Might be a bit too much though. How would you feel about dead body sex dolls?
All sex dolls are dead so they should all be illegal right? Have you ever seen living sex doll?  Would cadaver sex doll be a better description? Well if it is doll I don't care, there is still no victim. Perfectly agreed. You can fuck a poney doll I don't care. Just don't put photo on my fb cause that would be weird as fuck ^^ |
|
|
|
Might be a bit too much though. How would you feel about dead body sex dolls?
All sex dolls are dead so they should all be illegal right? Have you ever seen living sex doll? Would cadaver sex doll be a better description? Well if it is doll I don't care, there is still no victim. Let me fix that for you...
What is the problem with child sex dolls though?
I know it sounds sick but I don't see why it would be bad thing because there is no victim.
So let give rights to necrophiliacs, their victims are not not alive. No harm done?  This is immoral behavior and must not be be encouraged. If you do so you are just one of them. There is harm done for relatives of the dead so no. But no matter what sex dolls looks like there is no victim. Yes, but it could be a gateway to dangerous behavior. It could lead people to put their into reality. So all the films and video games where you murder someone should be prohibited too no? |
|
|
|
Im all for hate speech but the problem why it doesnt work and is illegal in most countries is quite easy: The average iq of a human being is 90-95. By definition it means half of mankind has a iq less of that - how long do you think it will just stay at words?  ( hate speech for me free speech for you ) It seems your IQ isn't so high then  It doesn't mean that half humans have less than that. For example if 33% of pop is at 70 and 67% is at 100, result will be average 90. Even though it's not half half ^^ Oh it can be an homogenised repartition meaning that half will be under the average. But stating average is at 90 alone is not enough |
|
|
|
Your statement isn't completely stupid but you're wrong, a study can't be judged only by who paid for it and who made it!
Sample surveys and opinion polls can be manipulated in several ways. For example, you can ask the same question in two different tones. 1. "Do you want to punish 16-year olds with jail time similar to the case with adult offenders, if they commit serious offenses? Or should they be sent to special juvenile institutions instead?" and 2. "Do you think that rapists deserve jail-time, even if they are slightly under the age of 18?" I am quite sure that the percentage of people agreeing with #2 will be more than #1. That just means your methodology sucks and that you have no clues about real scientific studies. Well he's just explaining how a study can be flawed... He's not saying that all studies are useless and stupid because numbers can be manipulated, he's just saying that each study is influenced by the way it was planned and then by the people behind it paying the scientists conducting the study. Rather true IMHO I understood that. And for me it shows either bad methodology and/or the abstinence of objectivity. Both is a the A and O for a real and good scientific study: Not biased and be able to reproduced. Oh ok. I agree then. It's the real point that should be checked before considering a study. Not who made it but has scientific method been respected. |
|
|
|
Seriously, there's enough place in Europe. Enough ressources. We have too many food, so we even send free food to the hungry Africans. No problem in Europe. I don't care what is happening in the rest of the World ... Dude, we got enough place and ressources for doubling the population easily... Stop being both dumb and blind... |
|
|
|
Wtf is happening? Well just go watch Idiocracy. It's EXACTLY what's happening. EXACTLY. |
|
|
|
Im all for hate speech but the problem why it doesnt work and is illegal in most countries is quite easy: The average iq of a human being is 90-95. By definition it means half of mankind has a iq less of that - how long do you think it will just stay at words? ( hate speech for me free speech for you ) It seems your IQ isn't so high then It doesn't mean that half humans have less than that. For example if 33% of pop is at 70 and 67% is at 100, result will be average 90. Even though it's not half half |
|
|
|
Baffled you say?
I'm not surprised...
Bernie is the guy who Americans thought they were voting for when they elected Obama... Obama made similar promises, but was really part of the establishment
And with some luck Bernie will be less scared of the establishment |
|
|
|
Bro can you fix the symbols for the dollar and yuan. it's minor but would make big difference
I don't understand, the dollar symbol is perfectly fine! |
|
|
|
Hahah funny the story is already cleared since one month. The girl lisa/elena was hiding at a friends home because she had trouble at school ( a talk from teacher with parents) - this was proofed through gps data of her mobile phone and the testimony of the friend and his mother where she was. At no time there was something sexual happening. It seems though that girl had consenting sexual intercourse with 2 different men several months before(!!!) the alleged kidnapping. The girl was 13 at that time and that would constitute of pedophilia in germany. ( legal age is 14 if your partner is older the 16 but younger then 18 i think, a bit complicated) So the german police even backtracked to stuff that happened way way before the alleged crime. Note here: The girl was never talking about the her two 20 year old boyfriends who she had a sexual relationship with (that was several montha ago when she was still 13). The kidnapping was just a invention of a scared girl because of school problems - the gps data and testimonies of the people proofs where she hid. Btw someone quote that so bryant the lier can read it or not so he can write more bullshit for a good laugh Btw truth got exposed around 27th january, just look up news articles after that Thx for clearing that out. Never believed that shit, it seemed completely impossible... Seriously man try to stop believing everything you read and start thinking a bit: Could you imagine two men raping a 13 years old and walking away free??? Without the parents suing them? SERIOUSLY? >< |
|
|
|
Damn! Blocks are fucking full! I've got and important tx waiting for its third confirmation for ages >< |
|
|
|
Science with an agenda is not actual science, it's called politics  Just to let you know If we accept research done by the LGBT lobbying groups, then we should also accept the same done by anti-LGBT groups such as various Christian organizations and conservative groups. This is like using the "research" done by Joseph Goebbels in the 1930s to claim that the Jews are an inferior race. LGBT lobbying groups are the new Nazis. Conservative groups yes, but Christian organizations, well, no. Bronze age nonsense is where you have to draw the line. Ahah Well I say you should accept all and study them. A good study isn't a study made by an independant organization (there is no such thing) but a study that can be easily criticized, giving precisely the used methodology and the percentage of error. I think it might be waste of time to analyze Christian studies. I might be wrong, but I feel whatever they come up with would require you to put bronze age glasses to understand any of it. These people believe in invisible guy in the sky, crackers that turn into human flesh, wine that turns into blood, and don't get me started on their moral code. I'm sorry, I'd not listen to studies done by delusional people. Objective studies, sure. But studies driven by religious groups by definition are not scientific. I remember a study asked by religious American about the behaviour of religious children. They were so full of themselves and so sure that they asked an independant organization to make the study. The study showed that on average religious kids were more violent, less generous and forgived less easily to other people xD |
|
|
|
Your statement isn't completely stupid but you're wrong, a study can't be judged only by who paid for it and who made it!
Sample surveys and opinion polls can be manipulated in several ways. For example, you can ask the same question in two different tones. 1. "Do you want to punish 16-year olds with jail time similar to the case with adult offenders, if they commit serious offenses? Or should they be sent to special juvenile institutions instead?" and 2. "Do you think that rapists deserve jail-time, even if they are slightly under the age of 18?" I am quite sure that the percentage of people agreeing with #2 will be more than #1. That just means your methodology sucks and that you have no clues about real scientific studies. Well he's just explaining how a study can be flawed... He's not saying that all studies are useless and stupid because numbers can be manipulated, he's just saying that each study is influenced by the way it was planned and then by the people behind it paying the scientists conducting the study. Rather true IMHO |
|
|
|
Moloch - I think you have something to answer for. I said I came across some quotes, not that I fact-checked them... I see plenty of sources attributing the quote to either man, and given that Blaise Pascal lived 300 years before Richard Jeni, I'd go with Pascal...  I really don't care who said it first... it's a good quote It's a good quote indeed. I like it. But it's not Pascal, definitely. It's impossible, Pascal was a big fatass zealot. Though being a good scientist, he expressed himself publicly numerous times over religion, with for example his famous bet, saying we should all be religious people. |
|
|
|
How about: You're wrong and don't know history.
Stalin, Hitler and Mao had the majority. Hitler was elected, Mao and Staline led a revolution. Thanks for giving the wrong examples.
Good and important point. I would take some exception in the case of Stalin however. As I understand things, he was mostly part of Lenin's entourage and the guy who came out on top at some point after the revolution. I LMFAO every time defenders of the indefensible shriek "the majority", as if the worst mass murderers in history, would have believed rigging elections with their loyalist vote counters & killing non-loyalist vote counters, and using revolutionary propaganda to pretend they had "the majority" behind them (when the actual, verifiable, majority of people did not vote for them or support their revolution OR THEIR OWN DISARMAMENT AND SUBSEQUENT DEMOCIDE), would have crossed their moral line. http://www.votefraud.org/josef_stalin_vote_fraud_page.htmIt's just about as ridiculous as claiming a serial child rapist is above telling any lie at all, ever. What you don't understand is that it was not two sides fighting... It was one side strong, united, dominating. USSR people had the right to bear weapons, it didn't help them... |
|
|
|
Damn, 1 cent fee is 1% it's far too much already! I usually pay a 0.1% fee and it goes in the first blocks! Fees go per kilobytes used in the blockchain, not per amount sent. The blockchain doesn't care if you send 0.01 btc or 10 btc - only about how much space is used by the transaction. Well. Logical I suppose. But how do you know the size of your transaction? |
|
|
|
Trump vs Bernie 2016... I called it a year ago
Still living in your dreamland? I thought that after the Nevada caucus results were out, you would woke up. Seems like I was wrong. Just admit it. Bernie lost Nevada, and that was the last straw. A massive defeat in South Carolina to Hitlery Clinton would seal his fate (He will lose very very badly, by 25 plus points. This is really good news for me, as I am supporting Trump. For Trump, it is easy to defeat Hitlery than Sanders. Well it's sure that if you got the choice between the two... It's like how do you prefer to die? Slow poison or nuclear bomb? I'd probably take nuclear bomb even if it makes much more damage. you are right .. we are just choosing motives of our deaths.. hillary or trump there is no diffrence between them for me.. Well after all it's the case in most countries. You vote against a candidate more often than for a candidate :/ |
|
|
|
Moloch - I think you have something to answer for. Well he probably just copy pasted this without checking not a big deal ^^ |
|
|
|
Sounds good but actually not entirely true. I can write only about Hungary, but I've heard about the same issues in Poland as well. The healthcare and education system is deteriorating since we joined the EU as all the highly skilled doctors and nurses moved to the west. Agriculture is now in the hands of a few oligarchs as the farmers and small agro-businesses were unable to compete against the much more subsidized Austrian, French and German farmers. Local industry practically disappeared as skilled workers also went to the western countries and local workshops are only manufacturing some small scale but complicated and work intensive parts for big western corporations. Apart from a thin middle and upper class living standards are actually going down since the early 2000s. There are more malnourished child and pensioner today than 20 years ago. Also a lot more people living under the official poverty threshold limit than back in the 90's. I didn't said that the EU accession of the former Warsaw Pact was 100% positive. It was more like 80% positive, and 20% negative. Obviously, when you are transforming from the Communist / Socialist system to the Capitalist system, the oligarchs will be able to steal a large chunk of the national wealth. This has happened in almost all the countries, including Russia, Ukraine, Moldova, Poland, and Hungary. Perhaps Belarus is the only exception because it is still under a dictatorship. Emigration of skilled workers is a major issue, but there are partial solutions to resolve this. For example, to compensate the doctors and other healthcare workers who are migrating to the Western European nations, you can import physicians from Ukraine and Serbia. Factory workers can be sourced from Moldova and Macedonia. And I strongly suspect that the fall in living standards might be because of the emigration of the middle class. The government should encourage them to return, with their hard earned money. Hungary won't be as expensive as England or Germany. The returnees will be able to live much more comfortably, than they are doing currently. Obviously. Because Socialism is the worst thing ever whereas Capitalism is plain Heaven! Damn I don't understand, why are people like you staying in EU? You wanna free capitalism? Go to the USA! They'll have exactly what you want! low immigration, death penalty, gun freedom, no social healthcare or welfare... Capitalism is dead in the US. WTF? If capitalism is dead in the US what is their economic system then??? |
|
|
|
Damn, 1 cent fee is 1% it's far too much already! I usually pay a 0.1% fee and it goes in the first blocks! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
