Futures mission accomplished

Looks like the short is in. If you ask me.

You have actively come into this thread since about $7k and saying the same fucking thing, and now the price is about 3x higher, and you still saying the same nonsense.....

Yeah, sure, sooner or later you are going to be correct... but your repetition of the same cyclical bitcoin price gonna crash nonsense, does not mean that you have any actual insight.

order it delivered to Mars

  ... https://electrek.co/2017/12/15/tesla-supercharger-fair-use-policy-deter-commercial-use/
Tesla is a SCAM.

BeeCash will never bee bitcoin :-D weeee ~ still fools are buying<<<<

javier‏
@f_baco
 
Weeklychart BTCUSD
Possibly complete sequence of 5 (V) Main waves.
Wave5(secondary) =3.618% Wave 1
Breaking up the area of 18,000-18100 would stop being able to be measured in projections by Elliot Waves.
The trend should change and address 61.8% of the entire historical movement

I feel like we are in a bubble that is getting ready to pop. I can't believe that 2000%+ growth is reasonable or able to be sustained. I don't believe this is exponential part of the S curve, I've heard that in 2013 and 2014. We are well before exponential growth. I think the only reason we haven't popped is the futures.

Sorry, but "[different]audience and infrastructure" is something uncomputable in drawing charts.
This thread is about a chart based on price and possible predictions thereof.

"Ideally, you would want to consider the amount of users coming in"
Please do (in a separate thread).

eks, we last higher low - 5900. All that hit below - bad. 10,000 probably continue. Well, actually, we are entering a zone scary volatility. Price will be healthy to go. And in general all bespolzeno review =)

Troika is. Ohrenevayu. That says it all =)

Ah, yes, light pierced. NOT good.

*****

Higher low 5900, sub 10k continues, price will be healthier, something pierced, trendline?

What if this is the strongest move bitcoin has ever had? Should the volatility be less then?

It looks like you have no understanding of the energy industry.  The only reason there was an enormous amount of metals being mined in the 20th century compared to all previous ones is because it was just a process of arbing excess energy that wasn't vital to keep nations running.  But now the energy industry as a whole has virtually given up funding to find new sources (maybe because they already took just about every low hanging fruit possible).  We are entering something resembling a Seneca cliff in the oil industry.

The only reason oil is plentiful right now in the US (and thus the price is low) is because enormous amounts of production increased lately that's almost entirely low grade shale/tar sand type stuff.  These alternative oil sources that are coming to market aren't even being done so at a profit.  They are losing money doing so.  How does it continue then?  There's lots of bad investment in the energy sector that has not toppled down and collapsed yet, but will because they are not making profits.  Or you can take the conspiracy route and think the US govt just prints money and gives it to them to subsidize the energy industry so it doesn't collapse (which is also possible since corporate welfare happens all the time).

Regardless, the era of having endless amounts of excess oil and energy to arb into bringing metals out of the ground is mostly over.  There will either be energy shortages from a Seneca cliff and no metals coming out of the ground, or energy prices will go to the moon, and since the price of oil makes up the vast majority of metals prices, metals go with them.  Here's a good chart to show the correlation of oil and metals.  Due to the bankers constantly naked shorting metals down to cost of production to try and suppress them and prop up the dollar, they act mostly as an energy futures contract until the global banker monopoly fix ends: