I'm enjoying this season more and more.    The gap between Red Bull and others is closer now as you can see. Verstappen can't dominate every race that easy anymore which is great to see.

I didn't understand why McLaren didn't call Norris to pit at the same time with his direct rivals when he had a great time advantage. I think Norris really deserved to win this race so no wonder why he was the "driver of the day".

Another interesting thing was seeing Ferrari gamble with Leclerc's race. Why would you go for hards while it was still slippy and likely to rain more??    I can't imagine how frustrated Leclerc was after such a poor race.

Vincent Kompany and Bayern Munich are massively making quality additions to improve the squad ahead of the new season. They've just made conclusion with the new defender they signed up. In the next few days it would be completing the deal for Fulham defensive midfielder who was the best and highest when it comes to tackling in the Premier League Competition last season.

I want to see if Vincent Kompany is enough for the task. I'm not saying he is not good enough, but he doesn't seem tactically better than Xabi Alonso.
I hope they don't disappoint Harry Kane no more this upcoming season.

He's played too many games in the Champions League Competition and he has a good knowledge of how intense every round gets. I do not expect him to be knocked out too early. Most likely the Semi finals would be the last place we see him. Still not smiling he couldn't win the three trophies this season.

Slots games are completely algorithm based so there is a lot of cheating because you are betting there to win and you are predicting that you will win that bet but you cannot understand or see what is happening in the backend of the game. so it is much higher risk. But those who enjoy gambling do not worry about win loss. But if we see that they are cheating us by using different tricks then it cannot be accepted. I still don't understand that they are cheating somehow. I think we lose gambling because of our bad luck

Maybe it's time for Barcelona to let go of one of their players and this time Newcastle are interested in signing Ferran Torres. Newcastle offered a fee of 20 million euros including bonuses for Barcelona but I think this offer is quite low considering Ferran Torres' market value is 30 million euros. Maybe Newcastle can increase the fee a little more so that Barcelona wants to let him go.

On the other hand, Barcelona certainly knows this is an opportunity to increase their increasingly poor financial resources and at least they have the funds to buy players under the tutelage of their new coach Hansi Flick. Moreover, even though Ferran Torres has recently been getting quite a lot of playing minutes, his overall performance is still lacking.

this is truly essential if someone really trying to make business deals and we are talking about some not measly amount of money where if you just not diligent enough to know that there's term that can cut you off your rights you gonna get in the losing side later on.
there's always reason why the big company always have legal department because they know that every business need someone that knows well about law and will oversee the legality from many aspects, you know sometime some people just ignore the importance of lawyer to skim through their contract to save some pennies ended up in unfavourable side because they don't even understand what they are signing.

spending some additional money is worth it for anything that involves large amount of capital, only people that have thoroughly learned about law will know that some term is trying to give advantage to the contract maker.
to be fair you can always use AI these days but its not guarantee, just letting AI do all the work will never give you high accuracy of how fair the contract is, some AI only fed with outdated data, regulation always changes, the AI can be outdated.
its always good to have someone help you take care of the law and regulation related thing even more so if that person is knowledgeable about the law and keep being updated.
but yes you gonna spend some additional money so always take that into account.

I think the minimum acceptable result that is expected from a United coach is top 4, right? Here's how bookmakers see the teams' chances:

Manchester City - 1.10

Arsenal - 1.25

Liverpool - 1.53

Chelsea - 2.38

Newcastle United - 2.75

Manchester United - 3.00

Tottenham Hotspur - 3.00

Aston Villa - 4.00

So far, I see that United has dropped out of the list of elite clubs and will only fight with the underdogs, and even in that group it is not a favorite. It is unlikely that the appointment of another coach could change this picture much, but the fact remains: for United, getting into the top 4 is the end of dreams, their chances of winning the title are estimated at 1 in 26.

So Erik Ten Hag is staying at Man United? It's good that there is still a chance to start again and the management believes Erik Ten Hag can bring the club better, but there is no chance that during the journey when things are bad Erik Ten Hag can be fired at any time.

Actually, Man United still has a lot of young players with potential, it's just Erik Ten Hag's job to be able to cultivate these players well, but I think he can bring better even though there is always criticism.
About Greenwood what is Erik Ten Hag's decision? The news is that he is also feuding with the coach.

I do not care who says what, Ronaldo will not be able to play at this one. Dude is already 40, he would be like 42 or something by that time, not sure if he will be still playing football at that age but even if we assume that he still plays, he will not be playing at national team when world cup comes.

There are already quite limited number of players that teams can send, so that means they are not going to spend one of the slots to a 42 year old Ronaldo, he is already not doing that great, even in 2022 world cup he was benched after a while, and now we are seeing him getting to something four years later? Of course not, he will not have a place. Maybe if they do that like emotionally, like so he would be a leader, but I doubt they would, he doesn't look like a leader at all.

When he complains of gambling, he can’t completely put the blame on it because it depends on how you gamble too. First rule is that no matter how good you are, you should never gamble money with desperation. Most times it clogs your view of things and you end up messing up. Gamble slowly and steadily. Some people want to buy houses and cars overnight and gambling for such unrealistic goals would only make it worse.

"Can afford to lose." Yes, that's the key to avoiding being frustrated in gambling and that's also the way that we won't be one of those people who call gambling sites a scam just because they lose what they cannot afford to lose.
I get it, they are hurting because of losing the money, I've been in that same position before but I never came to a position where I would call a gambling site a scam. Put the blame on the providers, especially in slots, they are the ones who made the system like that where we won't be winning in a faster way. Let's also blame ourselves because there are times we are winning and yet greed won't make us stop. It's the truth and I know many will understand me.

I agree that sports betting is better at giving more thrill to the game when you know you placed some money for your favorite team/player.

so have you experienced a thing like this from any online gamble site that make you to lose the money that you wanted to withdraw?

Maybe many of them are just butthurt like what you said but also there are some that have been cheated by gambling sites as we also knew that not all gambling sites operates as how we are seeing and knowing them now because there are other side of each gambling site.
that I also  believe that many of them will try to take players money but when they are being called then things changed and indeed they are paying the taken money from those gamblers sad but reality , while other sites pretend to  be not intended to act such but deep inside its their tactics to take fund from those who have no capacity to run against their behavior .

Honestly speaking, I doubt that there will be 500-1000 users when it comes to real mode game. The prizepool of the freeroll is quite attractive to be missed by those who like free roll tournament. When it comes to cash game or buy-in tournament, the number of participants can be lower than what you expect. We have many examples in this crypto industry where there are many poker sites unable to survive because they got so low interest. About house edge, as mentioned by arallmuus above, the most common used terminology is rake. As an addition, rake is usually few percent taken from the pot (in the cash games).

I recently came across a discussion about low odds in sports betting. I never believed that using low odds in sports betting could lead to success. And I believed that the reason for this state of affairs was that one loss can cancel out many victories. For me, this seemed like something that did not require proof, until a man began to argue with me, who, according to him, had achieved success in sports betting and had been taking profits from bookmakers for a long period.
 His strategy is:
1. He selects matches with relatively low odds, the outcome of which is more or less clear. For example, when an experienced team plays with outsiders.
2. You should choose many such matches for diversification purposes, so that one random loss does not wipe out all your winnings.
3. It follows from this that in most cases, low odds work out, and random losses are offset by a large number of wins.
 I would like to ask you, what do you think about such strategies? What do you think are the disadvantages of this strategy?

but gamblers who are addicted to gambling will not be able to easily pay and pay off their debt if they don't have money or when they have money, they might even have the thought of going back to gambling first to double up. their money and hope to win, the aim of which is to cover all losses including the debts that surround them.

Having Bitcoin is not difficult, because even if it's only 1 satoshi, you can immediately have it as long as you make a purchase, no matter how much you actually have. The only difficult thing is to immediately understand crypto trading. It is not easy to learn once you enter; it is not possible the next day.

You already know everything; trading is not designed like that in the Bitcoin industry. So, if you want to trade Bitcoin, you can do that right away; even now, you can do that, but the question is, do you have extensive knowledge of chart analysis in an exchange? Do you know how to read a trading graph? Yes, it is true that it is based on price prediction, but there is a basis using different tool indicators.

Bitcoin has always being known for its volatility from when it was made , using it has a reserve is all has to do with the individual's understanding of Bitcoin and the risk involve. Before someone can have 80% of his patrimony in Bitcoin,he knows what he stands to profit if being kept for a long term. In terms of risky ,it has to do with your mindset because there is nothing we do in this life that is not risky, you just have to keep your fears aside and be positive/trust always when investing in Bitcoin , despite the volatile nature of Bitcoin,it is still profitable.