Who was the first country?
Japan
|
|
|
Domanda:
Ma tutte le exchange non si ritroverebbero con una quantità mostruosa di BCC?
Probabilmente si. Se sono bravi ed onesti dovrebbero accreditarli agli utenti cui appartengono i BTC ma non ci spero troppo. Per questo motivo il consiglio è di spostare i Bitcoin nel tuo wallet locale finché la tempesta non passa...
|
|
|
if your business model works why do you want to run an ICO and divide your earnings with other people? Can't you just keep all of them for you?
|
|
|
I sound very anti-bitcoin. I'm not. But the truth is a lot of very rich and powerful people are looking to make cryptocurrencies fail, and this could be when they make their move. Take a couple of million in losses, but drop the market cap of all crypto by billions...
May I ask you who are those people and how do you know about their plans?
|
|
|
Segwit è comunque un softfork, quindi i blocchi segwit, per Bitcoin Cash, saranno visti come normali blocchi legacy. E' probabile, ma sarebbe da capire bene, non sono andato molto nel dettaglio, che le eventuali transazioni segwit, su Bitcoin Cash saranno spendibili dai miner, perché impostate come anyonecanspend.
Quindi a livello di blockchain si avrà 100% di compatibilità con Segwit in quanto softfork. Mi sorge un dubbio, alla fine questo hard fork potrebbe essere visto soltanto come l'inizio di una nuova alt ( ricordiamoci che è minoritaria ), se fosse, non ho capito i coin già minati e mai "convertiti" che fine fanno, insomma se ci sono, ad esempio '1000' estratti totali btc di quali solo '10' sono stati convertiti e diventati BCC, la rimanente parte di '990' non convertita che fine fa'? E se non fossero conteggiati, vuol dire che l'alt parte eventualmente con 120gb di translazioni e i suddetti '10' bcc??? Le monete non si convertono ma si sdoppiano: se al momento del fork hai 10 bitcoin hai ANCHE 10 bitcoin cash. Le stesse chiavi private avranno la stessa quantità di monete su entrambe le blockchain
|
|
|
Saw somewhere the other day that iconomi is holding about 10% of all byteball. Are they the largest holder now besides remaining airdrop? Any address holding more? With owner known?
Yes, LISK team is holding a very substantial amount too. If LISK team decides to redestribute the byteballs after the distribution to the LISK holders, it would be really good for the byteball distribution and LISK holders Why would Lisk distribute Byteball to Lisk holders? I would like this but sorry I have a hard time seeing them do this. They have no obligation to do such a thing either. because they have large amount of bitcoins from the ICO. byteballs are only distributed to bitcoin holders. from this point, it is fair. That'll never happen. The bitcoin became their property the moment it was sent over for the ICO. Unless the team is generous enough to give away millions of dollars for free, I don't see this at all. Waves team has been so generous few months ago
|
|
|
I like the concept overall, but what is the strategy to actually get real businesses interested in using DIMCOIN? I think it would be very difficult to convince business to use an uncharted altcoin, rather than something like bitcoin or ethereum.
Did you read OP? I don't see in the roadmap what you say. They will try to convince small business to be listed in HBSE market instead of stock market wich is over regulated for them.
|
|
|
NEM whitepaper ( http://nem.io/NEM_techRef.pdf ) describes a possible fair solution. To make it easy: it raises fees for everybody, in particular for accounts making many transactions and accounts with low budget.
|
|
|
could you please somebody help me
I want to join the ICO with depotwallet. Will I just send some NEM to the ICO 's NEM address and in 10 days they will send my DIMCOINs? is it all? Don't they need my depotwallet's deposit address or anything else?
Thak you very much.
If you send your xem from your depotwallet they can see the sending address of the transaction. No other informations needed.
|
|
|
Ive read the whitepaper over.. couple things come to mind.
1. I cant help but get over the fact the "witness" nodes to me feel like "centralization", as-is mentioned ... trusted institutions, banks etc can becomes these nodes. Whats preventing a majority collection of "witness" nodes from rewriting history or manipulating stuff as they see fit? Seems like a huge shortcoming to a otherwise amazing cryptocoin =)
2. The analogy of "value/stability" in the upper portion of the whitepaper is completely incorrect. The document references bitcoin's volatility in fiat currency exchange and then turns right around and states something along the lines that "bytes" are required to pay for storage used in the DAG ... hence inherent value. Those are 2 completely different and unrelated value measurements. If you are going to use the "fee of bytes" then you have to relate that to bitcoin's inherent tx cost in fees, btc is required to guarantee miners actually include your transaction in the blockchain. This has nothing to do w/ fiat exchange price. When it comes to both crypto's(all cryptocoins for that matter) the fiat exchange price is derived from the same thing - If people see a use for it, they will buy it, causing rising prices... period end of story.
3. Does anyone find it ironic that obtaining the entire supply is FREE??? To me, that means theres no effort / competition in obtaining the supply, therefore its inherently not worth much. I realize it all comes down to if enough folks find it useful enough to justify the cost of purchasing more from an exchange ... but still. The advantages of this coin will have to blow away Bitcoin in nearly every aspect AND people will have to want to use it more.... for this coin to be successful, otherwise it will just end up being another 1 out of hundreds of alts that dont mean anything. Just my 2c
In the end, #1 is my most concerning question, if someone could answer it in a way that instills more confidence in the network, Ill stand behind this alt like none other. But if its easily compromised through the "witnesses" then there really is no point to this coin.
As regards point 3: you should not confuse value with cost. Cost is what you pay. Value is what you get. Sometimes those are unrelated.
|
|
|
we have an announcement to post, but it seams that all newbes have the posts not rendering like it should, what should i do ?
Disclose real name, LinkedIn profile and whatever other information about yourself
|
|
|
Bitcoin, Ethereum, Xem, Waves, Byteball, Ardor, Time, Ecobit, Dimcoin
|
|
|
It would be quite interesting to see the effect of Doomsday (1st August, 2017) on Dimcoin as all cryptocurrencies are supposed to be somehow interconnected with bitcoin. With BIP 148 or Segwit implementation we could see a chain split and if Segwit comes into market, prices of bitcoin might boom upto $5k thereby increasing the price of Dimcoin itself however dimcoin might remain unaffected as well because of its unique data interchange module.
Dimcoin won't be traded on any exchange at that time. What kind of effect are you talking about?
|
|
|
Starting with a right step Already a scam before ICO starts.
|
|
|
nice idea.
Any way to manage controversy between an unsatisfacted asker and an expert who says he responded correctly?
|
|
|
|