|
Will also mean normal people can mine the coin. Which is what we all want.
|
|
|
|
Has the "revolutionary" new feature been announced yet? The one that required a paid hidden github account?
Been holding a few million Kitteh for a while and watching in despair as the price dropped and dropped.
Must say the devs have put my faith back in this coin and will continue to hold.
Soon(tm). Don't worry, we will announce it shortly. |
|
|
|
Dumping from the current network abusers, I suppose - multipool miners? Before the KGW kicks in, I guess? On the other note - I DL latest wallet from this thread and the pot smoking cat comes back?? EDIT: I think I got it; SOMEONE UPDATE THE OP PLS? It's hell of confusing this way, few different wallets in circulation  Pretty sure you did not download it from this thread. OP points to http://kittehcoin.info/wallet/win/kittehcoin-latest.zipSo not sure where you got the other wallet? |
|
|
|
I have rather difficult time to make sense of this kind of english, so it's hard for me to tell is the guy positive or negative.
But, defo - update the wallet in OP and all related places, wouldn't hurt to extend OP with extra info about latest fork too, to avoid people getting very confused.
The ONLY official wallet is on the official website. That will never change. http://kittehcoin.info |
|
|
|
Hey guys. I've never experienced this before so I'm starting to get little bit stressed. Incoming transactions are not getting any confirmations. Almost half hour since first transaction.  I sometimes find it can be slow. Confirmations will be done at some point, dont worry |
|
|
|
Screw all of the pools I've been on. Got scammed over at hashrapid out of 400k, now I switch to coins4everyone and its been down, and now they raise the threshold for withdrawls to 100k? wtf? I guess a bunch of fisherprice admins run these mint pools.
Go here and withdrawal http://162.243.4.85I thought that I had lost 2mil but they were still there  I think hes just busy We're you able to do a manual withdrawal? I tried, but it hasn't processed after many hours. I was able to do a manual withdrawal from the old server last night. Had to wait for about 10 mins. before it arrived. Anyone got any payouts from blocks 11353 up to 12035 ? Looks like the pool owner kept the coins for himself. I would not be saying this, but the same thing happened to his COINO pool last week while he was "upgrading" the server. Well personally for me there is 2.5mill missing somewhere. Could be more.. I was hashing away at 25k and should have had at least another 2-3 mill out. (Should have been even more if poxy server was not offline for a period of time) |
|
|
|
Due to recent events regarding Mt.Gox and Bitcoin attack. I have checked technical bit of it and figured that the issue is only with non-confirmed/pending transactions when being resent. Luckily for us all, LeaseRig.net does not perform any kind of resends, so it is not possible for anyone to issue such attack on LeaseRig.net. Additionally to that, I must say that 6 confirmations are needed for all deposits, so the paying out BTC is 100% validated and correct. I have been noticing that there have been odd working in BTC network for past few days - some transactions were sent with 0 fee, some took half a day or even whole day to complete. I received 0 reports of any provider not being paid and I received 0 reports of any customers missing funds. By this statistics I can say that LeaseRig.net is operating unaffected by the reported issue. This post is somewhat most understandable to all and also explains you why LeaseRig.net is not affected: The flaw isn't so much in Bitcoin as it is in exchange-systems. Many exchanges use the tx-id to uniquely identify transactions, but as it turns out, an attacker can change the tx-id without changing the actual transaction, rebroadcast the changed transaction (effectively creating a double-spend) and if his altered transaction gets accepted into a block instead of the legit transaction, the attacker receives his coins and can complain with the exchange that he didn't. The exchange will then check their db, fetch the tx-id from it, look it up in the blockchain and not find it. So they could conclude that the transaction indeed failed and credit the account with the coins.
A simple workaround is to not use the tx-id to identify transactions on the exchange side, but the set of (amount, address, timestamp) instead. If a user complains about not receiving their withdrawal, support can look it up using these 3 variables. It takes a little bit more work from support, but it prevents this attack from succeeding.
While it'd be nice if the tx-id isn't malleable, blaming this problem on a flaw in the protocol is quite a stretch.
LeaseRig.net does no saving of TXID into database. If there was an error with no payment being sent, then these would be solved manually. But a big exchange cannot afford to solve such issues manually thus having automated system for resolving them. Its nothing new, has been there for ages. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_Malleabilityhttp://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2014/02/10/mt-gox-blames-bitcoin-core-developer-greg-maxwell-responds/<gmaxwell> The challenge for me in offering something here is that this isn’t news to me – for years – and it’s never been a particularly large concern. This wouldn’t make the top ten list of dangers in the Bitcoin technology.
Garrick Hileman, an economic historian at the London School of Economics told CNBC that this error with bitcoin's protocol - called "transaction malleability" - isn't a new problem and believes that Mt Gox may be using it as a delaying tactic because of an internal technology complication, a regulatory issue, or even a solvency problem.
Mtgox is a pest to bitcoin. The sooner they shut down the better. I mean to start blaming a KNOWN tiny issue for the their own issues is just a fecking joke. DIE |
|
|
|
So my 30Mh farm has been "Payment received - waiting 1 confirmation" for over 8 hours. Anybody else have this kind of problem? It was a 6-hour rental, it should have been finished by now but instead it hasn't even started.
ANNOUNCESome of you read probably the announcment by mtgox that triggered a brief BTC selllof: https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20140210.htmlIf you read the technical details, then you'll see that there is a kind of attack that allows an attacker to alter a hash of an existing transaction that is just being propagated on the network. So the attack goes: 1/ Attacker request withdrawal from Exchange; 2/ Exchange send, and store Transaction TX on database; 3/ Attacker alter the TX number of the transaction 4/ Attacker claims to Exchange it never received funds 5/ Exchange check Transaction TX Id on database and indeed sees it does not exists, send again. That being said, yesterday I was puzzled because I saw 1 incoming payment for a rig, which was seen on the network (so it went to the status "Payment received -- Waiting 1 confirm", but then the transaction has now disappeared! Or rather, in fact, it appeared with another transaction number! So yesterday I was puzzled and suspected maybe a double spend. Then today, I got 6 more of those. Each from differents users. Now I know where this come from. The sender are of course not attackers (wouldn't work in above describded attack) but probably side effect in an ongoing large scale attack -- but this is only some guessing from my side from the little I know now. That being said, if your rented rig is in status "Payment received - waiting 1 confirmation" , then you are probably part of the 7 transactions that dissapeared, and I'll deal with you individually in the next 3 hours -- read, checking real payment and unblocking. Mux Its nothing new, has been there for ages. https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_Malleabilityhttp://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/2014/02/10/mt-gox-blames-bitcoin-core-developer-greg-maxwell-responds/<gmaxwell> The challenge for me in offering something here is that this isn’t news to me – for years – and it’s never been a particularly large concern. This wouldn’t make the top ten list of dangers in the Bitcoin technology.
Garrick Hileman, an economic historian at the London School of Economics told CNBC that this error with bitcoin's protocol - called "transaction malleability" - isn't a new problem and believes that Mt Gox may be using it as a delaying tactic because of an internal technology complication, a regulatory issue, or even a solvency problem.
Mtgox is a pest to bitcoin. The sooner they shut down the better. I mean to start blaming a KNOWN tiny issue for the their own issues is just a fecking joke. DIE |
|
|
|
|
WTS : 7mill for 0.5btc. PM
|
|
|
|
|
Rented without any problems. Would use again!
|
|
|
|
|
Rented without any problems. Would use again!
|
|
|
|
|
Rented without any problems. Would use again!
|
|
|
|
|
Rented without any problems. Would use again!
|
|
|
|
Does someone know if cryptsy meow deposit works properly now?
I want to transfer some coins from coinedup and do it fast.
Any thoughts?
it works and you will get your coins but not sure how long you might have to wait Thanks for the info. I'm sure I won't lose them. Problem is I would need them in the next 10-15 min after transfer is done. That's why I was asking. It happened to me more than once that I have lost a wave to buy or sell because my coins were stuck between exchanges. Don't want this to happen again.  10-15 is NOT gonna be possible. First time I did a test transfer took me 8 hours. 2nd time 24 hours +.. Ended up doing a ticket and it got sorted fast. Thanks again. I did the transfer. Am curious now how long it will take. Did you open a normal ticket, or did you contact someone to solve the problem after it got stuck?(Need all the info in case my coins get stuck) It's been 2 hours now and nothing there. When I check the blockchain I see a "not yet redeemed" message. Hopefully it won't take 24 hours. Just a normal ticket. Actually was sorted fairly fast |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
