1542
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Sia - Decentralized Storage - Working Beta - Launches June 7th, 2015
|
on: June 10, 2015, 04:45:41 AM
|
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found? Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today? Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having. After pulled gpuminer git and compile Give this Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Rebuild 'siad' hmm)) how to compile it on ubuntu? Hix, did you find a fix to the the issue? I am having zero luck compiling "siad" on Ubunut 14.04. No, i have broken my mind with this GOO
|
|
|
1543
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Sia - Decentralized Storage - Working Beta - Launches June 7th, 2015
|
on: June 09, 2015, 10:40:27 PM
|
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found? Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today? Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having. After pulled gpuminer git and compile Give this Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Rebuild 'siad' hmm)) how to compile it on ubuntu?
|
|
|
1544
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Sia - Decentralized Storage - Working Beta - Launches June 7th, 2015
|
on: June 09, 2015, 08:50:32 PM
|
Everyone seeing confirmed coin payouts lately? all my miners are really at it today showing high amounts of blocks found, I know that's not accurate all, but never seen it this bad. mining on 5 rigs. I continually restart miners when I see it happening. Not sure if even though we see bogus blocks found that if somewhere in there, there is real blocks being found? Dev did you say you were going to release a more efficient miner today? Yeah. On my gpu it's running about 6x as fast. Also we fixed the crashing and the fast-block stuff. (at least, mostly fixed it). So, sometime tonight once we've cleaned everything up a bit you can expect a release that addresses many of the problems people were having. After pulled gpuminer git and compile Give this Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112) Mining at 0.000 MH/s 0 blocks minedcurl did not receive correct bytes (got 21, expected 112)
|
|
|
1556
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][DROP] Dropcoin - Wallet Update | New Algo | No IPO/ICO/premine
|
on: June 06, 2015, 03:59:06 PM
|
Ubuntu 12.04 In file included from x6/grso.h:7:0, from x6/grso.c:10, from lphash.c:42: x6/brg_types.h:224:13: error: conflicting types for вЂuint_64t†#define u64 uint_64t ^ x5/vect128/compat.h:34:28: note: in expansion of macro вЂu64†typedef unsigned long long u64; ^ x6/brg_types.h:118:30: note: previous declaration of вЂuint_64t†was here typedef unsigned long uint_64t; ^ make[2]: *** [minerd-lphash.o] Error 1 in lphash.c cut #include "x5/vect128/nist.h" and paste before #include "x6/blake.c" Made it, but have new error In file included from lphash.c:68:0: x6/blake.c:46:22: error: redefinition of вЂblkIV512†static const sph_u64 blkIV512[8] = { ^ In file included from lphash.c:38:0: x6/blake.c:46:22: note: previous definition of вЂblkIV512†was here static const sph_u64 blkIV512[8] = { ^ lphash.c: In function вЂswitchHashвЂ: lphash.c:125:7: error: unknown type name вЂhashState_sd†hashState_sd * ctx_simd1; ^ mv -f .deps/minerd-cubehash_sse2.Tpo .deps/minerd-cubehash_sse2.Po lphash.c:193:26: error: вЂhashState_sd†undeclared (first use in this function) ctx_simd1=malloc(sizeof(hashState_sd)); ^ lphash.c:193:26: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in lphash.c:194:2: warning: implicit declaration of function вЂInit†[-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Init(ctx_simd1,512); ^ lphash.c:195:2: warning: implicit declaration of function вЂUpdate†[-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Update(ctx_simd1,(const BitSequence *)input,512); ^ lphash.c:196:2: warning: implicit declaration of function вЂFinal†[-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Final(ctx_simd1,(BitSequence *)output); ^ lphash.c:197:16: error: request for member вЂbuffer†in something not a structure or union free(ctx_simd1->buffer); ^ lphash.c:198:16: error: request for member вЂA†in something not a structure or union free(ctx_simd1->A); ^ mv -f .deps/minerd-nist.Tpo .deps/minerd-nist.Po make[2]: *** [minerd-lphash.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
|
|
|
|