So when you are teaching child about drugs, you must tell him to try for himself to
learn on his own skin that this is bad and wrong. Because never belive to no one..
Yes this can be apply to religion and politics but not on moral and life principles,
this must come from father and mother teachings!
Or father and father teaching. Or mother and mother teaching. |
|
|
|
Money will ALWAYS rule  I guess not always. Weren't there this socialist country, was it bolivia?, where a president won who surely has nothing to do with money. Pure idealist. People loved and love him and voted for him. All the money others used did not matter. So I guess it can work differently. Though of course those with money don't like it and that president and his country will have a hard time. Things can work differently. But not in a capitalist country. Capitalism means power = money which means the candidate with enough money will win. Always. |
|
|
|
Not sure Russia will act against Turket though. There is not much to win for them.
Of course West will let Turkey go alone. But on the other hand unless Turkey really attacks Russia, Russia has no true reason to attack Turkey. Turkey is even rather practical to fight Islamic countries.
I thought if Turkey decide to attack first in Syria. But they know and we know ,that this is pretty clear this is just maneuver. They must show their strength to Russia and to West.
Last decades they are grown up to really serious regional force.Yeah. Regional. Nothing more. And it's mainly because the region is void as fuck xD |
|
|
|
eth down 10% in 2 minutes and still falling.
Stick with your legacy banking system. Crypto doesn't want you.
Edit: 15% in 3 minutes. Magnificent crash!
Seriously? Damn i'm happy, I was nearly tempted to get in the train! Make that 20% in 4 min.  Edit: Coinmarketcap shows it at 9 bucks. What charts do you have?Same, I can't find charts correlated your statement. Though it's an excellent news if that's true. |
|
|
|
Border Crime Taking A Toll On Residents In Southwest New Mexico, Arizona Residents of New Mexico's Bootheel and parts of southern Arizona say human smuggling and drug trafficking is taking its toll on the region. The Deming Headlight reports that residents are scheduled Thursday to express their concerns to federal officials during a meeting at the Animas Community Center in Animas, New Mexico. Judy Keeler, a longtime resident of the rural border region, says her home was recently burglarized and it's not an unusual episode for other residents. Residents have said state Highway 80 has become a favorite for Mexican cartel drug runners who manage to navigate out of the Peloncillo Mountains along the Arizona-New Mexico border. They want an even more increased presence from the U.S. Border Patrol. http://krwg.org/post/border-crime-taking-toll-residents-southwest-new-mexico-arizona-------------------------------------------- Build That Wall! Lol cause you think it'll change anything? We've got a fucking ocean between Europe and South America, and drugs still come from here xD |
|
|
|
My comment was about BADecker claim. It was not attacking you or BADecker. Just that his idea of God (being the source of primal energy) and equating it with Christian God seems a bit of stretch to me. Calling "unexplained energy source" a God? Just say what it is: unexplained source of energy.
His definition of complexity being an energy level is news to me  Is new to everyone in fact. No one defines complexity this way... And for a good reason... It means you can't call complex or un complex things that are not physical. For example you can't say that a word/theory/code is complex. Not very useful definition no? |
|
|
|
What you don't want is to give them toys so they can get rid of their pulsions on objects and not on real children.
It's your choice but I don't think it's intelligent.
If we decide to give them dolls this is acknowledging their rights and their needs.This way you proclaiming them to buyers, but they are still sick persons. It is just question of time when they will decide to grab a child. They don't have rights, this is sick, you won't help them at all. You wont help kids this way! Don't be fooled! This is just try to introduce people with "pedophiles rights" this is message from OP also. No. Giving them this is just acknowledging their existence and our incapacity to prevent their potential agressions. Nothing more. Problem being he's right about the paralel with gays. There is a correlation between the two phenomenon. Not saying that gays = pedophiles of course. But the social phenomenon might be identical... So isn't it better to be extremely strong and firm on the positions? |
|
|
|
|
Getline and btcjam are the answer for that question you all ^^
Just give out lendings to people. You take back interests and they're happy! What could you ask more?
|
|
|
|
what part of my belief are you not grasping, facts do not care about yours or anybody elses opinions, unless you have proof that my claims are incorrect, EVERY single bit of new technology is effectively stolen by the military industrial complex and militarised, and classified... and every single military classification last for minimum 50 years..... sorry if you dont like reality, but welcome to the real world, you may want to look into the 125 scientists that have been murdered by guberments of the globe in the last decade, or the 45 bankers in the last 2 years, i will apologize for being more in the know of the real world even though its you who should be apologizing for not being upto the same page or even chapter as i Ok but where do you take your info from? You're making a claim. Fair enough. Do you have any kind of proof? |
|
|
|
eth down 10% in 2 minutes and still falling.
Stick with your legacy banking system. Crypto doesn't want you.
Edit: 15% in 3 minutes. Magnificent crash!
Seriously? Damn i'm happy, I was nearly tempted to get in the train! |
|
|
|
|
This rule isn't the best I've ever seen but is still quite right.
It's more 420 btw but that's the idea. When your btc price goes above 400 you can buy, and higher than 420 go and sell!
|
|
|
|
|
I don't really agree.
Bitcoin will be stable in price that's for sure. But bitcoin technology will evolve! In a truly important way!
The 2016 year will be the year for btc to scale! If they can't make it scale, 2017 will be the last for btc!
|
|
|
|
Trump Tower Was Built on Undocumented Polish Immigrants’ BacksThe Donald may denounce illegal immigrants as ‘rapists,’ but his empire’s crown jewel was erected on land cleared by a small army of undocumented Polish workers, a lawsuit alleged.The use of undocumented workers on a Trump construction site such as the hotel described by The Washington Post this week is certainly nothing new. Thirty-five years ago, a small army of illegal immigrants was used to clear the site for what became the crown jewel of Donald Trump’s empire. The 200 demolition workers—nicknamed the Polish Brigade because of their home country—worked 12-hour shifts, seven days a week with no overtime to knock down the old Bonwit Teller building and make room for Trump Tower on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. According to testimony in a protracted civil suit in federal court, the laborers were paid $5 an hour or less when they were paid at all. Some went unpaid after the contractor had financial troubles. A few never received even the paltry sum that was owed them for their dirty and hazardous efforts preceding the construction of Trump’s monument to his own wealth. “They were undocumented and worked ‘off the books,’” Manhattan federal Judge Charles Stewart said of the workers after they became the subject of a 1983 lawsuit. “No records were kept, no Social Security or other taxes were withheld.” Trump was speaking with more firsthand knowledge than his readers likely imagined when he wrote in his 2011 book Time to Get Tough: Making America #1 Again that “illegal immigration is a wrecking ball aimed at U.S. Taxpayers.” How interesting that he would choose a wrecking ball as a metaphor. The lawsuit involving literal demolition—Case 83CIV6346 in Manhattan Federal Court—was brought by Harry Diduck, a now deceased dissident member of Local 95 of the House Wreckers Union. His lawyer, Wendy Sloan, says he was one of a group of like-minded workers who simply wanted “a real union.” They had stood to gain nothing at all for themselves as they sought to prove that Trump and his partner, along with the general contractor, conspired to cheat the House Wreckers out of pension and welfare contributions by hiring these non-union laborers. Judge Stewart initially tossed out the complaint against Trump and his partner on the grounds that the contractor was the responsible party regarding the workers. The plaintiffs appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reinstated the complaint, returning the case to Judge Stewart. During the 16-day non-jury trial, a number of the Polish workers testified that Trump underlings had threatened them with deportation if they caused trouble. They walked in to the job from Brooklyn when a transit strike hit the city. Some of them slept at the site. Two workers further testified that they had approached Trump in person to demand overdue wages. Trump took the stand, even back in those days sporting a red “power” tie, blue pinstriped suit, and that hair. He told the court that he almost certainly did not speak to the laborers, in part because he was fearful of venturing into so dangerous a workplace. “I tend not to walk into buildings under demolition,” Trump said. “You have to be very brave to be in a building under demolition. I’m not sure I’m that brave.” He added that he had no need to visit the site because “You can see it from a block away.” He further testified that in any event he could not remember ever speaking to any of the workers or even being aware there were Polish workers on the site. http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/07/08/trump-tower-was-built-on-undocumented-immigrants-backs.html
|
|
|
|
I don't see how this is going to help them? Their urge is to feel supremacy over the victim.
I don't think if we let them to play with dolls they gonna change their behavior much.
That are predators don't forget!
Dude, calm down. They're not "predators"! They're people with different ways of lives! Those ways of lives aren't compatible with our societies, but no need to treat them like they were not humans! A good example? A guy in France kidnapped a girl not a long time ago, he kept her for 2 hours then released her. He didn't harm her in ANY way. They're not predators they're just different. Of course the man was sentences 5 years to jail and that's fucking normal! But no need to talk about them like they're not even humans. This is proof, ladies and gents, the title of this thread is 100% accurate, and why nambla was right to be mad being rejected by the gay movement. "Born this way"....This thread is therapeutic for some people here. This is a good thing to know that for them there no differences between pedophiles and: black people, immigrants and gays. What an amazing revealing development. Well glad if it revealed you anything but I still don't see what's wrong. Yeah of course they're the same as you me gays blacks white red... They're humans. They're born this way. They shouldn't be punished for having feelings as long as they don't do it. I sometimes feel the urge to kill the people around me because I can no longer bear their stupidity. Should I be punished for imagining a crime? Istill don't understand what you find wrong with that. |
|
|
|
Ever used a microwave to cook something in one minute?
Why do you not prepare your meal from scratch (wheat, pluck the chicken, milk the cow, etc.)?
Are you saying that the microwave turning our cooking time from a half day to one minute has not allowed people to do more with their lives?
Look at 100 years ago...all of those carriage manufacturers and horse breeders and horse shit shovelers who lost their jobs because of the automobile (that was mainly reserved for the rich).
Now practically everyone has a car that has more intelligence than the rocket that took men to the moon.
What do you not have right now that cheap manufacturing could give you?
DO YOU PEOPLE HAVE IMAGINATIONS?
Not the question. not saying it's a bad thing. Problem is not technology development. The problem is WHO will profit of the technological development |
|
|
|
I don't know. But a child sex doll might seem a bit too much in my opinion.
This can lead only to adopting this behaviour like normal. And they will get their rights to. I mean this is too much even for talking about. We are becoming like Babylon.. Yeah sure, don't talk about it. Better continue hiding this part of the population! |
|
|
|
People worrying about jobs...there will just be new jobs to replace the old jobs.
We used to have people who's job was to copy books by hand. They did not all die when it was automated. Telephone operators used to route your call, then it was automated. There was not a widespread epidemic of dying telephone operators.
As technology advances, we are able to do more. And that requires more people.
People used to wake up, spend all day either gathering their food or preparing the food or preparing to get through winter. Now we spend a tiny percentage of our productivity on feeding ourselves giving us time for tons of other things.
Technology will just ensure that even less of our productivity is spent on our essential needs.
Yeah but the amount of jobs created is ALWAYS lower than the amount of jobs destroyed |
|
|
|
It's pretty difficult to define what "hate speech" really is, it also depends on the circumstances. So in these days it's just a rubber category, used to keep certain taboos untouched, and suppress any uncomfortable truths.
If hate speech was legally defined as "incitement to murder" would you have a problem with that? It's clearly defined, no chance of rubberyness, slippery slope or being changed to suit governmental whim. Let's see what Wikipedia said about hate speech: "In law, hate speech is any speech, gesture or conduct, writing, or display which is forbidden because it may incite violence or prejudicial action against or by a protected individual or group, or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group. The law may identify a protected group by certain characteristics." Is this something clearly defined? Well, I think according to the above definition with a little creativeness I can try to sue almost anybody for almost anything. If it would be defined as "incitement to murder" that's a clear thing, that's fine. I have no issue with the first part of this "definition". Problems starting here: "or because it disparages or intimidates a protected individual or group". It's impossible to define precisely such a complex notion :/ That's why the "law" aspect is extremely complicated!!! |
|
|
|
I don't know. But a child sex doll might seem a bit too much in my opinion.
Well, not for me. I prefer the guys fuck a doll than my daughter!  |
|
|
|
Let me fix that for you...
What is the problem with child sex dolls though?
I know it sounds sick but I don't see why it would be bad thing because there is no victim.
So let give rights to necrophiliacs, their victims are not not alive. No harm done?  This is immoral behavior and must not be be encouraged. If you do so you are just one of them. Ok... So it means anything "not moral" should be ban? And who defines what is moral and what is not? you? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
