Yes, but that would be too easy. And religion's point is not to be easy, but to be hard and complicated. You must wreck your mind and body to really get to live forever.
Well not my fault if I don't have faith. God's fault! |
|
|
|
I have a transacation which is pending since I sent it, at around 11:30 CET (UTC+1). Is this slowness related to the high current price, which make people transact more, or are we under another stress test ?
People transact more so it all goes slower. But it's a bit strange, did you pay a correct fee? EDIT/ didn't read the answers --' Well you got your answer. Fees are still low but got to get paid. Don't worry though, you'll get confirmation but it might take up to few hours! |
|
|
|
in years to come gay will dominate the world. And HIV as well. Thanks to all the tranny and now kids also have HIV.
In the US, around 80% to 90% of the newly detected HIV cases are either directly or indirectly attributed to homosexual contact. (Indirect cases include bisexual men infecting heterosexual women, and homosexual IDUs infecting other individuals through contaminated needle). In the end, the tax payers are made to pay, for the treatment of these people. Exactly. Of course they purposely spread the disease. Maybe in their minds is that we're all going to die anyway why not spread it. anyone who do this thing I shall call an animal. If these homos are that responsible as they said they are that they can marry and have kids on their own must also learn to stop HIV but Nooo. They're going to infect everyone else to kill each other slowly but surely. and that's merciless. Please, have sex with an HIV positive dude and kill yourself. Thanks. And DO NOT REPRODUCE YOURSELF! |
|
|
|
Governments have killed and maimed many times more people than all "civilians" have ever, per capita, but governments should be the only ones with guns? Fuck you to death, you pro-democide freaks. What an argument... You're talking about governments like they were some independent entity! Government NEVER KILLED ANYONE! People did! When a government wants to kill part of the population or another country's population, they send the army, the people! And the people are more than willing to kill! What would gun control change to that? |
|
|
|
Argument of Bitcoin being great as a medium for money laundering is totally off. It is like saying that USD or EURO can't be and aren't used for that purpose.
Bitcoin can be used as a currency, which means it can be used in the same way as traditional money - laundering is unfortunately one of these 'unwanted' features.
Caveat: no nearly-anonymous USD or EURO exchanges; no way to send billions of USD or EURO, anywhere in the world, anonymously, for $.04  More or less. You can still exchange huge amount anonymously with things like Kraken. 2k$ every day is still a lot of money without ID, especially if you have a dozen of account! |
|
|
|
Why should we? Satan isn't going to punish us, why would he? He has no interest into crushing us! Better train us in order to take over the heavens!
Hahaha... touché What makes you think Satan is such a bad guy? He is only "the accuser"... accusing God of committing a moral crime... he's the good guy... Satan isn't the murderer of the bible... that's God... God murders everyone on the planet... and then keeps murdering, and commanding his followers to murder Satan only murders Job's family, and only because God told him to... It's just your opinion. Only people (influenced by Satan and evil spirits) kill other people, not God. Satan is bad because he destroyed God's ideal, heavenly kingdom, by pushing people to separate from God. After Human Fall, we had just misery, suffering and pain. God didn't want such world. So, yes, Satan is responsible for our misery, not God. You mean that God had no choice but to banish humanity from heaven because of Satan manipulation? Interesting question, which leads to another: is God powerless in front of Satan or He doesn't want to do anything against him? Either way - it's not good. Meh, don't answer before the other stupid Christian ^^ Yeah the idea is either God is omnipotent and could have kept us in heaven hence he decided not to do it. Hence he's a litle bitch. Or else he couldn't do it but hence he's not omnipotent. |
|
|
|
For what it's worth. I think I remember the other halving events have been non-events. I think this gets baked in months before it happens.  there was only another halving 50--->25, and it was not really an halving with great impact, for two reasons 25 coins are still more than enough for good profit, and second because bitcoin was not very well known back then The question is not enough or not enough... to speack sheckspirianly (lol) enough or not enough is not the question... because it is always enough... even in 4 years when the block will generate 6.25 and in 8 years 3.125 It will just not be enough for many people. They will stop mining and it will then be enough for other ones...it is market regulated. But the enough or not enough does not affect the bitcoin price... it is the value of the blocks,and the value of the blocks is known sice the start just to the end... it is why all the having effect are already in the price day after day The important part being, again, difficulty. If halving makes the price not enough for a lot of miners, they'll stop mining, difficulty will decrease which means energy costs will decrease which means miners will have their activity become more profitable. |
|
|
|
|
Ok I just oppened a short so I do hope the price will fall. BUt it won't go as far as 300 that's just not possible xD
|
|
|
|
|
Damn;.. seems I'm the only one shorting... And I start to regret it :/
|
|
|
|
^ i've seen all of that  oh and btw. the only capacity that is gonna be important is intelligence, body strength will be a thing of the past when we have working exo skellets or biological engineering. (to be honest it is already for a great part a thing of the past, just look at the machines we use today) Your little inventions are not for now, so why changing the present about a future event which is currently a pure speculation ? Yeah, now we use chainsaw instead of handsaw, but this still need a lot of strenght to accomplish a tree harvesting job.  Let me google this for youAHAHAHAH!!! xD Never saw this website before! That's fucking cool!!! That's horrible how it destroys one's ego but that's freaking cool xD |
|
|
|
Why should we? Satan isn't going to punish us, why would he? He has no interest into crushing us! Better train us in order to take over the heavens!
Hahaha... touché What makes you think Satan is such a bad guy? He is only "the accuser"... accusing God of committing a moral crime... he's the good guy... Satan isn't the murderer of the bible... that's God... God murders everyone on the planet... and then keeps murdering, and commanding his followers to murder Satan only murders Job's family, and only because God told him to... It's just your opinion. Only people (influenced by Satan and evil spirits) kill other people, not God. Satan is bad because he destroyed God's ideal, heavenly kingdom, by pushing people to separate from God. After Human Fall, we had just misery, suffering and pain. God didn't want such world. So, yes, Satan is responsible for our misery, not God. You mean that God had no choice but to banish humanity from heaven because of Satan manipulation? |
|
|
|
For you to say that requires presumption that the scriptural record of David and Goliath must be untrue, as it was an impossibly lucky shot with a huge consequence upon all susequent history.
Now, why should we believe your assertion ?
If it happened than it was possible. Don't get the fact that it was lucky in there to brag about god. It's not because the chances were incredibly thin that it's a miracle if it happened. And is it me or are you talking about David and Goliath like they were true? |
|
|
|
Scientists don't care about God because they cannot observe it or built mathematical model for it.
God is not even a serious topic for discussion.
I did my science degree to "find out all of the rules which are known to be exactly true, and to learn the methodology of test by which those were discovered, and how to apply honest test for anything else which we are not quite sure about yet". I regarded questions of theology and the origins of the universe to be much more important than mere details of the next commercially viable technology. Whilst there are plenty of hoaxes, nonsenses, and blatant political and commercial exploitations to provide examples of purportedly holy claims which are certainly untrue, there remain a handful of miraculous events which do seem to have happened, and which do seem to be the work of God. The way which I reconcile present day science with the appearance from time to time of miracles is to say that present science gives every particle a quantum mechanical uncertainty. If God gets to choose whether an atom was Left or Right, and is omniescent about propagating all future consequences of such a choice, that sort of very tiny subatomic tweak, sometimes years in advance of the main event, can be chosen to pick which trouser-leg of history we end up following. So by tweaking the right quantum state a few years beforehand, God really could have set the best wind speed on the day when David hit Goliath with an inaccurate primitive projectile weapon. Now, who's going to argue against that one ? Oh me I am going to argue with that one. What you're saying is that every action is the result of others. That everything has its own causes; Fair enough, it means that the way the first atom of hydrogen was send into that precise direction with this precise number of quanta or energies decided everything. And so? How does it prove the existence of God in any way? It just explains how an omninious and omnipotent being could be... Omninious and omnipotent? Whaou, what a demonstration... |
|
|
|
Can't almost believe that a teacher ignore such things and other teachers don't hear anything. We don't know the real story only what the media is telling.
i know the real story behind it.. some greedy bastards raped innocent girl and everybody in that scholl inculiding teachers , principal etc. stayed silent for their own sake..this is the what happened.. It's a bit strange. Why did the teacher didn't call the police, This could have been done in a fast and anonymous way. This is not an excuse for me. |
|
|
|
Actually, that is man's interpretation of the data. People forget (intentionally) that there is no way to take into account natural C-14 activity in the past, because nobody was there measuring the C-14 data as it happened. In addition, because of the carbon dating that has been proven to be false, the best that carbon dating might be is a better interpretation of things that we know the near date of through other methods.
In other words, carbon dating is all guesswork regarding the dates that are being interpreted from the results evidence.
It's not guess work! It's statistics! And that's why we do the experiments few dozens of times and we take into account a margin error! But you'd want us to be wrong about millions of years wrong? nonsense! Sounds quite reliable to me... the example they use to show the possibility of error using only 1 standard deviation, is still only off by like 5% at most... still super accurate This was demonstrated in 1970 by an experiment run by the British Museum radiocarbon laboratory, in which weekly measurements were taken on the same sample for six months. The results varied widely (though consistently with a normal distribution of errors in the measurements), and included multiple date ranges (of 1σ confidence) that did not overlap with each other. The extreme measurements included one with a maximum age of under 4,400 years, and another with a minimum age of more than 4,500 years Of course it is reliable! Usually Carbon 14 datation is wrong about 80 years. 80 years on a datation of dozens of thousands of years! Seems quite reliable to me too!!! |
|
|
|
It's a Sad Day in Bushville
Shortly after Jeb Bush announced his departure from the presidential race Saturday evening, brother George W. Bush issued a statement congratulating his younger sibling on his efforts – and for remaining above the fray in an unprecedented election cycle.
"Tonight I talked to my brother and congratulated him on his campaign for the Presidency," the 43rd president said in a statement obtained by PEOPLE. "I told Jeb how proud I am of him and his staff for running a campaign that looked to the future, presented serious policy proposals, and elevated the tone of the race. "
people dot com
Barbara bush knew what she was saying. "Too many bush!" I do not believe she just meant people were tired of the bush name (that, also is true) but as a mom she knew jeb wasn't not up for it. Damn! Even Europeans are tired as hell of bush name so I can't even imagine the Americans xD |
|
|
|
Is this thing still going on? Pedophile rights? How about serial killer rights? Incredible.
No, nothing is going on they're just saying shit that's all... |
|
|
|
I think its true that Mr. Trump is speaking for our rights and he wants to make America great again like it was always. He can have his great life he is billionaire but he is trying to speak up for us and for our better future.
Yeah! Sure about that shit! No doubt he's speaking for the people, who could he be speaking for? |
|
|
|
|
Well right now with the consensus reached I'd say that idle coins should stay in your wallet for some times ^^
|
|
|
|
If you have even done a shred of research into the topic you will clearly see that IN THE SAME PROFESSION WITH THE SAME JOB that men usually make more than women, and that the reason many lower-paying jobs have a lot of women is because it is more difficult for women to get the higher paying jobs. Men usually make more than the women. But that doesn't mean that the women are being discriminated. I will tell you from my example. In my team, there are a total of ~40 individuals, of whom around 75% are male and 25% are female. The job mostly involves coding and R&D. If you look at the work volume, 95% of the work is done by the males, and the remaining 5% is done by the females. And the total salary will be like 80% for the males, and 20% for the females. Here, we are paying 20% of the salary, for 5% of the work. Who is getting discriminated here? It's neigh impossible to compare salaries on a large scale for so many reasons... 1) A single CEO is worth 10,000 monkeys, no matter his/her gender... B) Men are 90% doctors, and women are 90% nurses... They both fall under healthcare, but wouldn't you expect a nurse to be paid less than a doctor? (This BTW, is why the feminists will always use the generic category of healthcare, rather than subdividing into doctors and nurses) You just can't compare like that, your numbers will be unreliable every time And you know how doctors are selected? You see French engineer schools have anonymous selection, and more time goes on more women enter them. It's not anonymous for doctor selection and nothing changes. Strange no? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
