Masternode collateral is 50K HXX ? moving post up again:
LATEST UPDATE, URGENT TO UPDATE 2.0.0.7:luckily this pharma exploid had no affect atall to pos, and there is no sing that exploid was ever used to hexx pow all miners where in equal position when pow hitted high diff. wallet protocol version 60027 client version 2.0.0.7 TEST4 -updated 3 inner seeds -one prefix value restored -added checkpoints -irc removed -fixed version number to wallet -alert and checkpoint keys changed -pos reward fix -removed leveldb leftovers from source -darksend options still not activated to wallet -makefile.unix fix to source -added more seednodes to wallet/source win wallet v2.0.0.7: http://www.filedropper.com/hexx-qt_6https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e2662b7e10fc968479c41626f7498df2e557798a91dd61885bc011b2f22745c9/analysis/1436358118/SHA256:e2662b7e10fc968479c41626f7498df2e557798a91dd61885bc011b2f22745c9 source v2.0.0.7: github: https://github.com/hexxcointakeover/hexxcoinreminder: client name is not hexxcoin-qt anymore it is hexx-qt conf file is not hexxcoin.conf anymore, it it is hexx.conf folder is still the same: Hexx if you run masternode add to hexx.conf : staking=0 |
|
|
|
I like the 30% as well. Wallet is up and running, all locked and loaded. Ready to assist where I can.... well.. you know the drill. Also, got IRC channel #Ratecoin up and running. Pinging drew to get the tip/game bot setup. Why dont you just change the daily blockcount to monthly as I am sure it isn't used. Then taper the rewards down by 25% monthly until you get back to the 3%. This example would allow 2 months from the first block to get the changeover. First 2 months @ 30% Month 3 @ 22.5% Month 4 @ 15% Month 5 @ 7.5% Month 6 and beyond 3%. Change const int DAILY_BLOCKCOUNT = 2880;
// miner's coin stake reward based on coin age spent (coin-days)
int64_t GetProofOfStakeReward(int64_t nCoinAge, int64_t nFees)
{
int64_t nRewardCoinYear;
nRewardCoinYear = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
int64_t nSubsidy = nCoinAge * nRewardCoinYear / 365 / COIN;
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
} to const int MONTHLY_BLOCKCOUNT = 86400;
// miner's coin stake reward based on coin age spent (coin-days)
int64_t GetProofOfStakeReward(int64_t nCoinAge, int64_t nFees)
{
int64_t nRewardCoinYear;
nRewardCoinYear = .1 * MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
if(pindexBest->nHeight < (2 * MONTHLY_BLOCKCOUNT))
nRewardCoinYear = MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < (3 * MONTHLY_BLOCKCOUNT))
nRewardCoinYear = .75 * MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < (4 * MONTHLY_BLOCKCOUNT))
nRewardCoinYear = .50 * MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
else if(pindexBest->nHeight < (5 * MONTHLY_BLOCKCOUNT))
nRewardCoinYear = .25 * MAX_MINT_PROOF_OF_STAKE;
int64_t nSubsidy = nCoinAge * nRewardCoinYear / 365 / COIN;
if (fDebug && GetBoolArg("-printcreation"))
printf("GetProofOfStakeReward(): create=%s nCoinAge=%"PRId64"\n", FormatMoney(nSubsidy).c_str(), nCoinAge);
return nSubsidy + nFees;
} I personally like the 30%, not sure what everyone else thinks? In my opinion what needs to be fixed is the 30 second block time. Bump that up to 2 or 3 minutes and it puts the coin on a long term path to success. |
|
|
|
couldn't ask for better help  |
|
|
|
|
This is stupid, why would anyone fork anythink made by that spots? The wallet is pretty much guaranteed to break. You might want to you a better code base.
|
|
|
|
|
I am getting the following error.
Error: Failed to invoke rpc method: TcpConnector::connect, ConnectEx failed, result=10061
|
|
|
|
|
selling 450 for 0.09btc PM me.
|
|
|
|
Yes love it
1st ;-)
Hate it. 2nd |
|
|
|
Ahhh, igotspots, the official clown of bitcointalk, always making us laugh with his antics.  |
|
|
|
Ahh man, those look great! |
|
|
|
Ha! Kar-Dash-ian. Instant classic  |
|
|
|
=============================== http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/ADC/=============================== Hands down, this is the best Block Explorers available with very unique real time statistical information, Address and Pow/PoS difficulty charts, Address claim, Rich List, sortable columns, drill down TX information, etc... With upcoming features... - stake view displaying an addresses staking summary - Markets summary - Signing and sending raw transactions This service was only launched a week ago (outside of HYP). I was able to work out a deal with Presstab (Dev) and have already prepaid the activation fee and for 6 months of service. With that said, I think its a service worth keeping for the long run, hence I propose a donation address and use those stakes in order to pay for the renewal of this service when the time comes (every 6 months). Anyone who finds this Block Explorer useful and worthwhile, please donate to the following address AU1G5VfsHCpQKuu2FGyGcSmRL1EjdUVHcE and I'll make sure the service remains available for AudioCoin. Thanks, -Kushed I can confirm Kushed paid me for the server costs. I received a small amount of ADC from the dev team as a bounty that I will forward on to you Kushed. I encourage others to send some your way as well. Thanks for that! I've just added another 100K to that as well. Donation address now has total of 350K ADC. Track Block Explorer Donation Funds here... http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/ADC/address.php?address=AU1G5VfsHCpQKuu2FGyGcSmRL1EjdUVHcE |
|
|
|
=============================== http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/ADC/=============================== Hands down, this is the best Block Explorers available with very unique real time statistical information, Address and Pow/PoS difficulty charts, Address claim, Rich List, sortable columns, drill down TX information, etc... With upcoming features... - stake view displaying an addresses staking summary - Markets summary - Signing and sending raw transactions This service was only launched a week ago (outside of HYP). I was able to work out a deal with Presstab (Dev) and have already prepaid the activation fee and for 6 months of service. With that said, I think its a service worth keeping for the long run, hence I propose a donation address and use those stakes in order to pay for the renewal of this service when the time comes (every 6 months). Anyone who finds this Block Explorer useful and worthwhile, please donate to the following address AU1G5VfsHCpQKuu2FGyGcSmRL1EjdUVHcE and I'll make sure the service remains available for AudioCoin. Thanks, -Kushed |
|
|
|
I would like to introduce a new Block Explorer for Noble. =============================== http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/NOBL/=============================== Hands down, this is the best Block Explorers available with very unique real time statistical information, Address and Pow/PoS difficulty charts, Address claim, Rich List, sortable columns, drill down TX information, etc... With upcoming features... - stake view displaying an addresses staking summary - Markets summary - Signing and sending raw transactions This service was only launched a week ago (outside of HYP). I was able to work out a deal with Presstab (Dev) and have already prepaid the activation fee and for 6 months service. With that said, I think its a service worth keeping for the long run, hence I propose a donation address that will stake in order to pay for the renewal of this service when the time come (every 6 months). Anyone who finds this Block Explorer usefull and worthwhile, please donate to the following address 9nxKncnWW5msaxTPVDpk5wCvK4kVqD32wU and I'll make sure the the stakes from this fund will go towards the renewal of this service for Noble Coin when time comes. Thanks, -Kushed |
|
|
|
|
Looks good... glad the ANN finally hit BCT.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
On a legal note:
Was the name 'Dashcoin' trademarked? The answer would appear to be no.
If it was trademarked, in which countries was it trademarked? Dashcoin has global shareholders.
Were any other intellectual property rights secured on Dashcoin's first public use? The answer would appear not.
The Dashcoin blockchain was created by its shareholders i.e. those who owned, bought and traded with their own unique Dashcoin addresses. They are, it would seem, Dashcoin shareholders, using the name Dashcoin. They contributed to the Dashcoin web pages - and to the Dashcoin 'goodwill'.
Can any one person 'sell' Dashcoin? Not, I would imagine without the shareholder's consent, or without a proper legal framework being constructed.
Have the Darkcoin/Dash people used the altcoin name 'Dashcoin'? It would appear not, and that name is still being used by the original shareholders.
Here's where it gets interesting from a legal point of view. There is the Tort of 'passing off'. This is where the goodwill established in a name is used by a person, or an organisation, in a such way as to make others think that they are the original entity with the goodwill. One of the tests for passing off is confusion, where others think that the new user is the original entity with the goodwill. This 'misrepresentation' does not have to be intended - it just has happen in a way to mislead the public's thinking (Still with me?!)
On the Poloniex chat facility today, there were several people who thought Dashcoin and Dash were one and the same. I did until recently. It could be argued that Darkcoin's re-emergence as Dash has caused 'confusion' and has in some form taken away some of the original Dashcoin's 'goodwill'. Therefore, it could be viewed that Dash (Darkcoin), by using the word 'Dash' has committed the the Tort of passing off.
If Darkcoin/Dash have any scruples, you would think they would back off and stop using the name Dash. Why is it so important that they have it? Why did they attempt to buy into the Dashcoin name?
Dont even get me started on all the countless poor confused soals that join #Dashcoin channel on IRC looking for help with their broken Darkcoin wallet. Some of them dont even go back to Dark, after seeing the light.  |
|
|
|
hi guys!
last dev post was on: 20 April 2015, 13:42:06...
nothing after this date...
the last post was to release Burst 1.2.3.
then no update...
somebody knows if the dev is still developing burst?
It will never be a success with a lead Dev being disengaged from the community like this. With multiple other solutions coming out that make use of hard drive space instead of wasting it there is no way Burst can compete with those. Regardless of how much community effort is put forth unless the tech changes significantly to make use of the space with POC2 there is no point of it. If someone was to ask what you can do with burst or where you can use it the answers are pretty slim. No place to use it unless you want to speculate on some assets. Some type of recurring income is needed for marketing purposes as well. Cobra is spot on in regards to other coins coming out that make actual use of hard drive space instead of wasting it. BURST should move quick while they still hold huge piece of the pie. Before miners remove space dedicated to mining BURST to mining other coins that puts that space to good use. |
|
|
|
|
Smart scam.
Assholes don't provide any updates, news or financial info what so ever, creating FUD in process, buying back shares along the way at fraction of the cost and once there is no more shares left, they announce a buy back so not to look like scum buckets.
GTFO
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting.
Bad timing with the ninja ANN. Not home at the moment
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
