that no devs would want to get their hands dirty in this pit of trolls. Play it safe, dump on the next pump and go buy monero or boolberry, they have the best devs.

I warned you before and I've warned you again. My post will be deleted, but the truth is a hard pill. If you read this, heed my advice.


RyanOlstren0, Mar 2, 2015

350 days later the same shits in your head haven't evaporated. Are you born like this or your medications are somewhat ineffective? Do you want me to prescribe a new treatment?

The above statement is not quite true. You can replace your head with a thicker one. Does this look familiar?

I told everyone here that the fud team bagholders would start dumping this coin after this last release. Longandshort and the rest of the "team" did just that. That's why you haven't heard from them. The fud team who controls the bitcointalk account deleted my posts and now you guys are the new bagholders. The dev is complicit in this, although he is getting played too. He put in countless hours probably to clone bytecoin and his shadows are worth less than when he started.

The tech here is nothing new. It's a rehash of bytecoin. Congrats on the devs for porting it to bitcoin, but you have literally nothing new here. Even stealth addresses were a port of Peter Todd's python implementation.

As far as recruiting talent, it won't happen. No real devs will come near the nutcases that come out to troll for this coin after they dump and refill their bags. They would probably have to recruit from other coins, but the fud team has fudded so many other coins, that no devs would want to get their hands dirty in this pit of trolls. Play it safe, dump on the next pump and go buy monero or boolberry, they have the best devs.

I warned you before and I've warned you again. My post will be deleted, but the truth is a hard pill. If you read this, heed my advice.


RyanOlstren0, Mar 2, 2015

350 days later the same shits in your head haven't evaporated. Are you born like this or your medications are somewhat ineffective? Do you want me to prescribe a new treatment?

So now Shadowsend has been deanonymized the next step is to banter quantum stuff?

Screw it, lets go shopping.

This post will be deleted in approx 5 mins, like so many before.

I remember how SDC bastards fudded Stealth Coin when it revealed some weaknesses.

These bastard trolls were led by longandshort.

Time to fud this disgusting SDC society now!!!

I wasn't specifically referring to this project because you are actually replying to devs code and ffmad which have been quite responsive to this. I have been an investor in XST, SSD, SYS, CLOAK, and maaaaaany others

Yeah I broke half my bag.

edu-online: Child_harold, you forgot to mention that it has also been the same team who have been working around the clock for the past 18 months to keep our dedicated users satisfied. Yes. We combine new and existing tech that sometimes needs to be improved. In this case, we will come up with a working solution (like we always do) if needed. As sated on Slack earlier this week, our lead developers are looking into the reported bug. We also think that it is only fair to reward Shen for pointing us in the right direction. It is what the bounty program was set up for in the first place. By constantly focussing on Shadows open source code, we can try to spot and fix it's weaknesses. All of this is done to work towards our main goal: saveguarding the privacy of our users. Anything that might compromise this is taken very seriously by all of our team members. That said, our team will be focusing on the issue at hand first and keep you all informed. In the mean time, please try to find some peace in the fact that we are all trying to achieve the same goal here. Privacy.

wheatcove sdc troll asked me to give a bump on this thread

-It is you The Team who have wholesale copied technologies like Bitmessage and Cryptonote and produced plagiaristic whitepapers whithout proper attribution.

Well it sounds like the last 18 months working on your "anon decentralized app platform" was jumping the gun.

Fix the "anon" part first and then come back in another 18 months with a marketplace app and see how it does against open bazaar which will have already established itself.

Good luck!

p.s. Getting quality peer review will be more difficult for you now based on the way you treated a valid bounty claim this time.

p.p.s. Is technovert and rynomster the same person?

CRZ's designs are beautiful and it's html5 which I love. You are confusing the different components now.

OH I am the biggest SDC supporter historically because the wallet is legit and a decentralized marketplace IS NEEDED and Monero aint doing it and all of the mainstream solutions are either centralized or require a coinbase wallet or some bullcrap to tie to. And I can't tip you because you are still on your anon troll account.

I edited my original post to include "My limited understanding is that reveals which signature belongs to the original initiator of a ring signature. Can any other information be deduced from that signature?

FINE i erased the "no it doesnt"

No it doesn't. SDT is still functional and SDC ring sig math was fundamentally flawed. I suspect that came from the size changes that were made to increase performance in 2014 which Smooth referenced in December as change he hadn't noticed in the code which I thought at the time was a significant improvement to ring. Just turns out maybe it wasn't or is just buggy. I don't know.