I won't be surprised to see any price considering what devs have been up to. Like SyRenity said: "We are working on several strategic partnerships at the moment, and will post an official update once they mature.". With all merchant tools and parnterships and huge development fund it's gonna be huge.

I mean there are always some dumpers among initial investors, but I'm not selling until Crypti market cap is at least 50% of Nxt market cap.

Samo se nadam da nece biti ko svako sto ovde kaze kupi pa pukne ko po obicaju ali opet.

Videcemo zar ne

And so we end the month of July
Predictions for this month aka August up down or sideways
Thinking this month or September will be up a fair bit but it can keep going on sideways lol.

Bytemaster says he can help you clone btsx, whether to consider cloning btsx it?
I think it would be more valuable.

My personal opinion would be guided heavily by the attitude of our lead dev, nioccoin, but I must admit this option does sound like a very interesting avenue to explore!!

DEV,You should consider clone BTS not QORA
1.BTS use C++,it's better than java
2.We don't know when and how will QORA release the resources
3.We have a strong community and BTS have a long term development map.this is win-win
4.In my opnion,BTS is better than QORA

hey haven't I just deleted your PM you sent me today about your burned house and debts and being out on the street with your children? Be careful guys, scam always exists so always do your research twice!

''We're distributing as if we reached 3K stakeholders (that's where the 166,667 ORA assets comes from, 500 M / 3000). Depending on the vote, we'll either give existing stakeholders more, or use for a 'round 2', or bounties, or some combination.''

so... let' vote

Thank you for reply. So, as I understand, initial distribution will be half (50%) of stakes to stakeholders. If vote will be to distribute another half to existing ORA asset holders at the vote moment, so, if I have, for example, 200,000 ORA asset, so I'll get another 200,000 ORA assets? In other words, every asset holder will double his assets. Am I right?

If this decision will come, it will be interesting to look at trades an AE

We will have a lot of stakes left over, and I've made a proposal that we use the NXT AE voting system to decide what to do democratically.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=673587.msg7816967#msg7816967

The original poll showed most people who responded were in favour of distributing left over stakes to the ~1000 non-sockpuppet registration applications we received via the registration webapp.

I am in favour of keeping at least some of the stakes in trust for later distribution, as I think that is both fair, and smart, as those stakes would be extremely beneficial for later promotion when (k)Ora is more established technically, and we want to generate some interest.

Feel free to respond in the poll thread and let people know your thoughts.

IMO the greatest asset we have right now is the embryonic community we have forming around a few key ideas & goals. As far as I am concerned (k)Ora is a longer term project than many other crypto coins, and the more people we have with a stake in the medium term the better.

This isn't going to be a pump & dump, as right now we don't have any working code, and it could be quite a while before we do, so anyone who dumps their stake now can take their 5-25 cents and go and buy a lolly pop, as that's all a (k)Ora stake will be worth IMO.

We'll publish the list soon, finalise the stakeholder list, then we'll distribute the 'first' round stakes on the NXT AE. After that .... we'll all decide what to do, assuming people like the idea of using the NXT AE to decide things like this.

I really do want this to be a decentralised community, so we need a mechanism to work things out, and the NXT AE voting system *could*  be the revolutionary management tool that crypto projects have been waiting for.

If there is no leader how do WE decide what to do? We vote!! Voting is probably only relevant for really big decisions, like the left over stake issue, so we'd only use it very occasionally IMO, and we'd have established procedures to cover how the votes would be organised.

Who's ever followed a coin, invested some time and a few dollars in mining or buying coins only to see it all go down the drain because the "main guy(s)" went MIA? Sometimes those projects can recover, but that's usually because a new "main guy" steps in to fill the void. What about if there's always a void? How should "things" get worked out so a project keeps moving forward when it faces a BIG contentious decision? Direct democracy, the community has a cheap and easy to organise vote!

If you missed the registration you can still speak up here and let people know your opinion on the stake issue, and anything else.

I think having a large number of stakes in trust for later use would actually increase the long term value of the first round stakes by a larger $ amount than  if we just give everyone a bigger 'slice' of a smaller 'pie'.

People make coins successful just as much as the tech!!

If you missed out have your say now, and try and convince the ~1k stakeholders reading your post that keeping some stakes in reserve for 'FREE' distribution later will be in THEIR interest. That's my argument - You help yourself just as much by helping others to join in now.

Remember, some of the key ideas for (k)Ora so far have been stakes are FREE, we will try to distribute fairly (no socks, long period of warning, long registration period etc), and most importantly, this is a decentralised leaderless 'starfish' community, so if you want something to happen, or a particular decision to be made - SPEAK UP & JOIN IN!

Everyone interested & motivated can influence the direction of (k)Ora!!

Yes you dont seem to know much. Simcoin, Nem are trading before launch

So only difference between pre-trading and trading will be that pre-trading will occur before the launch of the coin?
Will it be unprecedented case in cryptocurrency world that coin is traded before a launch or I didnt know about other of such?

You mean the price after initial fluctuations of massive holders selling and punic buyers?