https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/elizabeth-warren-gamestop-robinhood-market-manipulation.htmlWarren's take seems incorrect? I don't even think I get what she's trying to say. She's calling for SEC to investigate robin hood in regards to market manipulation, but is criticizing the SEC for allowing GME to fluctuate? This would mean you're taking the side of hedge funds oppose to ordinary investors who were the ones that caused GME to skyrocket. It's not market manipulation to collectively mass invest in a stock and drive demand up. Can a liberal please explain what they'd like a Biden administration to do here? I would love for SEC to investigate if Robin hood colluded, but the stock market should not be regulated to stop people from jumping on the bandwagon. If people want to gamble their money, let them do it. Also confident not much will come out of an SEC investigation. Dems and R's tend to have a shitty record against financial institutional corruption so I'm not gonna pretend like Trump would do something if he was still in office. One can hope though... Pocahontas, not surprisingly, sided with the hedge fund. She pretends to be a socialist, lmao! Charles Payne: Is Biden going to guarantee a stock market that works for everyone? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_xI6JUB9r0Jordan Belfort on who is 'criminally responsible' in GameStop, Robinhood saga https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvVLXqJgWHo
|
|
|
If you want to catch up with the latest ridiculous, laughable conspiracy theory nonsense, simply, search for a Tzupy ..EXCLUSIVE: ... BREAKING: ... link.
Click, shake head and chuckle....
Interesting, Tzupy never posted in politics until last month, wasn't active for months before that, and before that only posted in speculation. Since December though, it's been only P&S, all kraken/qanon/covid denier posts. You are mistaken, I did post in Politics many times before. The reason I waited to post about the stolen election, is that I waited for the evidence to accumulate. As for you, DeepState-lovers (or should I say operatives?), you should know that the truth eventually comes out, despite your efforts to suppress it. Hereistheevidence aggregates evidence relating to the stolen election, and the Capitol riot. https://hereistheevidence.com/capitol-protest-1-6-21/
|
|
|
...
I actually agree with stationing guardsmen outside of DC for the inauguration. The fact is we don’t know what sort of intelligence they had so we can’t even speculate on any potential threats. I don’t know if 25,000 troops was too much but it’s completely fair to have some stationed. Considering there were not even any demonstrations, it is fair to say the 25,000 troop level was excessive. It is very rare to have riots without an accompanying protest. The BLM riots for example initially saw many people protesting and a small percentage of them rioting (later many of the people "protesting" became de-facto human shields to the rioters, and as such were accomplices to the rioting). There were also thousands of people who attended Trump's January 6th rally, but only a few hundred actually went into the capital and only a handful of those people actually engaged in any violence (the rest merely went through 'breached' entrances. To say that 25,000 troops are necessary is like saying that 500,000 people were expected to protest Biden's inauguration, which almost double the number of people who attended W Bush's 2001 inauguration, and this would be during a pandemic. If his inauguration were to draw that many protestors, I don't think he could govern legitimately. The capital riots were the result of police forces being unprepared for a riot, and a few hundred people being stupid. It was not part of some kind of mass uprising. Of course the 25k troops were excessive, but only if Biden wanted his "inauguration" to look normal; for the "El Presidente" of a banana republic, the 25k troops are perfectly adequate. As for the Capitol riot of 6th january, the police has been not just unprepared, some of them were told to go home, and DoD reinforcements offered on the 5th were rejected. So it was a clear trap for naive Trump supporters, who entered the Capitol, after Antifa and Boogaloo Bois (dressed more or less as Trump supporters) breached the defenses.
|
|
|
Soooo.. Whatever happened with that Kracken thing?
New evidence, obtained during the 5th January election in Georgia, required dropping cases, which were based on older evidence. The cases might be refiled, with the claims based on the newer evidence (foreign interference, fake ballots created in the names of those who didn't vote).
|
|
|
Many people posting on Bitcointalk pretend to be libertarian, but in fact are brainwashed by the MSM, and have neo-marxist opinions. In such an environment, if you have conservative opinions, you are going to be censored somehow.
|
|
|
Terrence K. Williams tweeted:
Wait. So white supremacists stormed the Capitol to overthrow the white supremacist government but were stopped by the white supremacist police force and are now being tracked down by the white supremacist FBI?
|
|
|
Trump supporters know that it would be silly to go protest in DC now. So the troops are for someone else, Antifa, BLM, ChiComs? But Antifa, or BLM, or ChiComs (which afaik are in British Columbia, so only able to invade Seattle) would move only if Trump stays in office, after the 20th.
|
|
|
Facebook and Twitter are perfect examples of capitalism: - You have no say in how it work
- The guy who runs it is rich
- They control your access to information
- You have no privacy
- If you say anything they don't like, they shut you up
only difference is in socialism you get it for free. you can petition for changes the guy who runs it is on a salary it follows the law not a private business policy so less restrictions You just showed you have no idea how real socialism works. LMAO!
|
|
|
Speaker Pelosi not showing up for work today, no reason given why. Debbie Dingell temp asigned
I'm guessing that Pelosi has been punched, by a higher order DeepState operative, and she can't hide the hematoma with makeup.
|
|
|
|