Still, if that's okay for you, this is not okay for people who translated the thread with these 2,5% in mind, i had the time to take the bounty, translate it after few days and it was still 2,5% at the moment i finished since i took the bbcode to translate the bounty thread too, it seems really Big to be a "mistake" , and that "mistake" made a lot of people choose this bounty between August and septembre, and now they have enough people they discovered a supposed "mistake " weeks after the beginning of the bounty when they had enough participants, this is how It looks since they were hiding the change until i discover it.
Imagine in real life someone gives you a job to do, promise a specific reward and once your work is done, he tells you " ha sorry it was a miscalculation after all, you won't even get 50% of what we offered to you, deal with it" , no honest person would do that and this is not because we are in a crypto world that it's acceptable to have such behavior.
This is just totally dishonest, even if it does not affect you, it should make you think, if they are being like this and hiding it changing What was written without warning people and without offering any solution to people who came here with the Old information, they are not trust worthy and could do other change to the ICO for supposed "mistakes" discovered weeks after enough is collected..
You should in fact watch their reaction to this issue to see if they are trust worthy or not , if they are pro or not, a really serious project would discuss and offer a fair solution for first participants if It's really a mistake, so their next move will show something important for investors.
Edit : and i now have the proof it was not a typo mistake since the dev stated several Time himself 2,5% for the bounties, talking about translation in the same sentence. So now a lie, this is not going in the good direction...
Agreed from my side. If it wasn't a mistake but simply a twist and turn this is bad treatment of and contempt for bounty hunters. I would be dissapointed in Minerva. If it was a true mistake I can have understanding for that, since we're all human. But then I do feel they should compensate bounty hunters like you with a 2.5%, to make up for their own mistake. That would be fair policy to me and that is how I would deal with this. I also feel it would be good if they would give out a clear statement here in this topic. I'm not further going to participate in the discussion, but I saw in the Authorship topic what unfair treatment of bounty hunters can do to a project. Minerva shouldn't take a gamble with this. Transparancy, clarity and fairness are highly appreciated in a scene where so many scammers dwell (both on the project side as on the bounty hunter side).
Show Posts
