This is a tough situation. If the ICO had indeed paid for a community manager you'd expect that they'd trust him to manage the group without them paying attention.
That, though, does not mean that they're free of responsibility for their employee. The fact that he was allowed to do this means zero oversight. ICOs trust freelancers with little to no work to showcase with positions of power and this is what happens.
People should be more cautious, on both sides. At least I hope that DATx has the ID of the perpetrator so as to help in a police report. Otherwise I would also put part of the blame with them.
sorumluluk datx de.
ama sorumluluk kabul etmiyorlar.
singapurda kendileri.
arkadaşa polise git diyorlarda elinde delil olamdan nasıl gitsin.
datx parayı alanı tanımasa adamı niye admin yapsınlar.
peki arkadaş nasıl şikayetçi olacak?
parayı alan adamı datx tanıyor.
ve datx bilgi vermekten kaçıyor.
----------
the responsibility is datx.
but they do not accept responsibility.
singapurda themselves.
How do you go when you tell the friend you go to the police when you have evidence.
If the datx money field is not recognized, why do they do admin?
How will my friend be complaining?
The guy who gets the money knows the datx.
and datx escapes from giving information.
Show Posts
