Funny, you seem to want to end the discussion every time I bring up proof in your own words of you not only being abusive, but being full of shit about it and desperately struggling for new lies to cover it up. I guess that is why you suddenly need to pretend to be the better man and "ignore" me, so you can maintain the illusion that you don't know what I posted and never have to dig your hole deeper by trying to make more excuses and lies to cover for your behavior. This thread didn't solve any of the existing problems, only added more fuel to this fire. I haven't seen any attempt to do something, to end this finally. The main idiot is still arguing, just with different people. If I lock this thread he will REEEcreate another. :/ What do you suggest be done to end this finally, that we haven't tried over the last four years? People have voiced their opinions, now everything is being repeated ad infinitum. Please don't blame me for the actions of others. I am no longer arguing with him, hence the thread title. I did my best to steer clear of you, you started this shit, as you always do over and over and over again. Please, spare us the victim sob story. You have no one to blame but yourself. Funny, you seemed to think you could negative rate me from a position of DT1 simply for having opinions critical of your behavior which is how all of this began. I guess only special people like you get to have opinions. Funny how you "aren't arguing with" me, but you are still going on and on about me. You can't help yourself, that is the defining trait of your obsessive compulsive behavior. Hey look what I dug up! Tecshare, Badbear removed me from his trust list. I do not have a protected position on default trust. Stop lying about me.I'll go add the reference to the trust now and put this to rest.  Vod was removed from his trust list as a direct result of his abusive behavior. A staff member agreed his behavior was abusive. I have never been abusive. Show us the evidence... Here ya go! I plan to exclude you from my trust list due to your feedback on tecshare. I gave you the benefit of the doubt at first, but the way you keep antagonizing, provoking, and holding it over his head has made it pretty clear it was left out of spite. If you don't want this, I would suggest you resolve your issues with him ASAP.
The above PM was sent to Vod So which is it Vod? You are contradicting yourself in your own words. Oh right, you are pretending to be the better man so you don't have to respond to being caught being abusive and then blatantly lying about it to save yourself from digging your pit of bullshit even deeper trying to explain it. |
|
|
|
|
I am sure a lot of you have heard about this, but since the legacy media can't compete with the alternative media, they have opted to attack their ability to not only present their views, but earn a living from doing so. People are so hungry for truth and so tired of the old dried out turd that is the MSM, they literally can not compete with a guy in his garage on his web cam. This is only going to get worse, not just in the digital sphere, but in meat space.
They started with the fringes, now they are moving into quite main stream commentators. They are crafting a Communist style system of political correctness, and anyone who doesn't comply will be unpersoned and cut off from using the banking system, from transportation, from internet platforms, and even the ability to earn a living. Prepare yourselves, because when you make peaceful revolution impossible, you make violent revolution inevitable.
|
|
|
|
OPVod is tagged by TESCARE, teeGUMES, Fake Bill and Rmcdermott927 with these comments: TESCARE: Mentally ill stalker who will DOX and report you to government agencies as revenge for criticizing him. Avoid. bill gator: Endangering lives through DOXing. Coaxing criminals by indicating 500 BTC is held by the resident of the address they shared. This is a dangerous flaw of judgement. Rmcdermott927: I am leaving this feedback due to the completely irresponsible actions of this user. He attempted to dox a well known user on this forum and added that the user had 500 BTC in his possession. I feel that Vod's actions had no regard towards the life and property of other human beings and for this reason he should not be trusted.
How would you feel if an innocent person or child was harmed or killed due to your reckless actions? Well, I can't say from bill's and Rmcd's feedback that DOX is true, TESCARE's feedback indicates it is true, BUT, teeGUMES left this feedback: Publicly doxxed a member of the bitcointalk community. Backtracked once he slept on it and realized it was a bad idea. Impulse doxxing over a petty dispute is childish. Why teeGUMES said "publicly doxxed a member of the bitcointalk community"? Does it mean teeGUMES knows this dox is truth or, they lied that this information is true? Nah, they wouldn't lie in trust wall, they know dox is true. Do they? part of Rmcdermott927's comment: and added that the user had 500 BTC in his possession. I find it more interesting how some people are blaming others while they close both eyes to see that person brags all around internet that they are forum treasurer.
I'll keep mentioning it too.  Well that is just funny. Did Vod said that too? Anyway, all these comments and I figured out that only person who didn't tag Vod for doxxing is - OG Nasty himself. No, he wrote this in comment: Vod is a liar & trust abuser. Administrator describes his recent behavior as "disgusting" and makes statements like, "Red-trusting Vod over this is an appropriate usage of red-trust..." which is a sure sign that he's untrustworthy, and a disgusting human being. Nothing about doxing part. He is basically saying in his comment that Vod is liar & trust abuser and agrees with part of admin's post - only one part of it. Why is that? Does OG knows that everything posted by Vod has already been posted on this forum by himself, well, link to website was posted and in that website there is information about almost everything....? It is not doxxing if you have already doxxed yourself. So why "giving green light"? Why removing posts with doxing info? Why website linked in this forum with doxing info is all of sudden offline? Why was post with link edited and link is no longer there? Why another post(errr..2 posts) where OG said something about his site doesn't exist any more? Are we now pretending that we didn't know about 500 BTC? Rmcdermott927 didn't know OG was only one with keys to 500btc forums funds? Bill didn't know? OG didn't post video of his house? OG didn't post link to his website with personal information in it, under "about us or whatever"? No one knew about 500 btc?  This is nothing but a puppet show. I am not going to participate in a moderated thread where you get to throw accusations around and then delete any replies which are inconvenient for you, and I suggest no one else does either. That is why I created this thread so an actual open discussion about this topic can be had and not just a blatant naked one sided attempt at smearing people who disagree with you and your Politburo buddies. So because people are publicly voicing their displeasure with Vod's abusive behavior now they are automatically puppets? Cool story bro.
|
|
|
|
These are single use, expires June 30th, 2019. Shipping costs still apply. http://shutterfly.com/shopplaywin$25 off or 50% off: AB2Q-2Z5X-R9YM-XGXVA4 Free 20x30 Large Format Print: AB2P-9PYG-M69J-AN4Z9D |
|
|
|
I recently heard this breakdown of exactly why this system is a danger that I thought was quite eloquent and does a good job getting past the "conspiracy theory" aura around this discussion and covering factually possible application. |
|
|
|
|
I wanted to suggest a feature that would allow users who are limited as far as the amount of PMs they send a day, to send any member that replies to them unlimited messages as any other ranked user. I understand the limit is completely necessary to prevent personal message spam, but this would allow users to communicate uninhibited and without delay, without risking mass spam. I don't know if this implementation is possible but I deal with new users a lot as I sell several lower priced items and I have high levels of trust meaning I am often one of the first trading partners for new users here. Often they can not finish a transaction for days as a result of this limit. Is this suggestion technically viable without a ton of effort?
|
|
|
|
|
I purchased an Amazon gift card with cash and it turns out I didn't need it. I am asking $80 in Bitcoin or Litecoin. PM me for quickest response.
|
|
|
|
I reported this post as belonging in computer hardware and this post as belonging in currency exchange. Why were they marked bad? |
|
|
|
I was just thinking that some clown music that plays every time you log into the forum would be a nice feature. It would go well with the atmosphere here and would do a good job translating the reputability of this forum across all language barriers. This tune would be my first pick. This is also a close runner up. |
|
|
|
Since the original poster has decided to lock the thread, in my opinion prematurely, in a useless attempt to try to make this drama go away rather than let it unfold and be discussed so that it can be addressed I have decided to open the discussion up again here. It is funny how we all need to move on and forgive and "be the better man" when it is one of the "special" people who caused issues, but when it is anyone else it is perpetually open season. Now, the question is clearer. If I did not start the topic, we would have not seen the following post of theymos, that help us have better overview on admin's stance on Trust system, roles of DT members, and the way Trust / feedbacks works. It's only better for the forum, I believe. At the start, I believe that something inappropriately used with such feedbacks, that's all.
I actually believed that things solved on that day, but I was wrong when things become worst (it should be better), and we have not had a happy time. I am deeply sorry by starting the thread. So, I locked the topic. By now, the purpose of the topic likely reached. Two cases of Vod and Hhampuz solved, and theymos once again stepped in and stated his opinion.
What do you think if I lock the topic? (Personally, I believe it is time to lock it). I will listen to your opinion till the end of today, and might lock the topic tomorrow, even next hours if most of you support to lock it.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
