|
Does that mean personal twitter account will be able to be brave publisher or something? It will be great as there will not be only youtube or personal blogs but also personal social media account. People don't need to get confused, or to pass several complicated processes just to become publisher.
|
|
|
|
Have same opinion, i think ICO rating sometime can be paid to make positive review about project and make it hyped. So it is better to make analyze by ourself or if we face any problem to analyze, use forum opinion to review a project can be good to do.
I do believe few bounty/project infomation sites can be paid for promoting a specific project. We can't really trust anything in this world, we must do anything by ourselves. If at the end we are still scammed, at least we have done it by ourselves, we just need to improve our ability to avoid scam, so we won't find anyone to blame. |
|
|
|
|
Wait, is this for real? I knew Dexon since Cobinhood was conducting Dexon airdrop but I can't really believe what just happened. It's pointless for Cobinhood to exit-scam, they must be able to make more money by operating their business than just running away with investors' money/do this kind of action.
|
|
|
|
|
Even though your account got red tagged but your point here is interesting. It's always interesting to see people trying to help crypto adoptions. Is there any telegram group for community or this project is still in very early stage?
|
|
|
|
Read the main post once again, it seems that you do not understand the main idea of this topic. The one offering the 3% daily profit is not the site, but the dev of the bot. In simple sentence, this topic is offering you to invest on their bot. It means that you invest in a user (owner of the bot) who will use the invested to gamble on the site, not invest in the bankroll.
You don't get my point. Okay no problem, so you mean I need to invest in the bot then the bot will manage my money and invest on different things and the bot will get 3% daily profit while I get nothing, am I right? I don't understand who is crazy here...  Whoever offers 3% daily profit is never trustworthy, no matter it's site owner, bot owner, the bot, or even investment god. Really Did anyone trust on this kind of ponzi?
There might be some people do but I personally don't. |
|
|
|
|
OP is either new to this forum or trying to scam people (usually scammer just put their promotion then run away). I checked the website and got an issue of language, isn't there really English version of site yet?
|
|
|
|
The question is, can we buy them? So the FB has its shareholders and they will be the first to stand in line for these coins.
Nope, we can't. Big company are always looking for venture capital funding and never to open public sale as it will be complicated for them. They adon't need a small investment tho, lol. |
|
|
|
You will never find 100% safe on third parties, they can be a scam anytime, trust no one is a good thing to anticipate any form of hacking so you can be more careful. Exchange sites are prone to hacking and scams. so you have to be smart in securing your account and you have to be smart in dividing your money into each exchange
It's no need to repeat same things with different words, it's pointless. Your reply is something I already understood, then whaaaattt? |
|
|
|
Look at the fact that there are some bitcoin casinos did it already. Casinos such as Bitsler and Fortunejack has the system to detect money laundering attempt, the site hold users withdrawal because it was detected as money laundering attempt. Money laundering does not mean that any sites needs to know the real identity of the users but the sites knows the activity. The main idea of money laundering is not about who are the user but about the attempt. If you think that money laundering is only about who are the user doing it then it is a big mistake.
I bet the detection is when people just deposit their funds and then withdraw it without never playing. So if the launderer play nicely then the system could not detect it right? That means without KYC, gambling sites are not actually able to prevent money laundering. They are just assuming, and maybe people will be victim of their weak assumption. If at the end, the sites asking for identity verification before withdrawal then why don't they just apply it from the start so that bad people won't even use those websites, there will be no money laundering attempts, lol. |
|
|
|
Just a typical gambling games that do give out social interactions among other players.lol
It's an old site but I have never tried to play there lol. Is it fun to play? How many games available to play against players? |
|
|
|
-snip-
I'll admit I'm not expert in mining. I know very little about it, in fact. What I'm wondering is what would happen if bitcoin's price reached a level that was so insane that 1 satoshi was something like $5 or even higher. Would that not screw up the entire bitcoin system? There would be no way to send small amounts of bitcoin or very exact amounts, much less pay a fee to the miners. Am I missing something in that hypothetical case other than the fact that 1 satoshi will probably never be worth that much?
I have read about this somewhere (I forgot where). It's mentioned that Satoshi can be divided to smaller units when it reach expensive price for each Satoshi. It can be done through consensus. Theoretically possible but no need for now. yes you are right when the fees of transaction is very low then it will be more helpful and useful for lots of people to get the extra profit for their mining and the investment definitely a good chance to implement and the possibility of people to increase input field is also there.
I'm sorry, I don't really understand what you are trying to say. |
|
|
|
I am pessimistic that this bounty will continue. it seems that the IEO plan at binance made the team decide to stop the bounty. yes, they don't need a bounty because binance has a large community. I also doubt the previous campaign will be paid.
From bounty hunters side, it needs to continue so they will be able to earn from potential successful project. Unfortunately, it's not needed to continue bount campaign if we look this from investors or team side. It's enough promotion from Binance platform. For the previous campaign, they must pay fairly their participants. If they won't pay then they will lose their reputation and we all can say it's not legit and they may run whenever they want. |
|
|
|
We all know ETH is capable of doing that, it's volume is huge and therefore we cannot underestimate it.
Just $50 usd from the price now, and we will be back, I think that's only a small amount and not likely to get hit as we did a great job before going to $1,000.
Oh come one. it's only tens of dollars but if there is no reason for it to grow than it's not possible. Ethereum needs an encouragement from the developers to make investors trust in it and take a buy actions. |
|
|
|
|
Huh? It's and old issue, you can easily search "BiteBTC scam" on google and will have much result about that. The problem is in people their self, they never try to be aware of it and don't really care about others's experiences. They would just believe it's bad when real bad stuffs happens to them.
|
|
|
|
IEOs boost the trust level of investors, this alone makes a big difference.
You are right, but investors must be more careful of what he is believing. By the increasing number of IEO and its hype, there will be more scammers to take this opportunity to scam investors. Also, IEO is just ensure listing and not ensure that the project will be developed well. |
|
|
|
ADA Coin is sleeping deeply. When to wake up
We all know about ADA when it is in 10th place on CMC.
Most coin TOP has gradually transformed itself in the period of Bitcoin price increase. But hasn't ADA yet? So when does the ADA wake up?
They have been running its main-net since 2017 but I think ADA is waiting for 2020 to make everything ready and there is no longer problem on main-net (fully operate). |
|
|
|
Thats all a big screw up holy
For such scenario, either
The guy be good and return the extra tokens to the bounty manager or the worst case scenario, the project owner would need to create a new erc20 token
But, it doesn't really affect on the project owner side because they still pay the same amount of Token to bounty manager
It sucks to happen
The second scenario is not really needed, it's no need to create new token just because you sent tokens in wrong amount that usually not really much. There is also no reason for bounty hunters here not to send the token back as they will lose their reputation for the rest of their lives. Whenever manager sent wrong amount of token and the receiver is not willing to send it back then he needs to make it up, he needs to cut his payment off in order to complete the tokens distribution. |
|
|
|
You are right, there is no guarantee of a successful IEO project.
even though a popular exchanger held an IEO, I was afraid that the IEO would only be used when ICO was abandoned. Finally, the IEO only produces shitcoin which is popular at the beginning and eventually dies.
Nope, I don't think IEO only produces shitcoin, but I agree most of the result is the same, the main difference is that they are automatically listed on exchange than normal ICO projects. Listing never guarantees project development, but with that a project has an access to capital market and it's useful whenever they need additional funds for development. I do believe, even there are a lot of bad projects produced by ICO/IEO, there are also good project that are waiting for a good time to develop useful stuffs for our future lives. |
|
|
|
|
First that energi airdrop is not available for my country so it's not possible to earn 220 USD wiht just 30 minutes work like hat you mentioned. Second is that investing in security token is not really profitable, most of them have narrow market and it makes the liquidity low and almost can't give any profit.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
