Men usually make more than the women. But that doesn't mean that the women are being discriminated. I will tell you from my example.

In my team, there are a total of ~40 individuals, of whom around 75% are male and 25% are female. The job mostly involves coding and R&D. If you look at the work volume, 95% of the work is done by the males, and the remaining 5% is done by the females.

And the total salary will be like 80% for the males, and 20% for the females. Here, we are paying 20% of the salary, for 5% of the work. Who is getting discriminated here?

I do agree with the fact that Homosexuality is not natural mostly and 90% comes out after some one is molested and hence the game starts and then next to another this experience is shared and gayism is increased.
Its not natural but pleases the people who are molested first time.

If we manage to go sideways for a few days I think we will see another leg up. Otherwise it looks a bit droopy.

Wow, 2016 and Fidel Castro still makes headlines.

 /* I find this Wilikon dude hugely pedentic.
  * Alas, I have to deal with my creation and keep smiling
  */

{
 
    }

you mean, you have no problem with her wanting to implement it worldwide?

In other words, force it on you and me.

I believe insults and capitals are very useful defining who you are dealing with in life: level of education, social skills, mental age versus a date of birth on a ID card, etc, etc...

I welcome authenticity. If someone seems too annoying I never see their posts anyway. Everything is cool

 

 

I don't agree. Currently the main force behind any price movement in Bitcoin, either up or down, is speculation. Therefore, it shouldn't surprise anyone if out of a sudden we start losing $50 in less than a day. Same as the movement in the opposite direction. The only question is, the size of the pocket of the whale who decided to manipulate the price this current time.

Trump's victory over the Pope: Francis backs down over 'not Christian' claim as Vatican says it was not a 'personal attack' or attempt to influence presidential vote



The Vatican today executed a speedy climb-down in its feud with Donald Trump - handing the Republican White House hopeful a major political victory.

Pope Francis's suggestion that Trump was 'not Christian' because of his views on immigration was not a personal attack on the candidate, Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said on Friday.

Lombardi told Vatican radio that the pope's comments, which were denounced by Trump, were simply an affirmation of his longstanding belief that migrants should be helped and welcomed rather than shut off behind walls.

He also leaned toward confirming Trump's contention that his statement that Trump was 'not a Christian' was based largely on 'what he was told' about the billionaire's position.

Trump said Thursday that he suspected the Mexican government had propagandized to the Pontiff about him, prompting the unusual condemnation from the leader of the world's Roman Catholics.

'This wasn't in any way a personal attack, nor an indication of who to vote for,' Lombardi said.

'The Pope has clearly said he didn't want to get involdved in the electoral campaign in the US, and also said that he said what he said on the basis of what he was told [about Trump], hence giving him the benefit of the doubt.'








http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3454720/Popes-comments-Trump-not-personal-attack-papal-spokesman.html

You don't say?

How about the fact the newscaster claims she doesn't want to kill all the non-Muslims, just implement Sharia law everywhere.

She is talking against OUR WAY OF LIFE.  But if someone suggests that you should not talk against our way of life, that population reacts very offensively?

Something quite wrong with that.

]It's a leaked report, it should be possible to get a copy.

this bitcoin rise the last days looks realy interesting.
for me it looks like the beginning of bigger rises.
would not surprise me if we are more high end of this week.

I just hold it until the price rise again. That is the right thing to do as if they are idle then there must be something in our minds that we are not using bitcoins, we would surely hold bitcoins for price rise and sell it at a right time and make some profits out of it, honestly bitcoins can never be idle as we would surely keep on using it and spending it whenever we need and that is the right thing to do with bitcoins.

this thing will not giving affect to both bitcoin user and apple user because apple don't provide any currency and bitcoin don't provide any hardware
by allowing bitcoin wallet on their app store it mean bitcoin didn't break any appstore rules and apple seems take it fine

She openly talks about her "disbelief" so that's why she must cover her face nothing more.
To avoid problems if someone recognize her on street.
Many Muslims react very offensively on such talks.

Thx, that clarification is appreciated.

You're almost getting it.

Yes, you can argue that, but only if you argue the same against the person I was responding to.

Either all behavior is natural and therefore above moral reproach, or it's not.

Do you believe that sexual preferences are natural?  

Do you believe that homosexuals naturally find heterosexual sex disgusting?

Why do you believe that some people's sexual preferences are genetic, while other people's sexual preferences are evil religion?

Do you think you have some moral authority to condemn people's involuntary physiological reactions to sexual stimuli?

If a homosexual pornographic image gives one man an erection and makes another man vomit, why do you feel the need to call one man hateful?  

And if the image is heterosexual and makes the homosexual man vomit, why do you change your explanation from "hateful" to "natural"?

Generate addresses offline using libbitcoin's `bx` command,


Create them as needed, save them on encrypted usb. Cold storage for days.

Using "plug and play" spv or core wallets and trading on centralized exchanges does not make you a "bitcoin user" technically speaking.