Holy smokes, would you look at that! 7 golds in the last 100 spins. If you had some faith in betting on them, they would have made your day a little better! Nice to see that Plinko has been added, wil try it out sometime later today. It is not my favorite game but I got lucky recently on another site, so maybe I will also get lucky on 500casino. Also asked for a withdrawal with TRX and received it in less than 2 minutes!
We have Plinko battles as well, so you could always go against other players or bots. Quite a hit Good to hear that! Btw what's your on-site username? Who knows, might spot you in the chat!
|
|
|
Just went in with $700 over the past 2 weeks on the dip. Slowly making my way to be a full coiner
|
|
|
I got a few 3060 cards for under 400.
three in all for 1085.
they do 47+47+47= 141 mh and burn about 330 watts.
I have seen a few doing just over 50 mh and 115 watts
Are you using NiceHash for those results? I just got mine recently but it's LHR v2.
|
|
|
Compared to Audis and big houses from some people here, mine's pretty small.
Just some virtual (CSGO) skins during the 2017 bull run. I was looking at around $400+ and was like damn, could get me a sweet knife.
|
|
|
I don't think that few reports marked as bad was a major concern for Lucius, but the fact that Bitcoin Discussion board is full of topics and posts that shouldn't be there.
I know, that was merely made in jest.
|
|
|
@mprep, is the system able to amend/ reverse the outcomes from Bad to Good, and vice versa?
If that's possible, then it would resolve this case.
I can't do that myself but I've PMed theymos about marking the first report as good. Great, that's a mini reassurance for all of us. Lucius may now sleep well tonight
|
|
|
@mprep, is the system able to amend/ reverse the outcomes from Bad to Good, and vice versa?
If that's possible, then it would resolve this case.
|
|
|
I used the "development" word for a reason... I registered 7 years ago, maybe more. I was not active all that time, there were breaks, but what I wanted to say is that Freebitcoin then and now are two different dimensions... the fact is that they are still here (probably stronger and more popular)... I guess because they do everything thoughtfully and properly! That's why I believe that in the next 5-10 years they will still be there, and probably better than now! And definitely yes, the benefits of memberships are fine! Just to add that some casinos that accept FUN tokens are just great... my favorite is DPlay! But to be honest I didn't play at ClubRiches that much! Agree with you. Most wouldn't have gotten a taste of Bitcoin if it wasn't for this website. Heck, I was brought to this site by someone promoting it on a discussion board many years back Good that you could enjoy utilizing them on DP. Better be a regular of a few casinos rather than spreading yourself too far, to maximize the benefits unless you have alot of cash to spare :p
|
|
|
I didn't know that casinos can change their RTP on the same game as others up until now.
OP I think if you play enough on a single casino you get more benefits and rewards so that may be case to case per person. I don't think that we can rank casinos to which one is the most rewarding. I often play in different platforms but I always come back to the ones with weekly rewards.
They can contact the service providers about it actually.
|
|
|
I mean it's pretty subjective. Every casino could tout itself to be good or superior in something but in the end, every player has his or her own opinion after playing. Rollbit has its own player base and they could give more in one area, but not in the other. Likewise, there's a gambler here that gives his own honest takes on casinos he's played on. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5335097.0Could check his list and see which one suits your fancy. His review on our 500 Casino is pretty positive if you're interested
|
|
|
I locked +52k FUN tokens for a year in April... the fact is that people who bought at the top are at loss but in the beginning, the WoF wheal was very generous (before the change of chances for winning), so maybe they recovered their loss and they still have other benefits that come with holding FUN tokens, like higher interest on BTC and rakeback when gambling, daily WoF spins (I get 8 now). The timing is everything, my first purchase was at 40 sats, but most of the tokens I bought were under 30. Why not just grow them... it's what I do, I guess because I believe that FUN is here to stay, and if they continue to develop and add new stuff there will be some progress regarding FUN token price for sure! Just my thinking, time will tell if am I right or not! Even if there are no development, the benefits of memberships are fine. And it's not very easy to such tokens to rise back to its former ATH despite FUN topping the contenders with the trading volumes. I bought them during the debut when it was like a few cents but had to sell because they couldn't be transferred due to the crazy fees. Recently went in again and will be holding for the long term
|
|
|
I will experience it in a few days, 6500 fun will be around 8100 after locking it for 360 days, and I only think of locking it again but with a shorter duration per 30 or 90 days do not want to be left behind if the price has increased quite large to sell it and will return to buy if the price goes back down
I agree with you that locking FUN tokens for short periods is probably the only right decision in the current market situation. As an example, it is worth noting that the FUN token was worth about 3.5 cents in August last year, and now it costs four times less. So if we take that fact into account, then locking FUN tokens for a year doesn't look attractive at all, even despite the APY of 25%. With the current situation, it's still better than leaving them sitting in the balance. Why not just grow them in the meanwhile?
|
|
|
I understand buddy, it's just that right now I don't want to make a deposit, well maybe it's because I've lost quite a lot so of course I thought that it was completely free, it looks like there's still time to join the promotion so it's also possible to try when there is little money
Happens to everyone. Well, at least the minimum to qualify is 10 bucks. Some "charge" over 100 just for an attempt
|
|
|
I think even when the full payment will be processed, I will still keep the SCAM tag on the LTCCasino. The current case has started to resolve only because of the victim's activity and the pressure from the community. It is hard to imagine how many other less-active players could be damaged by their paranoid decisions.
Sad truth when they have no community to turn to, and have to take the (big) L.
|
|
|
Man, the Primedice case was terrifying to read.
Imagine sensing something was off but being under peer pressure at the same time to release the funds in order to uphold their reputation.
Most casinos would go down under if that ever happened.
|
|
|
Not long after CasinoNiels' windfall, we have another one, this time it's SCOOTIE on Mental slots! Enjoy them wins!
GIVEAWAY: Tell us what features you'd like to see added to our casino in our Tweet below and drop your 500 ID for a chance to win $10 🤑
https://twitter.com/CSGO500/status/1554176599876157444
|
|
|
Do you mean 40yrs old of age or what do you actually mean?
He probably meant years, no way it could be months or even days
|
|
|
NFT’s may never die but may never live neither. Take a look at ICO’s. You can’t say they are dead but do they live? You call that living? NFT’s didn’t even have the impact of the ICO’s and now they are even in a worse shale than them.
Nope. NFT’s don’t need their own sub forum. Nobody will visit there anyway. The idea of NFT’s was dumb to begin with and now proven worthless .
I actually could care less about most new NFTs. 99.99% of everything on Ethereum for example. Old NFTs won't die. They are collectors items. You understand that old sports cards have value, right? Same deal with old NFTs. They are scarce, non-fungible, and made when nobody really cared. To call NFTs "proven worthless" just reflects utter disregard for reality. All you need to do is visit OpenSea to be proven wrong. If people pay money for them, they are not worthless, independent of your personal opinion. I think many had the wrong idea that anything could be screenshot and claimed and probably resold on the blockchain, rendering the original art useless. It definitely takes some reading to know they work totally differently. Btw welcome back. It's been a while
|
|
|
|