I re-did the math.  With so few coins you are in for a long long wait for anything to happen.  Think about it.  At my rate of return on staking (assuming the rate is about the same - which really cannot be done) then my coins will double in about 3 years.  

So will yours... but since you have a little more than 100 coins to start with, and the POS payout is 100 coins... it will take you 3 years to see your first payout - on average.

I have 381 inputs, weighing a little more than 507,000 coin days.  I have been getting between 8 - 10 blocks per month (800 - 1000 coins per month).

112 coin days means you will get about 1/450th of what I am getting, assuming you do not improve in that regard.  If it STAYS at 112 coin days, then expect a 100 coin reward every 3 years or so if I am doing the math properly.

It would be helpful if you told us how many coins you have.  

Just wanted to take the opportunity to thank ChekaZ for the support given here.  I have personally had no issues at all except for one time when my wallet would not open due to a corrupted data file.  This was apparently as the result of a hard boot that made for an unclean write to my drive. 

It's great to see TZC hovering around a 5 million market cap.  Hoping it can surpass 10 million in the days and weeks ahead. 

And, it's great to have such good returns on POS. 

My thanks to the dev team and ChekaZ specifically.

Trezarcoin is an interesting possibility.  

I mined 32,000 coins and after only 24 hours the cojns started staking.  Been getting almost 200 coins per week after the auction coins matured.  800 in October and November.  

TZC is also showing up as a good profit as a mining coin.  It is neoscrypt and runs well on Nvidia cards.  

TZC has run from 200 Sats to over 500 this week to an all time high.  Take that for what it's worth.  

I mined about 32,000 coins and when POS first started I was getting a block or two per day.  Then the auction hit and all of the coins that matured after the auction slowed me down to a block or so per week.

You don't have many coins (neither do I really) and with a little bad luck it could take months for you to see something.  I can go for a week or more, then one day I get two blocks (200 coins).  Hard to say how it all works out as far as predictability goes.

Great to see steady climb in value here.  

I think the quick 0-Day POS (OK... 24 hours) aspect is creating many who are HODLing their TRZ as opposed to mining for a quick profit sale/exchange for something else.  That is creating a strong market that buyers have to contend with since sellers are... well... not selling so much.

For the same reason you need water if you want a swimming pool.  It is intrinsic to the process.

Are there any 'non blockchain' cryptocurrencies?  There is one - IOTA - based on something they call a 'tangle'.

Other than that, they all are based upon blockchain as far as I can tell.

You sated that the POS is skewed to the rich list.  Of course it is.  Staking is based upon the number of coins you have.  That is the only FAIR way to implement it.

No way to answer your question without knowing what your staking weight is. 

Were TZC listed on 'whattomine' (regardless of your opinion of the worth or lack thereof with the information found there) - it would likely be very near the top in profitability as we stay around 240-260 SAT's.

'A publicly listed company has assets and issues dividends'

Not all publicly traded stocks issue dividends.  Therefore, your statement is false.  84% of the LARGE companies that make up the S&P 500 pay a dividend, but there are hundreds, if not thousands, of mid-cap and small-cap PUBLICLY traded stocks that do NOT pay ANYTHING in the way of a dividend.  

As for a 'publicly listed company having assets' as if that alone is a virtue, assets are balanced out with debts and obligations.  There are hundreds of publicly traded stocks in companies that owe more than they have in assets.  

If you are going to try to sound smart, at least BE smart.

For me, I would counter your 'stock' comparison with the following two things that MANY companies can only DREAM OF...

1. SIGT has no debt
2. SIGT is not losing money

If you showed me a small or mid-cap biotech stock that has no debt and is not losing money - I will show you what is, in the world of investing, a winner.

Depends totally upon what the rewards are... no?

The real value of staking is not the 5% interest.  It is locking coins up from sale, reducing supply and as a result, likely an increase in value for the 20K you own.

Does it show a weight for your coins?

You will not put coins up for staking until your number comes up in a solution.  I mined Trezarcoin and that is the way that one worked. 

The 'expected time' is based upon averages.  One day I was awarded 600 TZC's in staking.  Then I could go 2 days and nothing.

Quick question...

is the ONLY staking reward a 5% annual return?  If so, how can that be a reliable number given the luck involved?

I mined all of my coins in a pool and POS worked out just fine.  I did not LEAVE them in an online wallet.  They were all going to my desktop wallet.

What miner are you using again?

When I was using the KERNLX versions I was seeing huge differences.  Been mining since 8/7.  That is 50 days with some down time of about 5 days - so call it 45 days.  Have 12150 coins.  That's 270 per day.  WTM has told me over 400 at times and under 250 at times.  The projected is often much higher than the 24 hour number.

if you are using the KRNLX version of ccminer, I recommend ditching it.  It seems to report too high a hashrate while delivering fewer coins than other versions.  So much so that I have wondered if there was something going on under the table that people like you and I might not see...  maybe a little hidden 'dev fee'?  I don't know.  I just know it looked like it was the fastest while for me it was actually the slowest in real world results.

I think cryptodrivel does not know shit from Shinola. 

SIGT has been among the top 5 in mining profits most of the time since it was announced.  Now, with a sharp decrease in supply imminent, there is potential for any increase in demand to immediately translate into appreciation of value.

EVEN if SIGT was 'copy/paste'... what difference does it really make?  People are not mining it because it is NOT copy/paste.  They are mining it because it is profitable to do so.  That profitability now has SIGT in people's cross hairs.  If it starts to run... then cryptodrivel can down vote and spam all he wants.  He will miss the train.

Once the mining is over, those who are mining for short term to roll into ETH or BTC will have no ability to continue that practice.

Funny how the FUD really picks up as we get close to the end of mining SIGT.

ASIC's RESISTANCE is STILL ASIC's RESISTANCE

What difference does it make how it is ACHIEVED?

Skunkhash algo helps achieve it.  Short mining period helps achieve it.

The fact is, by design, ASIC's mining was made nearly impossible by the DEV's.

The only way I would label the DEV's in any negative light in this regard would be if they said SIGT was ASIC's resistant, then a week later SIGT is being mined by ASIC's miners.

From a practical standpoint, regardless of being as the result of code, hardware, road map.... it DOES NOT MATTER.

ASIC's mining was rendered impotent BY DESIGN.  

Even if only through a short mining period... SO WHAT?  

No SIGT was ever mined by ASICs miners nor will ever be.

Hey... don't you start confusing the fud'er with facts.  That's not FAIR.