Kepler aims to raise $50,000,000 for the further development of the project. Is this your soft cap? If so, in whitepaper it says: Facilities / Complex $50,000,000 will be allocated for the construction of a complex. Also, Lab + the platform $100,000,000 has been earmarked for the creation of our revolutionary laboratory Factory $75,000,000 for a fully automated where most of the employees are robots. It means 50 million just for the complex? Or will you readjust the budget if you don't reach 250k but get 50m and more? I understand it like you wrote levyashin, 225.000.000 usd is one of the biggest numbers on cryptocurrency world, but we are talking about a factory here not just software or else, so i guess it is normal? |
|
|
|
|
I read a onepager in one of the upcoming ICOs, now i know we have a 300 paged whitepaper, brochures and presentations in ehealth, maybe a summerized whitepaper should be good for everyone:) 300 page is a lot for some of us.
Btw. I am ok with 5 eth. minimum cap on the private sale phase. Devs want to attract bigger investors so 5 eth is quite normal i think.
|
|
|
|
|
I just saw this project, as far as i can see, i am impressed with being a shareholder to a mega factory, i like this idea.
I'll read the 30 paged whitepaper for more details and come back to here and talk about this promising project.
ps. You shouldn't put media pages that are not published imo, I'm with niklasmato on this one about the red flags.
|
|
|
|
Good news. It's kind of a good exchange. The more exchanges, the better. never heard of that but well yeah the more the better Coss is quite a good exchange, i think it may be able to increase his user base during this year. I think so too. Many new exchanges had a stellar success last year. Binance going from zero to hero so to speak. Binance is pretty awesome, but I really feel like some of the new decentralized exchanges will be what start to becoming increasingly popular. The only question is which ones will take the lead. For example, waves is a project I haven't hear that much about. Collaboration between Mark.Space and COSS exchange is promising. With projects like this Coss Exchange can increase its customer base and have a chance competing exchanges like Binance or Kucoin. So this partnership is a win win to every party, Mark.Space, Mark.Space investors and Coss Exchange. |
|
|
|
Hello guys,
do you have any competitors? Please tell me some examples.
They dont have competitors (in crypto niche at last). Might not be direct competition but there is Xplay and Spankchain. I don't really know much about Xplay but Spankchain is a payment processor for porn and that is different than what we are trying to pull off here. Definitely spankchain and livestars are two different projects, Livestars offers everyone something, like clients have anonimity models get paid steadily and fast, so everyone is happy. spankchain is whole different thing. livestars with 00.16 usd price and %20 discount is a sure win. so dont miss this one. |
|
|
|
Someone heard about the special offer.
1 commercial unit offered per 10,000 mkr in the wallet
Do you have a link of this source? I would watch out for scams. You should check if the address you send tokens to, is the correct address by checking it on the official site. scams are nowadays everywhere around. people should be really double aware and check out everything... I think so too. Sounds a little bit unrealistic. that offer Sounds dangerous to me , even today a scammer tried to scam me for a ICO that I'm following on telegram so make sure that the offer comes from the right channel. The person tried to scam me, copied the group admins avatar and name (with one different letter) and poached me. I answered very politely. anyways, be careful in crypto world. |
|
|
|
I liked the onepager ( https://repu.io/onepager_eng.pdf), they explained what they solve and how are going to distribute tokens and basic info(which is helpful enough) about the team behind the project. I think all the ICO's should do this type of informative onepager. Good thinking. |
|
|
|
This is really so amazing, will we be actually be able to pay models using these tokens? Why can't you collaborate with the other cam community and ask other major websites also to start taking your token(if this is possible)?
Also it will eliminate another major problem, as far as I have observed, the card processors for these cam websites can be carded, and what the model and the website gets through these purchases may then be stolen money / it can the transaction can be reversed by the banks. With this token, this problem wouldn't exist at all, and cases of models colluding with carders will also be eliminated.
Why would other major cam websites accept LiveStars tokens, too? That would be some kind of advertisement for LiveStars on their cam website and won't happen if you ask me. What I can imagine is, that other adult webcam site will start to accept cryptocurrencies. Let's hope LiveStars has already established itself on the market when this happens. A collaboration between major cam websites and Livestars will be marvelous, if anything happens like that is a breakthrough in online webcam sites and business model. |
|
|
|
Unless the video last 3 hours i think is not going to cover all the information present in the wp
That's not necessary, although the video isn't long enough If it included important thing, I thought it as enough. Because the left detail information can be found on whitepaper, that's supposed to be usability of a whitepaper. I doubt anyone would watch a 3 hour video about any crypto project so its good that they make it short and cower all the important parts of eHealth. The biggest challenge is to make it interesting and appealing for investors. well therefore there are marketing agencies who make these kinds of videos They are not hiring a campaign manager for their project to answer questions, I don't think they will work with a marketing agency that provides this type of videos. |
|
|
|
|
Benim de aktif olarak takip ettiğim bir proje ve şu an için az para toplandığı için yatırımı katlama olanağı yüksek gibi gözüküyor. Kesinlikle yatırım yapmayı düşünüyorum, mantık olarak da olduk.a faydalı bir proje, coinleri sepetleştirerek riskimizi azaltıyoruz, bazen insan panik atak geçiriyor bir günde tek coine bağlı olup yatırımın yüzde 40'ı kaybolunca.. O yüzden faydalı olabilir.
|
|
|
|
Is this information official by the eHealth team?
Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential
For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week. I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted( I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field. That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project. Besides the people in project(which are crucial of course) are there any announced partnerships with any healthcare company, hospital or a pharmaceutical company? I am waiting for the whitepaper where I am sure that these points are clarified. I think it's going out this week. I am also quiet excited about the project, I forgot to look to this thread for a few days and today I remembered that we are expecting a whitepaper still.. hopefully devs will deliver. |
|
|
|
Is this information official by the eHealth team?
Hopefully I get enough information to understand the long timeframe of the project. Would be good because this topic got enoumous potential
For more credible information you should check the official website - http://ehfirst.io. It explains the project really good. In addition, the whitepaper should become available this week. I hope they will tell us about it. The activity of the administrators in the stream is not imprinted( I have checked some of the advisors and they are all very big names in their field. That's the point that stood out to me the most as well. If it weren't for those names, then I wouldn't have much confidence in the project. Besides the people in project(which are crucial of course) are there any announced partnerships with any healthcare company, hospital or a pharmaceutical company? |
|
|
|
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.
My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?
Because sometimes due to experience or other circumstances some doctor may overlook some simptoms and give an erroneous diagnosis. Thi project prevent these problems as well. Usually machines are more likely to make less mistakes. Who knows maybe in healthcare it will develop the same way It is really expected that this system will make less mistakes because of the implementation of AI and blockchain. I am just curious if there will be many bugs from the beginning. there will certainly be bugs at the beginning , but those get iron out as time passes. We are talking about health in here and if we are talking about 2025 as a working product, there won't be any room for any small big type of bug. |
|
|
|
It's just so any token can be added there. But in fact there is no bidding. And in my opinion now tokens should be still frozen on addresses? Or not? Yes, it seems the contract is available but people can't move them so they are frozen. Otherwise, there would be some sell orders. People should be careful with frozen tokens because they can use gas money for nothing, also beware when trading in Ether Delta, because ether delta is not sounding secure after hacking attempt. With raised about 6.5 m Usd and started 2nd round of ICO, hopefully this time markspace will reach to soft cap. |
|
|
|
another thing....
as an interface issue, language can be an obstacle to interaction
perhaps part of the solution is a real-time translation window?
as it is, if you do not speak Russian, you will have to cut and paste. This is a tedious and preventable issue.
it may apply to any language differential, though some languages are more likely to be spoken and thus the emphasis would be on those
my 2c
Definitely a marvelous idea, on the alpha phase, when I looked into to project, i couldn't understand a thing because all the chat is Russian, so a real time translation will be wonderful for the chat, Livestars can start with a few languages Chinese Russian English then add some other languages. |
|
|
|
This is a very popular project, reputation ranking system can be used in all walks of life, especially the enterprise recruitment staff can refer to the candidate's reputation, to recruit the right person for their own enterprise.
But, there are severe downsides also. People will always fake themselves to get the good rating which obviously leads to a fake world. that's my worry as well, however the dev's did reply saying they have a good system for weeding out the fakes I'm talking about fake human nature. No one can weed that out but still, it would make the world a lot faker. You are right, the same goes for TripAdvisor! The only thing that makes tripadvisor reliable is the number of users, the more people and more reviews are made the more the information is reliable. The same would be for Repu! I don't think TripAdvisor and REPU can be compared as the rating here has a whole different meaning. Yes, also TripAdvisor's system is very open to fraud. I would prefer something like imdb. Solid voting and not very possible to cheat. But they are both very different thing than social rating. I prefer a system like IMDB too, system of TripAdvisor is not good, I can understand that from my city and the others visited by me / friends told me. In my city a below average restaurant/ hotel got very good numbers, I am sure we can enhance these examples. REPU should prevent any fake rating or comments in the system. Are there anıy partnership announcements by the way? |
|
|
|
Mark.Space is going to help bring VR to main stream specially for VR applications. Demo looks great and like this project
I think you're expecting a bit too much. Mainstream VR will be happening when the hardware is cheap, comfortable and not dorky. MarkSpace has its place but remember it's all prerendered, not realtime, so there are limits to interactivity. For computers I agree with you, but for the phones i disagree ,there are also cheap VR devices for phones. For now all "MARK.SPACE" locations are 3D zones fully operating in any browser and compatible with all VR headsets. I think anyone can afford a phone and a VR helmet at the lowest price. Maybe Mark.Space can enhance this technology development speed to a new level. With this more companies can invest in this area and hardwares can be cheaper with new players on this field. Playstation VR is in alpha phase for me now:) I tried it once, didn't like it but maybe next version will be better(I'm sure) |
|
|
|
Alpha really meeting expectations, but it would be wonderful to have a larger number of models already in the initial stage of the definitive platform, this will further leverage the LiveStars project. And it will be good to understand the forms of payment and the inflows and outflows of revenue, how this will raise the value of your currency
They can't put lots of girls in alpha. They are probably not gaining anything from it and it won't be logical to put lots of girls there on an alpha. Even paying them would be a misuse of the funds. They are doing nice. Putting some girls from time to time. But maybe they can prefer prettier girls on alpha phase, i saw some of them and the modals bored and also not pretty:) I saw a "spankchain" name above of the thread, i think its an absurd name and doesn't feel serious or solid, livestars with its name and alpha phase proved that they are coming solid. |
|
|
|
Any new update with regards to upcoming alpha or beta release.? I hope it will come out too soon.
You can see their roadmap in website, where is written: 2018 year (2-nd Quarter) - Closed beta testing of the platform among ICO participants
2018 year (2-3 Quarter) - Public testing of the beta version of the platform
2018 year (3-4 Quarter) - Platform releasewo thats not a long time until then - im super curious Eventually Platform release is not gonna happen for q3/4, not because they can't deliver but because beta testing usually lasts for more then 5-6 months. It's a better safe the sorry situation, I bet that we'll see platform release on q1/2 2019 Building a platform is probably not something you can do overnight, people complaining about the roadmap really dont have patience Well, it is crypto. You are getting 10x daily, everything turns to ashes in a week. Too fast too much excitement. You are adapting it and you can't show anything a patient. Repu roadmap is one of this things. Yes you are absolutely right, even 10x in a overnight sometimes is not enough for some people, but a project detailed and well worked like REPU shouldn't be rushed, this is a long term investment and we are even pre pre ico phase. So be patient, there is a lot to come from this project. |
|
|
|
|
Hey:) any problems on stake update ? I think its late to update the spreadsheet of last week, are we connecting these to weeks together?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
