Any ETA on the Litewallet? I'm hoping it will make people more comfortable trading on the BlockDX. 

One more thing is that you do not trade tokens at Binance DEX, but trade b-tokens, at the rate of 1 b token to 1 real token. In order to exchange your b-tokens for regular tokens, you need to come to CEX in any way. This is all done in order to increase the rate of bnb.

I tried barterdex but couldn't understand how to use it, nor I saw any sign of XBC there. I am ready to pay 50% of the listing fees for crex24. I've tried this exchange personally and its good. Don't look at the volume because they're atleast not faking their volume similar to fatbtc. THe total listing fees is 0.25 btc. I can handle upto 0.12 btc. Let me know if anyone is ready to pay the other half to get xbc listed on crex24.

while DEX services have improved from the earliest iterations like etherdelta, they're still not nearly as reliable for real-time trading and especially algo trading. bots/algos are employed by many, many spot market traders whether to enter/exit positions over time, make markets, arbitrage the market, scalp, etc. this doesn't easily translate to decentralized exchanges at all. it requires a boatload of new coding logic and i assume employing algos on DEX is just way less dependable since even manual trading results in somewhat regular errors. lack of liquidity would compound these problems. this is a big part of the reason why all the liquidity is still on centralized exchanges.

A high performance decentralized exchange would be a real game changer in crypto, but so far nobody built an impressive one.

Would you guys like to be interviewed

The wallet is terrible, it just surprise me. Go and check waves wallet.

Is there really no linux wallet? 

I've just been on to them about being relisted, Dan has to fill in the submission again.

Edit
PM'd Dan.

thanks that's cool.

Well with these projects a road map if it is a serious one detailing the coming implementations and a new ANN thread with some nice looking graphics can create a lot of interest.

The thing i notice about you guys and actually david zimbeck is that you create great things but I don't think you guys market it enough before creations. Everyone else here is selling future dreams for 100's millions and you guys seem to wait and program in secret only briefly announcing things once they are coded and ready.

Investors buy dreams here but I think you and DZ can actually come good on your plans so these roadmaps can be marketed with more confidence than far larger projects.

Blocknet if it can get a good UI and be used via a website is going to be huge, even more so after people do not have to have the entire chainz on their local machines. I mean without doubt that project is going to be huge.

XC again if it has a solid role on blocknet ( i am not 100% clear what its role is with blocknet) and have top level anon and the other features you mention again with a masternode or if not masternode some other form of incentive to accumulate and hold ... a governance system for decentralised voting and funding mechanism ...then you are talking about another hugely marketable project.

Both of the projects can be huge and can be marketed right now on their road maps alone if they are realistic time frames and you have clear idea of how to code them out.

Of course I think bittrex could be persuaded to take back XC if they saw a great road map ahead. Apparently they are not charging now they just want very innovative and exciting projects.

that's a very interesting idea..

something like bytes and black bytes in bb?

have you a good idea how it would work and how you would code it out already?

What time frame would you expect to publish if you were to put a road map out now for it?

also is there an updated windows qt link the one in the OP does not work?

thanks

Thanks for those answers they are very promising actually.

I think we should evaluate if it will take- a few weeks of coding to address the issues via a node/collateral system
If then after this it would be superior to using zcash or other methods of anon.

I guess it boils down to work vs rewards of improving XC current version of mixing or switching out for a new variation.

I would say with evidence of XC being worked on again it will not be hard to bring forth a community around it once again.

Just keeping this thread active will snag new members all the time and once XC really is match for some other big anons ie the mixer is fixed or we move to another variation of anon then we can start comparing on the main alt board for even more interest.

Ok thanks for coming to the thread.

What does this mean though?
Does the mixer need work to become effective and free from DDOS attacks?

Where in your opinion does XC stand in the anon ranks. I mean how could it fair against other leading mixing based and different solutions to anon projects like zcash zcoin xmr and dash.

Is anon not the main funiton of xc now and is it now shifting focus to other features?

I guess I'm saying does the mixer need work to be worth of promoting it as a competition to these other projects and if not is there in the future plans to upgrade the mixer or move to another anon solution?

I would help promote this coin if i was sure this is something that is going to be taken seriously and kept alive on this board so we can build a community around it again.

I know block has to be the main focus and I am all for focusing on that until it is up there with the MC projects it deserves to be. I can not wait for a dex like blocknet.

However I hope after that XC will be getting a revamp too?

This is nice update XC has some great features so this is great which none has in the market. When new OP will take place with latest update and I think this will lead the market very soon.

XC is missing out on a alt coin bullrun like nothing we have ever seen before.

By dragging feet here you are missing out on millions in return.

Get some decent developers cracking on this and get it in a position to rival other GOOD anon coins.

Let's also think about getting it on an exchange with some volume.

I am still totally amazed they allowed  it getting delisted from bittrex.

I am shocked how this bull run has not inspired all hands on deck for XC and block these should be having teams working on them by now, be on better exchanges and be the discussion of BCT.

I think a rebrand for XC could be useful too.

I would like to see a technical comparison chart of this compared to dash, and other well known anon coins.

Oh nice. Xcurrency still getting extra features.

Atcsecure is one of the most solid crypto devs out there hands down and has just kept on delivering despite the naysayers.

Yes it is still syncing should i wait untill it is fully synced