The true “Sons of OgNasty” are those who constantly post about me. I don’t know why you guys are so obsessed with me. Surely there are people here who don’t have an enormous list of positive contributions to Bitcoin and this community that you could obsess over? Why make yourself look like a retard attacking someone who has done so much good here?
Why am I not surprised the same participants of the signature cult of "Friendly Managers" are attacking you? The true “Sons of OgNasty” are those who constantly post about me. I don’t know why you guys are so obsessed with me.
You have stolen thousands of bitcoins from the community and Theymos is protecting you. Good?  As far as I know, Ognasty claimed forked coins. Coins were forked after the treasury contract was made, if theymos didn't ask for the forked coins from Ognasty then I don't know why he's being attacked for it. (Or was it something else?) |
|
|
|
OP please open you inbox for Newbies
Another "Wannabe important info supplier," just use your main account or post here, idiot. |
|
|
|
|
Congrats on getting into this field.
|
|
|
|
Here's what I think are the facts:
- The single blockchain transaction is a transaction that undeniably linked the SmokerFace/worldofcoins accounts together.
- worldofcoins gave no information to explain how the link is not the same person (PMs, chat logs, public posts/topics, and so on).
- Both accounts have been caught cheating signature campaigns by post recycling.
- Both accounts have been paid by 1xbit (a scam casino).
- The linking transaction happened right after both accounts were paid by the 1xbit signature campaign.
- The linking transaction shows that SmokerFace sent to worldofcoins, then worldofcoins sent to worldofcoins' exchange/gambling platform/etc all in the same Bitcoin block.
1- He sent me funds, I used (What's the link here)? 2- I gave the reason for it, too; if I had asked when the connection between me and Smokerface was made, I most likely would've said, you don't store logs or trades for years. 3- No 4- For review, yes; campaign, no. 5- Yes, the chat also happened during that time. 6- You don't have to repeat the 1st and 5th points and make a combined 6th. |
|
|
|
Turning my arguments in troll statements is a good to way to divert attention.
Insisting on referring to me using plural pronouns and making up phrases in attempt to insult me aren't arguments. It's trolling. If you don't know the difference between arguing and attempting to insult some one you're ignorance goes beyond just being illiterate. No, I was not trolling you. I am liable for what I say, not what you understand. Can you quote it? Also, You gave me "Bounty Cheater" feedback. Would you please explain which bounty I cheated on? - Talking about literacy here, I might not be as literate as you, but what cheated bounty are we talking about here?, I am sure literate person would understand the meaning of "Bounty"? Edit: Did you take me for Small Rabbit's alt?
So you have no chat logs, no PMs, no public posts or threads that you can go back and look at for reference? Usually when two completely separate individuals trade with each other, then communication is involved? Plus, don't you think it's quite a convenient time to just forget about the details of this trade? The most important question for yourself is, if you were on trial right now, do you think what you have answered would imply guilt, or innocence?
Why would I be on trial for someone who did whatever they did and just happened to have a few chats and trades? As far as trial goes: The judge would have access to my bank accounts, not just for one single trade. (If I had 2 bank accounts, then surely they can be linked), Did smokerface sent all their earnings to me or just one?, If it's latter then I don't know would you hang someone for a couple of or just one trade. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
I'm trying to offer you the opportunity to give some reasonable explanations (such as, what the transaction between SmokerFace and yourself was), however so far you are passing up that opportunity with quite irrelevant jibber jabber in my opinion.
I don't remember exactly what this transaction was for, but I've traded altcoins with the person and even took loans. (Smokerface isn't the only person I've traded with like I said). If you specifically want me to tell which altcoins?, then I don't know which it was - If someone had questioned me this when they were tagging Smokerface, and this blockchain question was raised, then I would've answered it, but now, it's not feasible. So you have no chat logs, no PMs, no public posts or threads that you can go back and look at for reference? Usually when two completely separate individuals trade with each other, then communication is involved? Plus, don't you think it's quite a convenient time to just forget about the details of this trade? The most important question for yourself is, if you were on trial right now, do you think what you have answered would imply guilt, or innocence? I don't keep history for occasional traders, but I might still have access to the address he sent the funds. (I will have to check), I don't want to reveal much about how I operate my trades, but I am afraid there's no data left of this user, to give (If you or someone else asked me this before, Then I might have had for sure given it) - But why didn't anyone ask me back then? No, the guy deleted his account. So, I had to close the chat. |
|
|
|
I'm trying to offer you the opportunity to give some reasonable explanations (such as, what the transaction between SmokerFace and yourself was), however so far you are passing up that opportunity with quite irrelevant jibber jabber in my opinion.
I don't remember exactly what this transaction was for, but I've traded altcoins with the person and even took loans. (Smokerface isn't the only person I've traded with like I said). If you specifically want me to tell which altcoins?, then I don't know which it was - If someone had questioned me this when they were tagging Smokerface, and this blockchain question was raised, then I would've answered it, but now, it's not feasible. |
|
|
|
No.
Blockchain evidence doesn't prove me being Smokerface
You've admitted to having ownership of bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9I don't remember how I traded it, but most likely, yes not (bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9) | This one I own: bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9) (The one smokerface sent to). (Look at the justification below to clear your mind, too) This is how I see it going through: bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9 (Smokerface) -> bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9 (My wallet) -> 3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68 (My exchange, service, p2p) [3] Sure, np. Let me clear up the possible but not absolute blockchain connection for you, too. Yes, that last address, either belongs to my exchange, p2p trader, or gambling website (I don't have access to that wallet info anymore, given the amount of time elapsed) This is how, I trade off-forum: I've exchanged multiple times and gambled money in different casinos depending on the speed of the network (Now I mostly prefer BNB trades and loans, and yes, I take loans off-forum, even now).
So yes, there is quick transaction time between trades when trades occur through DM, within seconds to minutes.
People are active; you don't have to wait hours like on the forum for someone to read your post, look at your profile, and then provide a loan or trade; it's very quick. BTC isn't the only currency I trade with, and SF isn't the only person I've traded with.
" bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9", and " bc1qc240qa82qergkzzwpasg8ehp0clzt6gkzznwhc" (Also belong to me most likely). The later address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" (I don't know of which site is, but it most likely belong to account, or someone other than SF I traded with or had a deal with, I deal with a lot of people so I don't know who that might be, I could've provided logs if the person if from a p2p exchange, or a trade through dm but it would consume unnecessary time, and cannot guarantee I will find that person). The transactions made to "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68", from both addresses above, are through unconfirmed inputs from addresses of same wallet (most likely) (I could've preferred to wait, and send them separately) or I could've given sf that direct address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" to send the funds to, but I wanted to do it through my address (considering there, if any verification takes place, for the trade I did with 'h68' address, I can cite my owned address which send funds to it, I do it mostly with everyone, I trade occasionally.
Even smokerface mentioned it, they sent to the address. But they never claimed it to sent to "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5" | They explicitly mentioned whoever owns the address they sent the funds to, person owning that address have sent to "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5" (I didn't wanted my name mentioned at time, smokerface understood), but anyway it has come to light then this explanation should clear everything. Do you mean I sent to address "bc1q5x7zssejfd5nl74gtgd3f92u2wc4pjtues8yng" and whatever company or whoever owns that address sent it to "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5" where Worldofcoins sent their bitcoins in past Thus i own the address "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5".
Tigerfirst tried to cause confusion with this post, Royse somehow believes whatever this person says, they even gave merit to one of their posts. Smokerface nowhere claimed they sent to the exchange address "3CX2reYLXJh1hACiA1i6qq9WFCSEUc7Ax5" (They didn't even mention it was the exchange address, even if they had then i might have told them, but most likely didn't tell them about what I am going to do with our traded bitcoins)
If I am intentionally not being targeted, everything should be clear now, and people who gave me Negative for my Smokerface being my alt should revert their feedback. Can we not consider "probable certainty" but use feedback on 100% certainty in blockchain cases? |
|
|
|
Don't mind me, I just heard there was a brewing DT drama involving a shadowy cabal of gender-confused mammals and I figured I should do my part. Do I get new pronouns in this one, too?
Sure, You're involving yourself in the drama, so you're free to enunciate or use pronouns, no worries. |
|
|
|
I have personally sent PM Direwolf requesting them to revisit their feedback on my profile, and the same is the request from Nutildah (from them, it's public); I don't know if Don or Learn Bitcoin is doing it or not, so I won't bother asking them if they do then good, otherwise no need, I will wait for 3 days. Are you threatening people who have left negative feedback on your profile? No. Blockchain evidence doesn't prove me being Smokerface, nutildah mentioned username similarities, I've explained it too!, there are no similarities in usernames. (But some Mammals have it, what other reasons do you need to tag them, considering you're ok with that reason to tag, even though my username similarities are nill compared to them). People who group and abuse their DT status need at least a mention in their profile. I know people who look for legitimate feedback, disregarding it's given from a DT member, or not. |
|
|
|
I will refer to you as 'them'. You're free to quote out that part and write whatever you want.
~
"Mr. Literate Wannabae?"
If you're trying to troll me I have to warn you; trolling wars are my specialty. I'll have you crying yourself to sleep every night for a month of Sundays. But before I step into my hip waders, I'd like to remind you that one of the excuses and flimsy arguments you made to distance yourself from "smokerface" was that he was a troll, and you're not. Still pressing that argument, or not? Seriously? You cannot distinguish between argument and trolling?, where does lauda tagging for similar blockchain connection like mine has to do with trolling and where 1xBit manager writing royse text. Turning my arguments in troll statements is a good to way to divert attention. |
|
|
|
Stop referring to me as "them." Like most schizophrenics, each of my personalities is very possessive and territorial.
I will refer to you as 'them'. You're free to quote out that part and write whatever you want. I have gone through the evidence, and I have made my decision. I've been quietly following this drama for a couple of days now, and as always, I'm very selective with my feedback. You've provided nothing but excuses and flimsy arguments, while others have presented considerably viable evidence.
Sure, consider it an excuse, then. You were part of the group? By the way, 1xBit manager Mr. Goonie mentioned Royse's writing style, RaptarX, and Little Mouse had a similar connection in the address that Lauda also tagged. Is there any particular reason to target me only? - I hurt the person you respect. "Mr. Literate Wannabae?" |
|
|
|
So drug users can be prosecuted for financing terrorist organizations. What could possibly go wrong.
Where did you get that from? 2+2 Wannabe maths prof. We've been fighting the "war on drugs" for ~40 years. Clearly it hasn't worked, whether it was crack in the 1980s or opioids more recently. It's not going to work now that a different guy wants to do the same thing. To think otherwise is the definition of insanity.
Please let us what works, it will help everyone, Mr literate @Least trump is trying to fix the stuff. |
|
|
|
@DireWolfM14, Nutildah, and everyone who gave me negative feedback. Do you see me talking like this person, using slang and trolling (Anywhere)? It's clear that SmokerFace and me (worldofcoins) clearly aren't same.
You sounds helpless. You are trolling the forum for years and now you are asking if anyone see you trolling? Should I make a compilation of your troll? I don’t think so. nutildah gave you a second chance a long time ago which you didn’t take and trolled the whole forum. It has a consequences and You have to accept it. There is a dramatic changes in your writing style for last two days. I believes everyone notices that. You are behaving like a "good dog" instead of barking. You're the person I most expected a reply from. No worries, this is a request, I won't tag LB for the given duration, make you decision And, as far as making comparisons between accounts goes, no matter someone's DT or not, if they can't do it properly, then they shouldn't rely on targeting the person who traded with someone (Given the proof and justifications for the trades are stated). |
|
|
|
Please tell me honestly, do you believe Royse honestly didn't rig Spiroll's contest?, they awarded the prize money to the alt of the casino whose casino they were managing
Since you asked politely, no, I don't. Looks like he was just performing a task delegated to him by the Spiroll account. Yes, it's possible the person won't explain why it happened. But still, it seemed all staged; They even had trouble with Spiroll paying Royse money for the contest. I lost money in Spiroll, where the contest started with Royse (I don't want that money if my intent seems that way. The person has no issue regarding boasting about the money they make; it seems everything to them). These contests are over 2 years old and had only a handful of participants. Reviewing the contest in question, you would have lost to a different entrant anyway. Considering Spiroll used their alt to participate in their contest, I wanted to look for deleted posts too in the contest, but nvm. I won't be wasting my time with it. Looks like you started beef with Royse777 apropos of nothing here, which led to him creating this thread, which then led to you creating multiple threads about him. I explicitly mentioned, "I have no problem with it" Anyways, there's another person Royse was defending in the past who got accused of scamming a good chunk from bounty (Advice to reform was given, but the guy straight out exited the convo with F**K You attitude), but due to lack of evidence and slippery tactics, the person got away. I have no problem with it; people around me in real life use these tactics more effectively than people here do online.
But the person opened a thread against me, targeting me in a thread and referencing my posts and other stats. Naturally, I was going to retaliate.
There's too many other coincidences for me to believe you're not the same person as SmokerFace: [1] the use of the same nicknames, [2] the shared obsession with attacking the reputation of certain campaign managers, [3] and last but not least the other blockchain connections that have been mentioned in other threads.
Sure, np let me clear it for you. [1] Do you mean, nicknames "SmokerFace", and "worldofcoins"? (First one seems to resemble the face of someone who smokes, and the second one resembles theme "world of coins") - Both usernames aren't the same nicknames. [2] I don't know about Smokerface, but my beef with Royse, LM, and SR began after the mammal connection; it seemed to make sense what Smokerface wrote, and a few texts we discussed in a private group, discussions were *not only* focused on campaign managers, I agreed with a few point of views SF had, others also believed SF, but were concerned would community consider this as proof, then I seemed to connect dots of LearnBitcoin getting address of Little Mouse, Royse having the address of Small Rabbit, it's natural these dots seemed to point somewhere, Then mammal user names, and so on. - But I haven't tagged them solely because of this connection; you can check; I use ratings very responsibly.[3] Sure, np. Let me clear up the possible but not absolute blockchain connection for you, too. Yes, that last address, either belongs to my exchange, p2p trader, or gambling website (I don't have access to that wallet info anymore, given the amount of time elapsed) This is how, I trade off-forum: I've exchanged multiple times and gambled money in different casinos depending on the speed of the network (Now I mostly prefer BNB trades and loans, and yes, I take loans off-forum, even now).
So yes, there is quick transaction time between trades when trades occur through DM, within seconds to minutes.
People are active; you don't have to wait hours like on the forum for someone to read your post, look at your profile, and then provide a loan or trade; it's very quick. BTC isn't the only currency I trade with, and SF isn't the only person I've traded with.
"bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9", and "bc1qc240qa82qergkzzwpasg8ehp0clzt6gkzznwhc" (Also belong to me most likely). The later address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" (I don't know of which site is, but it most likely belong to account, or someone other than SF I traded with or had a deal with, I deal with a lot of people so I don't know who that might be, I could've provided logs if the person if from a p2p exchange, or a trade through dm but it would consume unnecessary time, and cannot guarantee I will find that person). The transactions made to "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68", from both addresses above, are through unconfirmed inputs from addresses of same wallet (most likely) (I could've preferred to wait, and send them separately) or I could've given sf that direct address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" to send the funds to, but I wanted to do it through my address (considering there, if any verification takes place, for the trade I did with 'h68' address, I can cite my owned address which send funds to it, I do it mostly with everyone, I trade occasionally.
@DireWolfM14, Nutildah, and everyone who gave me negative feedback. Do you see me talking like this person, using slang and trolling (Anywhere)? It's clear that SmokerFace and me (worldofcoins) clearly aren't same. What's also kind of interesting is worldofcoins decided to go on a 3-day hiatus after the start of SF's whirlwind frenzy of shit-spraying on Oct. 15th. Someone goes Offline for 3 days and someone else Punches you on the face while Someone Offline was Offline during that time, is that so? Therefore 'Someone offline' === 'Someone Punched' you on the face. @hacker, I wonder if you learned 'any programming by now '!=' which is not '/='  They posted in the same giveaways minutes apart: #1. 0-3
0-2
Ever heard of Forum's email notification?, I'm sure most of the users had that option on in that thread. This one is a few days apart:#3. So if there's going to be the third game then I'll take the following.
0-3
So we're counting Days apart now?, Just how badly you wanna Ride on me I can tell.Weird how both accounts never bet on the same score, right?
I AGREE IT'S WEIRD, VERY WEIRD, in those 8-10 (Combining both SmokerFace and Worldofcoins) predictions participating in the contest that could have infinite Results & Combinations if you include those contests. (Statistically speaking). nutildah aka nutty: NONE OF THEM CHOSE THE SAME PREDICTION!!!!!, Smokerface aka Ninja ( aka Maybe worldofcoins): nutildah Honey just say yes and I'll pick you up at night from your Home, You can't go on like this. SmokerFace only becomes active when there's a giveaway to cheat in or a sig campaign that accepts red trusted accounts. [1] - Given the noticeable overlap in these accounts' posting style, I'd say there's an 80-90% chance they [2] - are the same person without further blockchain evidence.
[1] - Where did you get that percentage?? [2] - Without further blockchain evidence?, Seriously?
[1] Also, both of them tend to think that I am alt of anyone I defend along with throwing illogical accusations. I would say there is 100% chance that both of the accounts are controlled by the same person after looking at [2] SM's indicated wallet connection between them.
[1] - We don't think you're alt of someone you defend, WE BELIEVE IT![2] - Summary below ~ hacker (hooker) aka Indian noob: SM aka Suchmoon indicated a wallet connection between them. Smokerface aka Ninja aka (maybe worldofcoins): omg my career is over hacker (hooker) aka Indian noob: Yes you're done. Natildah: Now I'll drink sugar, tea, rum Yahoo: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msAzcWv4rF8hacker (hooker) aka Indian noob: I'll celebrate my victory with Bobs and Vagana. Smokerface aka Ninja aka (maybe worldofcoins): **Confused how retarded people can be** **Never said he is worldofcoins** **Never said he's not worldofcoins**[/size]
I have personally sent PM Direwolf requesting them to revisit their feedback on my profile, and the same is the request from Nutildah (from them, it's public); I don't know if Don or Learn Bitcoin is doing it or not, so I won't bother asking them if they do then good, otherwise no need, I will wait for 3 days. The evidence, justification, and proofs I've laid out in this thread solve every doubt of me (not) being Smokerface, and I don't want to be associated with someone who's not me, As I've stated before, I've not done anything wrong, so consider this as a request, go through everything I've laid out, make your decision. That's all I have to say. [moderator's note: consecutive posts merged] |
|
|
|
JollyGood acting like an ascetic here as if he never tagged people for this kind of offence. As if he need more evidence to tag worldofcoins. But the reality is, worldofcoins thought to become a servant of JollyGood after getting tagged on his SmokerFace account, so JollyGood never doubt him.
Interesting!
You should be given Sherlock of the Year award, btw say that with your "Learn Bitcoin" account, you used to tag me. Do you think you will ever get a chance to deal with them?
I don't bother wasting time on a few spread sheet managing gang, who use morals as a tool to show themselves good and use that to gain connections, for financial benefits. |
|
|
|
There's too many other coincidences for me to believe you're not the same person as SmokerFace: the use of the same nicknames, the shared obsession with attacking the reputation of certain campaign managers, and last but not least the other blockchain connections that have been mentioned in other threads.
When you deal with someone through DMs you normally exchange texts, try to view their viewpoints, and a lot more. (And yes, i could be smokerface too, there's no possibility denying that too). Also like SmokerFace, the evidence that you used for these accusations was very weak. I don't really know what you were thinking.
Please tell me honestly, do you believe Royse honestly didn't rig Spiroll's contest?, they awarded the prize money to the alt of the casino whose casino they were managing - The alt account didn't win the contest, but the prize amount was awarded, and the winner complained about it (Nothing happened, Royse didn't even took responsibility of it) (Did SmokerFace provide this evidence too, or took part in that contest like me?) Even if you and I overlook these past allegations against royse, I am sure they will get themselves into the trouble, the way they're operating. I don't see myself dealing with Royse, Little Mouse, or their group in the future. (If someone is interested in taking over the investigation I started, then they're welcome to take the material I've provided. and reasons me believing it to be the case) Update: Feedback revised. That's all I have to say. |
|
|
|
Yes, that last address, either belongs to my exchange, p2p trader, or gambling website (I don't have access to that wallet info anymore, given the amount of time elapsed) This is how, I trade off-forum: I've exchanged multiple times and gambled money in different casinos depending on the speed of the network (Now I mostly prefer BNB trades and loans, and yes, I take loans off-forum, even now).
So yes, there is quick transaction time between trades when trades occur through DM, within seconds to minutes.
People are active; you don't have to wait hours like on the forum for someone to read your post, look at your profile, and then provide a loan or trade; it's very quick. BTC isn't the only currency I trade with, and SF isn't the only person I've traded with.
"bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9", and "bc1qc240qa82qergkzzwpasg8ehp0clzt6gkzznwhc" (Also belong to me most likely). The later address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" (I don't know of which site is, but it most likely belong to account, or someone other than SF I traded with or had a deal with, I deal with a lot of people so I don't know who that might be, I could've provided logs if the person if from a p2p exchange, or a trade through dm but it would consume unnecessary time, and cannot guarantee I will find that person). The transactions made to "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68", from both addresses above, are through unconfirmed inputs from addresses of same wallet (most likely) (I could've preferred to wait, and send them separately) or I could've given sf that direct address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" to send the funds to, but I wanted to do it through my address (considering there, if any verification takes place, for the trade I did with 'h68' address, I can cite my owned address which send funds to it, I do it mostly with everyone, I trade occasionally. Whatever you are accusing Royse777 of doesn't change the fact that you're the alt of a more-or-less scumbag account. Also, I would have done the same regardless of what campaign I'm currently involved in, given our history.
It looks that way, no doubt, considering you gave me/our a second chance in the past. Did you see my scumbag activity on my/our account (worldofcoins) post that event?, But once my beef with Royse started, which he began when I was hired, you too understand that, but why did you have to support him? The person locked his thread on me (showing only his viewpoint); I made a self-moderated thread, and you were allowed to post there, there were others whose posts i didn't delete, but the discussion in other thread revolved around users "Tiger ifst", and his + lm's campaign participants, the picture it painted was clear. The person kept attacking me after he made that thread on me. Was I supposed to "keep my head down" like you stated? If that's what you mean you would've done that in my every beef against royse, or anyone you preferred (under the guise of guiding me, using smokerface incident), then would I be focusing on the beef, or consider the safety, and rep. of my account?, Because i will have to keep the possibility of you keep brining this incident every now and the? I posted this in the other thread then thought it was better placed here instead.
A validation or reference for nutildah is not required as his record in this forum speaks for itself but after seeing recent comments made against him I wanted to make a post. Please note, he does not hand out negative tags on a whim even though he has been a member of the community for a very long time. Also, from an earlier post it seems he did advise you some time ago yet you disregarded his advice even though he probably had collated information that suggested/pointed you had other accounts yet never published it.
I realized the part about nutildah not having any ill-intention towards me. (They were right about some part, but for the others about making a rule for not allowing others to defend royse, but wouldn't it make sense If my allegations are against someone they should be the one clearing those not someone baby sit them through the process?), I will revise the feedback I granted them.I do not believe he would write to managers asking them to add/remove participants therefore I would advise you to remove the negative tag you gave him because it is completely unwarranted.
I did not mean they directly contacted the manager (but the tag they gave me would be seen and would impact my stay) Having said that, you have exerted a lot of energy trying to connect various accounts that could be up to no good and I know that can be frustrating when solid evidence is difficult to find. For example, various names have been mentioned in PMs between certain members regarding who is (or probably is) an alt-account or part of an account farming ring but even though some us know who they are, their names have not been made public because the evidence thus far is not strong enough.
Yes, it's plausible that most will not find this evidence compelling, but when invention through government, and private agencies take place, then they don't rely only on transaction details, they consider many other factors (for apparent reasons we cannot perform here on the forum), though irl people will most likely won't get away after pulling these stunts.
Btw this username, you chose to create a new account, Golden Hamster (Mammal) -> Was it intentional after going through my mammal theory of "Little Mouse", "Hedgehog", or "Small Rabbit"?
Not just mammals, specific types of mammals; rodents. Obviously someone is trolling you. Seems that way.
I believe I have cleared everything regarding my connection with Smokerface (let me know if anything is left), so everyone who tagged me for it should consider it and revise the tag they've granted me. |
|
|
|
What are the chances worldofcoins = CryptoGoonie? Oddly specific recommendation: Hello everyone the campaign has been paused until further notice and will be managed by worldofcoins in case it resume.
Spreadsheet and payment for last 3 weeks [Week 6, 7 and 8] will be processed within a few days.
You are free to remove your signatures if you want.
Why would I be mentioning my name knowing full well, i will -ve tagged if i manage it? Btw this username, you chose to create a new account, Golden Hamster (Mammal) -> Was it intentional after going through my mammal theory of "Little Mouse", "Hedgehog", or "Small Rabbit"? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
